Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(11): 1491-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015430

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the prevalence or risk factors for non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions and to identify associated patient characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty adults aged ≥ 65 admitted to medical and surgical units of a tertiary care facility and meeting inclusion criteria. MEASURES: We collected information on demographics, psycho-social factors, discharge diagnoses, and medications using surveys and patient medical records. Domains within discharge instructions included medications, follow-up appointments, diet, and exercise. At 5 days post-discharge, we assessed comprehension by asking patients about their discharge instructions, and compared responses to written instructions from medical charts. We assessed compliance among patients who understood their instructions. RESULTS: Prevalence of non-comprehension was 5 % for follow-up appointments, 27 % for medications, 48 % for exercise and 50 % for diet recommendations. Age was associated with non-comprehension of medication [odds ratio (OR) 1.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.12] and follow-up appointment (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.17) instructions. Male sex was associated with non-comprehension of diet instructions (OR 1.91; 95 % CI 1.10, 3.31). Social isolation was associated with non-comprehension of exercise instructions (OR 9.42; 95 % CI 1.50, 59.11) Depression was associated with non-compliance with medication (OR 2.29; 95 % CI 1.02, 5.10) and diet instructions (OR 3.30; 95 % CI 1.24, 8.83). CONCLUSIONS: Non-comprehension of discharge instructions among older adults is prevalent, multi-factorial, and varies by domain.


Subject(s)
Comprehension , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/standards , Aftercare/standards , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(3): 390-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21767453

ABSTRACT

To examine the pathogenesis of USA300 MRSA infection in long-term care residents, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 1691 adult residents of two extended-care facilities from 2003 to 2007 to assess whether the risk of subsequent MRSA infection is higher in USA300 MRSA-colonized residents compared to non-colonized residents or non-USA300 MRSA colonized residents. Six per cent of residents were colonized with USA300 MRSA; 12% of residents were colonized with non-USA300 MRSA; and 101 residents developed MRSA infection. The risk of infection was twofold higher in residents colonized with USA300 MRSA compared to residents not colonized with MRSA [adjusted hazard ratio 2·3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-4·5]. The risk of infection in USA300 MRSA-colonized residents was similar to USA300 MRSA non-colonized residents (relative risk 1·1, 95% CI 0·5-2·3). Our findings show that colonization with USA300 MRSA increases the risk of MRSA infection suggesting a similar pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carrier State/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Genotype , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Middle Aged , Molecular Typing , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , United States/epidemiology
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 30(11): 1425-30, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21487763

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of CHROMagar Acinetobacter when compared to sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar and MacConkey agar with 6 µg/ml of imipenem for the detection of A. baumannii in surveillance cultures of hospitalized patients. We utilized peri-anal swabs and sputum samples from patients admitted to the University of Maryland Medical Center ICUs from December 7 through December 21, 2009. Samples were plated onto four media in the following order: (1) 5% sheep blood agar (SBA), (2) MacConkey agar, (3) MacConkey agar with 6 µg/ml of imipenem, and (4) CHROMagar Acinetobacter (CHROMagar). SBA was the gold standard to which all media was compared. There were 165 samples collected during the study period. SBA and CHROMagar detected 18 of 18 (100%) Acinetobacter and 11 of 11 (100%) MDR-A. baumannii. MacConkey agar detected 16 of 18 (89%) Acinetobacter and 10 of 11 (91%) MDR- A. baumannii while MacConkey agar with 6 µg/ml imipenem detected 9 of 11 (82%) MDR-A. baumannii. CHROMagar did not differentiate MDR- A. baumannii from non-MDR-A. baumannii. CHROMagar may be useful for rapid detection of patients with MDR-A. baumannii if improved upon to better select for MDR-A. baumannii.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Culture Media/chemistry , Acinetobacter Infections/diagnosis , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anal Canal/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Infection Control , Intensive Care Units , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sputum/microbiology
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 3(4): 241-9, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12679267

ABSTRACT

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of hospital-acquired infections and an emerging infectious disease. VRE infections were resistant to standard antibiotics until quinupristin/dalfopristin (QD), a streptogramin antibiotic, was approved in 1999 for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections in people. After that decision, the practice of using virginiamycin in agriculture for animal growth promotion came under intense scrutiny. Virginiamycin, another streptogramin, threatens the efficacy of QD in medicine because streptogramin resistance in enterococci associated with food animals may be transferred to E faecium in hospitalised patients. Policy makers face an unavoidable conundrum when assessing risks for pre-emergent pathogens; good policies that prevent or delay adverse outcomes may leave little evidence that they had an effect. To provide a sound basis for policy, we have reviewed the epidemiology of E faecium and streptogramin resistance and present qualitative results from mathematical models. These models are based on simple assumptions consistent with evidence, and they establish reasonable expectations about the population-genetic and population-dynamic processes underlying the emergence of streptogramin-resistant E faecium (SREF). Using the model, we have identified critical aspects of SREF emergence. We conclude that the emergence of SREF is likely to be the result of an interaction between QD use in medicine and the long-term use of virginiamycin for animal growth promotion. Virginiamycin use has created a credible threat to the efficacy of QD by increasing the mobility and frequency of high-level resistance genes. The potential effects are greatest for intermediate rates of human-to-human transmission (R0 approximately equal 1).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterococcus faecium/pathogenicity , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Streptogramins/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use , Ecosystem , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Humans , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL