A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Increasing demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a climate of increasing focus on clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost has created a need for better acute postoperative pain control for patients. An ideal pain control method would have few side effects, decreased opioid consumption, improved pain control, early ambulation, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized, controlled study involving 79 patients undergoing elective THA between June 2015 and February 2016. Forty patients received liposomal bupivacaine and 39 patients received a fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB). In addition, the medical records of 28 patients who underwent elective THA between May 2015 and December 2015 were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was visual analog scale pain scores and the secondary outcomes were LOS and total opioid consumption. SPSS, version 22, was used to run 1-way analysis of variance with contrast and Mood's median test on the data. RESULTS: There were statistically significant decreases in pain intensity (P = .019) and LOS (P = .041) in both the liposomal bupivacaine group and the FICB group compared with those in the retrospective control group. In addition, only the FICB group showed statistically significant decreased total opioid consumption compared with that in the retrospective group (P = .028). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective THA have decreased overall pain intensity and a shorter LOS with multimodal pain management regimen that includes either liposomal bupivacaine or FICB. Patients who received FICB required less overall total opioids than the control group.

The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model.

INTRODUCTION: To our knowledge, no studies have studied the effect of metal instrumentation (MI) in the field of fluoroscopy regarding changes in the intensity, direction of scatter, and degree of radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team. The goal of this study was to determine whether the presence of MI increases scatter radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team when using a mini C-arm in the horizontal and vertical positions. METHODS: Four trials were conducted using a lamb limb specimen and a mini C-arm to simulate a forearm/wrist fracture fixation scenario. Radiation scatter percentages were measured with the mini C-arm in a vertical and horizontal position with and without the presence of MI (a six-hole 3.5-mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate attached to the specimen with six cortical screws and a self-retaining retractor) using a parallel plate radiation detector. RESULTS: The patient, scrub technician, circulating nurse, and anesthesiologist were exposed to no detectable radiation. In the horizontal position with the presence of MI, there was a 181-fold increase in scatter radiation exposure to the first assistant's eyes (0.016% versus 2.893%, 1.4 × 10-6 Sv/min versus 3.5 × 10-5 Sv/min) and increased exposure to the surgeon's hands compared with the horizontal position with no MI. In the vertical position, the scatter radiation received by the first assistant's eyes increased (zero versus 2.9 × 10-6 Sv/min) with MI present, whereas the only radiation measured for the surgeon was in the right hand which did not change with MI present (2.2 × 10-5 Sv/min). DISCUSSION: MI in the field of fluoroscopy increases scatter radiation exposure to a degree that may place the first assistant's yearly eye exposure in excess of the International Commission on Radiological Protection limit. Surgeons and their assistants should wear lead aprons, thyroid shields, and leaded glasses and minimize the usage of fluoroscopy with MI in the field.

Acute Perioperative Comparison of Patient-Specific Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation Utilization during Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Utilizing patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty has gained popularity in recent years with theoretical advantages in blood loss, intraoperative time, length of stay, postoperative alignment, and functional outcome, amongst others. No study has compared acute perioperative measures between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in the bilateral total knee arthroplasty setting. We compared patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in the setting of bilateral total knee arthroplasty to determine any benefits in the immediate perioperative period including surgical time, blood loss, pain medication use, length of stay, and discharge disposition. A total of 49 patients with standard instrumentation and 31 patients with patient-specific instrumentation were retrospectively reviewed in a two-year period at one facility. At baseline, the groups were comparable with respect to age, ASA, BMI, and comorbid conditions. We analyzed data on operative time, blood loss, hemoglobin change, need for transfusion, pain medication use, length of stay, and discharge disposition. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in regards to these parameters. Patient-specific instrumentation in the setting of bilateral total knee arthroplasty did not provide any immediate perioperative benefit compared to conventional instrumentation.