Correction to: Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a: Week 120 Analysis.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained affiliation and textual errors. This has been corrected with this erratum.

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a: Week 120 Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is the ideal clinical endpoint but is achieved rarely during oral antiviral treatment. A current unmet need in CHB management is achievement of HBsAg loss with a finite course of oral antiviral therapy, thereby allowing discontinuation of treatment. Significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss at 72 weeks post-treatment have been demonstrated when tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) was combined with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for 48 weeks compared with either monotherapy. This analysis provides follow-up data at week 120. METHODS: In an open-label, active-controlled study, 740 patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomly assigned to receive TDF plus PEG-IFN for 48 weeks (group A), TDF plus PEG-IFN for 16 weeks followed by TDF for 32 weeks (group B), TDF for 120 weeks (group C), or PEG-IFN for 48 weeks (group D). Efficacy and safety at week 120 were assessed. RESULTS: Rates of HBsAg loss at week 120 were significantly higher in group A (10.4%) than in group B (3.5%), group C (0%), and group D (3.5%). Rates of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion in group A were significantly higher than rates in group C (P < 0.001 for both) or group D (HBsAg loss: P = 0.002; HBsAg seroconversion: P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis confirm the results from earlier time points which demonstrate the increased rate of HBsAg loss in patients treated with a finite course of PEG-IFN plus TDF compared with the rates in patients receiving either monotherapy.

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin in Veterans With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 Infection, Compensated Cirrhosis, and Multiple Comorbidities.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We conducted a phase 4, open-label study with limited exclusion criteria to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin in veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, and compensated cirrhosis. This population is often excluded from clinical studies. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of treatment-naive (n = 47) and treatment-experienced (n = 19) patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection and compensated cirrhosis at 15 Department of Veterans Affairs sites. All subjects were given sofosbuvir (400 mg, once daily) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) in divided doses for 12 weeks. Patients with major psychiatric diseases or alcohol or substance use disorders were not excluded. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients achieved a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (79%; 95% confidence interval, 67%-88%); 16 of these patients were treatment experienced (84%; 95% confidence interval, 60%-97%) and 36 were treatment naive (77%; 95% confidence interval, 62%-88%). All patients had at least 1 comorbidity. Thirty-five percent had depression, 24% had posttraumatic stress disorder, and 30% had anxiety disorder. In addition, 29% had current substance use. Of the 7 patients (11%) who discontinued the study treatment prematurely, 3 did so because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue, anemia, nausea, and headache. Serious adverse events occurred in 8 patients. Only 2 of the serious adverse events (anemia and nausea) were considered to be related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 4 study, 12 weeks treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin led to a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy in almost 80% of veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, compensated cirrhosis, and multiple comorbidities, regardless of their treatment history. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02128542.

Effect of persistency of first-line HIV antiretroviral therapy on clinical outcomes.

Persistency is the time from initiation to discontinuation of therapy. Previous research has described factors that affect the persistency of initial antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, the impact of persistency on clinical outcomes is unknown. A retrospective study was conducted of treatment-naive HIV patients initiating ART between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 at an academic medical center. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards regression models with persistency as a time-varying covariate were fit for (1) immunologic failure (subsequent CD4 lower than initial CD4); (2) development of an opportunistic infection (OI) or malignancy; and (3) mortality. Analyses were repeated with an interaction term of persistency (per 180 days) and time (before and after 1 year of ART). Among 879 patients who started ART, the mean age was 38 years (±10) and most patients were racial/ethnic minority (59%), males (80%), and with baseline CD4 <200 cells/mm(3) (52%). There were 100 deaths, 94 OIs/malignancy, and 183 immunologic failures; the mean persistency=723 days. In multivariable modeling, increased persistency decreased the overall and long-term hazard for immunologic failure (0.84 per 180 additional days; 0.70-1.00; 0.045). Increased persistency exhibited a potential trend toward decreased hazard for the occurrence of OI/malignancy (0.91; 0.80-1.03; 0.124) overall and after 1 year. Persistency exhibited a trend toward less risk of mortality in the first year of ART (0.42; 0.17-1.06; 0.067). In this study of the relationship between initial ART persistency and clinical outcomes, increased persistency was associated with a decreased hazard for the development of immunologic failure, a trend toward a decreased hazard for OI/malignancy, and a trend toward a decreased risk of first year mortality. Given these findings, the relationship between persistency and clinical outcomes merits further study.

Medication persistence in the treatment of HIV infection: a review of the literature and implications for future clinical care and research.

Persistence, continuous treatment with a prescribed medication or intervention, is an important, but underrecognized aspect of medication treatment, especially for HIV. In contrast to adherence, which measures the percentage of patient behavior to a prescribed therapy, persistence measures the duration during which a patient remains on a prescribed therapy. Decreased persistence for HIV treatment, or shorter duration on therapy, is associated with increased rates of virological failure, development of antiretroviral resistance, and increased morbidity and mortality. Additionally, frequency and duration of nonpersistent episodes rather than adherence may be a better predictor of clinical outcomes in HIV-infected patients on certain regimens. In this review, we codify the constructs of persistence and adherence, and further define persistence as either patient or regimen persistence. Furthermore, current literature on the clinical consequences of and factors associated with suboptimal persistence is summarized. Finally, methods to measure persistence as well as interventions that may improve persistence and clinical outcomes are suggested.