Outcomes and survival following thoracic endovascular repair in patients with aortic aneurysms limited to the descending thoracic aorta.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a well-established therapy for descending aortic aneurysms (DTA). There is a paucity of large series reporting the mid- and long-term outcomes from this era. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of TEVAR with regards to the effect of aortic morphology and procedure-related variables on survival, reintervention and freedom from endoleaks. METHODS: In this retrospective single center study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes among 158 consecutive patients with DTA than underwent TEVAR between 2006 and 2019 at our center. The cohort included 51% patients with device landing zones proximal to the subclavian artery and 25.9% patients undergoing an emergent or urgent TEVAR. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were reintervention and occurrence of endoleaks. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 33 months [IQR 12 to 70] while 50 patients (30.6%) had longer than 5-year follow-up. With a median patient age of 74 years, post-operative Kaplan Meyer survival estimates were 94.3% (95%CI 90.8-98.0, SE 0.018%) at 30 days, 76.4% (95%CI 70.0-83.3, SE 0.034%) at one year and, 52.9% (95%CI 45.0-62.2, SE 0.043%) at five years. Freedom from reintervention at 30 days, one year, and five years was 92.9% (95%CI 89.0-97.1, SE 0.021%), 80.0% (95%CI 72.6-88.1, SE 0.039%), and 52.8% (95%CI 41.4-67.4, SE 0.065%), respectively. On cox regression analysis greater aneurysm diameter, and the use of device landing zones in aortic regions 0-1 were associated with an increased probability of all-cause mortality, and with reintervention during follow-up. Independent of aneurysm size undergoing urgent or emergent TEVAR was associated with higher mortality risk for the first three years post-operative but not on long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Larger aneurysms and those requiring stent-graft landing in aortic zones 0 or 1, are associated with higher risk for mortality and reintervention. There remains a need to optimize clinical management and device design for larger proximal aneurysms.

Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may provide clinical benefits in patients with aortic valve disease. A new class of bioprosthetic valves that enable rapid deployment AVR (RDAVR) may facilitate MIS. We here report the 1-year results of a randomized, multicentre trial comparing the outcomes for MIS-RDAVR with those for conventional AVR via full sternotomy (FS) with a commercially available stented aortic bioprosthesis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with aortic stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, multicentre, randomized comparison trial (CADENCE-MIS). Key exclusion criteria included AVR requiring concomitant procedures, ejection fraction of <25% and recent myocardial infarction or stroke. Patients were randomized to undergo MIS-RDAVR via upper hemisternotomy (EDWARDS INTUITY) or AVR via FS with a commercially available stented valve. Procedural, early and late clinical outcomes were assessed for both groups. Haemodynamic performance was evaluated by an echocardiography CoreLaboratory. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 94% of MIS-RDAVR patients. MIS-RDAVR was associated with significantly reduced cross-clamp times compared with FS (41.3 ± 20.3 vs 54.0 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001). Clinical and functional outcomes were similar at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively for both groups. While both groups received a similarly sized implanted valve (22.9 ± 2.1 mm MIS-RDAVR vs 23.0 ± 2.1 mm FS-AVR; P = 0.91), MIS-RDAVR patients had significantly lower peak gradients 1 year postoperatively (16.9 ± 5.3 vs 21.9 ± 8.6 mmHg; P = 0.033) and a trend towards lower mean gradients (9.1 ± 2.9 vs 11.5 ± 4.3 mmHg; P = 0.082). In addition, MIS-RDAVR patients had a significantly larger effective orifice area 1 year postoperatively (1.9 ± 0.5 vs 1.7 ± 0.4 cm2; P = 0.047). Paravalvular leaks, however, were significantly more common in the MIS-RDAVR group (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: MIS-RDAVR is associated with a significantly reduced cross-clamp time and better valvular haemodynamic function than FS-AVR. However, paravalvular leak rates are higher with MIS-RDAVR.

A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical procedures (MIS) may offer several advantages over conventional full sternotomy (FS) aortic valve replacement (AVR). A novel class of aortic valve prostheses has been developed for rapid-deployment AVR (RDAVR). We report a randomized, multicenter trial comparing the outcomes for MIS-RDAVR with those of conventional FS-AVR. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with aortic stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized comparison trial (CADENCE-MIS). Exclusion criteria included ejection fraction below 25%, AVR requiring concomitant procedures, and recent myocardial infarction or stroke. Patients were randomized to undergo MIS-RDAVR through an upper hemisternotomy (n = 51) or AVR by FS with a conventional stented bioprosthesis (n = 49). Three patients were excluded before the procedure, and 3 more patients who were randomized to undergo RDAVR were excluded because of their anatomy. Procedural, early clinical outcomes, and functional outcomes were assessed for the remaining 94 patients. Hemodynamic performance was assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory. RESULTS: Implanted valve sizes were similar between groups (22.9 ± 2.1 vs 23.0 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.9). MIS-RDAVR was associated with significantly reduced aortic cross-clamp times compared with FS-AVR (41.3 ± 20.3 vs 54.0 ± 20.3 minutes, p < 0.001), although cardiopulmonary bypass times were similar (68.8 ± 29.0 vs 74.4 ± 28.4 minutes, p = 0.21). Early clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups, including quality of life measures. The RDAVR patients had a significantly lower mean transvalvular gradient (8.5 vs 10.3 mm Hg, p = 0.044) and a lower prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.013) 3 months postoperatively compared with the FS-AVR patients. CONCLUSIONS: RDAVR by the MIS approach is associated with significantly reduced myocardial ischemic time and better valvular hemodynamic function than FS-AVR with a conventional stented bioprosthesis. Rapid deployment valves may facilitate the performance of MIS-AVR.

Spinal cord ischemia after thoracic stent-grafting: causes apart from intercostal artery coverage.

BACKGROUND: Examination of a large collective combined with individual case analyses may give new insights into mechanisms and prevention of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular repair. METHODS: In an 11-year period, stent-grafts were implanted in 406 patients for various aortic pathologic conditions. The mean age was 63 years (15-91 years) and 300 (74%) patients were men; 58 patients underwent staged thoracic stent-graft procedures. The length of aorta covered was between 75 and 584 mm (mean, 204 mm). Thoracoabdominal branched or fenestrated stent-grafts were implanted in 11 patients. The left subclavian artery was occluded in 161 patients (39%); this occurred in half of them (n = 78) after protective revascularization. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was used selectively in 4 cases; no neuromonitoring was used. RESULTS: The incidence of SCI was 2.7% (n = 11); 6 patients (1.5%) had major permanent deficits. Conditions that had a potential influence on SCI were analyzed. Statistical correlation was found for previous conventional or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR], 4.8), coverage of the entire descending thoracic aorta (OR, 3.6), and implantation of thoracoabdominal branched and fenestrated stent-grafts (OR, 9.5). Individual analyses revealed other conditions that might have played a role, such as embolization into the segmental arteries, severe visceral ischemia, profound hemorrhagic shock, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SCI is unexpectedly low despite extensive sacrifice of intercostal arteries. Extended coverage of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta seems to have a higher risk, but other factors may contribute to the individual disaster.

Reverse graft placement in the Florida sleeve procedure for aortic root aneurysm.

Since August 2009, 22 patients with aortic root aneurysm have been successfully operated on with our new aortic remodeling technique as follows: after placement of the Gelweave (Vascutek, Ltd., Inchinnan, UK) Valsalva vascular graft in the reverse manner to the Florida sleeve procedure, the aortic annulus was fixed with the collar of this prosthesis at the level of the basal ring and the aortic root was wrapped with the prosthesis. Furthermore, the aortic valve commissures were resuspended. The distal end of the graft and the transected aortic wall were sutured together with running sutures when they were anastomosed to the stump of the distal ascending aorta.

Endovascular stent-graft repair of late pseudoaneurysms after surgery for aortic coarctation.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the potential of endovascular stent grafts to treat late aortic pseudoaneurysms after coarctation repair. METHODS: Eight patients (7 male; age 28 to 58, mean 43 years) presented with aortic pseudoaneurysms after primary repair performed at the age of 5 to 27 (mean 12) years; 2 patients had rupture with hemorrhagic shock. The mean interval between the procedures was 31 (19 to 42) years; one patient had 3 previous operations. This subset represents 2.2% of our overall experience in thoracic endovascular repair (n=368). Thoracic endografts were implanted using the transfemoral technique. Custom-made reverse tapered stent grafts were used in 4 cases. The left subclavian artery (LSA) was covered in 5 patients. Protective transposition of the left subclavian artery was performed in 4 patients. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 12.5%; 1 patient died from secondary rupture after emergency repair. Primary complete exclusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 6 patients. Secondary exclusion after implantation of a second stent graft was successful in the second rupture patient. No endoleak was present at discharge. All discharged patients are alive after 8 to 63 (mean 36) months. Follow-up computed tomography or transesophageal echocardiography revealed no secondary endoleaks or late expansion. The pseudoaneurysms had shrunk completely in 3 patients, were reduced in size in 2 patients, and remained unchanged in 2 patients. No late secondary interventions were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Single piece, reversed, tapered stent grafts adapt better to the special anatomy of the hypoplastic aortic arch. Midterm results are excellent; complete shrinkage in 50% is remarkable. However, the long-term behavior of these implants in young patients requires further evaluation and surveillance.

Occlusion of the left subclavian artery with stent grafts is safer with protective reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Safe fixation of endovascular stent grafts in thoracic aortic disease often requires covering of the left subclavian artery (LSA) with the stent graft. It is controversial whether this occlusion can be done without additional risk of ischemic complications. METHODS: In 102 patients treated with endovascular stent grafts, the LSA was covered. In a nonrandomized clinical practice, unprotected occlusion of the LSA was performed in 63 patients (61%), whereas 39 patients underwent extrathoracic subclavian to carotid artery revascularization before (n = 28) or concomitantly with (n = 11) the endovascular procedure. RESULTS: Left cerebral ischemia occurred in 11% of the unprotected group and in 5% of the protected group. The difference was not statistically significant. The difference in spinal cord ischemia was insignificant owing to the low incidence in general, but the covered length of the aorta was significantly longer in the protected group. Arm ischemia after unprotected LSA occlusion occurred in 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of the results remains speculative because many factors contribute to left cerebral ischemia. However, in terms of overall complications, there is a significant difference in favor of the group protected by revascularization of the LSA either before or simultaneously with stent grafting. Arm ischemia is mostly mild and can be managed secondarily. Subclavian revascularization is associated with relatively low risk and should be considered in advance, at least when extended covering of the thoracic aorta is intended.

Stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta by the cardiothoracic surgeon.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated endovascular stent-grafting as a new technique in aortic surgery. METHODS: One hundred ninety-six stent-grafts were implanted in the thoracic aorta in 172 patients. All procedures but one were performed in the operating room by a team of cardiothoracic surgeons; 112 operations (57%) were emergency procedures. Twenty-four procedures (12%) were reoperations for endoleaks. The left subclavian artery origin was covered in 46 cases and the left common carotid artery in 2 cases. Access was by femoral cut-down in 174 procedures, percutaneous femoral approach in 1, and by conduit to the iliac arteries or infrarenal aorta in 17. Surgical reconstruction of damaged access vessels became necessary in 10 cases. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 9.7% (19 patients). Paraplegia occurred in 1.0% (2 patients). Primary technical success was 85.2%, secondary 91.8%. Six conversions to open repair were necessary, 3 during the procedures and 3 secondarily before discharge. Actuarial survival was 79% at 1 year, 67% at 3 years, and 55% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results are excellent, taking into account the high incidence of emergency procedures and that open surgery is not promising in many patients. The cardiothoracic surgeon can perform the procedure after adequate training in endovascular techniques. Surgical skills are mandatory because of the potential need for extended surgical approach to the access vessels or immediate conversion to open surgery. Therefore, the operating room is the preferred site for this procedure.

Orthotopic heart transplantation in patients with Marfan syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Due to the risk of vascular complications, the indication for heart transplantation (HTx) in patients with Marfan syndrome and end-stage heart disease remains controversial. We analyzed the results of such patients who underwent HTx at our institution. METHODS: Ten patients with Marfan syndrome (median age 36, range 19 to 56 years) underwent HTx between March 1986 and December 2005. The primary vascular manifestation of Marfan syndrome was type-A aortic dissection in three patients and ascending aortic aneurysm in seven patients. All patients had undergone cardiovascular operations prior to transplantation. All had refractory heart failure (New York Heart Association class IV) before transplantation. Three patients underwent transplantation after ventricular assist device (VAD) support (left VAD, n = 2; biventricular assist device, n = 1). RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths. Two patients died of causes unrelated to Marfan disease (pneumonia on day 27, n = 1; stroke on day 102, n = 1). One patient died due to type-B dissection 3.8 years posttransplantation and one due to rupture of an aortic arch aneurysm after 12.1 years. Two patients underwent thoracoabdominal aortic replacement for chronic dissection 14 and 20 months posttransplantation, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 80% at 1 year and 64% at 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier freedom from reoperation was 100% at 1 year and 62.5% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation in patients with Marfan syndrome results in good long-term survival, similar to that of patients without Marfan syndrome. Close follow-up and timely operation of aortic pathologies is mandatory. Reluctance to place these patients on a heart transplant waiting list appears not to be justified.