Ease of Application of Various Neuromuscular Devices for Routine Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Subjective evaluations to confirm recovery from neuromuscular blockade with a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) is inadequate. Quantitative monitors are the only reliable method to confirm adequate recovery of neuromuscular function. Unfortunately, many clinicians are unfamiliar with such devices and there is concern that the introduction of objective monitoring would be exceedingly laborious and could cause workflow delays. This study investigates how long it takes experienced nurse anesthetists to apply various neuromuscular devices as well as their perception regarding the ease of application. METHODS: Twenty nurse anesthetists were consented and participated in an educational session that familiarized them with 3 devices: SunStim Plus PNS (SunMed, Grand Rapids, MI), the acceleromyography-based IntelliVue NMT device (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and electromyography-based TetraGraph device (Senzime B.V., Uppsala, Sweden). Participants were timed while placing each monitor on patients in a real-world setting. For the quantitative devices (IntelliVue NMT and TetraGraph), participants were also timed when obtaining calibrated baseline train-of-four (TOF) ratios. Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in time to connect different devices. Participants were surveyed about how easy they found it to utilize these devices. RESULTS: After adjusting for multiple comparison, time to connect was significantly less for PNS (median, 29; range, 16-58 seconds) compared to either the TetraGraph device (median, 62.8; range, 32-101 seconds; P < .001) or the IntelliVue NMT device (median, 46; range: 28-90 seconds; P < .001). The difference in time to connect between the TetraGraph device and the IntelliVue NMT device was not statistically significant (P = .053), but it took significantly less time to calibrate the TetraGraph device than the IntelliVue NMT device (median difference, -16; range, -88 to 49 seconds; P = .002). The participants found applying either the IntelliVue NMT device (P = .042) or the TetraGraph device (P = .048) more difficult than applying a PNS while finding it easier to calibrate the TetraGraph device versus the IntelliVue NMT device (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It takes 19 seconds longer to apply a quantitative neuromuscular monitor (the IntelliVue NMT device) than a PNS. While this difference reached significance, this relatively minimal additional time represents an inappropriate barrier to the application of quantitative monitors. Regardless of which quantitative monitor was utilized, these nurse anesthetists found the application and utilization of such devices relatively straightforward.

Paravertebral block for radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube placement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) placement in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) carries risks related to periprocedural sedation and analgesia. To minimize these risks, we used a paravertebral block (PVB) technique for RIG placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ALS undergoing RIG placement under PVB between 2013 and 2017. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients with ALS underwent RIG placement under PVB. Median (range) age was 66 (28 to 86) years, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised score was 27 (6 to 45), and forced vital capacity was 47% (8%-79%) at time of RIG placement. Eighty-five (85.9%) patients underwent RIG placement as outpatients, with a mean postanesthesia care unit stay of 2.3 hours. The readmission rate was 4% at both 1 and 30 days postprocedure. DISCUSSION: PVB for RIG placement has a low rate of adverse events and provides effective periprocedural analgesia in patients with ALS, the majority of whom can be treated as outpatients.

Complications of Peripherally Inserted, Large-Bore, Rapid-Infusion Catheters in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: At our institution, peripherally inserted, 8.5-French rapid-infusion catheters (RICs) are placed for high-flow administration of intravenous fluids and blood products during liver transplant (LT). We sought to estimate the incidence of RIC placement-associated complications in LT patients. METHODS: Electronic health records of all patients who underwent LT from January 2008 through December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RIC-related complications were deemed clinically significant if they required surgical consultation or intervention due to infiltration. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and RIC complications. RESULTS: In total, 839 LT patients who received RICs were identified; of these, 14 (1.67%) had RIC-related complications, and 7 (0.83%) required surgical consultation. No patients needed fasciotomy or wound débridement due to a RIC complication, and no patients had permanent sequelae. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, only an increase in international normalized ratio (INR) from 1.4 to 2.2 (equivalent to the interquartile range of observed INR values) increased the odds of complications due to RIC placement (odds ratio [95% CI], 1.98 [1.10-3.56]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low incidence of perioperative RIC-related complications (1.7%). No patients had permanent RIC-related complications.

Forced-Air Convection Versus Underbody Conduction Warming Strategies to Maintain Perioperative Normothermia in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background Forced-air warming is an established strategy for maintaining perioperative normothermia. However, this warming strategy can potentially contaminate the surgical field by circulating nonsterile air. This study aimed to determine whether changing practice away from this method resulted in non-inferior rates of perioperative hypothermia. Methods We performed a chart review of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients from 2014 to 2017, when the strategy of intraoperative forced-air warming (FAW) was changed to preoperative FAW along with intraoperative underbody conduction warming (CW) with an underbody warming mattress. Data included patient temperatures throughout all phases of care, blood loss and transfusion requirements, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stays, and 30-day infection and mortality. Results A total of 769 charts were reviewed; 349 patients underwent surgery before the practice change and 420 after. Mean (SD; 95% CI) body temperatures at the time of incision were lower for group 1 than for group 2 (34.55 vs 35.52 °C [0.97 °C; 95% CI, 0.72-1.23 °C]). The average nadir of intraoperative body temperature was lower for group 1 than for group 2 (difference of means, 0.44 °C; 95% CI, 0.18-0.71 °C). Group 2 had a higher percentage of patients who presented hypothermic (temperature <36.0 °C) on arrival in the PACU (12.9% vs 7.7%). Conclusion Preoperative convective warming combined with intraoperative underbody conductive warming maintains normothermia during primary total joint arthroplasty and is non-inferior to forced-air intraoperative warming alone.