Attentional bias and metacognitions in cancer survivors with high fear of cancer recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common and severe problem amongst cancer survivors, but mechanisms to explain its development and maintenance are still lacking. The self-regulatory executive function (S-REF) model suggests that metacognitions and attentional bias to cancer-related words may explain high FCR. Thus, this study aimed to explore relationships between FCR, metacognitions and attentional bias in a mixed group of cancer survivors. METHOD: Sixty-three early-stage breast or prostate cancer survivors, diagnosed within 6 months to 5 years prior to participation and who had completed all hospital-based treatment with no evidence of cancer recurrence were recruited through two metropolitan oncology clinics. Participants completed a questionnaire battery and the dot-probe task. RESULTS: Survivors with clinical FCR had significantly greater positive beliefs about worry (10.1 vs 7.4, p = 0.002) and beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry (12.0 vs 7.7, p = 0.000) than those with non-clinical FCR, whereas the total metacognition score significantly predicted FCR in multiple regression analysis (ß = 0.371, p = 0.001). No significant differences were detected between participants scoring above and below clinical FCR levels in attention bias indices. CONCLUSIONS: This study found partial support for the S-REF model of FCR, with metacognitions but not attentional bias found to be related to FCR. Further research is needed to explore attentional biases in more detail.

Compliance of males with stage 1 testicular germ cell tumours on an active surveillance protocol.

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the rate of compliance among 57 males with stage 1 testicular germ cell tumours on an active surveillance protocol at a single Australian centre. At median follow up of 24 months, 81% had adequate compliance with the follow-up regimen, 12% were lost to follow up, and 16% relapsed; none between protocol visits. Active surveillance is an acceptable alternative to adjuvant therapy for stage 1 testicular germ cell tumours, with reduced toxicity for most and equivalent survival, but requires efforts to maintain adequate compliance with follow up to avoid late detection of recurrence.

The important role of radiation treatment in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma is an aggressive, radiosensitive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour. In this review, the roles of radiation therapy and chemoradiation in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma are described and discussed, and guidelines for patient management are presented. Radiation treatment may be indicated for definitive (> 55 Gy) or adjuvant (> 50 Gy) treatment of the primary tumour site and for prophylactic (> 50 Gy), adjuvant (> 50 Gy) or definitive (> 55 Gy) treatment of the regional lymph node field. If a patient presents with positive margins after initial biopsy or resection, definitive radiation therapy or chemoradiation may be an alternative to further surgery and, importantly, results in less delay than re-resection followed by adjuvant radiation treatment. Given the rarity of this tumour, patients should be enrolled on prospective databases and clinical trials, and managed in a multidisciplinary clinical setting wherever possible.

Long-term outcomes of SBRT for PSMA PET detected oligometastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer (PCa) is a challenging clinical scenario encountered more frequently with the widespread adoption of PSMA-PET. SBRT aims to defer androgen deprivation and may deliver sustained biochemical failure (BF) free survival in selected patients. Little long-term data is currently available regarding the effectiveness of this approach. METHODS: A retrospective single institution study of PSMA-PET directed SBRT without initial ADT for oligo-metachronous PCa. Median dose/fractionation was 24 Gy in 2# to bones and 30 Gy in 3# to lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was time to BF (PSA + 0.2 ug/L above nadir). Secondary endpoints included time to ADT for relapse (i.e. palliative ADT), BF defined as PSA nadir + 2 ug/L, toxicity, patterns of failure and survival. Patients were excluded if they received ADT with their SBRT, had short disease-free interval, or > 3 metastases on PSMA-PET. RESULTS: 103 patients treated from November-2014 to December-2019 were analysed from our prospective database. Median follow-up was 5 years. 64 patients were treated for nodal only disease, 35 bone only and 4 mixed. 15% were free of any BF at 5 years with median time to BF of 1.1 years. 32% (33/103) of patients had further curative-intent radiation treatment following their first BF after SBRT, including subsequent SBRT. Eight patients underwent potentially curative treatment for their second or third relapse. Allowing for salvage treatment, 29/103 (28%) were biochemically disease free at last follow up. At 5 years, 39% of patients had never received any ADT and 55% had not started ADT for relapse with a median time to ADT for relapse of 5.5 years. There were 2 grade 3 toxicities (rib fracture and lymphoedema), and no local failures. CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET guided SBRT for oligo-metachronous PCa recurrence in appropriately triaged patients results in excellent local control, low toxicity and over 50% ADT free at 5 years.

The GOFURTGO Study: AGITG phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine-oxaliplatin integrated with concomitant 5FU and 3-D conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of localised pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a poor prognosis. By increasing intensity of systemic therapy combined with an established safe chemoradiation technique, our intention was to enhance the outcomes of LAPC. In preparation for phase III evaluation, the feasibility and efficacy of our candidate regimen gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy with sandwich 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) needs to be established. METHODS: A total of 48 patients with inoperable LAPC without metastases were given gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2) d1 + d15 q28) and oxaliplatin (100 mg m(-2) d2 + d16 q28) in induction (one cycle) and consolidation (three cycles), and 5FU 200 mg m(-2) per day over 6 weeks during 3DCRT 54 Gy. RESULTS: Median duration of sustained local control (LC) was 15.8 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months, and overall survival was 15.7 months. Survival rates for 1, 2, and 3 years were 70.2%, 21.3%, and 12.8%, respectively. Global quality of life did not significantly decline from baseline during treatment, which was associated with modest treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, combined with an effective and safe regimen of 5FU and 3DCRT radiotherapy, was feasible and reasonably tolerated. The observed improved duration of LC and PFS with more intensive therapy over previous trials may be due to patient selection, but suggest that further evaluation in phase III trials is warranted.

Review of 120 anal cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for the majority of patients with anal cancer, with abdominoperineal resection reserved for salvage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our results after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, and/or surgery in terms of overall survival and colostomy free survival in patients with anal cancer. METHOD: A review of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 1991 and 2004 was performed. The principle end-points of the study were overall and colostomy-free survival. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were identified. The T stage distribution was T1 32, T2 44, T3 19, T4 17 and TX 8. Eighteen patients had clinically involved regional nodes. Eighty patients received radiotherapy as a component of their treatment. Twenty-four of the 80 patients had a colostomy. The most common late toxicity was faecal incontinence. The overall survival and colostomy-free survival rates for all 120 patients were 58% and 79% at 5 years, respectively. For the 80 patients who received radiotherapy, the corresponding figures were 66% and 82% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiation is effective organ preserving treatment for anal cancer. Grade 1 and 2 faecal incontinence is a relatively common late toxicity experienced by patients.

Ductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: An Uncommon Entity With Atypical Behaviour.

AIMS: Ductal adenocarcinoma is a rare variant of prostate cancer, and as such clinical outcomes and best management are not well defined. This series demonstrates the atypical presentation and unusual clinical behaviour of ductal adenocarcinoma and proposes management guidelines to assist clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of pure (nine patients) and mixed (18 patients) ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate referred to the Departments of Radiation Oncology of the Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy, nine patients (33%) with pure ductal and 18 (67%) with mixed ductal-acinar adenocarcinoma. The median follow-up was 38 months. Four patients (15%) failed locally, all of whom received less than 80 Gy, or no brachytherapy boost. Five patients (19%) failed distantly, four with biopsy-proven lung metastases. All distant failures occurred with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 3 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: This series shows the atypical clinical presentation of this entity, as well as its propensity to metastasise to unusual sites. Relapse may occur at low absolute PSA values and is often asymptomatic. Ductal cancer should not simply be regarded as a high Gleason grade cancer. We propose management guidelines, including regular computed tomography examinations (rather than relying solely on PSA levels) as part of the follow-up for patients with any component of ductal adenocarcinoma.

Late Genitourinary Toxicity Outcomes in 300 Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Dose-escalated Image-guided Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy.

AIMS: To quantify and qualify late genitourinary toxicity in a cohort of patients with localised prostate cancer treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to doses ≥78 Gy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 300 patients treated with definitive dose-escalated IMRT between 2007 and 2013. Ninety-seven patients received 78-80 Gy in 38 fractions, and 203 received 82-84 Gy in 40 fractions. International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and supplemental quality of life data were recorded at baseline, weekly during treatment and at follow-up. Genitourinary toxicities were recorded using modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria during weekly treatment review and at each follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity at 3 years. Baseline patient characteristics and symptoms were then used in univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of late urinary toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 58 months (range 9-109 months). The actuarial cumulative 3 year rates of grade ≥ 2 and grade 3 genitourinary toxicity were 14.9% and 2.8%, respectively. There was no grade 4 toxicity. History of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), alpha blocker use before radiation, any hormone use, baseline IPSS ≥ 14 and pre-existing incontinence or nocturia were significantly associated with late ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only previous TURP retained significance, with a hazard ratio of 2.54 (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study showed acceptable levels of late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity and low rates of late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity in a cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with image-guided IMRT to doses between 78 and 84 Gy. Variables associated with increased late ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity include previous TURP, alpha blocker use, hormone use and pre-existing urinary dysfunction.

Retrospective cohort analysis of neoadjuvant treatment and survival in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a high volume referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease. Neoadjuvant therapy (NA) with chemotherapy (NAC) and radiotherapy (RT) prior to surgery provides promise. In the absence of prospective data, well annotated clinical data from high-volume units may provide pilot data for randomised trials. METHODS: Medical records from a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, were analysed to identify all patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. Data regarding treatment, toxicity and survival were collected. RESULTS: Between January 1 2010 and April 1 2016, 220 sequential patients were treated: 87 with NA and 133 with upfront operation (UO). Forty-three NA patients (52%) and 5 UO patients (4%) were borderline resectable at diagnosis. Twenty-four borderline patients received NA RT, 22 sequential to NAC. The median overall survival (OS) in the NA group was 25.9 months (mo); 95% CI (21.1-43.0 mo) compared to 26.9 mo (19.7, 32.7) in the UO; HR 0.89; log-ranked p-value = 0.58. Sixty-nine NA patients (79%) were resected, mOS was 29.2 mo (22.27, not reached (NR)). Twenty-two NA (31%) versus 22 UO (17%) were node negative at operation (N0). In those managed with NAC/RT the mOS was 29.0 mo (17.3, NR). There were no post-operative deaths with NA within 90-days and three in the UO arm. DISCUSSION: This is a hypothesis generating retrospective review of a selected real-world population in a high-throughput unit. Treatment with NA was well tolerated. The long observed survival in this group may be explained by lymph node sterilisation by NA, and the achievement of R0 resection in a greater proportion of patients.

SpaceOAR Hydrogel in Dose-escalated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Rectal Dosimetry and Late Toxicity.

AIM: To investigate the feasibility, dosimetric benefits and late toxicity of a temporary hydrogel spacer between the rectum and the prostate for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with prostate cancer were enrolled on a phase I/II study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging before and after placement of 10 cm(3) of hydrogel. The first 10 patients had an additional magnetic resonance imaging after the completion of radiation treatment. SpaceOAR hydrogel was injected under general anaesthetic using a transperineal approach with transrectal ultrasound guidance. Primary end points were perioperative toxicity and comparison of rectal dosimetry. Secondary end points included cute and late radiation toxicity. All patients were planned on both pre- and post-hydrogel scans to a D95 of 80 Gy in 40 fractions. A contemporary control group of 110 prostate cancer patients treated with the same prescription was identified for comparison. RESULTS: There were no perioperative complications. Rectal doses were significantly lower for the post-hydrogel plans, especially above 65 Gy (V82 = 0.2% versus 1.3%; V80 = 0.8% versus 5.3%; V75 = 2.2% versus 9.5%; V70 = 3.7% versus 12.3%; V65 = 5.4% versus 14.7%; V40 = 22.9% versus 32% and V30 = 42.7% versus 49.4%). There was no significant difference in acute grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, which was 43% versus 51% and 0% versus 4.5% in the hydrogel and control groups, respectively. Late grade 1 was significantly less frequent in the hydrogel group (16.6% versus 41.8%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SpaceOAR hydrogel was inserted with minimal side-effects. Dosimetric benefits were greatest at higher rectal doses (V65 to V82). Late grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly lower than that seen in patients treated without hydrogel.

Implementing Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Anal Cancer: 3 Year Outcomes at Two Sydney Institutions.

AIMS: Modern chemoradiotherapy used for the treatment of anal cancer has significant acute toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may reduce these side-effects. We report our experience implementing IMRT with simultaneous boost at the Sydney Cancer Centre and Royal North Shore Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected acute toxicity data on all consecutive patients treated definitively with IMRT between January 2008 and December 2011. Patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. The radiotherapy dose varied by stage in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0529 protocol. The first 30 plans were evaluated for adherence to RTOG 0529 dose specifications. Locoregional control and survival outcomes were analysed in July 2014. RESULTS: We included 42 patients (stage I 12%; II 41%; III 45%) with a median follow-up time of 43 months. At 3 years the locoregional control was 94% (95% confidence interval: 78-99), overall survival was 92% (95% confidence interval: 78-97), disease-free survival was 89% (95% confidence interval: 73-96), metastasis-free survival was 89% (95% confidence interval: 73-96) and colostomy-free survival was 89% (95% confidence interval: 72-96). There was no acute grade 4 toxicity. Acute grade 3 toxicity rates were: dermatological (33%), gastrointestinal (14%) and haematological (19%). Twenty-six per cent of patients were hospitalised for treatment-related toxicity. Only 12% required a treatment break greater than 3 days. All patients achieved RTOG 0529 planning target volume dose specifications. Most critical organ dose constraints were either met or met with minor deviation. The exception was 76% major deviation in small bowel constraints. Despite this no increase in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost is safe and well tolerated in an unselected population. Most dose specifications are achievable. Excellent locoregional control and survival outcomes are achievable outside of a clinical trial setting.

Radiation treatment in recurrent squamous cell cancer of the vulva.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment and outcome of recurrent vulvar cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a retrospective review of 26 women referred to the department of radiation oncology between 1982 and 1995, patient records were analyzed with respect to the findings at original surgery, the time to locoregional recurrence, the location of the recurrence, and the subsequent management and outcome. RESULTS: Sixteen recurrences were managed with a combination of surgery and radiotherapy, and the remainder with radiation treatment, combined with chemotherapy in some cases. The overall survival for the entire cohort at 5 years was 22%. The 5-year survival for those with recurrence confined to the vulva (n = 13) was 46%, compared with 0% for those women with a recurrence located or extending beyond the vulva (p = 0.002). The local control rate was 34.6%. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the poor overall prognosis for this condition. In particular, they highlight the importance of the location of the recurrence as a prognostic indicator. Based on this review, we conclude that radiotherapy fields should encompass the region at risk if the intent is curative. Finally, low-dose palliation for groin node recurrence is ineffectual.

PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone.

PURPOSE: To study prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time of untreated, favorable grade, prostate carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective single-arm cohort study has been in progress to assess the feasibility of a watchful observation protocol with selective delayed intervention using clinical, histologic, or PSA progression as treatment indication in untreated, localized, favorable grade prostate adenocarcinoma (T1b-T2bN0 M0, Gleason Score < or = 7, and PSA < or = 15 ng/mL). Patients are conservatively managed with watchful observation alone, as long as they do not meet the arbitrarily defined disease progression criteria. Patients are followed regularly and undergo blood tests including PSA at each visit. PSA doubling time (Td) is estimated from a linear regression of ln(PSA) on time, assuming a simple exponential growth model. RESULTS: As of March 2000, 134 patients have been on the study for a minimum of 12 months (median, 24; range, 12-52) and have a median frequency of PSA measurement of 7 times (range, 3-15). Median age is 70 years. Median PSA at enrollment is 6.3 (range, 0.5-14.6). The distribution of Td is as follows: <2 years, 19 patients; 2-5 years, 46; 5-10 years, 25; 10-20 years, 11; 20-50 years, 6; > 50 years, 27. The median Td is 5.1 years. In 44 patients (33%), Td is greater than 10 years. There was no correlation between Td and patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, or initial PSA level. CONCLUSION: Td of untreated prostate cancer varies widely. In our cohort, 33% have Td > 10 years. Td may be a useful tool to guide treatment intervention for patients managed conservatively with watchful observation alone.

Prospective patient-based assessment of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this report is to prospectively evaluate pain control provided by palliative radiotherapy for all irradiated patients with bone metastases by using their own assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database was set up for all patients referred for palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using an 11 categorical point scale (0=lack of pain, 10=worst pain imaginable). Analgesic consumption during the preceding 24 h was recorded and converted into equivalent total daily dose of oral morphine. For those who received radiotherapy, follow-up was conducted via telephone interviews at week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 post treatment using the same pain scale and analgesic diary. Radiotherapy outcome was initially assessed by pain score alone. Complete response (CR) was defined as a pain score of 0. Partial response (PR) was defined as a reduction of score > or =2 or a> or =50% reduction of the pre-treatment pain score. We further analyzed outcomes using integrated pain and analgesic scores. Response was defined as either a reduction of pain score > or =2 with at least no increase in analgesics or at least stable pain score with a > or =50% reduction in analgesic intake. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were treated with palliative radiotherapy. When response evaluation was by pain score alone, the PR rates at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks were 44, 42, 30 and 38%, respectively; while the CR rates were 24, 32, 31 and 29%, respectively. The overall response rate at 12 weeks was 67%. When assessed by the integrated pain and analgesic scores, the response rates were 50, 46, 43 and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The response rate in our patient population is comparable with those reported in clinical trials. This is important when counselling our patients on the expected effectiveness of radiotherapy outside of clinical trials. Our observations confirm the generalizability of the trials conducted to date. While randomized trials still remain the gold standard of research, observational studies can serve as useful adjuncts to randomized trials to confirm the efficacy and guide the design of new controlled trials.

Prospective assessment of symptom palliation for patients attending a rapid response radiotherapy program. feasibility of telephone follow-up.

Clinical trials generally include motivated patients with relatively good performance status. This can result in an overestimation of the effectiveness of an intervention. Clinic follow-up protocols for outcome assessment after palliative treatments suffer from high attrition rates. In this study, the feasibility of telephone follow-up for the assessment of symptom palliation in patients receiving outpatient palliative radiotherapy as a tool to evaluate outcome was examined. Patients referred for palliative radiotherapy were asked to rate their symptom distress using the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at initial consultation. Patient demographics and analgesic consumption were collected. For those who received radiotherapy, follow-up was conducted through telephone interviews at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 post-treatment using the same modified ESAS and analgesic diary. One hundred ninety patients received radiotherapy to 256 sites from January to August 1999. Seventy-eight patients (41%) died during the 12-week follow-up period. The percentage of surviving patients responding to the telephone interview ranged from 63% to 68% during the 12-week study. Telephone follow-up is a feasible tool for the prospective outcome assessment of symptom palliation in this population. It compares well to clinic visits or mailed questionnaires. However, to improve the follow-up rates, other modalities may also need to be implemented.

How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review.

The purpose of this review was to examine the accuracy of physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients. A MEDLINE search for English language articles published between 1966 and March 2000 was performed using the following keywords: forecasting/clinical prediction, prognosis/prognostic factors, survival and neoplasm metastasis. Searches in CancerLit, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and reference sections of articles were performed. Studies were included if they concerned adult patients with various cancer histological diagnoses and employed clinical prediction and the readily available clinical parameters. Biochemical and molecular markers were excluded. Grading of the evidence and recommendations was performed. Twelve articles on clinical prediction and 19 on prognostic factors met the inclusion criteria. Clinical prediction tends to be incorrect in the optimistic direction but improves with repeated measurements. Performance status has been found to be most strongly correlated with the duration of survival, followed by the 'terminal syndrome', which includes anorexia, weight loss and dysphagia. Cognitive failure and confusion have also been associated with a shorter life span. Performance status combined with clinical symptoms and the clinician's estimate helps to guide an accurate prediction, as reviewed in an Italian series. There is fair evidence to support using performance status, and clinical and biochemical parameters, in addition to clinicians' judgement to aid survival prediction. However, there is weak evidence to support that clinicians' estimates alone could be specifically employed for survival prediction.

Patients with advanced cancer: a survey of the understanding of their illness and expectations from palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic metastases.

We conducted a pilot study to examine patients' understanding of their illness and their expectations for palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic metastases. Participants were asked to complete a survey consisting of seven questions prior to the initial consultation. Demographic details and information on extent of disease were collected. Patients were asked to score their symptom distress using the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Sixty patients participated in the pilot study between January and April 1999. Their median age was 68 years (range 46-90). The most common primary tumours were lung, prostate and breast. Twenty-one patients (35%) believed that their cancer was curable. Twelve (20%) expected that palliative radiotherapy would cure their advanced cancer and 23 (38%) believed that palliative radiotherapy would prolong their lives. Twenty-one patients (35%) had concerns about the effectiveness of radiation therapy and twenty (33%) had concerns about the side-effects of radiotherapy. Fifty-two (87%) were not familiar with the concept of radiation treatment. Forty-seven patients (78%) reported that they were not given information about the radiation treatment; 51 (85%) were not satisfied with the information that their own doctors had provided regarding radiation treatment prior to the consultation at our clinic. A significant proportion of the patients in this pilot study had misconceptions regarding their illness and unrealistic expectations from palliative radiotherapy. We plan to provide educational pamphlets for use in referring doctors' surgeries and clinics in order to inform patients of the nature, rationale and anticipated benefits and side-effects of palliative radiotherapy.

Female clear cell adenocarcinoma arising within a urethral diverticulum.

Clear cell adenocarcinomas arising from female urethral diverticulae are rare. The optimal management of this clinical entity is uncertain. Two cases managed by a combination of surgery and XRT (radiotherapy) are presented. The common histopathological findings and treatment options are highlighted. Individualized patient management in a multi-disciplinary setting is recommended.

Biopsy-proven brain metastases from prostate cancer: a series of four cases with review of the literature.

AIMS: Prostate cancer is very common and is the second most common cause of cancer death in males in Australia; however, brain metastases are exceedingly rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We review four cases of biopsy-proven brain metastases from prostate cancer and review the relevant literature. RESULTS: Three of four patients had acinar adenocarcinoma of prostate with one patient having ductal adenocarcinoma variant on histopathology. Three patients had the brain as the only site of metastatic disease. All patients underwent surgery, and three of four patients underwent adjuvant palliative radiotherapy to the brain. CONCLUSION: Brain metastases from prostate cancer are rare, but brain metastases without other sites of metastatic disease are exceedingly rare and may be more common with ductal adenocarcinoma variant.

Definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma.

AIMS: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a radiosensitive tumour. Radiotherapy has an important role in its treatment, including definitive management. This study aimed to determine the in-field control achieved with definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to examine patterns of relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with definitive radiotherapy or CRT for biopsy-confirmed MCC were identified from records of the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Melanoma Institute Australia. Definitive treatment was defined as treatment delivered to macroscopic or residual microscopic disease at the primary site or in regional nodes. Patients with distant metastatic disease at presentation and those treated electively or adjuvantly (i.e. after microscopically clear excision) were excluded. RESULTS: Of 26 patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (n = 18) or CRT (n = 8), 20 were disease free at last follow-up (median follow-up 23.5 months). Five of the six patients who recurred did so at distant sites, with two experiencing simultaneous in-field failure at treated nodal sites where there had been macroscopic disease at presentation. Eighty-nine per cent of all patients and 85% of those with macroscopic disease were free of in-field recurrence at 2 years. CONCLUSION: Definitive radiotherapy or CRT produces excellent in-field disease control in the treatment of primary and regionally metastatic MCC.