Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi ; 19(1): 44-48, 2017 Jan.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100321

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effect and mechanism of action of esmolol in the treatment of severe hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 102 children with severe HFMD were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into conventional treatment and esmolol treatment groups (n=51 each). The children in the conventional treatment group were given conventional treatment according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HFMD. Those in the esmolol treatment group were given esmolol in addition to the conventional treatment. The heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and respiratory rate (RR) were continuously monitored for all children. Blood samples were collected from all children before treatment and 1, 3, and 5 days after treatment to measure the levels of norepinephrine (NE), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) p65 in mononuclear cells. Serum levels of myocardial enzymes and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured before treatment and after 5 days of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in HR, SBP, RR, NE, TNF-α, IL-6, NF-κB p65, serum myocardial enzymes, and NT-proBNP before treatment between the conventional treatment and esmolol treatment groups. Both groups had significant reductions in these parameters at each time point (P<0.05). Compared with the conventional treatment group, the esmolol treatment group had significant improvements in the above parameters after 1 and 3 days of treatment (P<0.05). After 5 days of treatment, the esmolol treatment group had significant improvements in serum levels of myocardial enzymes and NT-proBNP compared with the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early application of esmolol can effectively stabilize the vital signs of the children with severe HFMD. Its mechanism of action may be related to reducing serum catecholamine concentration, alleviating myocardial damage, improving cardiac function, and reducing inflammatory response.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease/drug therapy , Propanolamines/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Female , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease/blood , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease/physiopathology , Humans , Infant , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Propanolamines/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
2.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi ; 18(11): 1065-1068, 2016 Nov.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817766

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect and safety of somatostatin in the treatment of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in neonates. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed, and 126 neonates who underwent surgery for congenital gastrointestinal anomalies were randomly divided into control group, treatment group A, and treatment group B. The neonates in the control group were given routine postoperative hemostasis, and those in the treatment groups were given somatostatin in addition to the treatment for the control group. The neonates in treatment group A were given intravenous injection of somatostatin 0.25 mg as the initial dose and 0.25 mg/h for maintenance, and those in treatment group B were given continuous intravenous pumping of somatostatin at a dose of 3.5 µg/(kg·h). The clinical outcome and complications were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the treatment groups had significantly shortened clearance time in occult blood test for gastrointestinal decompression drainage and a significantly lower degree of the reduction in 24-hour hemoglobin (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between treatment groups A and B. Compared with the control group, treatment group A had significant reductions in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP), and SaO2 after one hour of treatment (P<0.05 ), but there were no significant differences at the other time points between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in monitoring indices between the control group and treatment group B (P>0.05). No neonates in the control group experienced hypoglycemia reaction, and treatment group A had a significantly higher incidence rate of hypoglycemia (20%) than treatment group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin has a marked clinical effect and good safety in the treatment of neonates with postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding, and the administration of somatostatin by continuous intravenous pumping leads to fewer side effects.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prospective Studies , Somatostatin/adverse effects
3.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 71(5): 517-24, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25845654

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The risk of anemia due to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has not been well described, and new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported in recent years. We therefore conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs to fully characterize the risk of anemia with bevacizumab. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search of Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to investigate the effects of RCTs on bevacizumab treatment on cancer patients up to October 2014, and random or fixed-effect meta-analytical models were used to assess the risk ratio (RR) of anemia due to the use of bevacizumab according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 13,173 patients were included in this analysis from 18 RCTs. Among those patients receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy, the incidences of all-grade and high-grade (grade 3 and above) anemia were 24% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-41%) and 4.0% (95% CI 3.0-6.0%), respectively. Bevacizumab-containing therapy did not significantly decreased the risk of developing all-grade anemia (RR 0.872, 95% CI 0.739-1.029, P = 0.104) and high-grade anemia (RR 0.850, 95% CI 0.720-1.002, P = 0.053), which is not in agreement with previous meta-analysis. On subgroup analysis, we did not find significant risk differences based on bevacizumab dosage, tumor types, and concomitant drugs. When stratified by dose level, a significantly decreased risk of high-grade anemia with bevacizumab was obtained in a lower dose level (2.5 mg/kg/week, RR 0.773, 95% CI 0.611-0.978, P = 0.031) compared to control group. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab did not significantly reduce the risk of anemia with chemotherapy in cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Anemia/epidemiology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Anemia/etiology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL