Is unilateral transverse process-pedicle percutaneous kyphoplasty a better choice for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures in the old patients?

BACKGROUND: A few reports have shown that unilateral transverse process-pedicle percutaneous kyphoplasty is a good choice for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). However, this issue remains controversial and the related comprehensive research was lacked. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients receiving PKP surgery for OVCF. Patients were divided into three groups according to surgical approach. Symptom and radiographical evaluation were performed preoperatively, 1-month postoperatively, 1-year postoperatively and follow-ups. And follow-ups were repeated every year. Visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, anterior vertebral height, coronal Cobb angle and sagittal Cobb angle was determined and compared among three groups. RESULTS: Totally 447 patients were included with an average age of 76.6 ± 7.2 years old. UTP showed significantly shorter surgical duration (p < 0.001), lower cement volume (p < 0.001) but higher cement leakage proportion (p = 0.044). No significant statistical difference was found in terms of improvement rates among three groups. Besides, it was notable that the a significantly higher coronal Cobb angle was observed in UTP group, and a about 4°coronal correction was found after UTP PKP. CONCLUSION: UTTP PKP could achieve similar symptoms relief and kyphosis correction as UTP and BTP PKP. However, it had shorter surgical time and less radio exposure than BTP PKP, lower risk of cement leakage and higher proportion of bilaterally cement distribution than UTP PKP. It seemed to be a better choice for patients with OVCF. In addition, we found that UTP PKP was especially fit for OVCF patients with asymmetrical vertebral compression.

Predictive Factors for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures After Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) seemed to be a frequent and severe complication in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients receiving percutaneous vertebroplasty  or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), resulting in poor long-term outcome and recurrence of pain-related symptoms. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential predictor of AVF after PKP and figure out whether the intervertebral disc plays a role during the process of AVF. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Orthopedic, an affiliated hospital of a medical university. METHODS: Clinical data of OVCF patients receiving PKP were reviewed in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020. Four hundred and forty-five patients were recruited who met the abovementioned criteria in this study. The clinical data, including age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), vertebral height, vertebral kyphosis angle, cement volume, cement distribution, as well as adjacent disc degeneration extent, were recorded for each patient. Independent-sample t tests and chi-squared tests were performed to compare these indexes. Bivariate correlation tests and multiple linear regression analyses were performed among potential predictors. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and Kaplan-Meier plotter were applied to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of parameters for predicting the occurrence of AVF. RESULTS: Patients in both groups gained obvious improvements in symptomatic and radiographic indexes after first PKP. Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was only found between 2 groups with respect to BMD, kyphosis angle at last follow-up before second PKP, cement distribution, and disc degeneration grade. The ROC analysis showed that BMD = 15.5° was highly predictive of AVF after PKP (sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 24.6%; area under curve, 0.569, P = 0.109). Statistically significant difference of AVF incidence amongst patients with different cement distribution (P = 0.018) and similar trend was also found amongst patients with different disc degeneration (P = 0.000). Statistically significant difference was noted in terms of disc degeneration grade between 2 adjacent discs in AVF group. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is the retrospective nature of this study. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of AVF should be focused, especially when OVCF patients with the following predictors: (1) BMD < -3.45; (2) kyphosis angle at last follow-up > 15.5°; (3) I or II cement distribution; and (4) IV or V disc degeneration. More prophylactic treatment should be prescribed for these patients to avoid the occurrence of AVF.