ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: It is unclear if robotic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion (eRARC) provides additional benefit when performed along with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). We assessed the additional efficacy of eRARC in terms of perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 143 patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion between June 2010 and December 2021 at a single center. The patients were assigned to three groups: open radical cystectomy (ORC) with conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) [Group A], ORC with ERAS [Group B], and eRARC with ERAS [Group C]. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to evaluate how ERAS and eRARC affected outcomes respectively. Meanwhile, multivariable analysis was used to detect the predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: The median LOS was shorter after ERAS and eRARC. In the propensity score-matched analysis, ERAS was linked to a significantly shorter median LOS (28.0 vs. 20.0 days, P < .001), but eRARC was not associated with a shorter LOS (19.0 vs. 17.5 days, P = .21). Neither ERAS nor eRARC were connected with a reduce in complication rate. Following multivariable analysis, ERAS was found to be independently associated with shorter LOS (OR=0.23, P < .001), but eRARC demonstrated no such correlation (OR=0.29, P = .096). CONCLUSION: ERAS had strong association with shorter LOS, although eRARC did not contribute to additional efficacy. Neither ERAS nor eRARC decreased the complication rate.
Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Diversion , Humans , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Cystectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Urinary Diversion/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
(Objectives) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are standardized and multimodal perioperative care pathways designed to improve surgical outcomes by minimizing stress response and inflammation following surgery. First adopted in colorectal surgery, ERAS is now being employed in various other types of surgeries, most recently in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Implementation of ERAS protocols resulted in reductions in perioperative complication rates and length of hospital stay (LOS). However, information on the adoption of ERAS in patients undergoing RC in Japan is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ERAS implemented in the Toyohashi Municipal Hospital in 2017 for the management of patients with RC. (Patients and methods) This was a retrospective study of 103 patients who underwent RC and urinary diversion from January 2012 to March 2019. Of the 103 patients, 71 underwent surgery prior to the introduction of the ERAS were allocated to the 'traditional' group, while 32 were exposed to the ERAS protocol were allocated to the 'ERAS' group. In this study, ERAS included no bowel preparation, preoperative carbohydrate loading, preoperative fluid reduction, preoperative fasting, reduced drainage use, no nasogastric intubation, and early postoperative drinking and eating. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate LOS and postoperative complication rate (Clavien classification ≥2) after RC between the 'traditional' and 'ERAS' groups. (Results) Patient characteristics and intraoperative variables such as median age, sex, body mass index, clinical and pathological cancer stage, amount of bleeding, need for transfusion, and technique of urinary diversion did not differ between groups. However, duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the traditional group (402 min vs. 470 min; P = 0.03). Further, rate of complication was significantly lower (43.8% vs. 67.6%; P=0.03) and LOS after RC was significantly shorter (21 days vs. 28 days; P<0.001) in the ERAS group compared to the traditional group. Moreover, ERAS was an independent factor affecting shorter LOS after RC (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 1.52-17.90; P = 0.009) in multivariate analyses. (Conclusions) It is possible that the ERAS protocol adopted in this study reduced the LOS and postoperative complication rate after RC at this site in Japan.