Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
EMBO J ; 40(24): e105862, 2021 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34786738

ABSTRACT

The onset of random X chromosome inactivation in mouse requires the switch from a symmetric to an asymmetric state, where the identities of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. This process is known as X chromosome choice. Here, we show that RIF1 and KAP1 are two fundamental factors for the definition of this transcriptional asymmetry. We found that at the onset of differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), biallelic up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA Tsix weakens the symmetric association of RIF1 with the Xist promoter. The Xist allele maintaining the association with RIF1 goes on to up-regulate Xist RNA expression in a RIF1-dependent manner. Conversely, the promoter that loses RIF1 gains binding of KAP1, and KAP1 is required for the increase in Tsix levels preceding the choice. We propose that the mutual exclusion of Tsix and RIF1, and of RIF1 and KAP1, at the Xist promoters establish a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X-chromosome state.


Subject(s)
Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Telomere-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Tripartite Motif-Containing Protein 28/metabolism , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line , Female , Mice , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Stochastic Processes , Up-Regulation , X Chromosome Inactivation
2.
Proteins ; 91(7): 980-990, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36908253

ABSTRACT

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play a crucial role in numerous molecular processes. Despite many efforts, mechanisms governing molecular recognition between interacting proteins remain poorly understood and it is particularly challenging to predict from sequence whether two proteins can interact. Here we present a new method to tackle this challenge using intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). IDRs are protein segments that are functional despite lacking a single invariant three-dimensional structure. The prevalence of IDRs in eukaryotic proteins suggests that IDRs are critical for interactions. To test this hypothesis, we predicted PPIs using IDR sequences in candidate proteins in humans. Moreover, we divide the PPI prediction problem into two specific subproblems and adapt appropriate training and test strategies based on problem type. Our findings underline the importance of defining clearly the problem type and show that sequences encoding IDRs can aid in predicting specific features of the protein interaction network of intrinsically disordered proteins. Our findings further suggest that accounting for IDRs in future analyses should accelerate efforts to elucidate the eukaryotic PPI network.


Subject(s)
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , Humans , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistry , Eukaryota , Protein Interaction Maps , Protein Conformation
3.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(7): 3856-3875, 2021 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33751115

ABSTRACT

The glucocorticoid (GR) and androgen (AR) receptors execute unique functions in vivo, yet have nearly identical DNA binding specificities. To identify mechanisms that facilitate functional diversification among these transcription factor paralogs, we studied them in an equivalent cellular context. Analysis of chromatin and sequence suggest that divergent binding, and corresponding gene regulation, are driven by different abilities of AR and GR to interact with relatively inaccessible chromatin. Divergent genomic binding patterns can also be the result of subtle differences in DNA binding preference between AR and GR. Furthermore, the sequence composition of large regions (>10 kb) surrounding selectively occupied binding sites differs significantly, indicating a role for the sequence environment in guiding AR and GR to distinct binding sites. The comparison of binding sites that are shared shows that the specificity paradox can also be resolved by differences in the events that occur downstream of receptor binding. Specifically, shared binding sites display receptor-specific enhancer activity, cofactor recruitment and changes in histone modifications. Genomic deletion of shared binding sites demonstrates their contribution to directing receptor-specific gene regulation. Together, these data suggest that differences in genomic occupancy as well as divergence in the events that occur downstream of receptor binding direct functional diversification among transcription factor paralogs.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Binding Sites , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Protein Binding
4.
Nat Cell Biol ; 26(8): 1309-1321, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969762

ABSTRACT

Transcription factors (TFs) control specificity and activity of gene transcription, but whether a relationship between these two features exists is unclear. Here we provide evidence for an evolutionary trade-off between the activity and specificity in human TFs encoded as submaximal dispersion of aromatic residues in their intrinsically disordered protein regions. We identified approximately 500 human TFs that encode short periodic blocks of aromatic residues in their intrinsically disordered regions, resembling imperfect prion-like sequences. Mutation of periodic aromatic residues reduced transcriptional activity, whereas increasing the aromatic dispersion of multiple human TFs enhanced transcriptional activity and reprogramming efficiency, promoted liquid-liquid phase separation in vitro and more promiscuous DNA binding in cells. Together with recent work on enhancer elements, these results suggest an important evolutionary role of suboptimal features in transcriptional control. We propose that rational engineering of amino acid features that alter phase separation may be a strategy to optimize TF-dependent processes, including cellular reprogramming.


Subject(s)
Transcription Factors , Humans , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/genetics , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistry , Mutation , Protein Binding , Transcription, Genetic , DNA/metabolism , DNA/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Cellular Reprogramming/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL