Influence of initial angiotensin receptor blockers on treatment persistence in uncomplicated hypertension: A nation-wide population-based study.

We identified 55 504 uncomplicated, treatment-naïve hypertensive patients who started angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in 2012 from national claims data. The proportion of patients remaining on any hypertension treatment at 12 months and the adherence rate were similar between the losartan cohort (66.82% and 68.25%) and the nonlosartan ARB cohort (67.48% and 69.01%). After adjusting for confounding factors, there was no difference in persistence (aHR 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.01) on hypertension treatment between losartan and nonlosartan ARB cohort. Post hoc analysis showed that patients initially prescribed eprosartan, irbesartan (both, aHR 1.33), and telmisartan (aHR 1.11) were more likely to discontinue the initial drug, whereas valsartan initiators (aHR 0.96) were less likely compared with losartan initiators.

Persistence with Antihypertensive Medications in Uncomplicated Treatment-Naïve Patients: Effects of Initial Therapeutic Classes.

We aimed to assess one-year persistence with antihypertensive therapy (AHT) among newly treated uncomplicated hypertensive patients in Korea and to evaluate the effect of initial therapeutic classes on persistence. We retrospectively analyzed a random sample of 20% of newly treated uncomplicated hypertensive patients (n = 45,787) in 2012 from the National Health Insurance claims database. This group was classified into six cohorts based on initial AHT class. We then measured treatment persistence, allowing a prescription gap of 60 days. Adherence to AHT was assessed with the medication possession ratio. Calcium channel blockers (CCB, 43.7%) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB, 40.3%) were most commonly prescribed as initial monotherapy. Overall, 62.1% and 42.0% were persistent with any AHT and initial class at one year, respectively, and 64.2% were adherent to antihypertensive treatment. Compared with ARBs, the risk of AHT discontinuation was significantly increased with initial use of thiazide diuretics (hazard ratio [HR], 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.96-3.74) and beta blockers (HR, 1.86; CI, 1.77-1.95) and was minimally increased with CCBs (HR, 1.12; CI, 1.08-1.15). In conclusion, persistence and adherence to AHT are suboptimal, but the differences are meaningful in persistence and adherence between initial AHT classes.

Implication of different initial beta blockers on treatment persistence: atenolol vs new-generation beta blocker, a population-based study.

AIM: Potential heterogeneity within the same class of drug in terms of persistence may lead to different clinical implications. Given that the increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular events are due, in part, to the lack of persistent use of antihypertensive medications, the objective of this study was to evaluate 1-year persistence of new-generation beta blockers compared to atenolol in antihypertensive treatment-naïve patients. METHODS: A total of 9978 patients aged 18 years or older with hypertension newly diagnosed in 2012, without hypertension-related complication and initiated treatment with beta blocker monotherapy during 2012 were included in the analysis. Rate and duration of treatment and drug persistence were compared between atenolol and new-generation beta blockers. Hazards of discontinuation in nonatenolol compared to atenolol were evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional model. RESULTS: The rate of treatment persistence was higher in the nonatenolol group (57.35% vs 53.40%, P<.0001), and the time to treatment discontinuation was earlier in the atenolol group with a minimal difference in the average (243.2 vs 254 days, P<.0001). New-generation beta blockers demonstrated a lower risk of treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) compared to atenolol; a notable improvement was observed with carvedilol and nebivolol (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.69-0.80 and HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89, respectively), whereas betaxolol showed a substantially greater hazard for discontinuation compared to atenolol. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a meaningful improvement in treatment persistence with new-generation beta blockers compared to atenolol, with betaxolol as exception.