Chronic subdural cortical stimulation for phantom limb pain: report of a series of two cases.

Phantom limb pain is a complex, incompletely understood pain syndrome that is characterized by chronic painful paresthesias in a previous amputated body part. Limited treatment modalities exist that provide meaningful relief, including pharmacological treatments and spinal cord stimulation that are rarely successful for refractory cases. Here, we describe our two-patient cohort with recalcitrant upper extremity phantom limb pain treated with chronic subdural cortical stimulation. The patient with evidence of cortical reorganization and almost 60 years of debilitating phantom limb pain experienced sustained analgesic relief at a follow-up period of 6 months. The second patient became tolerant to the stimulation and his pain returned to baseline at a 1-month follow-up. Our unique case series report adds to the growing body of literature suggesting critical appraisal before widespread implementation of cortical stimulation for phantom limb pain can be considered.

Optimizing the patient handoff and progress note documentation efficiency in the EPIC EMR system within a neurosurgery residency: A quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Handoffs and documentation are a potentially modifiable source of medical error. However, little attention has been given toenhancementof these within the neurosurgical field. We aim to increase efficiency and accuracy of neurosurgical handoffs, including the neurological exam, thus decreasing medical documentation time within current duty-hour restrictions. METHODS: The existing Epic electronic medical record system was modified to include the neurological exam in the handoff: a tool used to generate lists including relevant patient clinical details and plans. The handoff tool was also converted into a subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) format, which was leveraged to efficiently generate daily progress notes. A four-question survey was developed to assess the effectiveness of this new format. Mean note times were compared before and after the EPIC update using an independent samples t-test. RESULTS: All of the surveyed neurosurgery residents at our institution reported a decrease in documentation time per progress note, felt the notes were more accurate, and found it easier to recall the neurological exams of patients. 8/9 residents felt that the new handoff made in-house call less stressful. There was a significant difference in mean note time, with the mean note time of 37.9 s after the EPIC upgrade compared to 120 s prior the upgrade. We project that over 241 h of documentation will be saved annually at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: This QI project demonstrates how a low-effort initiative improved resident recall of patients' neurological exams while saving time spent documenting daily progress notes.