A systematic scoping review of multidisciplinary cancer team and decision-making in the management of men with advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The early diagnosis of prostate cancer and subsequent access to the treatment options helps to achieve optimal cancer outcomes. As the treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer continues to evolve, patients need to access a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting to receive best-practice care. METHODS: In this paper a MEDLINE review was performed to assess clinical decision making in the context of MDT discussions for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS: From 441 returned articles and abstracts, 50 articles were assessed for eligibility and 16 articles included for analysis. Sixteen articles were identified, 9 of the 16 articles used quantitative methodology including three retrospective analysis of clinical registry data, patient medical records and/or MDT meeting notes and three cross-sectional surveys. Other study designs included one observation study and one study using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies and one mini-review. There were also four editorials included in the review and two consensus statements. CONCLUSION: This paper highlights the important role the inter-disciplinary MDT has on shared decision making for men with advanced prostate cancer. The application of MDT care is a rapidly growing trend in uro-oncology and an efficient MDT service requires further research to assess its efficiency so that it may expand through all aspect of uro-oncology.

Navigating systemic therapy for metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The last decade has seen a remarkable shift in the treatment landscape of advanced prostate cancer, none more so than in the management of metastatic castration-naïve disease. METHODS: This narrative review will examine existing and emerging evidence supporting systemic therapy use for metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer (mCNPC) and provide guidance on the selection of these agents with respect to optimising patient outcomes. RESULTS: The addition of either docetaxel (chemohormonal approach) or an AR pathway inhibitor (abiraterone, enzalutamide or apalutamide) is a reasonable standard of care option for men commencing long-term ADT for mCNPC. While the issue of disease volume as a predictive biomarker for docetaxel benefit has previously been debated, recent data support consideration of upfront docetaxel in all patients, regardless of metastatic burden. Decisions regarding systemic treatment for men with mCNPC should be based on comprehensive consideration of disease, patient and logistical factors. Multiple novel therapeutics for mCNPC are currently under active investigation. CONCLUSION: The introduction of potent systemic therapy earlier in the mCNPC disease course has resulted in dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes for patients. As the management of mCNPC continues to evolve, the future remains promising, with the expectation of ongoing improvements to patient outcomes and quality of life.

Robotic multivisceral pelvic resection: experience from an exenteration unit.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration remains a viable and effective treatment option for the management of locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancy. The aim of this study was to present an early experience of robotic multivisceral resection of pelvic malignancy, and to compare this experience with similar series through a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who had robotic-assisted multi-visceral resection for pelvic malignancy at a single Colorectal Surgical unit based between two tertiary academic hospitals. Primary outcomes observed included operation type, operation time, perioperative complications, and hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included R0 resection status, lymph node harvest, and rate of recurrence at clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Eight cases of robotic multivisceral resection were performed for primary locally advanced pelvic malignancy involving a rectal resection as part of their operative management. The median age of patients undergoing resection was 56 years (range 29-83 years). The male:female ratio was 6:2. The mean total operating time was 8.3 h (range 6-10 h). Perioperative blood transfusion requirements were minimal. Mean hospital length of stay was 15 days (range 7-26 days). No patients experienced any serious postoperative morbidity or mortality. All patients had clear margins on histological assessment and no patients have recurrence at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic multivisceral resection for malignant disease of the pelvis is a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach in highly selected cases.

PSMA PET applications in the prostate cancer journey: from diagnosis to theranostics.

The heterogeneity of prostate cancer has made imaging modalities of crucial importance in this disease. Accurate diagnosis and staging of the volume and extent of disease, especially in advanced and metastatic prostate cancer, can help to tailor the timing and modalities of treatment. While MRI has been effective in the detection of significant prostate cancer, its use in the identification and quantification of extraprostatic disease is limited. This gap is now being filled by PSMA PET. PSMA PET scans have now been shown to have a role in all stages in the prostate cancer journey. Emerging evidence has shown its promise in primary staging, restaging and theranostics. In this paper, we review the evidence for the use of PSMA PET in the various stages of prostate cancer, from initial diagnosis to advanced metastatic disease where other systemic treatments have failed.

Medical therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE): a cost minimisation analysis.

PURPOSE: A cost minimisation analysis compares the costs of different interventions' to ascertain the least expensive over time. We compared different prostate targeted drug treatments with TURP to identify the optimal cost saving duration of a medical therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: The Evolution registry is a prospective, multicentre registry, conducted by the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAUrf) for 24 months in 5 European countries. Evolution was designed to register the management of symptomatic BPE in clinical practice settings in 5 European countries. Direct cost evaluation associated with prostate targeted medical therapies and TURP was also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: In total, 1838 men were enrolled with 1246 evaluable at 24 months. Medical therapies were more cost saving than TURP for treatment durations ranging from 2.9 to 70.4 years. Cost saving depended on both medication class and individual country assessed. Daily tamsulosin monotherapy was more cost saving than TURP for ≤ 13.9 years in Germany compared to ≤ 32.7 years in Italy. Daily finasteride monotherapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years in France compared to ≤ 36.9 years in Spain. Combination therapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years for Italian patients versus ≤ 13.8 years in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: BPE medical management was more cost saving than TURP for different specific treatment durations. Information from this study will allow clinicians to convey medical and surgical costs over time, to both patients and payors alike, when considering BPE treatment.

Prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic obstruction: assessment of safety and efficacy.

PURPOSE: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has seen a recent increase in interest as a treatment for men with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The appeal of this intervention lies in reported reduction in morbidity and its minimally invasive nature. The purpose of this review is to assess the safety and efficacy of PAE as a new treatment in BPO and explore risks surrounding its performance. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed. Medical databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, limited to English, peer-reviewed articles. Search terms included prostatic artery embolization, lower urinary tracts symptoms, minimally invasive therapies, interventional radiology prostate, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers for content on development, methods, outcomes, and complications of PAE. RESULTS: Suitability of patients to undergo PAE depends on review of patient history, pre-procedure visualisation of appropriate vascular anatomy and clinical parameters. Despite this selection of candidates favourable for procedural success, PAE is not without risk of complications, some of which can significantly affect patient quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although initial findings show promise regarding safety and efficacy of PAE in improving symptom and quality-of-life scores, further investigation is required to establish durability of effect and the appropriate use of this experimental modality. There is currently limited robust evidence for the beneficial outcomes of PAE. Long-term follow-up studies will add to the evidence base to help further assess the feasibility of this procedure as an alternative to TURP.

Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile.

PURPOSE: This study aims to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of mini-PCNL and FURS for treating urinary tract calculi in a single session. METHODS: A systematic search using electronic databases was performed for studies comparing mini-PCNL and FURS for the treatment of urinary tract calculi. The primary outcome measurements were stone-free rates (SFRs) and complication rates for both techniques. Secondary outcome measurements were to compare patient demographics, operative duration, and inpatient stay. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.3 software. RESULTS: Sixteen studies on 1598 patients (n = 877 for mini-PCNL and n = 721 for FURS) met inclusion criteria. Demographics including age (p = 0.26), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.51), and gender ratio (p = 0.6), were similar in both groups. Overall, SFR was significantly greater in the mini-PCNL group compared to the FURS group (n = 763/877, 89.3 ± 8.4% versus n = 559/721, 80.1 ± 13.3% [OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.53-2.64; p < 0.01]). Duration of inpatient stay was significantly greater in the mini-PCNL group compared to the FURS group (n = 877, 4 ± 1.6 days versus n = 721, 2.5 ± 2.2 days, respectively [WMD: 1.77; 95% CI 1.16-2.38, p < 0.01]. Overall complication rates were not significantly different between mini-PCNL and FURS (n = 171/877, 19.5 ± 19.1% versus n = 112/721, 15.5 ± 18.9%, respectively [OR 1.43; 95% CI 0.85-2.4, p = 0.18]). CONCLUSIONS: Mini-PCNL is associated with greater SFRs and longer inpatient stay compared to FURS. Complication rates were similar for both techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of both technologies should be familiar to urologists and conveyed to patients prior to urological intervention for nephrolithiasis.

Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Data assessing the effectiveness of single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy (FURS) are limited. This study evaluates and compares single-use FURS with conventional reusable FURS. METHODS: A systematic search using electronic databases (Pubmed and Embase) was performed for studies evaluating single-use FURS in the setting of urinary tract stone disease. Outcome measures included a comparative evaluation of their mechanical, optical and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven studies on 466 patients met inclusion criteria. In vitro comparative data were available on three single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopes (LithoVue™, Polyscope™ and SemiFlex™) and clinical data were available on two (LithoVue™ and Polyscope™). The overall stone-free rate and complication rate associated with single-use FURS was 87 ± 15% and 9.3 ± 9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in procedure duration, stone size, stone clearance and complication rates when single-use FURS and reusable FURS were compared (duration: 73 ± 27 versus 74 ± 13 min, p = 0.99; stone size: 1.36 ± 0.2 versus 1.34 ± 0.18 cm, p = 0.93; stone-free rate: 77.8 ± 18 versus 68.5 ± 33%, p = 0.76; complication rate 15.3 ± 10.6 versus 15 ± 1.6%, p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Single-use FURS demonstrates comparable efficacy with reusable FURS in treating renal calculi. Further studies on clinical efficacy and cost are needed to determine whether single-use FURS will reliably replace its reusable counterpart.

Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Urology.

Autologous gastrointestinal tissue is the gold standard biomaterial for urinary tract reconstruction despite its long-term neuromechanical and metabolic complications. Regenerative biomaterials have been proposed as alternatives; however many are limited by a poor host derived regenerative response and deficient supportive elements for effective tissue regeneration in vivo. Urological biomaterials are sub-classified into xenogenic extracellular matrices (ECMs) or synthetic polymers. ECMs are decellularised, biocompatible, biodegradable biomaterials derived from animal organs. Synthetic polymers vary in chemical composition but may have the benefit of being reliably reproducible from a manufacturing perspective. Urological biomaterials can be 'seeded' with regenerative stem cells in vitro to create composite biomaterials for grafting in vivo. Mesenchymal stem cells are advantageous for regenerative purposes as they self-renew, have long-term viability and possess multilineage differentiation potential. Currently, tissue-engineered biomaterials are developing rapidly in regenerative urology with many important clinical milestones achieved. To truly translate from bench to bedside, regenerative biomaterials need to provide better clinical outcomes than current urological tissue replacement strategies.

Benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy and the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted therapies is currently undefined. In recent years, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a prognostic marker in several cancers, including mRCC. In this multicentre retrospective study, we aim to assess the impact of CN in mRCC and the value of NLR in risk stratification and patient selection. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with de novo mRCC from four large Australian hospitals were collected. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards method. RESULTS: Our study identified 91 de novo mRCC patients. Patients who underwent CN (n = 46, 51%) were more likely to be younger (59.0 years vs 64.6 years, P = 0.019) and to have received systemic therapy (91% vs 76%, P = 0.043). Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly improved in patients who underwent CN (23.0 months vs 10.9 months, hazard ratios (HR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.55, P < 0.0001). Patients with NLR ≥ 5 also had inferior mOS (6.2 months vs 16.7 months, HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.14-3.29, P = 0.014). CN was associated with substantially improved survival in patients with both NLR < 5 (mOS 31.1 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.18-0.64, P = 0.0009) and NLR ≥ 5 (mOS 10.9 months vs 2.3 months, HR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.11-0.69, P = 0.009). Significant survival benefits associated with CN were maintained in multivariate analyses (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.70, P = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: CN is associated with significantly improved overall survival in de novo mRCC. The incremental survival benefit associated with CN was seen irrespective of NLR.

Health information quality on the internet in gynecological oncology: a multilingual evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Oncological internet information quality is considered variable, but no comprehensive analysis of gynecological malig- nancies exists. The present authors' objectives were to compare the quality of common malignancy websites and to assess for language or disease differences; and secondly, to perform a quality comparison between medical and layperson terminology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: World Health Organization (WHO) Health on the Net (HON) principles may be applied to websites using an automated toolbar function. Using a search engine (www.Google.com) 8,400 websites were assessed using keywords 'endometrial, 'uterine', 'cervical', 'ovarian', 'vaginal', 'vulvar', plus 'cancer', in English, French, German, and Spanish; repeated for alternate terms e.g. 'cervix', 'womb'. RESULTS: Searches for "vaginal' 'uterine', 'cervical', and 'endometrial' each returned millions of websites. The total percentage of all assessed HON-accredited sites was notably low across all search terms (median 15%; range 3-19%). Significant differences by malignancy type (p < 0.0001), language (p < 0.0001), and tertiles (thirds) of the first 150 websites returned (p < 0.0001). French language had most accredited websites. Using alternate terms demonstrated significant differences (p < 0.001) in accredited websites for most gynecological cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Internet data on gynecological malignancies is overwhelming. Further, a lack of validation of the majority of gynecological oncologic sites should be appreciated with discrepancies in quality and number of websites across diseases, languages, and also between medical and layperson terms. Physicians should encourage and more importantly their professional bodies should participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health websites on the internet and direct patients to them.

Is fosfomycin a potential treatment alternative for multidrug-resistant gram-negative prostatitis?

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections of the prostate are an increasing problem worldwide, particularly complicating transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. Fluoroquinolone-based regimens, once the mainstay of many protocols, are increasingly ineffective. Fosfomycin has reasonable in vitro and urinary activity (minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint ≤64 µg/mL) against MDR-GNB, but its prostatic penetration has been uncertain, so it has not been widely recommended for the prophylaxis or treatment of MDR-GNB prostatitis. METHODS: In a prospective study of healthy men undergoing a transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia, we assessed serum, urine, and prostatic tissue (transition zone [TZ] and peripheral zone [PZ]) fosfomycin concentrations using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, following a single 3-g oral fosfomycin dose within 17 hours of surgery. RESULTS: Among the 26 participants, mean plasma and urinary fosfomycin levels were 11.4 ± 7.6 µg/mL and 571 ± 418 µg/mL, 565 ± 149 minutes and 581 ± 150 minutes postdose, respectively. Mean overall prostate fosfomycin levels were 6.5 ± 4.9 µg/g (range, 0.7-22.1 µg/g), with therapeutic concentrations detectable up to 17 hours following the dose. The mean prostate to plasma ratio was 0.67 ± 0.57. Mean concentrations within the TZ vs PZ prostate regions varied significantly (TZ, 8.3 ± 6.6 vs PZ, 4.4 ± 4.1 µg/g; P = .001). Only 1 patient had a mean prostatic fosfomycin concentration of <1 µg/g, whereas the majority (70%) had concentrations ≥4 µg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin appears to achieve reasonable intraprostatic concentrations in uninflamed prostate following a single 3-g oral dose, such that it may be a potential option for prophylaxis pre-TRUS prostate biopsy and possibly for the treatment of MDR-GNB prostatitis. Formal clinical studies are now required.

Interval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the temporal relationship between interval to biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised of 2,116 men from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Register, a whole-of-population database of all RPs performed between 1995 and 2000 in Victoria, Australia. Follow-up prostate-specific antigen and death data were obtained via record linkage to pathology laboratories and the Victorian Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages. Poisson regression models with PCSM as the outcome were fit to the data. Models included age at surgery, Gleason score and tumour stage as covariates. RESULTS: Median post-surgery and post-BCR follow-up was 10.3 and 7.5 years, respectively. 695 men (33 %) experienced BCR during follow-up, of which 82 % occurred within 5 years of RP; 66 men died from prostate cancer. Men with combined high Gleason sum (≥4 + 3) and extra-prostatic (≥pT3a) disease had substantially increased mortality rate with early BCR, while those experiencing BCR after a longer interval had significantly lower mortality. Men with combined low Gleason sum (≤3 + 4) and organ-confined disease (≤pT2c) risk disease were not at any substantial risk of death in this time frame regardless of timing of BCR following RP. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates the temporal relationship between BCR and PCSM using a whole-of-population cohort of men treated with RP. Men with low-risk features of prostate cancer at time of RP have low mortality even if they experience early BCR. This subgroup may be counselled regarding their favourable long-term prognosis.

Radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution: surgical tricks and management of complications.

AIM: Bladder cancer is the second most common urological malignancy, with urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell carcinoma) comprising almost 90% of all primary bladder tumours. Over recent decades, radical cystectomy has emerged as the predominant treatment modality for patients with high-grade, invasive urothelial cancers and for those with less-invasive disease who fail treatment with bladder-preservation strategies. Bladder substitution following radical cystectomy has become increasingly common and in many centers has evolved to become the standard method of urinary diversion. The main goal of this paper is to review intraoperative considerations for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with a focus on issues specific to surgical tricks with neobladder construction and postoperative complications. METHODS: Systematic literature review in Pubmed and Embase including bladder cancer, urinary diversion, neobladder, surgical technique and complications as key words. RESULTS: Intraoperative techniques and modifications have made neobladder construction more amenable and the standard in suitable patients. Postoperative complications still occur in a significant number of patients but may be minimised and recognised early for better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Orthotopic bladder substitution does not compromise oncological outcome and importantly can be performed with relatively good results regarding functional and quality of life issues. Modifications to intraoperative technique can assist with neobladder construction to aid better outcomes. Where possible orthotopic bladder substitution should be the diversion of choice. Of paramount importance is the active postoperative management and regular long-term follow-up of patients with an orthotopic bladder substitution.

An exploration of testicular cancer survivors' experience of ejaculatory dysfunction following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection-a sub-study of the PREPARE clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Ejaculatory dysfunction secondary to retrograde ejaculation or anejaculation is a complication of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for survivors of testicular cancer. We explored survivors' experiences of ejaculatory dysfunction following RPLND. METHODS: In a sub-study of a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial (ACTRN12622000537752/12622000542796), participants reporting ejaculatory dysfunction ≥ 6 months following RPLND were invited to complete semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used. Interviews continued until thematic saturation occurred, and codebook thematic analysis of interviews was performed. RESULTS: Of 58 individuals recruited to the trial, 33 (57%) reported ejaculatory dysfunction. Of these, 32 (97%) agreed to interview and 15 participated. Participants interviewed had median age 34 years (range 24-66), 12 (80%) in a long-term relationship with median time from surgery 36 months (range 11-112). Three overarching themes were identified. The first reflected the value of RPLND despite ejaculatory dysfunction. The second illuminated the impact(s) of ejaculatory dysfunction closely mapped to life stage, with flow-on impacts to fertility, sex, psychological wellbeing and communication. The third reflected information needs. Fertility was a substantial source of concern for some participants. Ejaculatory dysfunction had no effect on sex for some, whilst for others, sex was less pleasurable. Some reported benefits. Few reported ejaculatory dysfunction challenged masculinity, confidence, or self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine interventions to reduce distress related to fertility, challenged masculinity and body image. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Whilst most participants considered ejaculatory dysfunction to have little impact on their sexual function and relationships, some reported significant difficulties varying by life stage and relationship status.

Salvage radical prostatectomy following primary high intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of primary prostate cancer is increasing in a subset of men seeking definitive treatment with reduced morbidity. We review outcomes in men undergoing salvage radical prostatectomy after failed whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective data were collected for men presenting with an increasing prostate specific antigen and biopsy proven prostate cancer after high intensity focused ultrasound from 2007 to 2010 who underwent salvage open radical prostatectomy with a 22-month median followup, including prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, pathology results, continence and erectile function. RESULTS: Data for 15 men were available, including median age 64 years (IQR 55-69), Gleason score before high intensity focused ultrasound of 6 (8), Gleason score 7 (7), median cores positive 39% (IQR 17%-63%) and median prostate specific antigen 7 ng/ml (IQR 5-8). Whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound achieved median nadir prostate specific antigen 1.1 ng/ml (IQR 0.5-3.1). Biopsy after high intensity focused ultrasound demonstrated Gleason score 6 (in 3 patients), 7 (9) and 8/9 (3), and 42% (IQR 25%-50%) cores positive and a median time from high intensity focused ultrasound to radical prostatectomy of 22 months (IQR 7-26). Perioperative morbidity was limited to 1 transfusion in a patient with a rectal injury. Pathologically extensive periprostatic fibrosis was found with persistent prostate cancer, as pT3 disease (in 9 of 14), Gleason scores 6 (2), 7 (9) and 8 of 9 (4), with focally positive margins in 3 of 11 (pT3a). Postoperative prostate specific antigen was unrecordable in 14 of 15 patients with further treatment in 2. Postoperative continence (more than 12 months of followup) yielded no pad use in 6 of 10 men with universally poor erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy as salvage is feasible for men in whom high intensity focused ultrasound failed, but with a higher morbidity than for primary surgery. Pathology results are alarming given the number of cases with extraprostatic extension yet early followup data suggest acceptable oncologic control. These results should be factored in when counseling men who wish to undergo primary high intensity focused ultrasound.

Image guidance for focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Focal therapy is an appealing strategy for any tumor and in time may prove to be a valuable treatment option for low-risk, carefully selected prostate cancer (PCa) patients. In an era where active surveillance is now considered a viable option for low-risk PCa patients, it is conceivable that organ-sparing treatments could also become an established option. The aim of focal therapy is to achieve long-term cancer control with minimal morbidity yet without the side effects of radical therapy. Although lacking in evidence, it remains intuitive that if we treat the smallest possible region of the prostate where to ensure cancer control by ablation (laser, cryotherapy or another ablative source), then there is less potential for untoward side effects. Thus, we believe the ultimate goal in focal therapy is to target specifically the cancerous site while ablating it and the smallest zone of normal prostate tissue around it to obtain cancer control. To achieve this goal, one is dependent on high-quality imaging to: locate the cancerous lesion and have it assist in guiding the ablative modality toward the lesion; monitor the ablation in real time; accurately assess the extent and totality of the ablation post-treatment and finally be used to follow-up and monitor the prostate in search of a recurrence of cancer in the treated area or the development ion new zones. This review seeks to discuss such issues focusing on imaging modalities as they relate to focal therapy of PCa.

Assessment of Intrafraction Motion of the Urinary Bladder Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (cineMRI).

AIM: To assess the intrafraction motion of the urinary bladder and delineate the appropriate margin size for radiotherapy planning, for both the full and empty bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-site, single-arm study of 20 patients planned to undergo radical cystectomy for histologically confirmed muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (cineMRI) of the entire pelvis using a 3-Tesla system, prior to cystectomy. Patients first underwent a cineMRI with a full bladder, then voided and underwent a second MRI with an empty bladder. All MRI sequences were acquired over 18 min. We assessed the differences in bladder filling and subsequent bladder wall displacement, between the empty and full bladder, during a time period consistent with radiotherapy treatment delivery. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent cineMRI of the entire pelvis. The maximum mean directional displacements of the bladder walls over the 18 min duration of the scan for the empty bladders were 9.8 mm superiorly, 1.1 mm inferiorly, 2.39 mm anteriorly, 3.73 mm posteriorly, 2.74 mm to the left and 2.48 mm to the right. The maximal mean displacements for the full bladders were 9.2 mm superiorly, 1.1 mm inferiorly, 2.28 mm anteriorly, 1.08 mm posteriorly, 1.85 mm to the left and 1.73 mm to the right. Statistically significant differences were seen in the posterior, left and right displacements but were quantitatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Intrafractional motion secondary to bladder filling showed minimal variation between the full and empty bladder. Similar clinical target volume to planning target volume margins can be applied for the delivery of radiotherapy for a full and empty bladder.

Delivery of intracavernosal therapies using needle-free injection devices.

ED affects a significant proportion of males worldwide. With an ever-aging population the prevalence of ED is predicted to double in the next decade. Oral PDE-5 inhibitors are the first-line treatment for ED and have revolutionised its management. These agents are however ineffective in some men. Intracavernosal injection (ICI) of vasoactive agents is an effective second-line therapy for ED. Despite proven efficacy, needle phobia and anxiety with self-needling limit the use of intracavernosal (IC) therapies. Needle-free injection (NFI) devices allow delivery of parenteral therapies through the skin, without a needle. Although these devices have been available for decades, early studies investigating their use for ICI showed inferiority compared to standard needle-tip syringe delivery. Advances in engineering of these systems have lead to functional improvements of many aspects of fluid delivery. Our research demonstrates that modern NFI devices are better equipped to deliver ICI, and, in the cadaver models examined, achieved successful IC delivery. These findings support the potential feasibility of NFI devices to deliver ICI, and may broaden the utility of these devices to patients who refuse or discontinue IC therapy because of needle phobia or other issues with standard needle-tip syringes.