[Prospective controlled study evaluating teleconsultation and tele-semiology for the management of renal colic]. / Étude prospective contrôlée évaluant la téléconsultation et la télé-sémiologie pour la prise en charge d'une colique néphrétique.

INTRODUCTION: Physical examination appears to be a limiting factor of teleconsultation (TC). We evaluated the feasibility of self-percussion of the lumbar fossae (sPLF) and TC for simple renal colic (SRC) in comparison with a face-to-face consultation (FC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a comparative prospective study in two steps. First: evaluation of the quality of an sPLF on a standardized patient in TC, without and with tutorial. Secondarily: evaluation of a TC and a FC for a SRC with a standardized patient in real conditions. Evaluation using objective clinical scores and qualitative scales by an observer, the standardized patient and the practitioner himself. RESULTS: Forty-two practitioners were included in the study. In the absence of a tutorial, the sPLF was most often "poorly done". The tutorial led to a significant improvement in the quality of sPLF. There was no difference in diagnostic and therapeutic performance among senior physicians between TC and FC. The therapeutic performances of the interns were significantly lower in TC without his being aware of it. The qualitative scores were significantly lower in TC vs FC according to the practitioners, the standardized patient and the observer. CONCLUSION: An sPLF is feasible but its practice should be taught. Unlike interns, senior physicians were able to perform a TC comparable to FC for the management of SRC. TC and telesemiology therefore require dedicated training and an experienced practitioner.

Incidence and risk factors for urolithiasis recurrence after endourological management of kidney stones: A retrospective single-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: Almost half of the patients have had recurrent nephrolithiasis despite undergoing effective treatment. Our objective is to determine the recurrence rate of lithiasis after endourological management of nephrolithiasis and identify the risk factors for these recurrences. METHODS: Data were gathered retrospectively from all patients who were treated for nephrolithiasis by endourological management from May 2014 to January 2017 in our university hospital. The patients were devised into two groups: with and without recurrence. Many variables were also compared between these two groups. RESULTS: During this period 265 patients were treated for upper urinary tract stone. A total of 190 patients were included in the study. The median age and median BMI of the patients were 57.5 years and 25.2kg/m2, respectively. A biochemical analysis of the stones was performed in 117 (61.5%) patients. The most common types of stones were calcium oxalate monohydrate stones (n=44, 23.2%), mixed stones (n=39, 20.5%) including mixed calcium oxalate (n=10; 8.5%), calcium oxalate dihydrate stones (n=13, 6.8%) and uric acid stones (n=11, 5.8%). At the end of a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 13-61 monthes), 49 patients (25.8%) had a recurrent stone. In univariate analysis, the risk factors for recurrence were BMI greater than 25kg/m2 (HR: 2; P<0.05), diabetes (HR: 3.73; P<0.008) and smoking (HR: 3.1; P<0.039). However age (HR: 0.96: P<0.003) and high blood pressure (HR: 0.37; P<0.027) were protective factors. In multivariate analysis, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and age are still risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Stone recurrence is common after the management of urinary stones. In this study 25.8% of patients had recurred stone disease after endourological management with a median follow-up of 32 months. Our study findings showed that diabetes and smoking are risk factors for recurrence, while age and blood hypertension are protective factors that decreased the risk of recurrence.

[Surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction: Guidelines from the Committee for Male Voiding Disorders of the French Urology Association]. / Traitement chirurgical et interventionnel de l'obstruction sous-vésicale liée à une hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : revue systématique de la littérature et recommandations de bonne pratique clinique du Comité des Troubles Mictionnels de l'Homme.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Committee (CTMH) of the French Urology Association was to propose an update of the guidelines for surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: All available data published on PubMed® between 2018 and 2020 were systematically searched and reviewed. All papers assessing surgical and interventional management of adult patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were included for analysis. After studies critical analysis, conclusions with level of evidence and French guidelines were elaborated in order to answer the predefined clinical questions. RESULTS/GUIDELINES: Offer a trans-uretral incision of the prostate to treat patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with a prostate volume<30cm3, without a middle lobe. TUIP increases the chances of preserving ejaculation. Propose mono- or bipolar trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS with a prostate volume between 30 and 80cm3. Vaporization by Greenlight™ or by bipolar energy can be offered as an alternative to TURP. Offer a Greenlight™ laser vaporization to patients at risk of bleeding. Offer endoscopic prostate enucleation to surgically treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS as an alternative to TURP and open prostatectomy (OP). Minimally invasive prostatectomy is an alternative to OP in centers without access to adequate endoscopic procedures. Embolization of the prostatic arteries may be offered in the event of a contraindication or refusal of surgery for prostates with a volume>80cm3. Prostatic uretral lift is an alternative in patients interested in preserving their ejaculatory function and with a prostate volume<70cm3 without a middle lobe. Aquablation and Rezum™ are under evaluation and should be offered in research protocols. CONCLUSION: Major changes in surgical management of BPO have occurred and aim at reducing morbidity and improving quality of life of patients.

[An update on the most recent mini-invasive surgical and interventional techniques in the management of benign prostatic obstruction]. / Mise au point sur les nouvelles techniques chirurgicales et interventionnelles dans la prise en charge de l'obstruction sous-vésicale liée à l'hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: New surgical techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) have emerged in recent years. We sought to give an overview on each of these technologies. MATERIAL: A comprehensive review of the literature between 2013 and 2020 was carried out by a panel of national experts already practicing these interventions. All the data were then discussed among all the co-authors in order to obtain a consensus with regard to the selected articles and their analysis. Finally, an inventory was drawn to provide an overview of these technological advances and their availability in France. RESULTS: The treatment benign prostatic obstruction has diversified greatly over the past 5 years. 5 new technologies have emerged, allowing today a transurethral non-ablative treatment (UROLIFT®, ITIND®), a transurethral ablative treatment (REZUM®), a transurethral ablative treatment with robotic assistance (AQUABEAM®) or an endovascular management by embolization of the prostatic arteries. Only UROLIFT® is considered an established technology in the latest EAU-Guidelines. The other four are under evaluation and recommendations have only been issued for two of them, AQUABEAM® and the embolization of the prostatic arteries. CONCLUSION: These new minimally invasive techniques aim to increase the therapeutic options for the management of BPO in order to offer a management more suited to the wishes of the patient. Some are positioned as an alternative to surgical or medical treatment, others between medical and surgical treatment. These technologies are not all at the same level of development, evaluation and level of proof, but have in common a limited distribution in France, in particular given their cost. Validated studies will allow them to position their subsequent use more precisely.

Treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia using the Rezum® water vapor therapy system: Results at one year.

PURPOSE: To report the results of convective radiofrequency (RF) water vapor thermal therapy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with one-year follow-up evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was conducted in 2 French hospitals, for men with moderate to severe LUTS secondary to BPH, as an alternative to classical surgery treatment. The pre- and postoperative evaluation of urinary symptomatology was based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, measures of peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR). Erectile and ejaculatory functions were evaluated via the IIEF5 and MSHQ-ejd questionnaires. Rates of retreatment and complications were also reported. RESULTS: Sixty-two outpatients including 8 with urinary retention were treated. The median preoperative prostate volume was 47 (27-200) mL. At 6months postoperative, the IPSS had decreased significantly by 13.9 points (68.1%, P<0.001) and, at one year, by 12 points (61.5%, P<0.001). The quality of life (QoL) score at one year had decreased by 3.2 points (P<0.001) and the Qmax had improved by 6mL/s (P<0.001). All patients with urinary retention were weaned from bladder catheterization. No serious side effects (>Clavien II) were observed. No cases of de novo erectile dysfunction and an anejaculation rate of 10.8% was reported. The surgical retreatment rate at one year was 2.1%. CONCLUSION: The short-term results are encouraging, with significant efficacy on urinary symptoms and respect of sexual function. Nevertheless, it will be necessary to pursue the follow-up of this cohort to evaluate the mid-term and long-term evolution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Impact of partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room on the activity of kidney cancer surgery]. / Évaluation de l'utilisation de la salle hybride sur l'activité de chirurgie en cancérologie rénale.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (NP) after embolization of tumor vessels (NPESH) in a hybrid room combines embolization of tumor vessels and enucleation of the tumor under laparoscopy in the same operative time. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the use of NPESH in the management of patients treated with surgery for a localized kidney tumor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the uroCCR database, we included all consecutive patients operated in a university hospital for localized kidney tumor. From 2011 to May 2015, patients were treated by Standard Partial Nephrectomy (NPS) Laparoscopic or Open and from May 2015 to May 2019 by NPESH. We evaluated characteristics of patients, tumors, perioperative data and complications. These data were compared by Student and Khi2 tests. RESULTS: 87 NPS were performed during Period 1 and 137 NPS were performed during period 2. The ASA score of patients undergoing NPESH was higher than NPS (P<0.0001). The tumor complexity and median tumor size were similar in the two groups (P=0.852 and P=0.48). The complication rate for NPS and NPESH was 55.2% and 33.6% (P=0.002). There were less severe complications in the NEPSH group (P=0.012). The median length of stay was 8 and 4 days for the NPS and NPESH groups (P<0.0001). Positive surgical margins were 2 (2.3%) and 6 (4.6%) for the NPS and NPESH group (P=0.713). DISCUSSION: NPESH is an efficient technique compared to NPS. It seems to be an interesting alternative to limit renal ischemia, complication rate and length of stay for the management of localized kidney tumors.

[Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in low-risk prostate cancer. A literature review]. / Photothérapie dynamique dans le cancer de la prostate à faible risque. Revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, about 50% of newly prostate cancers are localized and low-risk according to D'Amico risk classification. Focal therapies whose objective is to treat only the index lesion appear as a new alternative being evaluated in the management of these cancers. Besides the interest in the control of the disease, focal therapies present a very low risk of morbidity. Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) is one of these new emerging therapies. METHOD: An exhaustive review concerning VTP in prostate cancer was carried out. A search by the following keywords "low-risk prostate cancer", "focal treatment", "vascular targeted photodynamic therapy" "TOOKAD" was carried out in Pubmed and Embase. RESULTS: In phase II studies, VTP showed a rate of 80% negative biopsies at 6 months, with good clinical tolerance. The European phase III, randomized prospective study, comparing VTP to active surveillance showed a lower proportion of progression, as well as a more significant duration before progression for VTP. The adverse events are mostly moderate and transient. The quality of life of patients is preserved, with a moderate impact on erectile and urinary functions. CONCLUSION: VTP appear to be a promising new approach in localized low-risk prostate cancer.

Double J stenting evaluation after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: During ureteroscopy for urolithiasis, postoperative ureteral drainage with double J stent is frequently used. It may reduce acute postoperative pain and late ureteral stenosis. Double J stent can have negative impact on life quality. After uncomplicated intervention, double J stent is not mandatory. Objective of our study was to evaluate pain and complications after ureteroscopy with or without stent. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ureteroscopy performed between May 2014 and January 2017. Interventions were compared regarding ureteral drainage with double J stent or not. Our primary outcome was early postoperative pain evaluated with an oral pain scale form 1 to 10 on day one after intervention. Clinical characteristics, per- and postoperative data were collected. We also looked for risks factors of complications. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-six interventions were included, 259 (70.8%) with and 107 (29.2%) without double J stent. Stone burden was higher in stented group (18.3 vs 9.4mm, P<0.0001). Patients without postoperative stents had more ureteral preparation with double J stent (78.5% vs 62.5%, P=0.0032) and had more ambulatory interventions (75.7% vs 52.5%, P<0.0001). Postoperative pain was not different (22% vs 17.75%, P=0.398). Complication rate was similar (29% vs 20.5%, P=0.1181), so was rehospitalization rate (0.8% vs 0.9%, P=1). In multivariate analysis, complications factors were unprepared ureter, experienced surgeons and access sheath. CONCLUSION: Not stenting after ureteroscopy do not increase pain or complications. Stenting should not be used after uncomplicated interventions for centimetric stones. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulation for mechanical cardiac valve operated for benign prostatic obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulation for mechanical cardiac valve operated for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifty-eight patients operated between 1998 and 2014, in seven French departments of Urology were included. Forty-five patients were operated by conventional surgery (transurethral resection of the prostate 38, open simple prostatectomies 7), and 13 patients were operated by Greenlight™ photovaporization of the prostate (PVP). In order to assess bleeding risk, blood transfusion was considered as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Fifteen (26%) patients received blood transfusion in the postoperative period. Mean duration of hospitalization was 8.5 days. Secondary surgery was required in 12 cases (21%), including endoscopic clot removal under general anaesthesia in 10 patients, and suprapubic haemostasis in 3 patients. One patient died 72hours after transurethral resection of the prostate because of a massive pulmonary embolism. Two independent predictors of blood transfusion were identified: conventional surgery use versus PVP, and high preoperative PSA. Blood transfusion rate was significantly lower in the group of patients operated by PVP compared to conventional surgery (0% versus 33%, P=0.010). In addition, the laser surgery was associated with shorter duration of hospitalization (3.4 days versus 9.9 days, P=0.014). However, it was not found any significant difference between patients operated by PVP compared to conventional surgery in terms of secondary bleeding (3/13 vs 8/45, P=0.7), or second surgery (2/13 vs 10/45, P=0.5). CONCLUSION: Bleeding risk of BPO surgery in patients with mechanical cardiac valve is high. The PVP seems to decrease significantly the early haemorrhagic risk compared to classic surgical procedures for patients with mechanical cardiac valve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Perioperative and economic analysis of surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A study of the French committee on LUT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate perioperative cost related to surgical treatments of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO): photoselective vaporization of the prostate (pvp), holmium/thullium laser enucleation (HoLEP/ThuLEP), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 237 patients who consecutively underwent a surgical treatment for BPH between January 2012 and June 2013 at nine institutions in France. An economic simulation model was constructed to estimate the cost of hospitalization related to surgical procedure from the hospital perspective and a cost minimization analysis was performed. RESULTS: TURP, OP, HoLEP/ThuLEP and PVP were performed in 99 (42%), 23 (10%), 64 (27%) and 51 (21%) patients, respectively. For men with prostate size<80mL: mean operative time was shorter with mTURP and PVP than HoLEP/thuLEP (P<0.001); Mean postoperative length of stay were 1.9, 3 vs. 3.4 days, for HoLEP/Thulep, PVP and TURP respectively (P=0.006); Costs of first hospitalization were comparable between HoLEP/ThuLEP and TURP but higher with PVP (P<0.001). For men with prostate size≥80mL: Compared to PVP and HoLEP/ThuLEP, OP was associated with shorter operative time (P<0.001) but longer length of stay (2.4, 4.2 vs. 7.8 days, respectively, P<0.0001); Costs of first hospitalization were significantly higher with OP than HoLEP/ThuLEP or PVP (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PVP and HoLEP/ThuLEP were associated with a shorter LOS than TURP and OP. This benefit suggests these procedures could be more cost effective than OP, but still not cheaper alternatives to TURP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Medicoeconomic aspects of benign prostatic hyperplasia medical treatment]. / Aspects médicoéconomiques des traitements médicamenteux de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate : une revue de la littérature du Comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme de l'Association française d'urologie.

INTRODUCTION: The medicoeconomic issues of drug management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are essential due to the aging population and the increasing number of therapeutic options. It is thus essential to assess the cost-effectiveness in order to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies economically. The objective of this work was to conduct a literature review on the medicoeconomic studies on the drug therapy of BPH. METHOD: After analyzing the literature, 43 articles were found and 9 were selected for their relevance. RESULTS: Based on Markov models, we observed that: combination therapy and combined treatments (alphablockers and inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase [5ARI]) seemed to have the best cost-effectiveness. Then came the alphablockers, less expensive but exposing to a greater risk of progression and to the necessity of surgical treatments. Then came the 5ARI monotherapy and finally simple monitoring. CONCLUSION: The Markov models are imperfect tools, and resources invested in care depend on both the economic model and the value that individuals and society give to efficiency and cost.

[Do postoperative drainage types modify outcomes after retrograde intrarenal surgery?]. / Le type de drainage postopératoire modifie-t-il les résultats de l'urétérorénoscopie souple pour la fragmentation laser des calculs rénaux?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study was to evaluate if the postoperative drainage type modified the outcomes after retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and intracorporeal lithotripsy f-URS for intrarenal stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 162 procedures of f-URS for intrarenal stones between January 2010 and January 2013 at a single institute. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used for comparisons of means and proportions between patients with ureteral stent or double pigtail stents. RESULTS: There were 86 males (52.8%) and 77 females (47.3%) with a mean age of 52.8 ± 17 years. Double pigtail stents and ureteral stents were used in 117 (72.2%) and 45 (27.8%) cases, respectively. Cases with postoperative double pigtail stents had a longer operative time (96.2 ± 35 min vs 81.2 ± 5 min; P = 0.018) and were less often operated by an experienced surgeon (P = 0.001). Length of hospital staying (P = 0.804), postoperative complication (P = 0.148) and stone free status (P = 0.116) were not different between postoperative drainage by double pigtail and ureteral stents. CONCLUSION: Postoperative drainage by double pigtail stent was used more often by surgeons in the beginning of their RIRS experience and was associated with longer operation time. Nevertheless, the postoperative drainage type did not modify the outcomes regarding the postoperative complication rate, the length of hospital staying and the stones free rate.

[Serious and unexpected complications of benign prostatic obstruction surgery: Results of the LUTS Committee survey from urologists of the French Urological Association]. / Complications graves et inattendues de la chirurgie de l'hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : résultats de l'enquête du CTMH auprès des urologues de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: Rare and severe complications of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery are poorly documented in the literature. Our purpose was to make an inventory of severe and unexpected complications of BPH faced by urologists of the French Association of Urology (AFU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A declarative 13-question survey was sent by e-mail 2 months before the 108th French Congress of Urology to the urologist's members of the AFU. Complications were split in complications due to material and complications directly related to the surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 216 (16.2%) urologists surveyed but only 85 forms were usable. Complications related to the material was divided into: excessive temperature of the serum irrigation leading to urethral and bladder burns (n=5), material default leading to interruption of the procedure (n=1) or incomplete hemostasis (n=2) and endoscope rupture (n=1). Peroperative complications related to surgery were divided into surgical complications: haemorrhage (n=7), urethral wounds (n=6), perforation and/or explosion (n=16), rectal wounds (n=11), obstructive renal failure (n=1); and medical complications: TURP syndrome (n=2), cardiovascular (n=5) and septic shock (n=6). CONCLUSION: This is the first French declarative study having allowed the identification of severe and unexpected complications of BPH surgery. The recorded occurred complications were very eclectic and secondary to all types of techniques used.

[Evaluation of the impact of CTMH guidelines on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. / Évaluation de l'impact des recommandations du Comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme sur la prise en charge de l'hypertrophie bénigne de prostate.

INTRODUCTION: The French guidelines on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been published in 2012 by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these guidelines on the BPH management by French urologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire has been distributed by email to 1141 urologists members of the French Association of Urologists in November 2013. RESULTS: We collected 222 responses (response rate: 19%). The guidelines have been read by 73% of the urologists. The guidelines were followed most of the time by 76% of them, 11% followed them systematically and 4.5% did not follow them. The new terminology was used by 28 to 52% according to the items. The symptoms were evaluated by the IPSS score (33%), by interrogatory alone (64%) or by neither of them (3%). Prostate volume was not systematically taken for account in the treatment strategy by 57% of the urologists. Sexual function was assessed systematically by 28% of the urologists, 11% used a questionnaire (IIEF: 92%). PSA was tested respectively by 70 and 51% of the urologists at the initial evaluation and the follow-up. After introduction of a monotherapy, 56% of the urologists evaluated the efficacy at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The French guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association were well known and used by French urologists. Some improvements can be expected for the use of the IPSS score, the evaluation of the sexual function, and the use of the new terminology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Guide dedicated to general practitioner for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia]. / Guide de prise en charge en médecine générale des symptômes du bas appareil urinaire de l'homme liés à une hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a guide dedicated to general practitioner for the diagnosis, the follow-up, and the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD: Guidelines already published for urologists were modified to make them relevant for general practitioners. The role of specialist's referral was defined. The whole content of the document was submitted to the formal consensus process in which urologists and general medicine teachers were involved. RESULTS: Initial assessment has several aims: making sure that LUTS are related to BPH, assessing bother related to LUTS, and checking for a possible complication. Initial assessment should include: medical history, physical examination with digital rectal examination, and urinalysis. Some other explorations such as frequency volume chart, serum PSA or creatinine, and ultrasonography of the urinary tract were found optional, meaning they are necessary only in specific situations. Referring to urologist is justified when LUTS might not be related to BPH (particularly when urgencies are predominant), or when a severe bladder outlet obstruction is suspected (severe symptoms, palpable bladder, post-voiding residual volume>100ml), or when a complication is assessed. Follow-up without treatment is justified for patients with no bothersome symptoms related to not complicated BPH. Several drugs are available for the treatment of bothersome symptoms related to BPH. Alpha-blockers and plants extracts might be offered as monotherapy. Five alpha reductase inhibitors might be offered to patients with LUTS related to a significant prostate hypertrophy (>40 ml) ; they might be given for a minimum duration of one year, alone or in association with alpha-blocker. The association of antimuscarinic and alpha-blocker might be used in patients with persistent storage LUTS in spite of alpha-blocker treatment. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors might be offered to patients with erectile dysfunction associated with LUTS related to BPH. In case of complicated BPH, or when medical treatment is not efficacious or not tolerated, a surgical option should be discussed. CONCLUSION: The male lower urinary tract symptom committee of the French Urological Association and general practitioner present the first guide for the management of LUTS related to BPH dedicated to general practitioner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Management of benign prostate hyperplasia]. / Prise en charge des symptômes du bas appareil urinaires liés à l'hypertrophie bénigne de prostate.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a frequent pathology in men after 50years old. It is responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). These LUTS might have an important impact on quality of life and might induce complications that might require medical or surgical treatments. The aim of this study was to explain the management of LUTS due to BPH.

[Treatment of localized prostate cancer by vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy with WST11]. / Traitement des cancers localisés de la prostate par photothérapie dynamique.

Focal therapies are new options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) with WST11 is one of these options. The aim of this treatment is to destroy a targeted area of the prostate by the associated action of the WST11 drug, light exposure and oxygen. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Fibers are introduced trans-perineally in the prostate by ultrasound guidance. The injection of WST11 is then performed with light illumination of the specific targeted area. Current data report 83% negative biopsies 6 months after treatment with good tolerance of the treatment. However, VTP still needs to be evaluated.

[Clinical impact of the intravesical prostatic protrusion: a review by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Impact en pratique clinique de l'indice de protrusion prostatique intravésicale: une revue de la littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) is a protrusion of the lateral and/or median prostatic lobes into the bladder lumen. IPP can be estimated by suprapubic ultrasound. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed/MEDLINE database using the following keywords: intravesical prostatic protrusion; benign prostatic enlargement; treatment outcome; ultrasonography. RESULTS: There are 3 grades of IPP: grade 1, 2 and 3 respectively if IPP ≤ 5mm, if 5-10mm, and if >10mm. IPP was a better prognosis factor than PSA and prostate volume for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with a sensibility of 80% and a sensitivity of 68% for grade 3. The progression risk of BOO increased with IPP (grade 1: OR=5.1 [95%CI: 1.6-16.2] and grade ≥ 2 OR=10.4 [95%CI: 3.3-33.4]). IPP was a predictive marker of failure of trial off catheter in patients with acute urinary retention with a 6 folds higher risk for grades ≥ 2. IPP was a prognosis factor for tamsulosine efficacy: 78% of patients with grade ≤ 2 had an improvement >35% of the IPSS-score versus 58% for grade >3 (P<0.01). Patients with grade >3 and a PV< 40cc had a poorer response to tamsulosine. After TURP, IPSS was more improved for grade ≥ 1 with an OR=3.43 (95%CI: 1.03-11.44, P=0.045). CONCLUSION: IPP can be a useful marker for the management of LUTS/BPH.

[Initial assessment of male non-neurogenic incontinence: systematic review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Bilan initial d'une incontinence urinaire masculine (non neurologique): revue de la littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on the initial evaluation of male urinary incontinence (MUI). METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using Pubmed/Medline from 1995 to 2013. RESULTS: Definition of MUI and its prevalence is variable according its definition and the population. Tools for its evaluation have been mainly studied in female population or only in patients with UI after radical prostatectomy. Objectives of the initial evaluation are to assess the type of incontinence, to evaluate its severity and the bother associated, and define the choice of treatment. Medical history, clinical assessment, and urine analysis are the first steps of the evaluation. Bladder diary, questionnaires and pad test can be useful to evaluate MUI. Post-void residual volume assessment is necessary if lower urinary tract symptoms are associated. Imaging is not routinely used in MUI. A specialist referral and further investigations such as urethrocystoscopy and urodynamics should be considered in case of invasive treatment, recurrent incontinence and specific situations. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of MUI should be sequential with systematic investigations and optional ones.

[Current state of compensation of on-duty and on-call urologists in France: a study from AFUF]. / État des lieux des rémunérations des gardes et astreintes d'urologie en France: une étude de l'AFUF.

INTRODUCTION: The French Association of Urologists-in-training (AFUF) aimed to assess the current state of remunerations of on-call and on-duty residents, assistants and lecturers in urology in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from February to May 2013 through a questionnaire sent to all members of the AFUF (327 members). Remunerations were given in gross values. RESULTS: Forty-three residents took part in the study, 16 assistants and 16 lecturers, representing 62 % of the whole centers (54 hospitals out of the 92 centers practicing urology in France). Most of responders were on security or operational on-call. Twenty hospitals were practicing multi-organ removal. Median remunerations of residents were about 59.51€ per on-call when moving at hospital for work and about 119.02€ per onsite duty. Assistants and lecturers were paid a flat fee rate for 37.5 % of them (140€ for assistants [with variability from 40 to 195€] and 130€ for lecturers [42.5-180]) or an hourly rate depending on the hours spent at hospital for the others (62.5 %): first, second move or move<3h were paid 100€ for assistants and 65€ for lecturers, 233.5€ and 236€ respectively for the third one or above 3h, 365€ and 473€ respectively above 8h. Multi-organ removals were paid a flat fee rate (60 %) or an hourly rate (40 %) as well. Beyond a threshold of 2-3hours, the hourly rate was more interesting than the flat fee rate. CONCLUSION: There were disparities in remuneration of on-call and on-duty urologists. Greater variability affected on-call flat fee rate remuneration beyond a certain threshold of hours and remuneration of multi-organ removal. These disparities should be considered in order to get a national harmonization.