Factors Associated With Head and Neck Polytrauma Presentation and Admissions at Emergency Departments of Varying Sizes.

Timely diagnosis of acute head and neck polytrauma presenting to emergency departments (EDs) optimizes outcomes. Since ED capacity influences triage and admission, the authors utilized the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database to understand how ED size and trauma characteristics affect head and neck polytrauma presentation and admissions. Demographics and injury characteristics from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database from 2018 to 2021 were analyzed to delineate factors contributing to polytrauma presence and admission through multivariable logistic regressions. The authors' 207,951-patient cohort was primarily females (48.6%), non-Hispanic (62.4%), and white (51.4%) people who averaged 57.2 years old. Nonspecific head injuries were predominant (59.7%), followed by facial trauma (22.6%) with rare substance involvement (alcohol, 6.3%; drugs, 4.1%) presenting to high-volume EDs (48.5%). Of the patients, 20% were admitted, whereas 31.1% sustained polytrauma. Substance use [alcohol, odds ratio (OR) = 4.44; drugs, OR = 2.90] increased polytrauma likelihood; neck (OR = 1.35), face (OR = 1.14), and eye (OR = 1.26) associated with polytrauma more than head injuries. Burns (OR = 1.38) increased polytrauma likelihood more than internal organ injuries. Black patients sustained higher polytrauma when presented to non-small EDs (OR = 1.41-1.90) than white patients showed to small EDs. Admissions were higher for males (OR = 1.51). Relative to small EDs, large EDs demonstrated a higher increase in admissions (OR = 2.42). Neck traumas were more likely admitted than head traumas (OR = 1.71). Fractures (OR = 2.21) and burns (OR = 2.71) demonstrated an increased admission likelihood than internal organ injuries. Polytrauma presence and admissions likelihood are site, injury, and substance dependent. Understanding the impact of factors influencing polytrauma presence or admission will enhance triage to optimize outcomes.

Extra-Alveolar Bone Screws for Conservative Correction of Severe Malocclusion Without Extractions or Orthognathic Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evaluate management of challenging malocclusions conservatively (no extractions or orthognathic surgery). RECENT FINDINGS: Most malocclusions have a predominately environmental etiology. Optimal esthetics and function are restored by aligning the dentition over the apical base of bone at the appropriate vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO). Extra-alveolar (E-A) anchorage is achieved at three intraoral sites: mandibular buccal shelf (MBS), infrazygomatic crest (IZC), and anterior ramus. MBS and IZC bone screws effectively anchor the conservative correction of severe dental and skeletal malocclusions. All bone screw sites are effective for anchoring lever arms to recover impacted teeth. Rather than extracting teeth, E-A anchorage corrects crowding by retracting the posterior segments to increase arch length. Skeletal malocclusion is corrected by aligning teeth over the apical base of bone and restoring the VDO by retracting and posteriorly rotating the dental arches as segments. Challenging dental and skeletal malocclusions can be treated routinely via determinate mechanics anchored with E-A bone screws.

Deep-learning segmentation to select liver parenchyma for categorizing hepatic steatosis on multinational chest CT.

Unenhanced CT scans exhibit high specificity in detecting moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis. Even though many CTs are scanned from health screening and various diagnostic contexts, their potential for hepatic steatosis detection has largely remained unexplored. The accuracy of previous methodologies has been limited by the inclusion of non-parenchymal liver regions. To overcome this limitation, we present a novel deep-learning (DL) based method tailored for the automatic selection of parenchymal portions in CT images. This innovative method automatically delineates circular regions for effectively detecting hepatic steatosis. We use 1,014 multinational CT images to develop a DL model for segmenting liver and selecting the parenchymal regions. The results demonstrate outstanding performance in both tasks. By excluding non-parenchymal portions, our DL-based method surpasses previous limitations, achieving radiologist-level accuracy in liver attenuation measurements and hepatic steatosis detection. To ensure the reproducibility, we have openly shared 1014 annotated CT images and the DL system codes. Our novel research contributes to the refinement the automated detection methodologies of hepatic steatosis on CT images, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of healthcare screening processes.

Failure rates for stainless steel versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: A single-center, randomized double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare failure rates for stainless steel (SS) and titanium alloy (TiA) bone screws (BSs) placed in the infrazygomatic crest (IZC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 386 consecutive patients (76 male, 310 female; mean age 24.3 years, range 10.3-59.4 years) received IZC BSs (SS or TiA) via a double-blind, split-mouth design. BSs penetrated attached gingiva (AG) or moveable mucosa (MM) with 5 mm of soft tissue clearance. All BSs were immediately loaded and reactivated monthly with ≤14 oz (397 g or 389 cN) applied directly to the upper archwire bilaterally for 6 months to retract the maxilla to correct Class II or bimaxillary protrusion. RESULTS: Of the 772 devices, there were 49 (6.3%) failures: 27 SS (7.0%) and 22 TiA (5.7%). The 1.3% difference was not statistically significant ( P = .07). There was no significant relationship between SS or TiA failures relative to (1) right vs left side, (2) unilateral vs bilateral, or (3) age at failure. Significantly ( P < .05) increased failure rates were noted for SS screws in only two subgroups: AG site (7.4%) and right side (7.8%). Unilateral failure occurred in 21 patients (5.4%), and bilateral failures occurred in 14 of the total 772 patients (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of 93.7% indicates that both SS and TiA are clinically acceptable for IZC BSs.