Usability of Patient Education-Oriented Cataract Surgery Websites.

PURPOSE: To assess the web accessibility and readability of patient-oriented educational websites for cataract surgery. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: Websites with information dedicated to educating patients about cataract surgery. METHODS: An incognito search for "cataract surgery" was performed using a popular search engine. The top 100 patient-oriented cataract surgery websites that came up were included and categorized as institutional, private practice, or medical organization according to authorship. Each site was assessed for readability using 4 standardized reading grade-level formulas. Accessibility was assessed through multilingual availability, accessibility menu availability, complementary educational video availability, and conformance and adherence to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. A standard t test and chi-square analysis were performed to assess the significance of differences with regard to readability and accessibility among the 3 authorship categories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the website's average reading grade level, number of accessibility violations, multilingual availability, accessibility menu availability, complementary educational video availability, accessibility conformance level, and violation of the perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust (POUR) principles according to the WCAG 2.0. RESULTS: A total of 32, 55, and 13 sites were affiliated with institutions, private practice, and other medical organizations, respectively. The overall mean reading grade was 11.8 ± 1.6, with higher reading levels observed in private practice websites compared with institutions and medical organizations combined (12.1 vs. 11.4; P = 0.03). Fewer private practice websites had multiple language options compared with institutional and medical organization websites combined (5.5% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.03). More private practice websites had accessibility menus than institutions and medical organizations combined (27.3% vs. 8.9%; P = 0.038). The overall mean number of WCAG 2.0 POUR principle violations was 17.1 ± 23.1 with no significant difference among groups. Eighty-five percent of websites violated the perceivable principle. CONCLUSIONS: Available patient-oriented online information for cataract surgery may not be comprehensible to the general public. Readability and accessibility aspects should be considered when designing these resources. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert for Clinically Significant Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a commercially available dexamethasone intracanalicular insert to treat dry eye. DESIGN: Single-center, double-masked randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically significant aqueous-deficient dry eye (combined ocular surface staining score, ≥ 3 [0-12]; corneal fluorescein staining score, ≥ 2 [0-6]; and Schirmer's wetting, < 10 mm at 5 minutes in both eyes) with symptoms (dryness, eye discomfort, or visual fatigue, ≥ 30 [0-100]) despite treatment with at least 1 prescription drop and deemed candidates for topical steroid therapy. METHODS: Seventy-five adult patients were enrolled. A 1:1 randomization sequence was used to determine which eye of each patient would receive the treatment (dexamethasone 0.4-mg intracanalicular insert with 30-day elution time) or sham (collagen plug). The fellow eye received the opposite treatment. Patients were masked to treatment assignment. Follow-up visits (at weeks 2, 4, and 6) were performed by a masked investigator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dry eye parameters and patient symptoms were used for efficacy, and intraocular pressure (IOP) was used for safety assessment. RESULTS: The severity of dry eye was comparable between the treatment arms (fellow eyes) at baseline. Eyes that received the dexamethasone insert showed significantly less corneal staining at week 4 (mean difference [MD], -0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.91 to -0.19) and conjunctival staining at week 4 (MD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.30) and week 6 (MD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.02). Schirmer's wetting was comparable between the two treatment arms. Although the patients reported less dryness in eyes that received the insert at week 4 (MD, -5.5; 95% CI, -11.4 to 0.4), no statistically significant differences were found in any patient-reported symptoms. At week 4, dexamethasone-treated eyes were more likely to show an IOP increase (by 5-10 mmHg; 9 eyes vs. 1 eye; relative risk, 9.00; 95% CI, 1.14-71.0). All cases of increased IOP were managed with short-term topical ß-blockers and subsided. CONCLUSIONS: The dexamethasone intracanalicular insert may be considered a dropless dual treatment for clinically significant aqueous-deficient dry eye when topical steroid treatment is deemed appropriate. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

United States Regulatory Approval of Topical Treatments for Dry Eye.

PURPOSE: To report the heterogeneity in methodology of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of topical dry eye treatments. DESIGN: Comparative analysis of clinical trials' methods. METHODS: We reviewed the online, publicly available FDA database, application review files, ClinicalTrials.gov registry records, and journal articles for each FDA-approved topical dry eye treatment. For each trial, we extracted information about the study, patient demographics, treatment names and doses, sample size in each arm, and the measurement instrument in a systematic fashion. RESULTS: Fourteen trials were included that assessed 5 topical treatments for dry eye (cyclosporine 0.05%, cyclosporine 0.09%, lifitegrast 5%, and loteprednol 0.25% eye drops and varenicline 0.03-mg nasal spray). Median treatment duration was 12 weeks (range, 2-24 weeks). In all trials, treatments, including varying concentrations of the same treatment, were compared with vehicle. Twelve trials (85.7%) evaluated a primary clinician-measured clinical sign, and 10 trials (71.4%) evaluated a primary patient-reported symptom. Corneal staining was the most frequently evaluated clinical sign primary outcome, reported in half (6 of 12) of the trials, and was graded using 4 different scoring systems. Conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia, and tear production were each measured using 2 different scoring systems. Ocular discomfort, the only patient-reported symptom primary outcome, was measured using 5 different instruments. CONCLUSION: A variety of outcome measures were used in these clinical trials. Clinically meaningful dry eye outcome measures and standardized measurements can optimize the assessment of and comparison of therapeutic benefits.

Enhancing online cataract surgery patient education materials through artificial intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve readability of online cataract surgery patient education materials (PEMs) in English and Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Websites with information dedicated to educating patients about cataract surgery. DESIGN: Comparative cross-sectional study. METHODS: The first 50 patient-oriented websites containing PEMs related to cataract surgery were identified through online search. Website authorship was categorized as an institution, private practice, or medical organization. Websites were assessed qualitatively for information accuracy, the presence of narrative video content, and multilingual availability. Readability of PEMs was assessed using five validated reading formulas. A natural language processing platform was used to simplify PEMs in English and Spanish. Converted PEMs were reassessed for readability and accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 32 institution, 7 private practice, and 11 medical organization sites were included. The overall average original reading grade level was 11.68 ± 1.59. After conversion, overall reading grade level improved to 7.94 ± 0.82 (p < 0.01). The first 10 results had better readability (10.40 ± 1.59) and reading ease (57.51 ± 9.24) compared to the subsequent 40 results (11.99 ± 1.43; p = 0.01; 47.64 ± 8.59; p < 0.01). Converted simplified Spanish text had an average reading ease score of 61.17 ± 5.39 (8-9th grade level). Native Spanish text reading ease improved from 57.41 ± 5.24 to 71.78 ± 5.24 (p < 0.01) following conversion (7th-grade level). CONCLUSION: AI conversion can enhance the readability of online PEMs on cataract surgery, while maintaining accuracy and content integrity, thereby improving accessibility and comprehensibility for a wider audience.