Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Outlook ; 66(6): 528-538, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30104024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that primary care nurse practitioners working in primary care settings may earn less than those working in specialty care settings. However, few studies have examined why such wage difference exists. PURPOSE: This study used human capital theory to determine the degree to which the wage differences between dingsPCNPs working in primary care versus specialty care settings is driven by the differences in PCNPs' characteristics. Feasible generalized least squares regression was used to examine the wage differences for PCNPs working in primary care and specialty care settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional, secondary data analysis was conducted using the restricted file of 2012 National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners. FINDINGS: Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition technique was used to explore the factors contributing to wage differences.The results suggested that hourly wages of PCNPs working in primary care settings were, on average, 7.1% lower than PCNPs working in specialty care settings, holding PCNPs' socio-demographic, human capital, and employment characteristics constant. Approximately 4% of this wage difference was explained by PCNPs' characteristics; but 96% of these differences were due to unexplained factors. DISCUSSION: A large, unexplained wage difference exists between PCNPs working in primary care and specialty care settings.


Subject(s)
Nurse Clinicians/economics , Nurse Practitioners/economics , Primary Care Nursing , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Workplace , Humans , United States
2.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 49(3): 347-355, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28388827

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine the relationships between nurse staffing and patients' experiences, and to determine the mediating effects of patient-reported missed care on the relationship between nurse staffing and patients' experiences. DESIGN: The study included 362 nurses and 208 patients from 23 nursing units of six hospitals in South Korea. METHODS: Nurse staffing was measured by patient-to-nurse ratios and by nurse- and patient-perceived staffing adequacy. Patients' experiences included adverse events, communication with nurses, and overall hospital rating. Patient-reported missed care was measured using the MISSCARE Survey-Patient with three domains: communication, basic care, and timely response. FINDINGS: Lower nurse-perceived staffing adequacy was associated with more patient-reported missed communication. Lower patient-perceived staffing adequacy was associated with more missed care and adverse events, and a lower likelihood of experiencing good communication with nurses and of giving a high overall rating to the hospital. Patient-reported missed care mediated the relationship between nurse staffing and patients' experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse staffing adequacy, particularly as perceived by patients, was significantly associated with patient-reported missed communication and basic care, as well as patients' experiences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Appropriate nurse staffing is required to reduce missed care and to improve patients' experiences.


Subject(s)
Nursing Care/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Quality of Health Care , Republic of Korea
3.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 34: 5-9, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27955957

ABSTRACT

Missed nursing care is an emerging measure of front-line nursing care effectiveness in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Given Magnet® hospitals' reputations for nursing care quality, missed care comparisons with non-Magnet® hospitals may yield insights about how Magnet® designation influences patient outcomes. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the relationship between hospital Magnet® designation and 1) the occurrence of nurse-reported missed care and 2) reasons for missed nursing care between NICU nurses employed in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals. A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care unit nurses was invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 2012; data were analyzed from nurses who provided direct patient care (n=230). Logistic regression was used to model relationships between Magnet® designation and reports of the occurrence of and reasons for missed care while controlling for nurse and shift characteristics. There was no relationship between Magnet® designation and missed care occurrence for 34 of 35 types of care. Nurses in Magnet® hospitals were significantly less likely to report tensions and communication breakdowns with other staff, lack of familiarity with policies/procedures, and lack of back-up support from team members as reasons for missed care. Missed nursing care in NICUs occurs regardless of hospital Magnet® recognition. However, nurses' reasons for missed care systematically differ in Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals and these differences merit further exploration.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Special , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Nursing/standards , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric/standards , Hospitals, Pediatric/trends , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/trends , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care, Neonatal/trends , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neonatal Nursing/trends , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , United States
4.
J Adv Nurs ; 71(3): 632-41, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25354486

ABSTRACT

AIM: We describe an innovative research protocol to test the role of missed nursing care as a mediator of the association between nurse workload and patient outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit. BACKGROUND: Increases in nurses' workloads are associated with adverse patient outcomes in neonatal intensive care settings. Missed nursing care is a frequently hypothesized explanation for the association between workload and outcomes. Few studies to date have tested missed care as a variable that mediates the workload-outcomes relationship. DESIGN: We use a longitudinal, observational study design. METHODS: We will recruit approximately 125 nurses (80% of target population) providing direct patient care in one neonatal intensive care unit. Four, 6-week data collection cycles occur over 1 year. At the end of every shift, nurses report on their workloads and the frequency with which specific patient care activities were missed for each infant cared for during the shift. Infant-specific nurse reports of missed care are linked to shift-level infant outcomes data extracted from the electronic health record. Funding for the study began in July 2012; Research Ethics Committee approval was granted in December 2012. DISCUSSION: Missed care may explain the effects of nurse workload on patient outcomes. This research will generate preliminary evidence regarding the causal relationships among nurses' workloads, missed care and infant outcomes that we will confirm in a future multi-site study.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Neonatal Nursing/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Workload , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient Safety
5.
J Adv Nurs ; 71(4): 813-24, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25430513

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aims of this study are to describe: (1) the frequency of nurse-reported missed care in neonatal intensive care units; and (2) nurses' reports of factors contributing to missed care on their last shift worked. BACKGROUND: Missed nursing care, or necessary care that is not delivered, is increasingly cited as a contributor to adverse patient outcomes. Previous studies highlight the frequency of missed nursing care in adult settings; the occurrence of missed nursing care in neonatal intensive care units is unknown. DESIGN: A descriptive analysis of neonatal nurses' self-reports of missed care using data collected through a cross-sectional web-based survey. METHODS: A random sample of certified neonatal intensive care nurses in seven states was invited to participate in the survey in April 2012. Data were collected from nurses who provide direct patient care in a neonatal intensive care unit (n = 230). Descriptive statistics constituted the primary analytic approach. RESULTS: Nurses reported missing a range of patient care activities on their last shift worked. Nurses most frequently missed rounds, oral care for ventilated infants, educating and involving parents in care and oral feedings. Hand hygiene, safety and physical assessment and medication administration were missed least often. The most common reasons for missed care included frequent interruptions, urgent patient situations and an unexpected rise in patient volume and/or acuity on the unit. CONCLUSION: We find that basic nursing care in the neonatal intensive care unit is missed and that system factors may contribute to missed care in this setting.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Management/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse's Role , Self Report , United States , Young Adult
6.
Nurs Outlook ; 62(1): 22-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24139748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nurses are known to migrate from rural to urban areas, which may cause geographic imbalances in the workforce. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare new graduate nurse retention based on the type of geographic area (capital, metropolitan, and nonmetropolitan) of their first job and their job satisfaction by geographic location. METHODS: The sample included 533 nursing graduates working full-time as registered nurses in hospitals or clinics. Survival analysis was conducted to compare nurse retention in three geographic locations. RESULTS: Survival curves for nurses in capital and nonmetropolitan areas were significantly different. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival probabilities of nurses in the capital were .923, .881, and .872, respectively, whereas those in nonmetropolitan areas were .887, .776, and .672, respectively. Nurses in nonmetropolitan areas were more dissatisfied with pay (odd ratio [OR] = 1.820, p = .009), fringe benefits (OR =1.893, p = .015), employment security (OR =2.640, p = .033), and personal growth (OR =1.626, p = .045) than those in the capital. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses employed in nonmetropolitan areas were more mobile and less satisfied with their jobs than those in the capital.


Subject(s)
Job Satisfaction , Nurses , Cities , Emigration and Immigration , Nurses/psychology , Republic of Korea , Rural Population
7.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 44(1): 63-70, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22233430

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine factors related to turnover of new graduate nurses in their first job. DESIGN: Data were obtained from a 3-year panel survey (2006-2008) of the Graduates Occupational Mobility Survey that followed-up college graduates in South Korea. The sample consisted of 351 new graduates whose first job was as a full-time registered nurse in a hospital. METHODS: Survival analysis was conducted to estimate survival curves and related factors, including individual and family, nursing education, hospital, and job dissatisfaction (overall and 10 specific job aspects). FINDINGS: The estimated probabilities of staying in their first job for 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.823, 0.666, and 0.537, respectively. Nurses reporting overall job dissatisfaction had significantly lower survival probabilities than those who reported themselves to be either neutral or satisfied. Nurses were more likely to leave if they were married or worked in small (vs. large), nonmetropolitan, and nonunionized hospitals. Dissatisfaction with interpersonal relationships, work content, and physical work environment was associated with a significant increase in the hazards of leaving the first job. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital characteristics as well as job satisfaction were significantly associated with new graduates' turnover. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The high turnover of new graduates could be reduced by improving their job satisfaction, especially with interpersonal relationships, work content, and the physical work environment.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Job Satisfaction , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Marital Status , Nursing Administration Research , Nursing Methodology Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Republic of Korea , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
8.
J Nurs Adm ; 42(10 Suppl): S27-36, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22976891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Describing the safety climate in hospitals is an important first step in creating work environments where safety is a priority. Yet, little is known about the patient safety climate on medical-surgical units. PURPOSES: Study purposes were to describe quality and strength of the patient safety climate on medical-surgical units and explore hospital and unit characteristics associated with this climate. METHODOLOGY: Data came from a larger organizational study to investigate hospital and unit characteristics associated with organizational, nurse, and patient outcomes. The sample for this study was 3,689 RNs on 286 medical-surgical units in 146 hospitals. FINDINGS: Nursing workgroup and managerial commitment to safety were the two most strongly positive attributes of the patient safety climate. However, issues surrounding the balance between job duties and safety compliance and nurses' reluctance to reveal errors continue to be problematic. Nurses in Magnet hospitals were more likely to communicate about errors and participate in error-related problem solving. Nurses on smaller units and units with lower work complexity reported greater safety compliance and were more likely to communicate about and reveal errors. Nurses on smaller units also reported greater commitment to patient safety and participation in error-related problem solving. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nursing workgroup commitment to safety is a valuable resource that can be leveraged to promote a sense of personal responsibility for and shared ownership of patient safety. Managers can capitalize on this commitment by promoting a work environment in which control over nursing practice and active participation in unit decisions are encouraged and by developing channels of communication that increase staff nurse involvement in identifying patient safety issues, prioritizing unit-level safety goals, and resolving day-to-day operational problems the have the potential to jeopardize patient safety.

9.
Res Nurs Health ; 35(3): 265-76, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22377771

ABSTRACT

Nursing scholars and healthcare administrators often assume that a more diverse nursing workforce will lead to better patient and nurse outcomes, but this assumption has not been subject to rigorous empirical testing. In a study of nursing units in acute care hospitals, the influence of age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and perceived value diversity on nurse job satisfaction, nurse intent to stay, and patient satisfaction were examined. Support was found for a negative relationship between perceived value diversity and all outcomes and for a negative relationship between education diversity and intent to stay. Additionally, positive relationships were found between race/ethnicity diversity and nurse job satisfaction as well as between age diversity and intent to stay. From a practice perspective, the findings suggest that implementing retention, recruitment, and management practices that foster a strong shared value system among nurses may lead to better workplace outcomes.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Cultural Diversity , Hospitals, Special , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Critical Care/organization & administration , Hospitals, Special/organization & administration , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Longitudinal Studies , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Social Values , Workforce , Workplace
10.
Nurs Res ; 60(2): 107-14, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21317822

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Researchers who examine the relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care frequently rely on the Medicare case mix index to adjust for patient acuity, even though it was developed originally based on medical diagnoses and may not accurately reflect patients' needs for nursing care. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the differences between unadjusted measures of nurse staffing (registered nurses per 1,000 adjusted patient days) and case mix adjusted nurse staffing and nurse staffing adjusted with nursing intensity weights, which were developed to reflect patients' needs for nursing care. METHOD: Secondary data were used from 579 hospitals in 13 states from 2000 to 2006. Included were three measures of nurse staffing and hospital characteristics including ownership, geographic location, teaching status, hospital size, and percent Medicare inpatient days. RESULTS: Measures of nurse staffing differed in important ways. The differences between the measures were related systematically to ownership, geographic location, teaching status, hospital size, and percentage Medicare inpatient days. DISCUSSION: Without an accurate method to incorporate acuity into measurement of nurse staffing, research on the relationship between staffing and quality of care will not reach the full potential to inform practice.


Subject(s)
Nursing Administration Research/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Quality of Health Care , Risk Adjustment/methods , Bias , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Health Facility Size/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Medicare , Ownership/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis , Research Design , United States , Workload/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Adv Nurs ; 67(12): 2637-48, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21645043

ABSTRACT

AIM: To examine variations in nurses' perceptions of their work environments among hospitals and intensive care units, and to compare analytic findings from using subscales and a composite measure of the Revised Nursing Work Index at the hospital and intensive care unit levels. BACKGROUND: A positive relationship has been found between the nurse work environment and outcomes for patients and nurses. Nurses' perceptions of their work environments have been analysed using different analytic approaches. METHODS: A survey was conducted in August-October 2007 that included 817 staff nurses in 39 adult intensive care units of 15 hospitals in South Korea. Seven subscales of the Revised Nursing Work Index were identified from an exploratory factor analysis. The subscales and composite (mean of the seven subscales) for each hospital and intensive care unit were analysed using multilevel regression analyses and classified as good, moderate or poor environments. RESULTS: Considerable variations in the subscales were found among both hospitals and intensive care units. On the composite measure, 2 hospitals were rated as good, 10 moderate and 3 poor; 9 intensive care units were ranked as good, 24 moderate and 6 poor. Even intensive care units within hospitals exhibited variations in the subscales and composite. Most hospitals and intensive care units had mixed (i.e., good, moderate, poor) environments across the seven subscales and thus, subscales were not always congruent with the composite. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity of the subscales and the composite measure, and the differences among intensive care units within hospitals imply that use of different analytic approaches may reveal different findings and perspectives of nurse work environments.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Facility Environment/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Job Satisfaction , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Facility Environment/standards , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Male , Nursing Administration Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Quality of Health Care , Republic of Korea , Statistics as Topic , Workplace/organization & administration , Workplace/psychology , Workplace/standards
12.
Nurs Econ ; 29(6): 308-16, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22360105

ABSTRACT

As the largest importer of internationally educated nurses (IENs), the United States is considered to be the epicenter of global nurse migration. The purposes of this study were to examine the geographic distribution of IEN hiring and determine associations between community and hospital characteristics and IEN hiring. More community characteristics than hospital characteristics were strongly associated with IEN hiring which suggest perceived community needs and receptivity to lENs could be an important consideration in hospital administrators' decisions to hire IENs. These findings suggest that as the U.S. population ages and becomes increasingly diverse, the demand for IENs is likely to grow. Nurse leaders and faculty may face challenges with regard to the ethical recruitment of IENs from low-income countries, incorporation of IENs into U.S. health care organizations, and continued development of a diverse U.S.-educated nursing workforce. This study expands understanding of the demand side of IEN employment in U.S. hospitals by providing the first in-depth examination of the community and hospital factors related to hospitals' IEN hiring.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Community , Internationality , Nurses , Personnel Selection , Geography , United States , Workforce
13.
Med Care ; 48(7): 659-63, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20548254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies of the impact of registered nurse (RN) staffing on hospital quality of care for hospital inpatients often rely on data sources that do not distinguish inpatient from outpatient staffing, thus requiring imputation of staffing level. As a result, estimates of the impact of staffing on quality may be biased. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of changes in RN staffing on changes in quality of care with direct measurement of staffing levels. RESEARCH DESIGN: Longitudinal regression analysis of California general acute care hospitals where inpatient staffing is measured directly. SUBJECTS: Estimation sample reflects outcomes for 11,945,276 adult inpatients at 283 hospitals from 1996 to 2001. MEASURES: Patient outcomes are in-hospital mortality ratio and surgical failure-to-rescue ratio after nurse-sensitive complications with risk adjustment through calculation of the expected number of adverse outcomes using the Medstat disease staging algorithm. Staffing levels were measured as the number of full-time equivalent nurses per 1000 inpatient days. RESULTS: Estimates suggest that changes in RN staffing were associated with reductions in mortality and failure to rescue. At 2.97 RN full-time equivalents per 1000 inpatient days, a 1-unit increase in staffing was associated with a 0.043 decrease in the mortality ratio (P < 0.05), and the estimated effect was smaller at hospitals with higher staffing levels. Estimates for failure to rescue ratio were statistically significant only at higher staffing levels. CONCLUSIONS: Results are compared with those from similar studies, including studies using imputation of inpatient staffing, and are found to be consistent with attenuation bias induced by imputation.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , California , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/nursing , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis
14.
Res Nurs Health ; 33(1): 35-47, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20014218

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the relationship between registered nurse (RN) staffing and six post-surgical complications: pneumonia, septicemia, urinary tract infections, thrombophlebitis, fluid overload, and decubitus ulcers, in a dataset that contained the present on admission (POA) indicator. We analyzed a longitudinal panel of 283 acute care hospitals in California from 1996 to 2001. Using an adaptation of the Quality Health Outcomes Model, we found no statistically significant relationships between RN staffing and the complications. In addition, the signs of the relationships were opposite to those expected. That is, as staffing increased, so did some of the complications. We discuss potential reasons for these anomalous results, including the possibility that increases in RN staffing may result in earlier detection of complications. Other explanations include issues with risk adjustment, the lack of nurse level variables in the model, and issues with the POA indicator itself.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Postoperative Complications/nursing , California , Cross Infection/nursing , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Models, Theoretical , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia/nursing , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/nursing , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Sepsis/nursing , Surgical Wound Infection/nursing , Urinary Tract Infections/nursing
15.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 41(1): 70-8, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19335680

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate if differences in antecedents of severe and nonsevere medication errors exist. DESIGN: A longitudinal study of 6 months of data from 279 nursing units in 146 randomly selected hospitals in the United States (US). METHODS: Antecedents of severe and nonsevere medication errors included work environment factors (work dynamics and RN hours), team factors (communication with physicians and nurses' expertise), person factors (nurses' education and experience), patient factors (age, health status, and previous hospitalization), and medication-related support services. Generalized estimating equations with a negative binomial distribution were used with nursing units as the unit of analysis. FINDINGS: None of the antecedents allowed predicting both types of medication errors. Nurses' expertise had a negative and medication-related support services had a positive association with nonsevere medication errors. Nurses' educational level had a significant nonlinear relationship with severe medication errors only: As the percentage of unit BSN-prepared nurses increased, severe medication errors decreased until the percentage of BSN-prepared nurses reached 54%. In contrast, RN experience had a statistically significant relationship with nonsevere medication errors only and nursing units with more experienced nurses reported more nonsevere medication errors. CONCLUSIONS: Severe and nonsevere medication errors might have different antecedents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Error prevention and management strategies should be targeted to specific types of medication errors for best results.


Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Medication Errors/adverse effects , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
16.
Res Nurs Health ; 32(1): 18-30, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18825733

ABSTRACT

We used autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) modeling to examine the relationship between change in nurse staffing and change in medication errors over 6 months in 284 general medical-surgical nursing units. We also investigated the impact of select hospital and nursing unit characteristics on the baseline level and rate of change in medication errors. We found essentially no support for a nurse staffing-medication error relationship either cross-sectionally or longitudinally. Few hospital or nursing unit characteristics had significant relationships to either the baseline level or rate of change in medication errors. However, ALT modeling is a promising technique that can promote a deeper understanding of the theoretically complex relationships that may underlie the nurse staffing-medication error relationship.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Nursing Administration Research/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Research Design , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Models, Theoretical , Nursing Administration Research/statistics & numerical data , Risk Management , United States
17.
Res Nurs Health ; 32(3): 321-34, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19204940

ABSTRACT

We tested a theoretical model of the relationships of hospital context, nursing unit structure, and patient characteristics to patients' perceptions of the extent to which nurses met their expectations for management of troubling symptoms. In our sample of 2,720 patients randomly selected from 278 nursing units in 143 hospitals, we found that patient age was positively associated with patients' perceptions of symptom management. The proportion of registered nurses as caregivers on the unit was not a significant predictor of symptom management, but better work conditions on the unit (nurses' autonomy, participation in decision-making, and collaboration with other disciplines [relational coordination]) significantly contributed to patients' perceptions of better symptom management.


Subject(s)
Health Facility Environment/organization & administration , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Inpatients/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Decision Making, Organizational , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Nursing , Models, Psychological , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nursing Methodology Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Organizational Culture , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Professional Autonomy , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Workplace/organization & administration , Workplace/psychology
18.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 34(1): 19-28, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19104261

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Describing the safety climate in hospitals is an important first step in creating work environments where safety is a priority. Yet, little is known about the patient safety climate on medical-surgical units. PURPOSES: Study purposes were to describe quality and strength of the patient safety climate on medical-surgical units and explore hospital and unit characteristics associated with this climate. METHODOLOGY: Data came from a larger organizational study to investigate hospital and unit characteristics associated with organizational, nurse, and patient outcomes. The sample for this study was 3,689 RNs on 286 medical-surgical units in 146 hospitals. FINDINGS: Nursing workgroup and managerial commitment to safety were the two most strongly positive attributes of the patient safety climate. However, issues surrounding the balance between job duties and safety compliance and nurses' reluctance to reveal errors continue to be problematic. Nurses in Magnet hospitals were more likely to communicate about errors and participate in error-related problem solving. Nurses on smaller units and units with lower work complexity reported greater safety compliance and were more likely to communicate about and reveal errors. Nurses on smaller units also reported greater commitment to patient safety and participation in error-related problem solving. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nursing workgroup commitment to safety is a valuable resource that can be leveraged to promote a sense of personal responsibility for and shared ownership of patient safety. Managers can capitalize on this commitment by promoting a work environment in which control over nursing practice and active participation in unit decisions are encouraged and by developing channels of communication that increase staff nurse involvement in identifying patient safety issues, prioritizing unit-level safety goals, and resolving day-to-day operational problems the have the potential to jeopardize patient safety.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hospital Administrators/psychology , Hospital Units/standards , Interprofessional Relations , Nursing Service, Hospital/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Patient Care Team/standards , Safety Management/standards , Benchmarking , Catchment Area, Health , Communication , Decision Making, Organizational , Health Care Surveys , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Nursing Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Organizational Culture , Problem Solving , Social Responsibility , United States , Workplace/standards
19.
J Nurs Manag ; 17(8): 994-1001, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19941573

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the present study was to determine whether there are differences in hospital characteristics, nursing unit characteristics, the nurse work environment, job satisfaction and turnover rates in rural and urban nursing units. BACKGROUND: Research in urban hospitals has found an association between the nurse work environment and job satisfaction and turnover rates, but this association has not been examined in rural hospitals. METHOD: Rural and urban nursing units were compared in a national random sample of 97 United States hospitals (194 nursing units) with between 99 and 450 beds. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between hospital and nursing unit characteristics and the nurse work environment in rural and urban nursing units. Both nursing unit characteristics and the work environment were found to have a significant influence on nurse job satisfaction and turnover rates. CONCLUSION: Job satisfaction and turnover rates in rural and urban nursing units are associated with both nursing unit characteristics and the work environment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Both rural and urban hospitals can improve nurse job satisfaction and turnover rates by changing unit characteristics, such as creating better support services and a work environment that supports autonomous nursing practice. Rural hospitals can also improve the work environment by providing nurses with more educational opportunities.


Subject(s)
Health Facility Environment , Hospitals, Rural , Hospitals, Urban , Job Satisfaction , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personnel Turnover , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Personnel Administration, Hospital , Regression Analysis , United States , Workforce
20.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 10(3): 180-6, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20008398

ABSTRACT

Using an innovative statistical approach-data envelopment analysis-the authors examined the technical efficiency of 226 medical, surgical, and medical-surgical nursing units in 118 randomly selected acute care hospitals. The authors used the inputs of registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, and unlicensed hours of care; operating expenses; and number of beds on the unit. Outputs included case mix adjusted discharges, patient satisfaction (as a quality measure), and the rates of medication errors and patient falls (as measures of patient safety). This study found that 60% of units were operating at less than full efficiency. Key areas for improvement included slight reductions in labor hours and large reductions in medication errors and falls. The study findings indicate the importance of improving patient safety as a mechanism to simultaneously improve nursing unit efficiency.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Acute Disease/nursing , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/standards , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Linear Models , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Administration Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Perioperative Nursing/organization & administration , Statistics, Nonparametric , Workload/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL