Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cell ; 139(3): 623-33, 2009 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19879847

ABSTRACT

The C. elegans cell lineage provides a unique opportunity to look at how cell lineage affects patterns of gene expression. We developed an automatic cell lineage analyzer that converts high-resolution images of worms into a data table showing fluorescence expression with single-cell resolution. We generated expression profiles of 93 genes in 363 specific cells from L1 stage larvae and found that cells with identical fates can be formed by different gene regulatory pathways. Molecular signatures identified repeating cell fate modules within the cell lineage and enabled the generation of a molecular differentiation map that reveals points in the cell lineage when developmental fates of daughter cells begin to diverge. These results demonstrate insights that become possible using computational approaches to analyze quantitative expression from many genes in parallel using a digital gene expression atlas.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Cell Lineage , Gene Expression Profiling , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins , Cell Differentiation , Gene Expression Profiling/methods
2.
Genome Res ; 22(7): 1282-94, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22508763

ABSTRACT

How cells adopt different expression patterns is a fundamental question of developmental biology. We quantitatively measured reporter expression of 127 genes, primarily transcription factors, in every cell and with high temporal resolution in C. elegans embryos. Embryonic cells are highly distinct in their gene expression; expression of the 127 genes studied here can distinguish nearly all pairs of cells, even between cells of the same tissue type. We observed recurrent lineage-regulated expression patterns for many genes in diverse contexts. These patterns are regulated in part by the TCF-LEF transcription factor POP-1. Other genes' reporters exhibited patterns correlated with tissue, position, and left-right asymmetry. Sequential patterns both within tissues and series of sublineages suggest regulatory pathways. Expression patterns often differ between embryonic and larval stages for the same genes, emphasizing the importance of profiling expression in different stages. This work greatly expands the number of genes in each of these categories and provides the first large-scale, digitally based, cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics in live animals. The resulting data sets will be a useful resource for future research.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genes, Reporter , Animals , Body Patterning , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Division , Cell Lineage , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Embryonic Development , Gene Expression Profiling , High Mobility Group Proteins/genetics , High Mobility Group Proteins/metabolism , Organ Specificity , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
3.
Dev Biol ; 358(2): 345-55, 2011 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854766

ABSTRACT

end-1 and end-3 are GATA transcription factors important for specifying endoderm cell fate in Caenorhabditis elegans. Deletion of both factors together results in larval arrest, 0% survival and a fate change in the endoderm-specifying E lineage. Individual deletions of either factor, however, result in the development of viable, fertile adults, with 100% of worms developing to adults for end-1(-) and 95% for end-3(-). We sought to quantify the variable phenotypes seen in both deletions using automated cell lineaging. We quantified defects in cell lifetime, cell movement and division axis in end-3(-) embryos, while quantifying perturbations in downstream reporter gene expression in strains with homozygous deletions for either gene, showing that each deletion leads to a unique profile of downstream perturbations in gene expression and cellular phenotypes with a high correlation between early and late defects. Combining observations in both cellular and gene expression defects we found that misaligned divisions at the E2 stage resulted in ectopic expression of the Notch target ref-1 in end-3(-) embryos. Using a maximum likelihood phylogenetic approach we found end-1 and end-3 split to form two distinct clades within the Caenorhabditis lineage with distinct DNA-binding structures. These results indicate that end-1 and end-3 have each evolved into genes with unique functions during endoderm development, that end-3(-) embryos have a delay in the onset of E lineage cell fate and that end-1 has only a partially penetrant ability to activate E lineage fate.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , GATA Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Lineage/physiology , Cell Movement , Conserved Sequence , Endoderm/cytology , Endoderm/growth & development , Endoderm/metabolism , Evolution, Molecular , GATA Transcription Factors/deficiency , GATA Transcription Factors/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Knockout Techniques , Genes, Helminth , Genes, Reporter , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Transcription Factors/deficiency , Transcription Factors/genetics
4.
Nat Methods ; 5(8): 703-9, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18587405

ABSTRACT

We describe a system that permits the automated analysis of reporter gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans with cellular resolution continuously during embryogenesis. We demonstrate its utility by defining the expression patterns of reporters for several embryonically expressed transcription factors. The invariant cell lineage permits the automated alignment of multiple expression profiles, allowing direct comparison of the expression of different genes' reporters. We also used this system to monitor perturbations to normal development involving changes both in cell-division timing and in cell fate. Systematic application of this system could reveal the gene activity of each cell throughout development.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/analysis , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Animals , Automation , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Cell Lineage , Genes, Reporter/genetics , Organ Specificity , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Dev Biol ; 314(1): 93-9, 2008 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18164284

ABSTRACT

Comparative genomic analysis of important signaling pathways in Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans reveals both conserved features and also differences. To build a framework to address the significance of these features we determined the C. briggsae embryonic cell lineage, using the tools StarryNite and AceTree. We traced both cell divisions and cell positions for all cells through all but the last round of cell division and for selected cells through the final round. We found the lineage to be remarkably similar to that of C. elegans. Not only did the founder cells give rise to similar numbers of progeny, the relative cell division timing and positions were largely maintained. These lineage similarities appear to give rise to similar cell fates as judged both by the positions of lineally equivalent cells and by the patterns of cell deaths in both species. However, some reproducible differences were seen, e.g., the P4 cell cycle length is more than 40% longer in C. briggsae than that in C. elegans (p<0.01). The extensive conservation of embryonic development between such divergent species suggests that substantial evolutionary distance between these two species has not altered these early developmental cellular events, although the developmental defects of transpecies hybrids suggest that the details of the underlying molecular pathways have diverged sufficiently so as to not be interchangeable.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis/embryology , Cell Lineage/physiology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Caenorhabditis/cytology , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Cell Death/physiology , Cell Movement/physiology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , Phylogeny , Signal Transduction , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL