ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess a correlation between MRI labyrinthine changes detected with IV-gadolinium optimized high-resolution 3D-FLAIR sequences 4 h after injection (OPT4-3DFLAIR) and the type of SSNHL, in terms of frequency alteration and severity. METHODS: This was a prospective monocentric study achieved from July 2019 to December 2020. The inclusion criterion was acute hearing loss of at least 30 dB over three contiguous frequencies occurring within a 72-h period, documented by a pure-tone audiometry (PTA). The primary endpoint was the visual assessment of hyperintensity in labyrinthine structures on OPT4-3DFLAIR performed on 3T MRI. RESULTS: Thirty-six affected ears were included (20 men, 15 women; mean age: 54.5 ± 16.3 years) with 69.4% full-spectrum hearing loss. The median hearing loss, expressed as median and interquartile range [IQR] was 91 dB [74-120], with 47.2% of concomitant acute vestibular syndrome. Pathological signal was found in 26 out of 36 ears (72.2%). Basal turn enhancement was found in all abnormal MRIs, with 73.1% of apical turn enhancement and 50% of vestibular enhancement. Seventeen on 19 cases (89.5%) with apical involvement on MRI had low-frequency hearing loss. Vestibular involvement on MRI was significantly associated with a wider frequency range of hearing loss (p = 0.0002) and the severity of SSNHL (84.5 [71.7-92.5] dB versus 120 [85.8-120] dB, p = 0.0158). CONCLUSION: This report shows that in pathological MRI in SSNHL, a pathologic cochlear base signal is always detected, a cochlear apical turn enhancement matches with low-tone impairment, and a pathological signal within the posterior labyrinth is associated with an impairment of all frequencies and the severity of SSNHL.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Vestibule, Labyrinth , Adult , Aged , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Vestibule, Labyrinth/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hypocalcemia is the most common complication of thyroidectomy, requiring supplementation as well as prolonged hospitalization. Our study's objective was to determine a corrected calcium (CCa) level on day 1 after thyroidectomy predictive of no calcium and vitamin supplementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective study conducted between January 2012 and July 2015 in 396 patients, consisting of 331 cases of total thyroidectomy, with seven completion surgeries. The data collected were age, sex, type of thyroid surgery, etiology, anatomical pathological analysis, and the need for calcium and vitamin supplementation therapy as well as its duration. CCa levels were analyzed 20 and 30 h after surgery then on days 2 and 3. To determine a cut-off value for CCa, a ROC curve analysis was performed. The population was described in terms of numbers and associated percentages for categorical variables, and mean. RESULTS: Mean CCa on 20 h after surgery was 2.09 mmol/L (p < 0.001) and 30 h was 2.06 mmol/L p = 0.02. CCa of less than 2.13 mmol/L was predictive of calcium and vitamin supplementation with 56% sensitivity and 97% specificity. On the evening of day 1, the cut-off value for CCa was 2.06 mmol/L with 67% sensitivity and 65% specificity. CONCLUSION: This prospective study confirms that CCa on the first morning after surgery is reliable when it is more than 2.13 mmol/L. In total, analyzing CCa on day 1 after total thyroidectomy allows the discharge of 70% of patients on the first day after surgery, with no risk of hypocalcemia.
Subject(s)
Calcium/blood , Hypocalcemia/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Thyroid Diseases/blood , Thyroid Diseases/surgery , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypocalcemia/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Evaluation of endoscopic ethmoidectomy performed as a day-case in terms of security, quality, and satisfaction of the patient. This prospective observatory bi-centric study over 1 year included 74 patients undergoing an ethmoidectomy respecting the eligibility criteria of ambulatory care. We recorded patients' demographic data, operative details, satisfaction, postoperative course, and follow-up results. Nasal symptoms were evaluated by SNOT-22 on preoperative appointment and postoperatively at D30. No non-absorbable nasal packing was used, eventually in the case of preoperative-bleeding absorbable gelatine packing. The postoperative follow-up took place at D1 by phone call and at D10 and D30 to assess complications, Visual Analogue Scale, and state of ethmoidal corridors by endoscopic exam. Patients benefited of bilateral ethmoidectomy in 82.4 % cases associated with septoplasty in 42 %. The majority (95 %) was discharged on the same day. Only one patient had bleeding at D0 and was kept in standard hospitalization, such as three other patients for medical or organizational reasons not related to surgery. At D1, 23 % described postoperative light bleeding but needed no revisit and pain was estimated at 1.3 (VAS). No readmission was observed, and no major complication was noted. SNOT-22 decreased successfully by 56 %, statistically related to postoperative treatment of corticosteroids and in the case of Samter triad. 97 % of patients were satisfied of the ambulatory care. These results suggest that within an experienced and dedicated day-case medical and paramedical team, ethmoidectomy can be safely performed on a day-case basis with high quality of taking care and satisfaction of patients.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Epistaxis , Ethmoid Sinus/surgery , Hemostasis, Surgical , Nasal Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Epistaxis/diagnosis , Epistaxis/etiology , Epistaxis/prevention & control , Female , France , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Hemostasis, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Nasal Surgical Procedures/methods , Nasal Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Preference , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Rhinoplasty , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The aim of our study was to identify clinical criteria for optimizing rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness using the Baha device. We made a retrospective study of 102 patients with unilateral deafness requesting auditory rehabilitation over a period of 5 years. All subjects underwent a series of stereo audiometric tests, with and without Baha worn on a headband, and were then referred to a hearing care specialist for a real life trial of 15 days. The Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) questionnaire was administered. Patients refusing the implantation were retrospectively submitted to a questionnaire specifically designed to ask the reasons for refusal. We measured stereo audiometric test results, age, aetiology of deafness, duration of auditory deprivation on the rehabilitated ear, and GHSI score. At the conclusion of testing, the implantation rate was 29%. During preoperative testing, the improvement in understanding of speech-in-noise was 22 ± 11% for patients agreeing to the implantation versus 13 ± 11% for patients refusing the implantation. Age, aetiology of deafness and duration of auditory deprivation had no influence on the implantation decision. Speech-in-noise testing and aided stereo audiometric gain were the only two measures showing statistically significant differences between the groups agreeing to and refusing the implantation. There were multiple reasons for refusal of the implantation. Among these, the four principal reasons were: absence of perceived benefit during stereo audiometric testing (59%), requirement for surgery (35%), cost of the solution (44%), and aesthetics (41%). Hence, no other criteria except the preoperative improvement in understanding of speech-in-noise and the aided gain from Baha worn on a headband were found to be predictive of the patient's acceptance of surgical implantation of a bone-anchored implant/abutment for Baha. Speech-in-noise testing with and without Baha worn on a headband has a role to play in deciding on the implantation of a bone-anchored hearing solution.
Subject(s)
Bone Conduction/physiology , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Sound Localization/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry , Child , Female , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This document presents the fundamentals of speech audiometry in noise, general requirements for implementation and criteria for choice among the tests available in French according to the health-professional's needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The recommendations are based on a systematic analysis of the literature carried out by a multidisciplinary group of doctors, audiologists and audioprosthetists from all over France. They are graded A, B, C or expert opinion according to decreasing level of scientific evidence. RESULTS: Eight tests of speech audiometry in noise can be used in France. CONCLUSION: To be complete, evaluation of hearing status requires testing understanding of speech in noise. The examination must begin with a minimum of two measurements familiarizing the subject with the test procedure. For initial diagnosis, adaptive procedures establishing the 50% speech reception threshold (SRT50) in noise are to be preferred in order to obtain a rapid and standardized measurement of perception of speech in noise. When the aim is to measure real-life speech comprehension, tests based on sentences, cocktail-party noise and free-field stimulation are to be preferred. Prosthetic gain is evaluated exclusively in free field. This is the only way to evaluate the contribution of binaurality and to measure perception in noise in an environment as close as possible to real life. In order to avoid acoustic interference in free field, at least five loudspeakers should be used, in particular for evaluating the effectiveness of directional microphones, CROS devices enabling sounds picked up in the damaged ear to be rerouted to the functional ear, or bimodal fitting (i.e., when hearing is enabled by two modalities: for example, hearing aid for one ear, cochlear implant for the other).
Subject(s)
Audiology , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Aids , Otolaryngology , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , SpeechABSTRACT
Humanitarian action, in the broad sense, including global outreach missions by ENT physicians, has been effective for many years. These volunteer missions have not had any specific regulatory framework, be it medical, social or above all ethical. The testimony of ENT physicians in certain "recipient" countries, in particular during the 2017 Paris Congress of the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies (IFOS), revealed the importance of adequate coordination between "provider" and "recipient" teams. Several ethical reports have been made, but few specifically focused on ENT outreach. The present review is based on feedback from several missions given to the French Society of OtoRhinoLaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) and IFOS, and on a review of the literature. A specific charter of global outreach and humanitarian missions in ENT has been drawn up. This review is essential for optimizing the sharing of knowledge and training in otorhinolaryngology across the world while respecting mandatory sociocultural and ethical rules.
Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Humans , ParisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Access to diagnosis and treatments for auditory disorders and related pathologies has regressed in France during the COVID-19 pandemic, posing a risk to the patient's chance of recovery. This best practice recommendations guide aims to list the existing technological solutions for the remote examination of a patient with hearing complaint, and to outline their benefits and, where applicable, their limitations. METHODS: The recommendations were developed both from the clinical experience of the medical experts who drafted the guide, and from an extensive review of the literature dealing with clinical practice recommendations for tele-audiology. Tele-audiometry solutions were identified on the basis of a search engine query carried out in April 2020, prior to verification of their availability on the European market. RESULTS: Video otoscopy solutions allow for the teletransmission of images compatible with a high-quality diagnosis, either by connecting via internet to a tele-health platform or using a smartphone or a tablet with an iOS or Android operating system. Using the same telecommunication methods, it is possible to remotely conduct a pure-tone audiometry test in accordance with standard practice, a speech-in-quiet or a speech-in-noise audiometry test, as well as objective measures of hearing. Clinical and paraclinical examinations can be accessed by the physician to be interpreted on a deferred basis (asynchronous tele-audiology). Examinations can also be conducted in real time in a patient, at any age of life, as long as a caregiver can be present during the installation of the transducers or the acoumetry. Tele-audiology solutions also find application in the remote training of future healthcare professionals involved in the management of deafness and hearing impairment. CONCLUSION: Under French law, tele-otoscopy is a medical procedure that is either a tele-expertise (asynchronous adive) or a teleconsultation act (synchronous advice). Subjective and objective evaluation of the patient's hearing functions can be done remotely provided that the listed precautions are respected.
Subject(s)
Audiology/methods , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Telemedicine , Audiometry/methods , Decision Trees , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , France , Hearing Tests , Humans , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Otoscopy , Smartphone , Video RecordingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical pitfalls can be anticipated through a preoperative CT-Scan in case of middle ear implantation with a semi-implantable middle ear ossicular stimulator from Otologics (SIMOS). A second outcome measure was to assess the auditory gain obtained in the series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 19 consecutive surgical procedure for a SIMOS implantations was achieved. Preoperative Ct-Scans were analyzed and several measurements of the mastoid were taken out from axial transverse views, ie. the distance between the incus and the cortical mastoid bone [d(i-c)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the incus [d(i-ss)], the distance between the sigmoid sinus and the cortical bone of the mastoid [d(c'-ss)]. On coronal images, the dura of the middle fossa was described as procident if it was lower than the head of malleus and/or body incus. Auditory gain was calculated on pure tone and speech audiometry with bisyllabic words. RESULTS: All cases were successfully implanted. d(i-c) was on average at 33.1 +/- 2.6 mm in cases easy to implant. One case of contracted mastoid was difficult and led to the impaction of the sigmoid sinus. In this case the distance d(i-c) was shorter at 25 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (27.9 mm). Also d(ss-c') was lower at 7 mm than the average minus 2 standard deviations of the others (7.6 mm). Two other cases led to difficult surgical procedures because of a low middle fossa dura. This too low middle fossa dura could be identified on preoperative coronal CT-scans in these two cases. Audiometric gains were remarkable, with an average of 39 +/- 16 dB. In case of severe sensorineural hearing loss the average gain was higher at 46 +/- 9 dB. Two revision-procedures were required, one for a device failure, the second because of skin alteration due to systemic inflammatory disease requiring corticosteroids. Mean follow-up was 50 +/- 22 months. CONCLUSION: The SIMOS is a powerful middle ear implant that can undoubtedly give a huge audiometric gain. The implantation procedure requires a precise microsurgical operation that can be hampered by anatomical conditions of the petrous bone. A thorough examination of preoperative CT-scan is highly recommended in order to obtain measurements of the mastoid in axial views, and the analysis of the position of the middle fossa dura in coronal views.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Transducers , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Audiometry, Speech , Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Ear, Middle , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incus , Male , Malleus , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Half of the patients presenting with head and neck tumor are malnourished at the outset of treatment. Muscle mass loss (sarcopenia) seems to be critical. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of nutritional status and sarcopenia on postoperative complications in head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study for the period November 2014 to May 2016 included 92 patients operated on for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Complications at 30 days were graded on the 5-level Clavien-Dindo classification. Nutritional status was assessed anthropometrically (weight), biologically (albuminemia and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI)), on CT (muscle mass index at 3rd lumbar vertebra) and functionally (Short Physical Performance Battery). Assessment was made at the outset of management, and nutritional treatment was initiated as appropriate. Potential risk factors for postoperative complications were assessed: performance status, prior radiation therapy, smoking and alcohol abuse. RESULTS: 54% of patients were malnourished on the NRI. 41% had grade≥2 complications. The most frequent complications were infection and healing disorder. The risk of complications was higher in case of malnutrition (62% vs. 17%; P<0.001) and sarcopenia (56% vs. 22%; P<0.01), with 50% longer hospital stay (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Malnutrition and sarcopenia are independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Sarcopenia , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Nutritional Status , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sarcopenia/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. RESULTS: The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Communication , Female , France , Health Surveys , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.
Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Patient Selection , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Off-Label Use/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Young AdultABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , France , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Replantation/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative complications related to cochlear implantations. We searched for risk factors predicting these complications and analyzed the complications in the youngest and most elderly. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent cochlear implantation in France between January 2012 and December 2016 were anonymized and registered in the EPIIC database. This population included 3483 adults and 2245 children. Their demographic and surgical data and their incidence of peri- or post-operative complications, including their severity, whether major or minor, were all indicated. RESULTS: The global complication rate was 6.84%. The risk of complication was higher in initial implantation versus reimplantation (P<0.0001). The risk was also higher for bilateral implantation versus unilateral (P<0.0001). Complications were more frequent for patients with cochlear malformation (P=0.002). There was no difference in complication rates across age groups; babies under 1 year old, and the elderly over 80 and even over 90, did not have more complications than the rest of the population. Patients treated in the daily care unit had no more complications than those who were hospitalized for one night or more (P=0.64). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a safe technique with a low incidence of complications. The absence of increased risk in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum justifies offering this solution to all, without age limitation.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlea/abnormalities , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Day Care, Medical/statistics & numerical data , France/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Middle Aged , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
This study concerns the results of cochlear implantation in children and adults from French cochlear implantation centers, monitored at one, two and three years by the Cochlear Implant French Registry EPIIC. This multicenter study enrolled 2603 subjects (1667 adults and 936 children) implanted in one ear. The following parameters were studied: hearing overall performances, monosyllabic or dissyllabic word perception, speech intelligibility, self-assessment questionnaire of Cochlear Implant (CI) benefits (Abbreviated profile of Hearing aid Benefit); professional activity and schooling. This study confirms the ceiling effect in adults' performances after the 1st year and the progressive growth in children's performances. It also shows that the contralateral hearing aid enhances performances compared to the CI alone condition, in all follow-up sessions. The French register of CIs is the only worldwide register of systematic follow-up on a period of three years and more of all adults and children implanted in a country.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Auditory Perception , Child , Child, Preschool , Education , Employment , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Self-Assessment , Speech Intelligibility , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the incidence and results of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults and children in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of data in the French national registry of cochlear implantations from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2016. Functional results from CAP (Category of Auditory Performance) questionnaires and speech audiometry tests, with mono- and di-syllabic word-lists, were compared before and after implantation. Speech audiometry tests were carried out against a noisy background, except before simultaneous implantations. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty two bilateral cochlear implantations were performed during this period, that is, 16.4% of all cochlear implantations. Five hundred and eighty eight bilateral implantations were performed sequentially. 59% of the bilateral implantations were performed in children. Bilateral implants significantly improved CAP scores in all cases (P<0.001). Auditory performance, with the two types of word-list, were significantly improved after simultaneous implantation (P<0.01). After sequential implantation, the speech discrimination score, already very good with the first implant, reached 63±26% [0-100] with monosyllabic word lists, and 72±28% [0-100] with dissyllabic words. There were more complications due to surgery in bilateral cases than in the entire population of cochlear recipients (9.1% vs 6.4%, P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Hearing is significantly improved by simultaneous cochlear implantation. For sequential implantation, at one year, when auditory results were already excellent from the first implant, in the bimodal condition CAP scores were significantly improved, although there was no further change in speech audiometry in noise.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Audiometry, Speech/methods , Auditory Perception , Child , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/etiology , Female , France , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Speech Discrimination Tests/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Cochlear and brainstem implants have been included on the list of reimbursable products (LPPR) in France since March of 2009. The implants were initially inscribed for 5 years, after which an application for renewal with the French National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies (Commission Nationale d'évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologies de santé - CNEDiMTS) was required [Haute Autorité de santé, 2009]. Upon registration to the list of reimbursable products, the companies and the reference centers for cochlear and brainstem implants were asked to set up a post-registration registry called EPIIC. This article reports the evolution in the EPIIC registry of the general indicators for 5051 patients over the five years from 2012-2016.
Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Brain Stem Implants/economics , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/economics , Computer Security , Databases as Topic , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , France , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Care Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.
Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Child Language , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Communication , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/etiology , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Education of Hearing Disabled/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mainstreaming, Education/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Schools , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a necrotizing vasculitis of small and medium-sized vessels comprising inflammation of the vessel wall and perivascular and extravascular granulomas, frequently presenting in the form of chronic sinusitis. OBSERVATION: We report the case of a 27-year-old man who presented with very painful acute frontal sinusitis that was managed medically and surgically. The symptoms rapidly recurred despite treatment and CT scan demonstrated diffuse thickening of the sinus mucosa. Anti-proteinase 3 ANCA were positive. Biopsy of a pulmonary nodule confirmed the diagnosis of GPA. The patient was treated with corticosteroids in combination with rituximab, resulting in improvement of the clinical, laboratory and CT signs. DISCUSSION: In the presence of persistent, acute, localized sinusitis despite appropriate treatment, associated systemic signs and/or the presence of other signs suggestive of GPA, the ENT surgeon must request a targeted work-up. In the absence of treatment, GPA can be fatal within a few months. However, with currently available treatment, remission is obtained in 80% of cases with a 75% 10-year survival rate.
Subject(s)
Frontal Sinusitis/diagnosis , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/diagnosis , Pain/etiology , Adult , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Frontal Sinusitis/surgery , Humans , Male , Myeloblastin/immunology , Recurrence , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To report the known data on the functional consequences of cochlear ischemia and the tools available to detect them. METHODS: Review of the main integrated in vivo models described in mammals. RESULTS: The main integrated models of cochlear ischemia use laser doppler velocimetry to measure the degree of ischemia. Cochlear function can be effectively monitored during cochlear ischemia through the cochlear potentials and otoacoustic emissions, each of these signals giving specific information. The cochlea appears to be particularly resistant to several minutes of reversible ischemia. Indirect monitoring of cochlear ischemia can be achieved through distortion-product otoacoustic emissions during surgical procedures to the cerebellopontine angle. It is still impossible to directly and noninvasively detect cochlear ischemia in nonsurgical clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated models of cochlear ischemia have contributed greatly to our knowledge of the functional behavior of the cochlea in this specific situation. Clinical practice now needs to be able to detect cochlear ischemia early and noninvasively, for example in cases of sudden hearing loss.
Subject(s)
Cochlea/blood supply , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/physiopathology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Animals , Cochlea/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Electrophysiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Gerbillinae , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Humans , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry , Rabbits , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical, histological, epidemiological and occupational data related to exposure to wood dust in a series of 100 nasal sinus malignant tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study of cases diagnosed between 1st January 1981 and 31 December 2000, in the Auvergne region of France. Individual, medical, and occupational data were collected from a questionnaire completed by the patient (or the patient's family in case of death) and from the medical documents available. RESULTS: Forty-six cases (46 men), with an average age of 63+/-9.2 years [range, 43-82], had been exposed to occupational wood dust before the diagnosis. Fifty-four cases (30 men, 24 women), with an average age of 64.3+/-8.7 years [range, 40-96], had never been exposed. The average annual incidence increased, either for the total population or for the two subgroups distinguished on the basis of occupational exposure to wood dust. The majority of the patients presented different functional symptoms at the time of the diagnosis. For the 46 patients exposed to wood dust, the tumors were primarily ethmoid adenocarcinomas (92%). For the 54 non-exposed patients, the tumors observed were mainly epidermoid carcinomas (57%), then adenocarcinomas (15%). On the 46 patients exposed to wood dust, 85% were carpenters or cabinetmakers. For the majority of the patients, wood dust exposure started before the age of 20 (average age: 17+/-4.5) and the longest exposure began before 1981. The exposure time to wood dust before diagnosis was in the majority of cases greater than 20 years (mean exposure time: 37 years+/-11.4). Only 15% were exposed at the time of the diagnosis (mean time between the end of the exposure to the diagnosis was 11 years+/-2.8). Of the 54 non-exposed patients, no professional risk factor was evidenced. CONCLUSION: Epidemiologic data, such as the increasing incidence, and clinical and professional data, such as the occupational exposure to wood dust, were in agreement with the French and European literature. It is still probably too early to appreciate the effectiveness of prevention, established in France since 1980, on nasal sinus tumor incidence.