Reversing the effects of antiplatelet agents in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage: a look at the literature.

Patients are increasingly being prescribed antiplatelet agents (APAs) for a growing number of medical and surgical conditions. These agents are associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In the setting of warfarin use and ICH, strategies to reverse the drug effects have improved outcomes. No such strategy exists for APAs, and these patients continue to have poor posthemorrhage outcomes. One strategy is the use of platelet transfusions to provide functional, circulating platelets. Studies have shown mixed results regarding the benefit of this practice. Other strategies include the use of desmopressin and recombinant factor VIIa. More studies are necessary to delineate the effectiveness of the various strategies.

Infusion technique of hematopoietic progenitor cells and related adverse events (CME).

BACKGROUND: The use of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplant has risen over the past two decades. A variety of adverse events (AEs) of varying severity have been noted during HPC infusions. These AEs have been associated with several factors such as the amount of dimethyl sulfoxide and white blood cells in the HPC product. We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis to determine the effect of two different HPC infusion techniques, manual push with syringes versus infusion from bags with the aid of gravity, on the occurrence of infusion-related AEs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Infusions between December 2008 and November 2010 involving peripheral blood HPCs were reviewed. Pertinent clinical and HPC product-related information was recorded. Data were analyzed to determine the incidence of infusion-related AEs and its association with patient and product-related variables. RESULTS: We found 461 AEs in 645 patients during the study period. A total of 325 (50%) experienced at least one AE. Flushing was the most common type of AE followed by nausea and hypertension. The use of syringe infusion was more commonly associated with AEs (odds ratio, 1.82 [95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.50]; p=0.002). Other independent risk factors were cryopreserved products and the amount of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the product. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the effect of two different infusion techniques on infusion-related AEs. Our findings suggest that the use of bags for infusion protected the patients from AEs.

Risks and adverse outcomes associated with emergency-release red blood cell transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Group O red blood cell (RBC) units are used for emergency transfusions and are often uncrossmatched when transfused. We sought to determine the risk of alloimmunization and identify acute adverse outcomes of this practice. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The transfusion medicine database was searched for emergency-release transfusion (ERT) episodes from January 2006 through December 2010. The data collected included age and sex of the recipient, blood bank history, survival after the ERT episode, antibody screen results, antibody identifications, and compatibility of released units. RESULTS: A total of 1444 ERT episodes took place involving 1407 patients. A total of 4144 RBC units were released. Of the 129 positive antibody screens, 34 had no antibody on further work-up, 14 had autoantibodies, 48 had a single antibody specificity, and 25 had multiple antibody specificities. Seven patients developed an antibody that could be attributed to the ERT episode, and 15 patients developed an antibody after ERT and additional RBC transfusions. There were 32 reported suspected transfusion reactions. No acute hemolytic transfusion reactions were reported. Seven patients were given a total of 10 incompatible RBC units. Of these patients, one developed a delayed serologic transfusion reaction. The rate of alloimmunization attributable to ERT was 3%. Overall, the rate of incompatible transfusion was less than 0.3% and the rate of a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction was approximately 0.02%. CONCLUSION: There is minimal risk associated with the release of emergency uncrossmatched blood in the setting of an acutely bleeding patient. [Correction statement added after online publication 15-Oct-2012: the number of patients with autoantibodies, single antibody specificity and multiple antibody specificity has been update.].