Evaluation of Multiplex Rapid Antigen Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B in Respiratory Samples.

BACKGROUND: There is little data about the performance of multiplex rapid antigen tests (RATs) on the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A (Flu A), and influenza B (Flu B). This study is to evaluate the performance of Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel (Abbott Diagnostics, Korea) and analyze the factors influencing its sensitivity. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and stored at the Korea University Anam hospital. In total, 400 residual samples from nasopharyngeal swabs were examined. The diagnostic accuracy of RAT was compared to that of RT-qPCR using the Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). RESULTS: Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel showed the sensitivities of 88.0%, 92.0%, and 100% for SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, and Flu B, respectively, and specificities of 100% for all. The agreements with previously licensed single-plex RATs were shown to be high. In the analysis of variables affecting sensitivity, inappropriate sampling time after symptom onset (STASO) and high cycle threshold (Ct value) were shown to negatively affect the sensi-tivity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the multiplex RAT is useful for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B, but more clinical studies are needed.

Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.

OBJECTIVES: CellaVision DC-1 (DC-1, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) is a newly launched digital morphology analyzer that was developed mainly for small to medium-volume laboratories. We evaluated the precision, qualitative performance, comparison of cell counts between DC-1 and manual counting, and turnaround time (TAT) of DC-1. METHODS: Using five peripheral blood smear (PBS) slides spanning normal white blood cell (WBC) range, precision and qualitative performance of DC-1 were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3, EP15-Ed3-IG1, and EP12-A2 guidelines. Cell counts of DC-1 and manual counting were compared according to the CLSI EP 09C-ED3 guidelines, and TAT of DC-1 was also compared with TAT of manual counting. RESULTS: DC-1 showed excellent precision (%CV, 0.0-3.5%), high specificity (98.9-100.0%), and high negative predictive value (98.4-100.0%) in 18 cell classes (12 WBC classes and six non-WBC classes). However, DC-1 showed 0% of positive predictive value in seven cell classes (metamyelocytes, myelocytes, promyelocytes, blasts, plasma cells, nucleated red blood cells, and unidentified). The largest absolute mean differences (%) of DC-1 vs. manual counting was 2.74. Total TAT (min:s) was comparable between DC-1 (8:55) and manual counting (8:55). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that comprehensively evaluated the performance of DC-1 including its TAT. DC-1 has a reliable performance that can be used in small to medium-volume laboratories for assisting PBS review. However, DC-1 may make unnecessary workload for cell verification in some cell classes.

HPLC-MS/MS Method Validation for Antifungal Agents in Human Serum in Clinical Application.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal drugs is recommended. LC-MS/MS outperforms bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for TDM. In this study, we validated TDM for voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole using HPLC-MS/MS with the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method. METHODS: For the validation of LC-MS/MS for antifungal TDM, accuracy, precision, linearity, carryover, lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), ion suppression, and sample stability tests were performed according to the guidelines of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: The LC-MS/MS triazole method showed that all analytes had biases less than 8.9% and coefficients of variation (CV) less than 7.7%. The linearity was validated over the ranges of 0.20 to 5.86 mg/L for voriconazole, 0.12 to 4.96 mg/L for posaconazole, 0.09 to 1.85 mg/L for itraconazole, and 0.12 to 2.38 mg/L for OH-itraconazole. Ion suppression and carryover were negligible. The lower limits of quantitation (LLOQs) for voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and OH-itraconazole were 0.114 mg/L, 0.206 mg/L, 0.118 mg/L, and 0.065 mg/L, respectively. Voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and OH-itraconazole can be stored at 4℃ for 4 - 7 days, according to sample stability. Sample preparation took < 15 minutes per batch, and analytical run time was 5 minutes per sample. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a simple, reliable, and quick LC-MS/MS method for triazole antifungal agents TDM suitable for routine hospital practice.

Comparison between tube test and automated column agglutination technology on VISION Max for anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres: A multidimensional analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: VISION Max (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) measures anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres using automated column agglutination technology (CAT). We compared tube test (TT) and CAT of VISION Max comprehensively, including failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), turnaround time (TAT) and cost, and suggested modified CAT (MCAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 100 samples (each 25 for blood type A, B and O with anti-A and anti-B), anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres were measured by TT and CAT (1:2-1:1024 dilution), as well as by MCAT (with agglutination at 1:32 dilution, then perform additional testing from 1:64 to 1:1024). We assessed the agreement and correlation between TT and CAT and compared FMEA (risk priority number [RPN] score), TAT (h:min:sec) and cost (US dollar, US $) among TT, CAT and MCAT. RESULTS: TT and CAT showed overall substantial agreement (k = 0.73) and high correlation (ρ ≥ 0.75) except blood type O with anti-A (ρ = 0.68). Compared with TT, CAT showed lower RPN scores in FMEA and similar TAT and cost (FMEA, 33,700 vs. 184,300; TAT, 15:23:00 vs. 14:26:40; cost, 1377.4 vs. 1312.4, respectively). Regarding FMEA, TAT and cost, MCAT was superior to CAT or TT (43,810; 13:28:00; 899.2, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first multidimensional analysis on VISION Max CAT for measuring anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres. The results of anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres by CAT were comparable with those of TT. MCAT would be a safe, time-saving and cost-effective alternative to TT and CAT in high-volume blood bank laboratories.

Development and Validation of a U-HPLC-MS/MS Method for the Concurrent Measurement of four Immunosuppressants in Whole Blood.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and validate a U-HPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of four immunosuppressants in human whole blood. METHODS: The method was based on the injection of 20 µL of calibrators and controls pretreated with the liquid phase extraction method for chromatography separation and mass spectrometry determination. LPE offline was performed by adding 0.1 mol/L ZnSO4 and acetonitrile, while separation of target compounds was achieved within 2.5 minutes by a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column using ammonium acetate and ACN mixed with formic acid as solvents. RESULTS: The assay offers ng/mL detection limits (from 1.1 to 12.4 ng/mL), accuracy (% deviation from -4.4% to 5.6%), precision (CV less than 15% at all QC levels), and linearity (from 23.4 to 948 ng/mL for CsA, from 2.11 to 45.5 ng/mL for TAC, SIR and EVR). The recovery and matrix results were acceptable, and the carryover was less than 1%. The results of method comparison show that IA-based methods overestimated the concentration of drugs compared with the MS-based method. Comparing our MS-based method with external LC-MS/MS showed that the results were within 2 SDs. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a reliable assay for the analysis of CsA, TAC, SIR and EVR in whole blood using U-HPLC-MS/MS.

Usefulness of KL-6 for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Background: Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a novel biomarker for interstitial lung disease, and it reflects acute lung injury. We explored the usefulness of KL-6 to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: In a total of 48 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, KL-6 levels were measured using the HISCL KL-6 assay (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) with the HISCL 5000 automated analyzer (Sysmex). Clinical outcomes (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ventilator use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] use, and 30-day mortality) were analyzed according to KL-6 percentiles. Age, initial KL-6 level, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and critical disease were compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan-Meier methods for clinical outcomes. Results: KL-6 quartiles were associated with ICU admission, ventilator use, and ECMO use (all p < 0.05), except 30-day mortality (p = 0.187). On ROC curve analysis, initial KL-6 level predicted ICU admission, ventilator use, and ECMO use significantly better than age, CCI, and critical disease (all p < 0.05); age, initial KL-6 level, CCI, and critical disease predicted 30-day mortality comparably. On Kaplan−Meier survival analysis, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 4.8 (1.2−19.3) for age, 4.7 (1.1−21.6) for initial KL-6 level, 3.9 (0.9−16.2) for CCI, and 2.1 (0.5−10.3) for critical disease. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that KL-6 could be a useful biomarker to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. KL-6 may contribute to identifying COVID-19 patients requiring critical care, including ICU admission and ventilator and/or ECMO use.

Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.

OBJECTIVES: Vision Pro (West Medica, Perchtoldsdorf, Austria) is a recently developed digital morphology analyzer. We evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on white blood cell (WBC) differentials. METHODS: In a total of 200 peripheral blood smear samples (100 normal and 100 abnormal samples), WBC preclassification and reclassification by Vision Pro were evaluated and compared with manual WBC count, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (H20-A2). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was high for normal WBCs and nRBCs (80.1-98.0%). The overall specificity and overall efficiency were high for all cell classes (98.1-100.0% and 97.7-99.9%, respectively). The absolute values of mean differences between Vision Pro and manual count ranged from 0.01 to 1.31. In leukopenic samples, those values ranged from 0.09 to 2.01. For normal WBCs, Vision Pro preclassification and manual count showed moderate or high correlations (r=0.52-0.88) except for basophils (r=0.34); after reclassification, the correlation between Vision Pro and manual count was improved (r=0.36-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated the performance of Vision Pro on WBC differentials. Vision Pro showed reliable analytical performance on WBC differentials with improvement after reclassification. Vision Pro could help improve laboratory workflow.

Evaluation of LabType-SSO HLA Typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 loci.

BACKGROUND: For HLA genotyping, PCR sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) methods using the Luminex platform are widely used. We evaluated the performance of LabType-SSO (One Lambda, USA) in Koreans. METHODS: LabType-SSO were performed on 50 residual DNA samples analyzed by sequence-based typing (SBT) for all HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles with gene frequency > 0.1% in Koreans. RESULTS: The LabType-SSO results were in complete agreement with SBT at the 2-digit level. For 4-digit level, 9 HLA-A alleles, 1 HLA-B allele, 3 HLA-C alleles, neither HLA-DRB1 nor -DQB1 allele showed ambiguous results for assignment of most probable types considering HLA gene frequency in Koreans. In addition, two cases of DQB1*04:01 allele were incorrectly assigned to DQB1*04:02. CONCLUSIONS: LabType-SSO tests showed accurate assignment of 2-digit level and LabType-SSO HLA-DRB1 test showed correct 4-digit most probable HLA type. The tests can be useful as intermediate resolution typing for solid organ transplantation.

Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system.

BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000SR system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r2 ) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000SR system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000SR system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (-0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000SR. It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease.

Performance evaluation of three automated quantitative immunoassays and their correlation with a surrogate virus neutralization test in coronavirus disease 19 patients and pre-pandemic controls.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is currently ongoing, meanwhile vaccinations are rapidly underway in some countries. The quantitative immunoassays detecting antibodies against spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 have been developed based on the findings that they have a better correlation with the neutralizing antibody. METHODS: The performances of the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG, and Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S were evaluated on 173 sera from 126 SARS-CoV-2 patients and 151 pre-pandemic sera. Their correlations with GenScript cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit were also analyzed on 173 sera from 126 SARS-CoV-2 patients. RESULTS: Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S showed the highest overall sensitivity (96.0%), followed by LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG (93.6%). The specificities of Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG were 100.0%, followed by Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (99.3%). Regarding the correlation with cPass neutralization antibody assay, LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG showed the best correlation (Spearman rho = 0.88), followed by Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (all rho = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The three automated quantitative immunoassays showed good diagnostic performance and strong correlations with neutralization antibodies. These assays will be useful in diagnostic assistance, evaluating the response to vaccination, and the assessment of herd immunity in the future.

Acceptable Donor-Specific Antibody Levels Before and After Desensitization Therapy in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Plasmapheresis (PP) is commonly used for desensitization in highly sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in living donor kidney transplantation. We analyzed the impact of DSA levels before and after desensitization on renal allograft outcome. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent desensitization with PP, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab before kidney transplantation in Seoul National University Hospital from August 2006 to August 2016 were enrolled. The association of median fluorescent intensity (MFI) value of DSA with graft outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: The frequency of positive HLA class II DSA after desensitization was lower in patients without antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those with AMR (p = 0.006). The cutoff value of MFI sum of HLA class II DSA after desensitization for predicting AMR was 2,122 with 63% sensitivity and 94% specificity. The frequency of moderate HLA class II DSA (MFI 5,000 - 10,000) after desensitization was significantly higher in patients with graft loss compared to those without graft loss (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Weak HLA class II DSA after desensitization including PP, IVIG, and rituximab was related to AMR and moderate levels of HLA class II DSA after desensitization was related to graft loss in living donor kidney transplantation.

New Potential Biomarker Proteins for Alcoholic Liver Disease Identified by a Comparative Proteomics Approach.

Chronic alcohol consumption causes hepatic steatosis, which is characterized by a considerable increase in free fatty acid (FFA) and triglyceride levels. To identify the possible proteins involved in the progression to alcoholic hepatosteatosis, we performed proteomic analysis on livers of mice exposed to alcohol. 2D-based proteomic analysis revealed that EtOH exposure in mice changed the expression of 43 proteins compared with that in mice fed a normal diet (ND). The most notable protein changes were proteins involved in Met metabolism and oxidative stress, most of which were significantly downregulated in alcohol-exposed animals. Although non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) seem to share the same molecular processes, the difference between these conditions is still unclear. To address this question, we explored the features of alcoholic hepatosteatosis that were different compared with those of methionine and choline deficient (MCD) diet-induced mice with nonalcoholic liver damage. Although most of the differentially expressed proteins associated with ALD did not significantly differ from those of NAFLD, nine proteins showed considerably different patterns. Of these, ornithine aminotransferase, vitamin D binding protein, and phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein were considerably upregulated in ALD mice, compared to that in NAFLD and ND mice. However, other proteins including inorganic pyrophosphatase were differentially regulated in MCD mice; however, they did not differ significantly between the alcoholic model and ND control mice. These results suggested that the identified proteins might be useful candidate markers to differentiate ALD from NAFLD. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 1189-1200, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Effects of Various Concentrations of Pronase on Flow Cytometric Crossmatching Patients Treated With Rituximab and Donor HLA-Specific Antibodies.

Background: Pronase pretreatment can reduce rituximab (RTX) interference by degrading CD20 in B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) testing. However, it may also reduce the assay sensitivity by degrading HLA molecules. We investigated the effects of various pronase concentrations on RTX interference and the analytical sensitivity of B-cell FCXM testing. Methods: Using 59 patient serum samples and 38 donor lymphocyte samples, we designed 97 recipient-donor pairs and divided them into three groups according to RTX use and the presence of weak-to-moderate donor HLA-specific antibody (DSA) reactions: RTX+/DSA-, RTX+/DSA+, and RTX-/DSA+. FCXM was performed after pretreating lymphocytes with six different pronase concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mg/mL). Results: With B-FCXM testing, false-positive results due to RTX in the RTX+/DSA- group markedly decreased with increasing pronase concentrations. The median channel shift values in the RTX+/DSA+ and RTX-/DSA+ groups did not significantly decrease when the pronase concentration was increased from 1 mg/mL to 2 or 3 mg/mL. All eight RTX+/DSA+ cases that were positive at 1 mg/mL pronase but negative at 2 or 3 mg/mL had mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA values of less than 3,000 except for DQ5 (MFI: 5,226). With T-cell FCXM, false-positive results were observed in 2.9% of 315 FCXM tests with pronase pretreatment. Conclusions: Higher concentrations (2 or 3 mg/mL) of pronase effectively eliminated RTX interference but still carried a risk for false negativity for weak DSA reactions in B-cell FCXM. Higher pronase concentrations can be used as an auxiliary method to detect moderate-to-strong DSA reactions in RTX-treated patients.

Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated digital morphology (DM) analyzers on body fluids (BF). We evaluated the performance of a DM analyzer, Sysmex DI-60 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) for white blood cell (WBC) differentials in BF samples. METHODS: In five BF samples (two pleural fluids and three ascites) containing a single, dominant cell type (>80%, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, abnormal lymphocytes, and malignant cells in each sample), we evaluated the precision of the DI-60 and compared the WBC differentials and turnaround times (TAT) between DI-60 and manual counting. RESULTS: The precision of the DI-60 pre-classification and verification was excellent (%CV, 0.01-3.16%). After verification, the DI-60 showed high sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency (ranges: 90.8-98.1%, 96.8-97.9%, and 92.5-98.0%, respectively) for the dominant cell types in neutrophil- and lymphocyte-dominant samples. For all samples, the DI-60 and manual counting showed high correlations for major cell types (neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and others, r = 0.72 to 0.94) after verification. The agreement between the pre-classification and verification of the DI-60 was strong in the neutrophil-dominant sample (κ = 0.81). The DI-60 showed a significantly longer TAT (min: s) than manual counting for all samples (median TAT/slide: 6:28 vs. 1:53, p < 0.0001), with remarkable differences in abnormal lymphocyte- and malignant cell-dominant samples (21:05 vs. 2:06; 12:34 vs. 2:25). CONCLUSIONS: The DI-60 may provide reliable data in neutrophil- and lymphocyte-dominant BF samples. However, it may require longer times and higher workloads for WBC differentials especially in BF samples containing atypical cells. Further improvement would be needed before applying DM analyzers for routine clinical practice in BF analysis.

Comparison of Four T-cell Assays and Two Binding Antibody Assays in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinees With or Without Omicron Breakthrough Infection.

Background: Several T-cell response assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are available; however, their comparability and correlations with antibody responses remain unclear. We compared four SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response assays and two anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assays. Methods: We enrolled 89 participants who had received a booster dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccine. Fifty-six participants without breakthrough infection (BI) (ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 group: N=27; BNT162b2 group: N=29) and 33 with BI were included. We evaluated two whole-blood interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) (QuantiFERON and Euroimmun), T-SPOT.COVID, an in-house enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay (targeting the spike and nucleocapsid peptides of wild-type and Omicron SARS-CoV-2), Abbott IgG II Quant, and Elecsys Anti-S, using Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Spearman's correlation tests. Results: The correlations between the IGRAs and between the ELISPOT assays (ρ=0.60-0.70) were stronger than those between the IGRAs and ELISPOT assays (ρ=0.33-0.57). T-SPOT.COVID showed a strong correlation with Omicron ELISPOT (ρ=0.70). The anti-spike antibody assays showed moderate correlations with T-SPOT.COVID, Euroimmun IGRA, and ELISPOT (ρ=0.43-0.62). Correlations tended to be higher in the BI than in the noninfected group, indicating that infection induces a stronger immune response. Conclusions: T-cell response assays show moderate to strong correlations, particularly when using the same platform. T-SPOT.COVID exhibits potential for estimating immune responses to the Omicron variant. To accurately define SARS-CoV-2 immune status, both T-cell and B-cell response measurements are necessary.

Clinical Impact of Recipient-Derived Isoagglutinin Levels in ABO-Incompatible Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

ABO incompatibility is not considered a contraindication for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We hypothesized that recipient-derived isoagglutinin (RDI) levels could play a critical role in clinical outcomes. In this study, we compared clinical outcomes such as survival, GVHD, infection, relapse, transfusion, and engraftment, among ABO-compatible patients (ABOc), ABO-incompatible patients (ABOi) with low RDI, and ABOi patients with high RDI. The ABOi with high RDI group was defined as recipients with more than 1:16 RDI levels. We analyzed 103 recipients (ABOc, 53; ABOi with low RDI, 36; ABOi with high RDI, 14). The ABOi with high RDI group showed a decreased 1-year survival and increased acute GVHD grade IV and RBC transfusion (p = 0.017, 0.027, and 0.032, respectively). The ABOi with high RDI group was an independent risk factor for increased death, RBC transfusion, and poor platelet (PLT) engraftment (odds ratio (OR) = 3.20, p = 0.01; OR = 8.28, p = 0.02; OR = 0.18, p = 0.03, respectively). The ABOi with high RDI group showed significantly delayed PLT engraftment. In conclusion, this is the first study underscoring high RDI levels as a marker predicting unfavorable outcomes in ABOi HSCT.

Evaluation of Cellular Responses to ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 Vaccinations.

While numerous studies have evaluated humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, data on the cellular responses to these vaccines remain sparse. We evaluated T cell responses to ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 vaccinations using an interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA). ChAdOx1-nCoV-19- and BNT162b2-vaccinated participants initially showed stronger T cell responses than unvaccinated controls. The T cell response decreased over time and increased substantially after the administration of a BNT162b2 booster dose. Changes in the T cell response were less significant than those in the anti-receptor-binding domain IgG antibody titer. The study results can serve as baseline data for T cell responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and suggest that the IGRA can be useful in monitoring immunogenicity.

Soluble ST2 as a Useful Biomarker for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) is an emerging biomarker for sepsis as well as for heart failure. We investigated the prognostic utility of sST2 for predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In a total of 52 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, sST2 levels were measured using the ichroma ST2 assay (Boditech Med Inc., Chuncheon-si, Gang-won-do, Republic of Korea). Clinical outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, and 30-day mortality. sST2 was analyzed according to clinical outcomes. sST2, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, critical disease, and 4C mortality score were compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan−Meier methods for clinical outcomes. The sST2 level differed significantly according to ICU admission, ventilator use, ECMO use, and 30-day mortality (all p < 0.05). On ROC curve analysis, sST2 predicted ICU admission, ventilator use, ECMO use, and 30-day mortality comparable to SOFA score but significantly better than critical disease. sST2 predicted ICU admission, ventilator use, and ECMO use significantly better than the 4C mortality score. On Kaplan−Meier survival analysis, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 8.4 (2.7−26.8) for sST2, 14.8 (3.0−71.7) for SOFA score, 1.8 (0.5−6.5) for critical disease, and 11.7 (3.4−40.1) for 4C mortality score. This study demonstrated that sST2 could be a useful biomarker to predict ICU admission, ventilator use, ECMO use, and 30-day mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. sST2 may be implemented as a prognostic COVID-19 biomarker in clinical practice.

Performance Evaluation of Three Antibody Binding Assays, a Neutralizing Antibody Assay, and an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay for SARS-CoV-2 According to Vaccine Type in Vaccinated Group.

We evaluated the performance of SARS-CoV-2 assays in the vaccinated group using receptor-binding domain antibody assays (RBD Ab assay), neutralizing antibody assay (nAb assay), and interferon-gamma release assay (IGR assay). We also compared the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 assays based on vaccine type in a large population. We collected 1851 samples from vaccinated individuals with vector, mix-and-match (MM), and mRNA vaccines. The performance of the RBD Ab assays was assessed by SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Laboratories, Sligo, Ireland), SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), and anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The nAb assay was assessed by cPass SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody detection kits (GenScript, NJ, USA). The IGR assay was assessed by QuantiFERON (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). Median values of the RBD Ab assays and nAb assay sequentially increased after the first and second vaccinations. RBD Ab assays and nAb assay showed very strong correlations. The median values of the RBD Ab, nAb, and IGR were higher in the mRNA vaccine group than in the vector and MM vaccine groups. The agreement and correlation among the RBD Ab assays, nAb assay, and IGR assay were higher in the mRNA vaccine group than in the vector and MM vaccine groups. We compared the performance of the RBD Ab assay, nAb assay, and IGR assay based on the vaccine types using the RBD Ab, nAb, and IGR assays. This study provides a better understanding of the assessment of humoral and cellular immune responses after vaccination.