Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
World J Urol ; 33(1): 119-24, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24562314

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine predictors of fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated, unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed by urology residents during the first 2 years of residency. METHODS: The patient charts and computed tomography scans of consecutive, unilateral, uncomplicated ureteroscopy cases for urolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The cases were performed by beginning urology residents over the course of their first 2 years of urology residency training. RESULTS: A total of 200 ureteroscopy cases were reviewed. The mean stone diameter was 7.1 (±3.2) mm. Forty-three percent of cases were performed for renal stones and 58 % for ureteral stones. The mean operative time was 80.2 (±36.9) min. The mean fluoroscopy time was 69.1 (±38.2) s. No significant differences existed between cases performed by each of the two residents, and no statistical differences in case difficulty were observed throughout the study period. Linear regression analysis revealed the strongest association with lower fluoroscopy time to be increasing resident experience (p < 0.001). By the end of the 2-year review, fluoroscopy time decreased by 79 % from 135 to 29 s per case. Other significant factors associated with increasing fluoroscopy time were placement of a postoperative stent under fluoroscopic guidance (p < 0.001), utilization of a flexible ureteroscope as opposed to a semirigid ureteroscope (p < 0.001), and balloon dilation of the ureteral orifice (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated, unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis decreases with increasing urology resident operative experience. Other technical options during ureteroscopy were also found to influence fluoroscopy time.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy , Internship and Residency , Operative Time , Ureteroscopy , Urolithiasis/surgery , Urology/education , Adult , Aged , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Exposure , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urolithiasis/diagnostic imaging
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 122(3): 637-45, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20524058

ABSTRACT

Papillary carcinoma of the breast represents approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer. The prevalence of both invasive and in situ papillary carcinoma seems to be greater in older postmenopausal women and, in relative terms, in males. Histologic features of the tumor include cellular proliferations surrounding fibrovascular cores, with or without invasion. In this review, characteristics of both in situ and invasive disease are outlined. Immunohistochemical analyses of papillary carcinoma suggest the utility of markers such as smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, calponin, p63, and high molecular weight keratins, which can characterize the myoepithelial cell layer. With respect to radiographic evaluation of papillary carcinoma, ultrasonography is the most extensively studied imaging modality, though magnetic resonance mammography has potential utility. Available data suggest improved outcome for papillary carcinoma as compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. Treatment-related information for patients with papillary carcinoma is limited, and patterns noted in available series suggest a variable approach to this disease. The scarcity of information underscores the need for further treatment- and outcome-related studies in papillary carcinoma of the breast.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Papillary/therapy , Female , Humans
3.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 42(5): 494-6, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19000985

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to describe the finding of vicarious excretion of intravascular contrast media in association with endovascular management of an aortic aneurysm and to discuss the clinical significance. Vicarious excretion of intravascular contrast material through the hepatobiliary system will be encountered occasionally following endovascular procedures. Plain abdominal images obtained for the purpose of graft position and structural integrity will increase recognition of this finding. Vicarious hepatobiliary excretion of parenteral contrast media, while associated with renal obstruction or parenchymal pathology, is not pathognomonic for renal pathology.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/etiology , Triiodobenzoic Acids/administration & dosage , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Biliary Tract/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Polycystic Kidney Diseases/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Urology ; 84(3): 520-5, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909957

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of Safety, Minimization and Awareness Radiation Training (SMART) on fluoroscopy time during unilateral uncomplicated ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed by urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive ureteroscopy cases for urolithiasis meeting inclusion criteria and performed by first-year urology residents over a 2-year period were reviewed. Fluoroscopy times during SMART and without SMART were compared. RESULTS: A total of 202 ureteroscopy cases were reviewed. The mean patient age was 48.7 years. The mean stone diameter was 7.6 ± 3.3 mm. The mean operating time was 79.8 ± 34.3 minutes. The mean cumulative fluoroscopy time was 85.6 ± 36.9 seconds per case. A Spearman rank correlation identified 8 variables significantly correlated with fluoroscopy time, with the most significant correlation between shorter fluoroscopy time and SMART exposure (rho = 0.532; P <.001). Multivariate regression analysis (r = 0.701) revealed that fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter with SMART (P <.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed the fluoroscopy time of the cases performed during SMART (mean, 45 seconds) to be significantly shorter than the fluoroscopy time of cases performed by the same residents before SMART (mean, 102 seconds; P = .005), and the fluoroscopy time of cases performed by residents the previous year with similar ureteroscopic experience but without SMART (mean, 78 seconds; P <.001). CONCLUSION: SMART reduces fluoroscopy time during unilateral uncomplicated ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed by urology residents by 56%.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/methods , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Ureteroscopy/methods , Urology/education , Adult , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ureteral Calculi/diagnostic imaging , Urolithiasis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL