Artificial intelligence to improve cytology performance in urothelial carcinoma diagnosis: results from validation phase of the French, multicenter, prospective VISIOCYT1 trial.

PURPOSE: Cytology and cystoscopy, the current gold standard for diagnosing urothelial carcinomas, have limits: cytology has high interobserver variability with moderate or not optimal sensitivity (particularly for low-grade tumors); while cystoscopy is expensive, invasive, and operator dependent. The VISIOCYT1 study assessed the benefit of VisioCyt® for diagnosing urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: VISIOCYT1 was a French prospective clinical trial conducted in 14 centers. The trial enrolled adults undergoing endoscopy for suspected bladder cancer or to explore the lower urinary tract. Participants were allocated either Group 1: with bladder cancer, i.e., with positive cystoscopy or with negative cystoscopy but positive cytology, or Group 2: without bladder cancer. Before cystoscopy and histopathology, slides were prepared for cytology and the VisioCyt® test from urine samples. The diagnostic performance of VisioCyt® was assessed using sensitivity (primary objective, 70% lower-bound threshold) and specificity (75% lower-bound threshold). Sensitivity was also assessed by tumor grade and T-staging. VisioCyt® and cytology performance were evaluated relative to the histopathological assessments. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and December 2019, 391 participants (170 in Group 1 and 149 in Group 2) were enrolled. VisioCyt®'s sensitivity was 80.9% (95% CI 73.9-86.4%) and specificity was 61.8% (95% CI 53.4-69.5%). In high-grade tumors, the sensitivity was 93.7% (95% CI 86.0-97.3%) and in low-grade tumors 66.7% (95% CI 55.2-76.5%). Sensitivity by T-staging, compared to the overall sensitivity, was higher in high-grade tumors and lower in low-grade tumors. CONCLUSION: VisioCyt® is a promising diagnostic tool for urothelial cancers with improved sensitivities for high-grade tumors and notably for low-grade tumors.

Artificial intelligence to improve cytology performances in bladder carcinoma detection: results of the VisioCyt test.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) using the VisioCyt® test (VitaDX International, Rennes, France) to improve diagnosis of bladder carcinoma using voided urine cytology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national prospective multicentre trial (14 centres) was conducted on 1360 patients, divided in two groups. The first group included bladder carcinoma diagnosis with different histological grades and stages, and the second group included control patients based on negative cystoscopy and cytology results. The first step of this VISIOCYT1 trial focussed on algorithm development and the second step on validating this algorithm. A total of 598 patients were included in this first step, 449 patients with bladder tumours (219 high-grade and 230 low-grade) and 149 as negative controls. The VisioCyt test was compared to voided urine cytology performed by experienced uro-pathologists from each centre. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was highly improved by the VisioCyt test compared to cytology (84.9% vs 43%). For high-grade tumours the VisioCyt test sensitivity was 92.6% vs 61.1% for the uro-pathologists. Regarding low-grade tumours, VisioCyt test sensitivity was 77% vs 26.3% for the uro-pathologists. CONCLUSION: In comparison to routine cytology, the results of the first phase of the VISIOCYT1 trial show very clear progress in terms of sensitivity, which is particularly visible and interesting for low-grade tumours. If the validation cohort confirms these results, it could lead to the VisioCyt test being considered as a very useful aid for pathologists. Moreover, as this test is in fact software based on AI, it should become more and more efficient as more data are collected.

ThinPrep® imaging system-assisted vs manual screening of urinary cytology slides in the detection of the "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" category.

BACKGROUND: The ThinPrep® Imaging System (TIS) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved review system for cervical cytopathology, where it has been shown to increase performance over manually reviewed slides. Application of the TIS to urinary cytology has only been reported in a single study, in 2013. METHODS: We aimed to compare the agreement of two cytotechnologists' and a pathologist's manual screening (dots) with the fields of view (FOVs) selected by the TIS. We also aimed to track cases in which the TIS could identify missed abnormals and reduce the false-negative fraction. Electronically marked TIS fields (EMTFs) suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) were controlled by follow-up cystoscopy and histology, where available. RESULTS: A total of 826 consecutive specimens were studied. Of those, 94 (11.4%) were unreadable by the TIS. There were 710 possible comparisons, of which 380 (53.5%) received no dot after manual screening. Of the 330 remaining slides, 149 (45.1%) had at least one dot matching with the TIS FOVs. After TIS reading, EMTFs were noted in 13 of 636 (2.0%) negative cytology cases. Surveillance showed that 3/13 (23.1%, 0.4% of the 710 possible comparisons) of those cases matched with high grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), whereas 6/13 (46.1%, 0.8% of the 710 possible comparisons) had negative follow-up at 24 months, and 4/13 (30.8%) were lost for follow-up. CONCLUSION: The TIS increases the detection rate of SHGUC cells, potentially leading to a slight decrease in the false-negative fraction, but at the expense of a slight but larger increase in the number of false-positive cases. These findings stress the importance of a careful approach to the evaluation of the FOVs.

The value of BRCA-1-associated protein 1 expression and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A deletion to distinguish peritoneal malignant mesothelioma from peritoneal location of carcinoma in effusion cytology specimens.

OBJECTIVE: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM), represents 30% of all malignant mesothelioma, and is characterised by a difficult diagnosis and different presentations. Immunohistochemistry has improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between metastatic adenocarcinoma and malignant mesothelioma, and loss of BRCA-1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression is correlated with BAP1 somatic or constitutional genetic defects. Furthermore, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) is frequently lost in DMPM. In the present study, we assessed the value of integrating BAP1 in the panel of antibodies used for the diagnosis of DMPM in cytological samples. Since p16 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) assay could constitute an additional useful adjunct, results of BAP1 immunostaining and p16 FISH assays have been compared. METHODS: Forty-eight DMPM patients and 71 peritoneal carcinomatosis patients were included. BAP1 immunohistochemical and CDKN2A FISH techniques were performed on tissue specimens of DMPM (n = 48) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 71) then on cell-block of DMPM (n = 16), peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 25) and peritoneal benign effusion (n = 5). RESULTS: Loss of BAP1 expression was observed in 56.3% of DMPM while none of the peritoneal carcinoma specimens showed BAP1 loss of expression. CDKN2A loss was observed in 34.9% DMPM and 2.1% peritoneal carcinoma. Although BAP1 immunostaining was successful in 100% of cytological DMPM samples, CDKN2A deletion status could be obtained for 75% of DMPM cases. CONCLUSION: BAP1 immunostaining represents an objective and reproducible diagnostic biomarker for peritoneal mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens and should be preferred to CDKN2A FISH analysis on these precious samples.

[A new terminology for urinary cytopathology: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (2015)]. / Une nouvelle terminologie pour la cytopathologie urinaire : le Système de Paris (2015).

As for the Bethesda system for cervical and thyroid cytopathology, a terminology for reporting urinary cytology has been published in 2015. The new "Paris System" provides a consensus terminology for urinary cytology which underlines the criteria for the recognition of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and of those excluding HGUC, or suspicious for HGUC. It also focuses on new rules to recognize and report the subgroup of "atypical urothelial cells". Here we describe and illustrate the various categories as in the reference book. We analyse the main diagnostic criteria, including microscopic features as well as the risk of malignancy associated to every diagnostic category.

Non-invasive prediction of recurrence in bladder cancer by detecting somatic TERT promoter mutations in urine.

BACKGROUND: Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is characterised by a high risk of recurrence. Patient monitoring is currently based on iterative cystoscopy and on urine cytology with low sensitivity in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) is frequently reactivated in UBC by promoter mutations. METHODS: We studied whether detection of TERT mutation in urine could be a predictor of UBC recurrence and compared this to cytology/cystoscopy for patient follow-up. A total of 348 patients treated by transurethral bladder resection for UBC were included together with 167 control patients. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 80.5% and specificity 89.8%, and was not greatly impacted by inflammation or infection. TERT remaining positive after initial surgery was associated with residual carcinoma in situ. TERT in urine was a reliable and dynamic predictor of recurrence in NMIBC (P<0.0001). In univariate analysis, TERT positive-status after initial surgery increased risk of recurrence by 5.34-fold (P=0.0004). TERT positive-status was still associated with recurrence in the subset of patients with negative cystoscopy (P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: TERT mutations in urine might be helpful for early detection of recurrence in UBC, especially in NMIBC.

[BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression in pleural diffuse malignant mesothelioma: A comparative cytological and histological analyses on 50 patients]. / Apport de l'expression protéique de BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) dans le diagnostic des mésothéliomes malins diffus pleuraux : une analyse cytologique et histologique comparative sur une série de 50 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse malignant mesothelioma (MMD) is a rare disease. The diagnosis is difficult and needs an antibody panel. The tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) is involved in several cancers, including MMD. Loss of BAP1 expression is correlated with BAP1 somatic or constitutional genetic defects. Our work assesses the value of integrating BAP1 in the panel of antibodies used for the diagnosis of MMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical techniques were performed on cytological and histological specimens of MMD and adenocarcinoma pleural metastasis. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients with MMD and the 24 patients with adenocarcinoma pleural metastasis, loss of BAP1 expression was observed in 11 (48%) and one adenocarcinoma (6%) on cytological specimens and in 12 MMD (48%) and in one adenocarcinoma (5%) on biopsy specimens. The concordance between immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry was 100%. The specificity of BAP1 was 100% on cytological and biopsy specimen for the diagnosis of malignancy in case of mesothelial proliferation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Loss of BAP1 expression is an indicator of MMD in a context of mesothelial proliferation. This immunohistochemistry could be integrated in the panel of immunostaining used for MMD diagnosis, either on histological or cytological samples. Furthermore, loss of BAP1 expression guides the patient to an oncology genetic counseling in order to eliminate a MMD developed as part of a constitutional genetic defect.

[Technical recommendations and best practice guidelines for May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining: literature review and insights from the quality assurance]. / Recommandations techniques et règles de bonne pratique pour la coloration de May-Grünwald-Giemsa : revue de la littérature et apport de l'assurance qualité.

May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain is a Romanowsky-type, polychromatic stain as those of Giemsa, Leishman and Wright. Apart being the reference method of haematology, it has become a routine stain of diagnostic cytopathology for the study of air-dried preparations (lymph node imprints, centrifuged body fluids and fine needle aspirations). In the context of their actions of promoting the principles of quality assurance in cytopathology, the French Association for Quality Assurance in Anatomic and Cytologic Pathology (AFAQAP) and the French Society of Clinical Cytology (SFCC) conducted a proficiency test on MGG stain in 2013. Results from the test, together with the review of literature data allow pre-analytical and analytical steps of MGG stain to be updated. Recommendations include rapid air-drying of cell preparations/imprints, fixation using either methanol or May-Grünwald alone for 3-10minutes, two-step staining: 50% May-Grünwald in buffer pH 6.8 v/v for 3-5minutes, followed by 10% buffered Giemsa solution for 10-30minutes, and running water for 1-3minutes. Quality evaluation must be performed on red blood cells (RBCs) and leukocytes, not on tumour cells. Under correct pH conditions, RBCs must appear pink-orange (acidophilic) or buff-coloured, neither green nor blue. Leukocyte cytoplasm must be almost transparent, with clearly delineated granules. However, staining may vary somewhat and testing is recommended for automated methods (slide stainers) which remain the standard for reproducibility. Though MGG stain remains the reference stain, Diff-Quik(®) stain can be used for the rapid evaluation of cell samples.

GASTRICHIP: D2 resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomized and multicenter phase III study.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, gastric cancer remains diagnosed at advanced stage (serosal and/or lymph node involvement). Despite curative management combining perioperative systemic chemotherapy and gastrectomy with D1-D2 lymph node dissection, 5-year survival rates of T3 and/or N + patients remain under 30%. More than 50% of recurrences are peritoneal and/or locoregional. The use of adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy that eliminates free cancer cells that can be released into peritoneal cavity during the gastrectomy and prevents peritoneal carcinomatosis recurrences, was extensively evaluated by several randomized trials conducted in Asia. Two meta-analysis reported that adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy significantly reduces the peritoneal recurrences and significantly improves the overall survival. As it was previously done for the evaluation of the extension of lymph node dissection, it seems very important to validate on European or caucasian patients the results observed in trials performed in Asia. METHODS/DESIGN: GASTRICHIP is a prospective, open, randomized multicenter phase III clinical study with two arms that aims to evaluate the effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin on patients with gastric cancer involving the serosa and/or lymph node involvement and/or with positive cytology at peritoneal washing, treated with perioperative systemic chemotherapy and D1-D2 curative gastrectomy. Peroperatively, at the end of curative surgery, patients will be randomized after preoperatively written consent has been given for participation. Primary endpoint will be overall survival from the date of surgery to the date of death or to the end of follow-up (5 years). Secondary endpoint will be 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival, site of recurrence, morbidity, and quality of life. An ancillary study will compare the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology pre- and post-gastrectomy in two arms of the study, and assess its impact on 5-year survival. The number of patients to be randomized was calculated to be 306. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2012-005748-12, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01882933.

UroVysion® multiprobe FISH in the triage of equivocal urinary cytology cases.

The search for biological and clinical significance of equivocal urinary cytology has emerged as the most promising application of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Using the multiprobe UroVysion(®) assay, a negative FISH result in the presence of atypical urothelial cells favors the presence of reactive, benign alterations and helps to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. However, a negative FISH result in case of a negative or equivocal cytology does not exclude low-grade urothelial neoplasia. Equivocal findings are a notorious problem after conservative treatment, particularly after BCG immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ, where even benign reactive changes can appear worrisome. In this situation, a positive FISH result in spite of non-high grade cytology independently indicates persistent or recurrent urothelial carcinoma. However, chromosomal abnormalities are not restricted to malignancy but may also occur in benign cells. Tetraploidy with a balanced duplication of the whole genome, or polyploidy can occur in non-neoplastic conditions of the bladder such as Decoy cells, radiotherapy-induced changes and urolithiasis. Thus, a positive FISH result in a patient with a history of pelvic irradiation does not prove cancer unless there is unequivocal 9p21 deletion. Recent studies show that an aggressive workup of patients with a suspicious cytology+positive UroVysion(®) result and negative cystoscopy is not currently justified. However, multi-target UroVysion(®) FISH remains an excellent tool to improve diagnosis in urinary cytopathology, provided that FISH results are interpreted in the light of the clinical situation, and that one reminds that FISH adds no diagnostic value in case of clearly positive, high-grade cytology.

[Atypical urothelial cells (AUC): A Bethesda-derived wording applicable to urinary cytopathology]. / Cellules urothéliales atypiques (AUC) : une formulation inspirée du système de Bethesda applicable à la cytologie urinaire.

AIMS: To investigate (1) whether sparse nuclear atypias involving deep urothelial cells have a diagnostic or prognostic value in urinary cytology, and (2) whether the terms atypical urothelial cells "of undetermined significance" (AUC-US) or "cannot exclude high grade" (AUC-H) might be used to standardize urinary cytology reports. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Atypical urothelial cells (AUC) were defined as deep cells with nuclear abnormalities (increased N/C ratio, eccentric nucleus, hyperchromatism and/or irregular shape) in small number not allowing their categorization as malignant, high grade. We studied 435 urinary samples from 126 patients with AUC at any step of their clinical history, followed up over a 10-year period (1999-2009). Every case was compared with histopathology within 6 months and to long term follow-up including cystoscopy and histopathology combined. RESULTS: A total of 183 AUC was recorded. AUC were associated with negative, benign or low grade histological results in 36 of 106 cases (33.9 %) within 6 months, but a high grade was simultaneously documented in 70 cases (66 %). AUC preceded high-grade lesions in 66 cases (36.1 % of all AUC) in a mean interval of 10.5±12.0 months. Overall, AUC were associated with or predictive of high-grade lesions in 135 cases (73.8 %). CONCLUSION: AUC have a diagnostic and prognostic value. Applying the terms AUC-US and AUC-H to urinary cytopathology reports would allow, as for the Bethesda system for cervical or vaginal cytologic diagnoses, better appreciation of the risk of progression to high grade tumours in cases with atypias.

Sequential use of bronchial aspirates, biopsies and washings in the preoperative management of lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: The combination of cytology and biopsies improves the recognition and typing of small cell (SCLC) versus non small cell (NSCLC) lung cancers in the fiberoptic bronchoscopy assessment of centrally located tumours. METHODS: We studied whether bronchial aspirates performed before biopsies (BA) and washings performed after biopsies (BW) could increase the diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy. A series of 334 consecutive samples taken in patients with suspicious fiberoptic bronchoscopy findings was studied. Two hundred primary tumours were included in the study. The actual diagnosis was based on surgical tissue specimen analysis and/or imaging techniques. The typing used was that of the 1999 WHO/IASLC classification. RESULTS: The diagnosis of malignancy and tumour typing were analyzed according to the sequential (combined) or single use of tests. Malignancy was assessed by cytology in 144/164 (87.8%) positive biopsy cases and in 174/200 tumour cases (87.0%). BA before biopsies allowed 84.0% of cancers to be diagnosed, whereas BW after biopsies allowed 79.0% of cancers to be found (p = ns). However, combining biopsies with BW allowed 94.0% of cancers to be diagnosed, whereas 82.0% were diagnosed by biopsies alone (p < 0.001). The highest diagnostic yield was obtained with the combination of BA, biopsies and BW, with 97.0% sensitivity. Exact concordance in typing was obtained in 83.8% of cases. The six surgically resected cases (3.0%) with negative cytology and biopsy results included four squamous cell carcinomas with necrotizing or fibrous surface and two adenocarcinomas, pT1 stage. CONCLUSION: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy may reach a yield of close to 100% in the diagnosis and typing of centrally located, primary lung cancers by combining bronchial aspirates, biopsies and washings.

p16/Ki-67 dual labeling and urinary cytology results according to the New Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: Impact of extended follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of p16INK4a has been identified in urothelial malignancies both cytologically and histologically. In addition, p16/Ki-67 dual labeling has been shown to identify high-grade urothelial cancer cells and some progression cases within a 12-month delay. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was published in late 2015. Its aim is to clarify the criteria for diagnosing or, conversely, excluding high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). METHODS: Dual labeling was performed on archived ThinPrep-based Papanicolaou slides. A total of 208 samples (negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma [NHGUC], 59; consistent with low-grade urothelial neoplasia [LGUN], 24; atypical urothelial cells [AUC], 15; and suspicious for or showing HGUC, 110) were analyzed for p16/Ki-67 after reclassification according to TPS. We assessed the oncologic status of the patients with cystoscopy, urinary cytology, histology, and prolonged 36-month follow-up data. RESULTS: The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 for life-threatening lesions was not different from that of urinary cytology (82.8% vs 83.6%; P = 1). However, among patients with samples classified as NHGUC and AUC, disease-free survival was significantly shorter for dual-labeled cases versus cases with negative dual labeling (P < .0001). The same tendency was observed in patients with histologically proven LGUN (P < .0001). As for specificity in patients with negative cystoscopy and cytology combined, prolonged follow-up showed 90% overall survival at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: A long-term evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual labeling may identify HGUC and progression in cases with negative/low-grade urinary cytology results, and there are potential implications for the clinical management of patients after the conservative treatment of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:552-62. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

[Immunocytochemistry in malignant serous effusions]. / L'immunocytochimie dans les épanchements néoplasiques des séreuses.

Immunocytochemistry may be of valuable help in typing most malignant serous effusions. Various preparatory methods are described including centrifugation and smearing, cytocentrifugation, cell blocks and liquid based cytology. The value and usefulness of immunocytochemistry depends on the experience of each pathologist. The use of a panel of antibodies associating markers of carcinomas with markers of mesothelial cells is recommended.

[Diagnostic keys in conventional serous fluid cytopathology]. / Clés diagnostiques en cytologie conventionnelle des séreuses.

Cells from serous effusions can easily be concentrated by centrifugation. Thereafter, various procedures allow cells to be deposited on glass slides. Standard stains give excellent morphologic details for analysis. However, unsatisfactory specimens are frequently observed in daily practice. Standardization brought by liquid based cytology may be of some help for immunocytochemistry, but conventional methods remain essential. Several decades of experience and analysis of literature allow the authors to select the best criteria for interpretation, with emphasis on the differential diagnosis of malignant vs. benign effusions.

Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to objectively compare Cytyc Thinprep and other methods of obtaining thin layer cytologic preparations (cytocentrifugation, direct smearing and Millipore filtration) in urine cytopathology. METHODS: Thinprep slides were compared to direct smears in 79 cases. Cytocentrifugation carried out with the Thermo Shandon Cytospin 4 was compared to Thinprep in 106 cases, and comparison with Millipore filtration followed by blotting was obtained in 22 cases. Quality was assessed by scoring cellularity, fixation, red blood cells, leukocytes and nuclear abnormalities. RESULTS: The data show that 1) smearing allows good overall results to be obtained, 2) Cytocentrifugation with reusable TPX chambers should be avoided, 3) Cytocentrifugation using disposable chambers (Cytofunnels or Megafunnel chambers) gives excellent results equalling or surpassing Thinprep and 4) Millipore filtration should be avoided, owing to its poor global quality. Despite differences in quality, the techniques studied have no impact on the diagnostic accuracy as evaluated by the rate of abnormalities. CONCLUSION: We conclude that conventional methods such as cytocentrifugation remain the most appropriate ones for current treatment of urinary samples. Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.