Preclinical safety profile of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): mechanism of action of its cytotoxic component retained with improved tolerability.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is the first antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. The therapeutic premise of ADCs is based on the hypothesis that targeted delivery of potent cytotoxic drugs to tumors will provide better tolerability and efficacy compared with non-targeted delivery, where poor tolerability can limit efficacious doses. Here, we present results from preclinical studies characterizing the toxicity profile of T-DM1, including limited assessment of unconjugated DM1. T-DM1 binds primate ErbB2 and human HER2 but not the rodent homolog c-neu. Therefore, antigen-dependent and non-antigen-dependent toxicity was evaluated in monkeys and rats, respectively, in both single- and repeat-dose studies; toxicity of DM1 was assessed in rats only. T-DM1 was well tolerated at doses up to 40 mg/kg (~4400 µg DM1/m(2)) and 30 mg/kg (~ 6000 µg DM1/m(2)) in rats and monkeys, respectively. In contrast, DM1 was only tolerated up to 0.2mg/kg (1600 µg DM1/m(2)). This suggests that at least two-fold higher doses of the cytotoxic agent are tolerated in T-DM1, supporting the premise of ADCs to improve the therapeutic index. In addition, T-DM1 and DM1 safety profiles were similar and consistent with the mechanism of action of DM1 (i.e., microtubule disruption). Findings included hepatic, bone marrow/hematologic (primarily platelet), lymphoid organ, and neuronal toxicities, and increased numbers of cells of epithelial and phagocytic origin in metaphase arrest. These adverse effects did not worsen with chronic dosing in monkeys and are consistent with those reported in T-DM1-treated patients to date.

Clinical trial considerations on male contraception and collection of pregnancy information from female partners.

BACKGROUND: There is little guidance regarding the risk of exposure of pregnant women/ women of childbearing potential to genotoxic or teratogenic compounds via vaginal dose delivered through seminal fluid during sexual intercourse. METHOD: We summarize current thinking and provide clinical trial considerations for a consistent approach to contraception for males exposed to genotoxic and/or teratogenic compounds or to compounds of unknown teratogenicity, and for collection of pregnancy data from their female partners. RESULTS: Where toxicity testing demonstrates genotoxic potential, condom use is required during exposure and for 5 terminal plasma half-lives plus 74 days (one human spermatogenesis cycle) to avoid conception.For non-genotoxic small molecules and immunoglobulins with unknown teratogenic potential or without a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) from embryo-fetal development (EFD) studies and no minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), condom use is recommended for males with pregnant partner/female partner of childbearing potential. For teratogenic small molecules with estimated seminal fluid concentration and a margin between projected maternal area under the curve (AUC) and NOAEL AUC from EFD studies of ≥300 (≥100 for immunoglobulins) or in the absence of a NOAEL with a margin between MABEL plasma concentration and maternal Cmax of ≥300 (≥10 for immunoglobulins), condom use is not required. However, condom use is required for margins below the thresholds previously indicated. For small molecules with available seminal fluid concentrations, condom use is required if margins are <100 instead of <300. Condom use should continue for as long as the projected margin is at or above the defined thresholds. Pregnancy data should be proactively collected if pregnancy occurs during the condom use period required for males exposed to first-in-class molecules or to molecules with a target/class shown to be teratogenic, embryotoxic or fetotoxic in human or preclinical experiments. CONCLUSION: These recommendations, based on a precaution principle, provide a consistent approach for minimizing the risk of embryo-fetal exposure to potentially harmful drugs during pregnancy of female partners of males in clinical trials. Proactive targeted collection of pregnancy information from female partners should help determine the teratogenic potential of a drug and minimize background noise and ethical/logistical issues.

Therapeutic enhancement of IL-2 through molecular design.

A recombinant human IL-2 analog (rIL-2, Proleukin) is currently being evaluated for clinical benefit in HIV infected patients. It is approved for therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Treatment of cancer patients with rIL-2 results in durable responses but is associated with life-threatening toxicity, which limits its use to patients in relatively good health. Antitumor efficacy associated with rIL-2 therapy are hypothesized to be mediated by distinct types of cells that express structurally different forms of the IL-2 receptor. This hypothesis suggests that it might be possible to engineer an IL-2 variant addressing the risks associated with the therapeutic use of IL-2. In this article, we review the clinical experience with IL-2 and its analogs, the evidence that different IL-2 receptors may dissociate efficacy and toxicity, and describe the generation of a novel IL-2 variant with the potential for a superior therapeutic index.

On developing a process for conducting extractable-leachable assessment of components used for storage of biopharmaceuticals.

Extractables and leachables are product-related impurities that result from product contact with components such as gaskets, stoppers, storage bags, cartridges, and prefilled syringes that are used for processing, storage, and/or delivery of biopharmaceuticals. These impurities are a concern for patients due to potential effects on product quality and safety. It is possible that such an impurity could directly impact the patient or indirectly impact the patient by interacting with the protein therapeutics and forming protein adducts. Adducts and leachables may or may not be detected as product-related impurities in routine stability indicating assays depending on the rigor of the analytical program. The need for the development of a thorough and holistic extractable and leachable program based on risk assessment, review of existing literature, and consolidation of industry best practices is discussed. Standardizing component use within an organization enables streamlining of the extractable-leachable program. Our strategy for an extractable-leachable program is divided into different stages, each stage detailing the activities and the department within the organization that is responsible for execution of these activities. The roles and responsibilities of the key stakeholders are identified. The integration of analytical activities with health-based risk-assessment information into the design of an extractable-leachable program is highlighted.

Duration of chronic toxicity studies for biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals: is 6 months still appropriate?

For chronic use biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals, toxicity studies of 6 months have generally been accepted for regulatory approval. This review assessed the data for 23 approved biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals to determine whether the studies conducted were predictive of human safety and whether there is new data from approved products indicating that longer than 6 months is necessary. This assessment involved three approaches; whether new toxicities were identified at >6 months, similarity of findings between 6 months and shorter studies and predictivity of clinical adverse events. In two cases there were apparently new findings in studies >6 months. On examination however, one of these cases was a well established risk with foreign protein administration to animals (adalimumab). For insulin aspart, the 12 month study identified tumors not seen in shorter term studies, however, determination of carcinogenic potential is not a goal of chronic toxicity studies and is addressed by separate studies. In most cases the toxicology studies were predictive of common clinical adverse reactions, but were poorly predictive of rare clinical events or some serious adverse reactions. Although specific circumstances may require a longer study, this review indicates no new data is available to refute the utility of 6 month studies to support chronic clinical dosing with biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals.