ABSTRACT
High-dose melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (MEL 200) is the standard of care as a conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). We compared a novel conditioning combination incorporating busulfan, melphalan, and bortezomib (BUMELVEL) versus standard MEL 200 in newly diagnosed patients undergoing AHSCT for MM. Between July 2009 and May 2012, 43 eligible patients received BUMELVEL conditioning followed by AHSCT. BU was administered i.v. daily for 4 days to achieve a target area under the concentration-time curve total of 20,000 mM·min based on pharmacokinetic analysis after the first dose. MEL 140 mg/m(2) (MEL 140) and VEL 1.6 mg/m(2) were administered i.v. on days -2 and -1, respectively. Outcomes were compared with a contemporaneous North American cohort (n = 162) receiving MEL 200 matched for age, sex, performance status, stage, interval from diagnosis to AHSCT, and disease status before AHSCT. Multivariate analysis of relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was performed. The median follow-up was 25 months. No transplant-related mortality was observed in the study cohort at 1 year. PFS at 1 year was superior in the BUMELVEL cohort (90%) in comparison with 77% in MEL 200 historical control subjects (P = .02). Cumulative incidence of relapse was lower in the BUMELVEL group versus the MEL 200 group (10% at 1 year versus 21%; P = .047). OS at 1 year was similar between cohorts (93% versus 93%; P = .89). BU can be safely combined with MEL 140 and VEL without an increase in toxicities or transplant-related mortality. We observed a superior PFS in the BUMELVEL cohort without maintenance therapy, warranting further trials.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Myeloablative Agonists/toxicity , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation Conditioning/standards , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This multicenter, phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of BuCyE with individually adjusted busulfan based on preconditioning pharmacokinetics. The study initially enrolled Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients ages 18 to 80 years but was amended due to high early treatment-related mortality (TRM) in patients > 65 years. BuCyE outcomes were compared with contemporaneous recipients of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Two hundred seven subjects with HL (n = 66) or NHL (n = 141) were enrolled from 32 centers in North America, and 203 underwent ASCT. Day 100 TRM for all subjects (n = 203), patients > 65 years (n = 17), and patients ≤ 65 years (n = 186) were 4.5%, 23.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 63), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 29), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23), respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) were 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL, respectively. In the matched analysis rates of 2-year TRM were 3.3% for BuCyE and 3.9% for BEAM, and there were no differences in outcomes for NHL. Patients with HL had lower rates of 2-year PFS with BuCyE, 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%), than with BEAM, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%), with no differences in TRM or OS. BuCyE provided adequate disease control and safety in B cell NHL patients ≤ 65 years but produced worse PFS in HL patients when compared with BEAM.
Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Lymphoma/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Carmustine/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , North America , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after autologous transplantation have limited therapeutic options. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase IIa study to investigate the safety and efficacy of i.v. busulfan (Bu) in combination with bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for a second autotransplantation. Because a safe Bu exposure was unknown in patients receiving this combination, Bu was initially targeted to a total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 20,000 µM × minute. As no concentration-limiting toxicity was observed in 6 patients, this Bu exposure was utilized in the following treatment cohort (n = 24). Individualized Bu dose, based on test dose .8 mg/kg pharmacokinetics (PK), was administered daily for 4 consecutive days starting 5 days before transplantation, followed by a single dose of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)) 1 day before transplantation. The total mean dose of i.v. Bu (including the test dose and 4-day administration) was 14.2 mg/kg (standard deviation = 2.48; range, 8.7 to 19.2). Confirmatory PK demonstrated that only 2 of 30 patients who underwent transplantation were dosed outside the Bu AUC target and dose adjustments were made for the last 2 doses of i.v. Bu. The median age was 59 years (range, 48 to 73). Median time from first to second transplantation was 28.0 months (range, 12 to 119). Of 26 evaluable patients, 10 patients attained a partial response (PR) or better at 3 months after transplantation, with 2 patients attaining a complete response. At 6 months after transplantation, 5 of 12 evaluable patients had maintained or improved their disease status. Median progression-free survival was 191 days, whereas median overall survival was not reached during the study period. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (50.0%) and stomatitis (43.3%). One transplantation-related death was observed. A combination of dose-targeted i.v. Bu and bortezomib induced PR or better in one third of patients with MM who underwent a second autotransplantation, with acceptable toxicity.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Boronic Acids , Busulfan , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Myeloablative Agonists , Pyrazines , Transplantation Conditioning , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Autografts , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Boronic Acids/adverse effects , Boronic Acids/pharmacokinetics , Bortezomib , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Busulfan/adverse effects , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Myeloablative Agonists/adverse effects , Myeloablative Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Prospective Studies , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Pyrazines/adverse effects , Pyrazines/pharmacokinetics , Survival RateABSTRACT
Uncontrolled delayed nausea and vomiting remains a problem after high-dose preparative regimens used for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Recently, aprepitant was approved for highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, and, in particular, is effective for decreasing delayed emesis. To evaluate its safety and efficacy in the transplantation setting, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone in patients treated with ablative preparative regimens. Patients were randomized to receive oral aprepitant or placebo daily with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone during and for 3 days after the completion of the preparative regimen in this prospective randomized, double-blind study. The primary objective was complete response (CR) rate, defined as no emesis with no or mild nausea. Other endpoints included number of emetic episodes, nausea severity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), the need for rescue antiemetics, and transplantation outcome, including regimen-related toxicity. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomized and 179 patients were eligible for analysis. Overall, CR rates were 81.9% for the aprepitant and 65.8% for the placebo arms (P < .001). Percentages of patients with no emesis all days were 73.3% for aprepitant and 22.5% placebo (P < .001). Mean VAS scores were 16.6 mm aprepitant and 16.9 mm placebo (NS), and there were no differences in the amount of rescue antiemetics used, regimen related toxicity, engraftment, or transplantation outcome. Aprepitant in combination with dexamethasone and ondansetron significantly decreased emesis and significant nausea, whereas not increasing RRT or affecting short-term survival but had no significant impact on the use of PRN antiemetics, or overall VAS nausea scores.
Subject(s)
Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Morpholines/administration & dosage , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Aprepitant , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morpholines/adverse effects , Ondansetron/administration & dosage , Ondansetron/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has infected tens of millions across the world, but there is a significant gap in our understanding about COVID-19 in the hematopoietic stem transplant (HSCT) recipient population. Prolonged viral shedding is frequently observed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARSCoV-2), but studies suggest viral loads decline 10 days after symptom onset. Current CDC guidance suggests that severely ill and immunocompromised hosts are no longer infectious after 20 days from symptom onset. Cycle threshold (Ct) values are inversely proportional to the viral load and are used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration. Specimens with reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) Ct values > 33-34 have been associated with inability to culture virus, and have been used as a surrogate for diminished infectivity. We report two cases of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) recipients who had prolonged durations of infectivity with SARSCov-2, based on culture positivity and persistently low Ct values for greater than 50 days.
ABSTRACT
Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) remains the standard high dose therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Intensifying the high dose regimen has shown promising results. We report here 7-year follow up of our novel high dose regimen of busulfan and melphalan followed by bortezomib (BuMelVel). Forty-three MM patients received BuMelVel high dose therapy with pharmacokinetic adjusted busulfan. Outcomes were compared to a matched control cohort from the CIBMTR database (n = 162) receiving MEL200. The primary endpoint was progression free survival. Five year PFS was 47% v 30% (95% CI; 32-62) in favor or the BuMelVel group (95% CI; 23-37) (p = 0.05). In multivariate analysis for PFS, BuMelVel (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.97)(p = 0.036) was predictive. Similar to recent reports of double alkylator therapy, although depth of response was similar between the BuMelVel group and MEL200, the BUMELVEL group experienced an improved PFS.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Although bone marrow transplantation has been recognized as an effective therapy for malignant and nonmalignant blood disorders, the modality has also been associated with side-effects and complications. Among these adverse events, neurologic complications emerged as an important and frequent source of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. The survival of patients who died from complications related to central nervous system abnormalities appears to be shorter compared to those who died from non-neurological complications. The incidence of neurologic complications appears to correlate with the degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity and the risk status of the underlying disease. Nonrelapse mortality associated with reduced intensity regimens is lower compared to myeloablative conditioning regimens. However, reduced intensity regimens are still associated with significant incidence of complications, including graft-versus-host disease, opportunistic infections, organ toxicity, and neurologic complications. Complications of sepsis-related encephalopathy in mechanically ventilated patients are frequently either overlooked or misdiagnosed. Obtaining a microbiological diagnosis through body fluid cultures or tissue identification is important in order to identify the source of infection and guide an effective antimicrobial therapy. However, pursuing a microbiological diagnosis must not delay the administration of antibiotics and resuscitation of a patient with septic shock.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Brain Diseases/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/physiopathology , Graft vs Host Disease/psychology , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Infections/epidemiology , Infections/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Although acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia initially respond to conventional chemotherapy, most patients relapse and succumb from their disease. For the past 30 years, efforts at intensifying induction or postremission conventional chemotherapy have met with limited success. Of all the therapies examined, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has achieved the best outcomes, with the first reports of cure 25 years ago. Most phase III studies have failed to demonstrate a clear advantage of allografting over chemotherapy because of significant risk of transplant-related mortality. However, there is reason for optimism based on the identification of high-risk groups and from improvements in the prevention and management of transplant-related complications. These accomplishments, along with a recent increase in the donor pool through the availability of unrelated donors and cryopreserved umbilical cord blood stem cells, continue to make allografting the most promising curative modality for acute leukemias.