Assessing robotic-assisted surgery versus open approach in penetrating Crohn's disease: advantages and outcomes in ileocolic resection.

INTRODUCTION: Penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with the open approach traditionally favored. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential benefits but remains understudied in this complex patient population. Additionally, the lack of standardized surgical complexity scoring in CD hinders research and comparisons. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with penetrating CD who underwent either robotic-assisted ileocolic resection (RICR) or open ileocolic resection (OICR) at our institution from January 2007 to December 2021. We assessed endpoints, including length of stay, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and other perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: RICR demonstrated safety outcomes comparable to OICR. Importantly, RICR patients experienced significantly reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (median 4.5 days versus 6.9 days; p = 0.01), lower surgical site infection rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01), and decreased 30-day readmission rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed the need for additional strictureplasties (coefficient: 84.8; p = 0.008), colonic resections (coefficient: 41.7; p = 0.008), and estimated blood loss (coefficient: 0.07; p = 0.002) independently correlated with longer operative times). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be a safe and potentially beneficial alternative for the surgical management of penetrating CD, offering advantages in perioperative outcomes reducing length of stay, blood loss, surgical site infection rates, and readmission rates. Further validation with larger cohorts is warranted.

Surgery, stomas, and anxiety and depression in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort analysis of privately insured patients.

AIM: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are diagnosed with anxiety/depression at higher rates than the general population. We aimed to determine the frequency of anxiety/depression among IBD patients and the temporal association with abdominal surgery and stoma formation. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients with IBD using difference-in-difference methodology and a large commercial claims database (2003-2016). Outcomes were anxiety/depression diagnoses before and after major abdominal surgery or stoma formation. RESULTS: We identified 10 481 IBD patients who underwent major abdominal surgery, 18.8% of whom underwent stoma formation, and 41 924 nonsurgical age- and sex-matched IBD controls who were assigned random index dates. Rates of anxiety and depression increased among all cohorts (P < 0.001). Surgical patients had higher odds of anxiety [one surgery, adjusted OR 6.90 (95% CI 6.11-7.79), P < 0.001; two or more surgeries, 7.53 (5.99-9.46), P < 0.001] and depression [one surgery, 6.15 (5.57-6.80), P < 0.001; two or more surgeries, 6.88 (5.66-8.36), P < 0.001] than nonsurgical controls. Undergoing multiple surgeries was associated with a significant increase in depression from 'pre' to 'post' time periods [1.43 (1.18-1.73), P < 0.001]. Amongst surgical patients, stoma formation was independently associated with anxiety [1.40 (1.17-1.68), P < 0.001] and depression [1.23 (1.05-1.45), P = 0.01]. New ostomates experienced a greater increase in postoperative anxiety [1.24 (1.05-1.47), P = 0.01] and depression [1.19 (1.03-1.45), P = 0.01] than other surgical patients. CONCLUSION: IBD patients who undergo surgery have higher rates of anxiety and depression than nonsurgical patients. Rates of anxiety and depression increase following surgery. Stoma formation represents an additional risk factor. These findings suggest the need for perioperative psychosocial support services.