Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in brain arteriovenous malformations treated with open surgery research: a systematic review and proposal of a reporting guideline for surgical and clinical outcomes.

Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

Presentation and management of cerebral proliferative angiopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on treatment outcomes.

Cerebral Proliferative Angiopathy (CPA) is a rare brain vascular malformation, similar to Arteriovenous Malformations (AVM) but lacking of early venous drainage. Presentation and treatment outcomes were investigated, examining for morbidity, mortality and complications. A meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science were searched with keywords such as "cerebral proliferative angiopathy" and "management". We pooled and meta-analyzed outcomes on documented CPA cases. 11,079 studies were pooled as a result of manual citation searching, 50 studies were included, adding up to 115 CPA cases. The majority of patients were females (1.38:1), with a mean age of presentation of 26.9 (19.4) years. Headache (46%) and seizures (34%) were the most common presenting symptoms. 37% of patients presented with focal neurologic deficit. Patients managed conservatively from the surgical standpoint (i.e. nonoperative management) did not undergo homogenous treatment strategies, and major complications were at 47% (95% CI: 17%, 76%), with a 1% mortality (95% CI: 0%, 6%). Surgical and embolization interventions presented the highest proportion of major complications, 66% (95% CI: 33%, 99%) and 73% (95% CI: 42%, 100%), respectively. The embolization subgroup led in mortality, with 3% (95% CI: 0%, 10%). No death was documented in patients undergoing surgery. CPA has a similar presentation to brain arteriovenous malformations, but its treatment outcomes are potentially worse. This difference is not attributable to heterogeneity in assigning patient treatment strategies. This highlights the need for more accurate diagnostic methods.

STA-MCA Double-Barrel Bypass: A Systematic Review of Technique and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Conventionally, one branch of the superficial temporal artery (STA) is utilized to revascularize the middle cerebral artery (MCA). However, there is the possibility of utilizing both branches of the STA when performing the bypass, characterizing the double-barrel (DB) STA-MCA bypass. Notably, a lack of studies evaluating this technique led the authors to conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched systematically for publications of DB-STA-MCA bypass on November 1st, 2023. The findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Case reports were not included for statistical analysis purposes. RESULTS: The review included 408 patients and 534 bypasses from 34 studies. The main etiology was Moyamoya disease (64.6%), followed by cerebral ischemia (22.2%) and aneurysms (12.5%). The median of the mean follow-ups of each study was 12.8 months (range 1.5-87.9). The postoperative patency was 100%. The follow-up patency was 98% (95% CI: 96%-100%; I2 = 0%). The procedure-related mortality was 0% (95% CI: 0%-1%; I2 = 0%). Aneurysms obtained 87% (95% CI: 72%-100%; I2 = 4%) of good clinical outcomes, while Moyamoya disease yielded a rate of 70% (95% CI: 10%-100%; I2 = 97%). Ischemic complications occurred at a rate of 6% (95% CI: 2%-11%; I2 = 36%), while hemorrhagic occurred at 6% (95% CI: 1%-11%; I2 = 56%). Hyperperfusion syndrome rate was calculated as 18% (7%-30%; I2 = 55%) for Moyamoya disease. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure appears to be safe, with excellent patency rates. The clinical efficacy for ischemic and Moyamoya diseases warrants further standardized robust investigation with a broader number of patients, and aneurysm studies are required to enhance sample sizes. The main complication for the Moyamoya subgroup is hyperperfusion syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia.

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN), caused by vascular compression of the nerve root, is a severe cause of pain with a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While microvascular decompression (MVD) has lower recurrence rates when compared with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) alone, refractoriness can still be as high as 47%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of MVD + PSR when compared to standalone MVD for TN. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients, in English, published between January 1980 and December 2023, comparing MVD vs. MVD + PSR for TN. Endpoints were pain cure, immediate post-operative pain improvement, long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, and complications (facial numbness, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding). We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I2 was used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and Baujat analysis were conducted to address high heterogeneity. Eight studies were included, comprising a total of 1,338 patients, of whom 1,011 were treated with MVD and 327 with MVD + PSR. Pain cure analysis revealed a lower likelihood of pain cure in patients treated with MVD when compared to patients treated with MVD + PSR (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.72). Immediate postoperative pain improvement assessment revealed a lower likelihood of improvement in the MVD group when compared with the MVD + PSR group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.95). Facial numbness assessment revealed a lower likelihood of occurrence in MVD alone when compared to MVD + PSR (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.15). Long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding analyses revealed no difference between both approaches. Our meta-analysis identified that MVD + PSR was superior to MVD for pain cure and immediate postoperative pain improvement for treating TN. However, MVD + PSR demonstrated a higher likelihood of facial numbness complications. Furthermore, identified that hearing loss and intracranial bleeding complications appear comparable between the two treatments, and no difference between long-term effectiveness and recurrence.

Challenges and limitations in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery: Systematic review with proposed approach and checklist to mitigate errors and improve the assessment of the real-world experience.

Meta-analyses are highly valued in medical science, yet accurately reporting complications in neurosurgical studies remains challenging. Examples include inconsistencies in defining and classifying complications and variations in reporting methods. This lack of reproducibility and comparability, along with other issues related to biases, hinders the ability of meta-analyses to yield significant advancements. This systematic review investigated the challenges and limitations inherent in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery. Based on the identified challenges and our group's experience, we developed a practical checklist to mitigate and avoid common errors in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery.We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies addressing challenges in assessing complications in neurosurgery. The main findings were qualitatively synthesized to identify common challenges and limitations. The proposed checklist was developed using a modified Delphi technique. Eleven studies were included, uncovering heterogeneity and a lack of standardization regarding the classification of complications in neurosurgery across various authors and institutions. They suggested solutions such as implementing a more uniform classification system. Additionally, the NeuroComp Meta-Analysis Checklist was developed, comprising 23 items divided into 5 domains, with a practical approach and suggestions on how to deal with the challenges when meta-analyzing.We identified numerous challenges and concerns when assessing complications in the neurosurgical field. The NeuroComp Meta-Analysis Checklist incorporated methodologies and approaches we utilized in several previously published meta-analyses. While we acknowledge that the proposal cannot solve all the issues involved in comparing and meta-analyzing complications in neurosurgery, it has the potential to enhance the informativeness of future meta-analyses and help authors mitigate common errors. Ultimately, this tool has the potential to contribute to the advancement of accumulating real-world evidence in neurosurgical science.

Decompressive Craniectomy with or Without Dural Closure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Decompressive craniectomy is used to alleviate intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury and stroke by removing part of the skull to allow brain expansion. Traditionally, this procedure is followed by a watertight dural suture, although evidence supporting this method is not strong. This meta-analysis examines the feasibility of the open-dura (OD) approach versus the traditional closed-dura (CD) technique with watertight suturing. A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis were conducted on OD and CD dural closure techniques. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant trials. The primary end point was the rate of complications, with specific analyses for infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Mortality, poor neurological outcomes, and operation duration were also assessed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Following a comprehensive search, 930 studies were screened, from which four studies and a total of 368 patients were ultimately selected. The primary outcome analysis showed a reduced likelihood of complications in the OD group when compared with the CD group (368 patients, odds ratio 0.54 [95% CI 0.32-0.90]; I2 = 17%; p < 0.05). Specific analysis of infections and CSF leaks did not show statistically significant results, as well as the evaluation of the mortality rates and poor neurological outcome differences between groups. Assessment of operation duration, however, demonstrated a significant difference between techniques, with a mean reduction of 52.50 min favoring the OD approach (mean difference - 52.50 [95% CI - 92.13 to - 12.87]; I2 = 96%). This study supports the viability of decompressive craniectomy without the conventional time-spending watertight duraplasty closure, exhibiting no differences in the rate of infections or CSF leaks. Furthermore, this approach has been associated with improved rates of complications and faster surgery, which are important aspects of this technique, particularly in its potential to reduce both costs and procedure length.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty versus Nonoperative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures frequently result in pain and decreased quality of life (QoL). The management of these fractures remains a topic of debate. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we analyzed randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) with non-operative treatment (non-OT). The outcomes of interest included pain, QoL, cement leakage, and new osteoporotic vertebral fractures after 1 year. Compared to non-OT regarding pain relief, PV yielded significant improvement at 1-2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.67 (6/14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.29 to -0.06; I2 = 92%, random effects) and 1 year (mean difference = -1.07 (4/14; 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.18; I2 = 97%, random effects). For QoL, notable improvements were observed at 1 week (standard mean difference = -2.10 (5/14; 95% CI: -3.77 to -0.42; I2 = 98%, random effects) and 3 months (mean difference = -1.58 (4/14; 95% CI: -3.07 to -0.09; I2 = 96%, random effects), with 1 month, 6 months and 1 year being inconclusive. A cement leakage rate of 42% (10/14; 95% CI: 25% to 59%; I2 = 99%, random effects) was found. Further, PV did not significantly heighten the risk of new fractures within a year (odds ratio = 1.26 (6/14; 95% CI: 0.63 to 2.53; I2 = 74%, random effects). PV emerges as a promising intervention for specific time intervals regarding pain relief, especially in the extended-term analysis, and QoL, especially in the short-term analysis, compared to non-OT. However, clinicians must consider cement leakage risks. Heterogeneity among studies underscores careful patient selection.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in ventriculoatrial shunt research for normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review and VAS-NPH reporting guideline.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is an important treatment option for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). However, clinical studies reporting the use of VAS for NPH lack sufficient standardization for meta-analytic comparisons that could provide robust evidence regarding its use. This study aims to assess the quality of reporting in these studies and develop a reporting guideline checklist to standardize terminology, concepts, and reporting while reinforcing the essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. METHODS: This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, with no timeframe restriction. The level of evidence of the studies was assessed using the GRADE system, and the rigor used in the publication of the results was assessed concerning adherence to the guidelines indicated by the EQUATOR Network Group. Furthermore, the studies were scrutinized focusing on eight domains: (1) Characteristics of the included studies and baseline characteristics of the patients; (2) Reporting methodology; (3) Pivotal concepts definition; (4) Adverse events assessment; (5) Data writing and reporting; (6) Detailed outcomes reporting; (7) Specific clinical outcomes assessment and reporting; and (8) Complications reporting. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 734 patients and 753 shunts were included in this review, and the assessment exposes notable deficiencies in reporting, specifically in baseline patient details, methodology, and outcome assessments. Only two studies followed reporting guidelines, prompting concerns about comprehensive reporting of adverse events and intraoperative complications. Varied reporting completeness existed for shunt-related issues. The absence of standardized definitions for key concepts and insufficient intervention details were observed. A VAS-NPH reporting guideline, encompassing 36 items across eight domains, was developed to address these shortcomings. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reveals significant deficiencies in methodological rigor and reporting quality. The proposed VAS-NPH Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to rectify these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility. This initiative aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the use of VAS in NPH.

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass versus Occipital Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass for Treating Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: When traditional therapies are unsuitable, revascularization becomes essential for managing posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or vertebral artery aneurysms. Notably, the PICA-PICA bypass has emerged as a promising option, overshadowing the occipital artery-PICA (OA-PICA) bypass. The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses for treating posterior circulation aneurysms. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 studies for the PICA-PICA bypass and 16 studies on the OA-PICA bypass, involving 84 and 110 patients, respectively. The median average follow-up for PICA-PICA bypass was 8 months (2-50.3 months), while for OA-PICA, it was 27.8 months (6-84 months). The patency rate for OA-PICA was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) for PICA-PICA. Complication rates were 29% (95% CI: 10%-47%) for OA-PICA and 12% (95% CI: 3%-21%) for PICA-PICA. Good clinical outcomes were observed in 71% (95% CI: 52%-90%) of OA-PICA patients and 87% (95% CI: 75%-100%) of PICA-PICA patients. Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-6%) for OA-PICA and 1% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for PICA-PICA. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures have demonstrated promising results in efficacy and safety. PICA-PICA exhibits slightly better patency rates, better clinical outcomes, and fewer complications, but with a lack of substantial follow-up and a smaller sample size. The choice between these procedures should be based on the surgeon's expertise and the patient's anatomy.

Ultrasound-Guided Resection of High-Grade Gliomas: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) present a challenge in neuro-oncology, often necessitating surgical resection for optimal management. Ultrasound holds promise in achieving better gross total resection (GTR) and improving outcomes. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates literature providing robust evidence on the use of intraoperative ultrasonography (iUSG) in HGG resection. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines a comprehensive search was made across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science utilized terms related to iUSG for HGG resection. The meta-analysis examined randomized trials and observational cohort studies on iUSG-guided HGG resection. GTR, subtotal resection, and postresection complications were assessed. Statistical analysis, employing R software for a single proportion analysis with confidence intervals of 95%, I2 statistics for heterogeneity, and the instrumental variables method with restricted maximum likelihood for a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included in our study. The GTR overall rate in patients with iUSG-guided resection was found to be 64% (95% confidence interval: 46%-81%). Two-dimensional ultrasound remains dominant at 80% against other options of ultrasound. Complications were reported at a 15% rate (95% confidence interval: 7%-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided robust data on the utilization of iUSG-guided resection regarding the attainment of GTR and the complications related to resection. However, challenges such as outcome heterogeneity and limited complication reporting highlight the need for further research to optimize iUSG in HGG treatment. Long-term follow-up studies on patient survival and postsurgery quality of life will complement existing literature, guiding clinical practices in managing HGG.

Comparing surgical clipping with endovascular treatment for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm (uMCAA) has traditionally been treated with open surgical clipping (SC). Endovascular treatments (EVTs) were designed to reduce surgical risks in these cases. Nevertheless, despite its potential benefits, many surgeons favor SC for uMCAA. This updated meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of SC and EVT for uMCAA. METHODS: The authors searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases according to the Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients with uMCAA reporting comparative data of SC and EVT. The endpoints were the complete occlusion rate (Raymond class I and II), good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2 or Glasgow Outcome Scale score ≥ 4), procedure-related complications (further divided into major and minor), and mortality. The authors pooled OR with 95% CI values with a random-effects model. I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to address high heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plot analysis and the Egger's test. RESULTS: The analysis included data from 10 studies. Regarding the complete occlusion assessment, the comparative analysis revealed OR 0.17 (95% CI 0.08-0.40, p < 0.01), favoring SC. In terms of achieving good clinical outcomes, OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.20-0.97, p < 0.05) was determined, favoring SC. No differences regarding total procedure-related complications, major complications, or mortality were identified. However, a higher likelihood of minor complications was identified for EVT, with OR 4.68 (95% CI 2.01-10.92, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a lower likelihood of complete occlusion at last follow-up and lower likelihood of good clinical outcomes in patients treated with EVT when compared with SC. Furthermore, a higher likelihood of minor complications was identified in patients who underwent EVT when compared with SC. The findings reinforce that, based on the currently available data, SC should be considered the primary approach for treating uMCAA. However, EVT is an evolving approach, and this study's findings represent a synthesis of observational studies. Randomized trials are warranted to elucidate which approach should be the mainstay for uMCAA and to identify the nuances that determine whether SC or EVT is more or less indicated for addressing uMCAA with consideration of the individuality of each patient and aneurysm.

Same-day discharge in craniotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients undergoing craniotomy were subject to extended hospital stays for intensive monitoring and management of potential complications. However, with the evolution of surgical methods, anesthesia, and postoperative protocols, the feasibility and interest in same-day discharge (SDD) are growing. This study aimed to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a safe and feasible approach in craniotomy through a meta-analysis of the available literature. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2023. Eligible studies comprised reports in English with a minimum of 4 patients who underwent craniotomies and were discharged with same-day discharge, whether single-arm or comparative with normal discharge. Single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the studies and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % CI was used to measure effects in comparative analysis. A random-effects model was adopted. Endpoints included success and failure of pre-planned same-day discharge, and postoperative complications throughout the hospital stay (until discharge), these complications were further categorized into major and minor complications. Also, need for reoperation, readmission within 24 h, readmission after 24 h, and mortality. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. Five studies were included in the single-arm analysis, comprising data from 715 patients. Four studies comprising 731 patients were included in the comparative analysis, of whom 233 were discharged on SDD, and 498 were discharged normally. The analysis revealed a success rate of 88 % (95 % CI, 83 %-94 %), readmission to the hospital within the initial 24 h rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-2 %), readmission after 24 h rate of 1 % (95 % CI, 0 %-2 %;), total postoperative complications until discharge rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), major complications rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %), minor complications rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), and mortality rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %). Comparative analysis for complications and mortality showed no difference between both approaches. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified that same-day discharge in craniotomy for selected patients, as well as for tumor resection craniotomies, is highly feasible and safe, with a high success rate, low failure, and reoperation rates. Moreover, for selected patients, no evidence of harm in same-day discharge was identified when compared with normal discharge. Consequently, same-day discharge may be considered a viable option, provided appropriate selection criteria are employed.

Surgical clipping and endovascular treatments for small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A comparative pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Small and very small anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms pose a complex challenge in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology due to their critical location and potential for severe consequences upon rupture. Surgical clipping has been a traditional approach, but it presents challenges requiring precision and expertise. Endovascular treatment has emerged as an alternative, offering minimally invasive techniques with potential advantages. This study aims to comprehensively compare outcomes and efficacy between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small or very small ACoA aneurysms. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms comparing surgical clipping and endovascular treatments. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on both treatment modalities. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Pooled analyses with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare treatment effects, and statistical analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 637 patients were included. Endovascular treatment, predominantly coiling, was performed in 60.3% of patients, while 39.7% underwent surgical management. Endovascular treatment exhibited an 18% retreatment rate, contrasting with 0% in the surgery group. Mortality rates were 3% and 6% for endovascular and surgical treatments, respectively. Overall complications occurred in 1.8% of patients, with intraoperative rupture and cerebral infarction being the most common. CONCLUSION: In summary, our study indicates a comparable outcome between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small ACoA aneurysms, with the former showing a lower retreatment rate. Decision factors include surgeon expertise, healthcare context, and patient age. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies, considering variations in aneurysm status and evolving techniques.

Ventriculoatrial Shunt Versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is usually the primary choice for cerebrospinal fluid shunting for most neurosurgeons, while ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is a second-line procedure because of historical complications. Remarkably, there is no robust evidence claiming the superiority of VPS over VAS. Thus, we aimed to compare both procedures through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, the authors systematically searched the literature for articles comparing VAS with VPS. The included articles had to detail one of the following outcomes: revisions, infections, shunt-related mortality, or complications. In addition, the cohort for each shunt model had to encompass more than 4 patients. RESULTS: Of 1872 articles, 16 met our criteria, involving 4304 patients, with 1619 undergoing VAS and 2685 receiving VPS placement. Analysis of revision surgeries showed no significant difference between VAS and VPS (risk ratio [RR] = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.9-1.34; I2 = 84%, random effects). Regarding infections, the analysis also found no significant difference between the groups (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.36-1.25; I2 = 74%, random effects). There was no statistically significant disparity between both methods concerning shunt-related deaths (RR = 2.11, 95% CI: 0.68-6.60; I2 = 56%, random effects). Included studies after 2000 showed no VAS led to cardiopulmonary complications, and only 1 shunt-related death could be identified. CONCLUSION: Both methods show no significant differences in procedure revisions, infections, and shunt-related mortality. The literature is outdated, research in adults is lacking, and future randomized studies are crucial to understand the profile of VAS when comparing it with VPS. The final decision on which distal site for cerebrospinal shunting to use should be based on the patient's characteristics and the surgeon's expertise.