Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Med Princ Pract ; 26(1): 50-56, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the symptoms of lung cancer in Turkey and to evaluate approaches to alleviate these symptoms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study included 1,245 lung cancer patients from 26 centers in Turkey. Demographic characteristics as well as information regarding the disease and treatments were obtained from medical records and patient interviews. Symptoms were evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and were graded on a scale between 0 and 10 points. Data were compared using the χ2, Student t, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Potential predictors of symptoms were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The most common symptom was tiredness (n = 1,002; 82.1%), followed by dyspnea (n = 845; 69.3%), appetite loss (n = 801; 65.7%), pain (n = 798; 65.4%), drowsiness (n = 742; 60.8%), anxiety (n = 704; 57.7%), depression (n = 623; 51.1%), and nausea (n = 557; 45.5%). Of the 1,245 patients, 590 (48.4%) had difficulty in initiating or maintaining sleep. The symptoms were more severe in stages III and IV. Logistic regression analysis indicated a clear association between demographic characteristics and symptom distress, as well as between symptom distress (except nausea) and well-being. Overall, 804 (65.4%) patients used analgesics, 630 (51.5%) received treatment for dyspnea, 242 (19.8%) used enteral/parenteral nutrition, 132 (10.8%) used appetite stimulants, and 129 (10.6%) used anxiolytics/antidepressants. Of the 799 patients who received analgesics, 173 (21.7%) reported that their symptoms were under control, and also those on other various treatment modalities (dyspnea: 78/627 [12.4%], appetite stimulant: 25/132 [18.9%], and anxiolytics/antidepressants: 25/129 [19.4%]) reported that their symptoms were controlled. CONCLUSION: In this study, the symptoms progressed and became more severe in the advanced stages of lung cancer, and palliative treatment was insufficient in most of the patients in Turkey.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell , Palliative Care , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Dyspnea/complications , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Fatigue/complications , Fatigue/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pain/complications , Pain/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Pol J Pathol ; 67(2): 108-13, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27543864

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine the presence of SKI-interacting protein (SKIP) expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and its effect on prognosis by investigating SKIP correlation with the Ki-67 proliferation index and prognostic parameters. Pathological preparations of the patients diagnosed with MPM between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to evaluate the expression of SKIP and the Ki-67 proliferation index. Correlations between SKIP expression, clinicopathological factors and survival were investigated. Survival data were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of the variables. In total, 52 patients were evaluated in the study; 36 of them were male and 16 were female. The mean age of the patients was 62.3 ±12.2 years. The median overall survival period was 8.5 months. Factors negatively affecting general survival in the univariate analysis included high SKIP expression, Ki-67 proliferative index over 30%, presence of non-epithelioid type MPM and stage III-IV disease (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that high SKIP expression, high Ki-67 proliferative index and presence of non-epithelioid type MPM are independent factors that affect the survival rate. Higher SKIP expression is associated with poor prognosis in MPM.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Cell Proliferation , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mesothelioma/pathology , Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases/biosynthesis , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Ki-67 Antigen/biosynthesis , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Mesothelioma/metabolism , Mesothelioma/mortality , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Middle Aged , Mitotic Index , Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases/analysis , Pleural Neoplasms/metabolism , Pleural Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models
3.
Neoplasma ; 61(4): 433-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24645844

ABSTRACT

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare but highly lethal form of cancer that affects the serosal membranes. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is the second most common form of malignant mesothelioma (pleural mesothelioma is the most common). The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients with MPM. A retrospective analysis was performed on 35 patients who were admitted to our hospital between March 2005 and July 2013. The patients' demographic and clinical data, laboratory results, radiological signs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. The mean age of the 35 patients was 59.0±14.4 years, the mean survival time was 16.2±12.9 months, and the majority of the histopathological types of MPM were epithelial (68.6%). 82.9% of the patients had been exposed to asbestos, and the mean duration of exposure was 28.3±14.5 years. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal distention/pain, weight loss, dyspnea, and chest pain. The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis was 4.6±3.3 months. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy in combination with supportive care was used in the treatment of 68.6% of the patients, while supportive treatment alone was used in the others. Our results revealed that patients who were >60 years old (p=0.019), who were exposed to asbestos >20 years (p=0.033), who had an ECOG PS of 3 (p=0.000) were more likely to have a poor MPM prognosis.In conclusion, increased age, duration of environmental asbestos exposure and ECOG PS are important factors that influence the prognosis of MPM patients.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Mesothelioma/mortality , Peritoneal Neoplasms/mortality , Pleural Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asbestos/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Mesothelioma/etiology , Mesothelioma/pathology , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Peritoneal Neoplasms/etiology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL