[Application of failure mode and effect analysis in reducing the risk of nosocomial infection].

Objective: To explore the effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in the management of nosocomial infection, and provide reference for the effective prevention and control of nosocomial infection. Methods: Using FMEA to identify, analyze, evaluate and screen out the high-risk events of nosocomial infection in January 2020, from which two hospital level priority improvement projects of hand hygiene compliance and blood-borne occupational exposure were determined. After risk control and intervention measures, the effects before and after improvement were compared. Results: Except for the lack of incentive mechanism and insufficient communication between medical and nursing teams, the differences in hand hygiene compliance and blood-borne occupational exposure risk priority coefficients before and after the implementation of FMEA were statistically significant (P<0.05) . After the implementation of FMEA, the hand hygiene compliance was 74.92% (79375/105953) , which was significantly higher than 68.40% (58361/85328) before the implementation of FMEA, and the difference was statistically significant (χ(2)=996.55, P<0.01) . The incidence of blood-borne occupational exposure after the implementation of FMEA was 3.85% (80/2080) , which was lower than the 6.16% (123/1998) before the implementation of FMEA, and the difference was statistically significant (χ(2)=11.49, P<0.01) . Conclusion: FMEA has a good effect in nosocomial infection management. It can identify and evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection prospectively, so as to control the risk effectively.

Study on sperm function in men long after cessation of gossypol treatment.

Sperm function was assessed in 19 men 3-10 years after cessation of gossypol treatment and 2-9 years after recovery of normal sperm density. Nineteen normal fertile men of similar age served as the controls. The zona-free hamster egg-sperm penetration assay (SPA) revealed a highly significant difference (P less than 0.01) in the penetration rates between the treated and the control groups. Hormone assays indicated that there were no significant differences in circulating levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) between the two groups, but the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level of the treated group was significantly higher than that of the controls (P less than 0.05). The results showed that sperm function in the treated group was lower than that in the control, which may be a result of persistent gossypol-mediated damage to the testes.