Professional equipoise: Getting beyond dominant discourses in an interprofessional team.

In 2011, the US Department of Veterans Affairs established five Centers of Excellence to study training in the patient-centered medical home clinical microsystem. Early on, our center began a discourse analysis in order to better understand each profession's assumptions about roles, responsibilities, and the basis for "truth" in clinical care. We discovered that these different discourses were pervasive and led to unhelpful stereotypes of each other. This article describes the evidence we identified that led us to hypothesize these conflicting discourses and stereotypes. Specifically, we report on our attempts to identify the traditional discourses of four post-graduate professions--medicine, nurse practitioner, psychology, and pharmacy. We also share lessons from our efforts to defuse participants from their identified discursive assumptions, and develop appreciation and value for the discursive contributions of other professions--a process we call professional equipoise. We conclude that we can change these discourses and the professional identity formation of novices if we provide sustained, integrated interprofessional education curriculum. This implies that we need: embedded, longitudinal training; faculty role modeling of inquisitiveness, respectful relationships, and risk taking; and safe and honest discussion about our differences.

The impact of denial on health-related quality of life in patients with HIV.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of denial coping on quality of life (QOL) over time among individuals living with HIV, as denial has been understudied as a coping strategy within the literature on HIV/AIDS. METHODS: In a sample of 65 adult men and women, we used multilevel linear modeling to test trajectories of change in physical and mental health-related QOL across baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, including denial as a predictor and gender as a moderator. RESULTS: The use of denial coping was associated with lower physical and mental health-related QOL at baseline. Denial coping predicted an increase in QOL over time, though QOL remained low in those who practiced denial coping. Men's baseline mental health-related QOL was more negatively affected by denial coping than women's. Women tended to increase in QOL more slowly over time compared to men. CONCLUSION: Reliance on denial as a coping strategy is associated with poorer physical and mental health-related QOL in an HIV-positive population, though participants who engaged in denial also displayed more rapid improvement in their QOL over time. Men and women displayed different rates of improvement in QOL, indicating a need for gender-based treatment approaches. Future research should examine the complex role of denial on change in QOL.

Interprofessional grant writing seminar for early career faculty in a small, isolated teaching center.

Small, isolated teaching centers have difficulty mentoring interprofessional junior faculty in research methods and grant writing. Peer mentoring programs for grant writing at larger institutions have been successful. In this short report, we describe our program that leveraged mentor experience using four framing seminars followed by project refinement in three-person peer groups and monthly mentored works in progress meetings. In its first year, ten faculty from medicine, psychology, and pharmacy completed the program and successfully obtained six funded grants. Five of the projects transitioned from single profession applications to interprofessional applications as participants connected and profession-specific expertise was identified. Refinements for future cohorts are discussed.