Risk of suprascapular nerve injury in open Trillat procedure: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN. METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (ß angle). RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean ß angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the ß angle was measured at 12°. CONCLUSION: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.

Lateral approach total knee arthroplasty achieves equivalent patellar tracking in severe valgus deformity compared to mild valgus deformity.

PURPOSE: Patellar tracking problems represent 2-10% of complications of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in valgus knees. However, there are no studies assessing patellar tracking according to the severity of the valgus deformity. The hypothesis was that lateral approach TKA in severe valgus deformity provides equivalent patellar tracking to that in knees with mild valgus deformity. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2016, 77 TKAs were performed via a lateral approach on a severe valgus deformity (HKA > 195°). Forty-three TKAs performed without tibial tubercle osteotomy and with complete radiological data were included in this study. These were compared with 86 matched TKAs performed via a lateral approach with a mild valgus deformity (HKA between 181° and 190°). Patellar tilt and patellar position were assessed by axial view radiographs at the last follow-up. Complications and clinical outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The follow-up was mean 52 ± 21 months in the severe valgus group. No significant differences were found between the severe valgus deformity group and the mild valgus deformity groups in patellar tilt (1.6° ± 6.6° versus 1.9° ± 3.2°, respectively) or patellar subluxation. There were complications in 12% (n = 5) and 11% (n = 9) of the severe valgus group and the mild valgus group respectively, without significant difference. There was no significant difference in extensor mechanism complication rate (2.3% versus 4.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lateral parapatellar approach, without tibial tubercle osteotomy, for TKA in severe valgus deformity results in good patellar tracking. With this approach, the extensor mechanism complication rate in severe valgus deformity was not higher than for mild valgus deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis. METHODS: A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Primary osteoarthritic knees have more varus coronal alignment of the femur compared to young non-arthritic knees in a large cohort study.

PURPOSE: Many surgeons are performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an aim to reproducing native anatomical coronal alignment. Yet, it remains unclear if primary osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic populations have similar knee coronal alignment. This study aims to describe and compare the distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment in a large primary osteoarthritic cohort and a young non-osteoarthritic cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a monocentric prospectively gathered data, from 1990 to 2019, of 2859 consecutive primary osteoarthritic knees in 2279 patients. Patients underwent standardized long-leg radiographs. Femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA) were digitally measured using software. Femoral, tibial and knee phenotypes were analyzed, and descriptive data were reported. Data were compared to a young non-osteoarthritic population previously described. RESULTS: In osteoarthritic knees, the mean FMA was 91° ± 2.9° (range 86°-100°) and the mean TMA was 87° ± 3.1° (range 80°-94°). No significant difference was observed for FMA and TMA between genders. The most common femoral and tibial phenotypes were varus (38.7%) and neutral (37.1%). The most frequent knee phenotype was a varus femoral phenotype with a neutral tibial phenotype (15.5%), which is different to the non-osteoarthritic population. CONCLUSION: This study showed the wide distribution of knee phenotypes in a large osteoarthritic cohort. There was more varus distribution of the femoral coronal alignment compared to a non-osteoarthritic population, suggesting consideration and potential adaptation of the realignment strategy of the femoral component during TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity.

PURPOSE: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), knee phenotypes including joint line obliquity are of interest regarding surgical realignment strategies. The hypothesis of this study is that better clinical results, including decreased postoperative knee pain, will be observed for patients with a restored knee phenotype. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on prospective data, including 1078 primary osteoarthritic knees in 936 patients. The male:female ratio was 780:298, mean age at surgery was 71.3 years ± 8.0. International Knee Society Scores and standardized long-leg radiographs (LLR) were collected preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up after TKA. Patients were categorized using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification including the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on LLR by a single observer, allowing knee phenotypes to be categorized considering the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle (MPTA-LDFA) as measure of constitutional alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO) (MPTA + LDFA). Clinical results were compared between patients with surgically restored preoperative constitutional knee phenotype to patients without restored constitutional knee phenotypes. Descriptive data analysis such as means, standard deviations and ranges were performed. T tests for independent samples were performed to compare group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using the χ2 test. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A third of patients (33.4%) had constitutional knee varus with apex distal JLO. 63.5% of patients had preoperative apex distal JLO. Postoperatively, 57.8% of patients had a neutral HKA (- 2° to 2°) and a neutral JLO (- 3° and 3°), with only 18% of patients with restored constitutional knee phenotype. Of these patients, statistically less postoperative pain was observed in patients where apex distal JLO was restored compared to non-restored apex distal JLO (pain score 46.7 vs. 44.6; p = 0.02) without clinical relevance. Other categories of restored JLO or arithmetic HKA angle were not associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that performing mechanical alignment for primary TKA resulted in most cases in a change of the preoperative knee phenotype. These results emphasize the relevance of considering joint line obliquity to better understand preoperative knee deformity and better restore knee phenotypes with a more personalized realignment strategy to potentially improve TKA postoperative results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patellar component size effects patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Patellar component positioning and patellofemoral kinematics are of great importance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The factors influencing patellar tilt are femoral rotation and lateral patellar release. However, the effect of patellar component size remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-operative risk factors for patellar tilt, particularly the effect of the patellar component size. The hypothesis was that increasing the patellar component size would reduce the risk of patellar tilt. METHODS: 878 primary TKAs with patellar resurfacing were included between January 2015 and October 2018. Analysis was performed at 1-year postoperatively on patients categorized into two groups: patellar tilt (PT) and no patellar tilt (NPT). A multivariate analysis was performed for the effect of patellar component size, femoral rotation, femoral overbuilding, patellar thickness and lateral release on patellar tilt risk. Secondary analysis was performed for any difference in clinical outcomes and revision rates between groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that increasing the patellar component size decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 37% (p < 0.001). Placing the femoral component at 3° of external rotation decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 67% (p < 0.001). Secondary analysis showed better clinical outcomes in the NPT group, especially regarding global satisfaction, and KSS objective and subjective scores. The revision for any cause was less in the NPT group (p = 0.019). The cause for TKA revision was related to the patellar in 11% of cases in the NPT group and 65% in the PT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased patellar component size and positioning the femoral component in external rotation decreases the risk of patellar tilt, improves clinical outcomes and decreases the rate of surgical revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Lateral acromioplasty cannot sufficiently reduce the critical shoulder angle if preoperatively measured over 40°.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether arthroscopic lateral acromion resection can sufficiently reduce the critical shoulder angle (CSA) without damaging deltoid muscle insertion. METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair were retrospectively analysed. According to the preoperative CSA, patients were categorized as Group I (CSA < 35°) and Group II (CSA ≥ 35°). Additional arthroscopic lateral acromion resection was performed in Group II. The CSA was measured 1 week postoperatively, while RC integrity and the deltoid attachment were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months via ultrasound. Deltoid function was evaluated using the Akimbo test, in which patients place their hands on the iliac crest with abduction in the coronal plane and internal rotation of the shoulder joint while simultaneously flexing the elbow joint and pronating the forearm. RESULTS: Large and massive RC tears were more prevalent in Group II (p = 0.017). In both groups, the CSA reduction was statistically significant (Group I = 1°: range 0°-3°, Group II = 3.7°: range 1°-8°; p < 0.001). When the preoperative CSA was > 40°, the respective postoperative CSA remained > 35° in 83.3% of cases (p < 0.001). Final shoulder strength was correlated with the amount of CSA reduction (rho = 0.41, p = 0.002). The postoperative CSA was higher, but not significantly different (n.s.), in patients with re-torn (36°, range 32°-40°) than with healed RC (33°, range 26°-38°). No clinical detachment or hypotrophy of the deltoid was observed with the Akimbo test and ultrasound evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic lateral acromion resection is a safe procedure without affecting deltoid muscle origin or function, and it is effective in significantly reducing the CSA. However, the CSA cannot always be reduced to < 35°, especially in patients with preoperative CSA values > 40°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological results of the MAKO CT-based robotic-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A PRISMA systematic review was conducted using four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, GOOGLE SCHOLAR) to identify all clinical and radiological studies reporting information regarding the use and results of the CT-based robotic-assisted system to perform TKA between 2016 and 2020. The main investigated outcome criteria were postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, clinical scores, knee range of motion, implant positioning and the revision rate. The ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies and the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were identified, of which 26 met inclusion criteria. Of these 26 studies, 14 were comparative. The follow-up varied from 30 days to 17 months. This CT-based, saw cutting Robotic TKA is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain score (2.6 versus 4.5) and with significantly reduced time to hospital discharge (77 h versus 105), compared with conventional TKA. The two comparative studies assessing functional outcomes at 1 year reported significantly better functional scores with CT-based robotic TKA compared with conventional TKA (WOMAC score: 6 ± 6 versus 9 ± 8 (p < 0.05); KSS function score: 80 versus 73 (p = 0.005)). Only three comparative studies assessed implant positioning, and these reported better implant positioning with CT-based robotic-assisted TKA. CONCLUSION: The CT-based robotic-assisted system for TKA reduced postoperative pain and improved implant positioning with equal or slightly superior improvement of the functional outcomes at one year, compared to conventional TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review level IV.

Does healing of both greater and lesser tuberosities improve functional outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture? A retrospective study of twenty-eight cases with a computed tomography scan at a minimum of one-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is often indicated in elderly patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The rate of greater tuberosity (GT) healing varies from 37 to 90% in this population. The aim of this study was to assess greater and lesser tuberosity (LT) fixation and healing on CT scan after RSA for PHF. Our hypothesis was that both GT and LT healing leads to better functional results after RSA for fracture. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort consisted of 28 patients treated with an RSA for a four-part PHF during the inclusion period. The mean age at surgery was 77 years. Clinical examination and CT scan were performed at a minimum one year follow-up to assess tuberosity position and healing. RESULTS: The GT healed in 22 patients (78.5%), the LT in 24 patients (87.5%) and both tuberosities were healed in 20 patients (71.5%). Constant score was significantly improved with GT, LT and both tuberosity healing (p = 0.05, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 respectively). Motion in anterior elevation was improved with GT and both tuberosity healing (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 respectively). Motion in external rotation was improved with GT and both tuberosity healing (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSION: GT and LT healing was associated with better functional results and active motion. Anatomical reduction and consolidation of both tuberosities is beneficial with a cumulative effect for functional recovery.

Current role of intraoperative sensing technology in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Sensors have been introduced within the last 10 years to quantify soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to give the surgeon objective data. These devices are fairly new and their impact on patient outcome remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize all the relevant surgical and clinical results of sensors for TKA. METHODS: A PRISMA systematic review was conducted using five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, and the COCHRANE LIBRARY) to identify all available literature that described the surgical and clinical results of sensors for TKA between 2000 and 2021. The main investigated outcome criteria were intraoperative data, postoperative functional and clinical outcome, knee range of motion, complications and revision rates. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were finally included. The maximum reported follow-up was 26 months. A balanced knee with sensor corresponded to a mediolateral difference inferior to 15 lb and a stable posterior drawer test. The standard assessment of knee balance was a poor predictor of the true soft tissue balance when compared to sensor data. At least 60% of TKA needed an additional rebalancing procedure with the sensor, after conventional gap balancing. Achieving a quantitatively balanced knee resulted in a significantly higher patient satisfaction score. But the prospective comparative studies found no demonstrable improvement in clinical outcome, range of motion or complication rate at one year postoperatively for patients undergoing TKA using sensor-guided balancing compared with routine techniques. CONCLUSION: Even though the use of the intraoperative sensing technology was not related to an improvement in clinical outcome, the current studies showed that using sensors facilitates the reproduction of natural joint stability, and improves the rate of achieving a balanced knee. Sensor use in complex cases could be particularly valuable, but their use in standard practice remains to be defined.

Significant risk of arthrolysis after simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and treatment of dislocated bucket-handle meniscal tear.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative stiffness is a feared complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In case of associated dislocated bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT), reduction is urgent, with ligament reconstruction in the same surgical step. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment of associated dislocated BHMT in ACL reconstruction incurs increased risk of arthrolysis for stiffness in flexion and/or extension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective exposure/non-exposure study included 208 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between January 2009 and December 2018. Those showing dislocated medial or lateral BHMT at surgery (group A) were compared versus those free of meniscal lesions (group B). The main objective was to assess the risk of surgical revision for arthrolysis within 12 months. Group A included 69 patients: 40 male (58%), 29 female (42%); mean age, 29.0±11.2 years. Group B included 139 patients: 68 male (49%), 71 female (51%); mean age, 30.0±10.4 years. Patients were classified according to age of ACL tear, as acute (<6 weeks), subacute (6 weeks to 6 months), or chronic (>6 months). RESULTS: Risk of revision surgery for arthrolysis was greater in Group A than in Group B, with 7 (10.1%) and 4 (2.9%) cases respectively (p=0.044), with 12-month arthrolysis-free survival of 89.7% (95% CI, 82.7-97.2) and 97.1% (95% CI, 94.3-99.9) respectively (p=0.023). Stiffness in flexion and extension was more frequent in Group A at 6 weeks and at 6 months (p>0.05). Risk of arthrolysis did not significantly differ according to accident-to-surgery time in the overall series (p=0.421) or specifically in Group A (p=0.887). The BHMT was sutured in 39 cases (56.5%), including 3 failures (7.7%) at 12 months' follow-up. Arthrolysis was required in 6 patients treated by meniscal suture (15.4%) and just 1 patient treated by meniscectomy (3.3%) (p=0.128). CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed increased risk of surgical revision for arthrolysis after ACL reconstruction in case of dislocated BHMT treated in the same surgical step. Age of ACL tear and type of BHMT treatment (suture or meniscectomy) showed no impact on postoperative stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective exposure/non-exposure cohort study.

Stiffness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Risk factors and arthroscopic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: One of the principal complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is stiffness. There are no publications concerning stiffness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Study objectives were to describe the incidence of stiffness after UKA, to look for risk factors, and to describe safe and effective arthroscopic treatment. METHODS: There were 240 UKA performed between March 2016 and January 2019 included. Robotic-assisted surgery was performed in 164 patients and mechanical instrumentation in 76 patients. Stiffness was defined as flexion < 90° or a flexion contracture > 10° during the first 45 post-operative days. Patients with stiffness were treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis. Several factors were studied to look for risk factors of stiffness: body mass index, gender, age, mechanical or robotic instrumentation, preoperative flexion, previous meniscectomy, and anticoagulant treatment. Arthrolysis effectiveness was evaluated by flexion improvement and UKA revision rate. RESULTS: 22 patients (9%) developed stiffness. Mechanical instrumentation significantly increased the risk of stiffness with OR = 0.26 and p = 0.005. Robotic-assisted surgery decreased the risk of stiffness by five-fold. Before arthrolysis, mean knee flexion was 79°, versus 121° (53% improvement) after arthroscopic arthrolysis. Only 2 patients (9%) underwent UKA revision after arthrolysis. DISCUSSION: Stiffness after UKA is an important complication with an incidence of 9% in this study. Arthroscopic arthrolysis is a safe and effective treatment with a range of motion improvement of > 50%. Robotic-assisted surgery significantly decreases the risk of postoperative stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study, retrospective cohort study.

Condylar constrained knee prosthesis and rotating hinge prosthesis for revision total knee arthroplasty for mechanical failure have not the same indications and same results.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether there are any differences in outcomes and complication rates between condylar constrained knee (CCK) and rotating hinge knee (RHK) prostheses used for the first revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) after mechanical failure. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive non-septic revisions of posterior stabilized implants using 33 CCK and 30 RHK prostheses were included. Clinical evaluation and revision rate were compared between the two groups at two years minimum follow-up. RESULTS: The CCK group had significantly better clinical outcomes and satisfaction rates compared to patients with RHK (KSS-knee 70.5 versus 60.7 (p < 0.003) and KSS-function 74.9 versus 47.7 (p < 0.004) at 3.7 (2.0-9.4) years mean follow-up. Moreover, the clinical improvement was significantly higher for the CCK group concerning the KSS-Knee (+23.9 vs. +15.2 points, p = 0.03). The postoperative flexion was significantly better in the CCK group compared to the RHK group (115° vs. 103°, p = 0.01). The prosthesis-related complications and the re-revision rate were higher in the RHK group, especially due to patellofemoral complications and mechanical failures. CONCLUSIONS: CCK prostheses provided better clinical and functional outcomes and fewer complications than RHK prostheses when used for the first non-septic rTKA. CCK is a safe and effective implant for selected patients, while RHK should be used with caution as a salvage device for complex knee conditions, with particular attention to the balance of the extensor mechanism.

Arthroscopic Trillat Procedure: A Guided Technique.

The Trillat procedure is a surgical treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant or irreparable rotator cuff tears in elderly patients. The procedure comprises an inferior closing wedge partial osteotomy of the coracoid process with fixation to the glenoid neck. This results in a lowered and medialized coracoid process that acts as a bone block and the conjoint tendon is brought closer to the glenohumeral joint, thus closing the subcoracoid space, which blocks humeral dislocation. We describe an arthroscopic step-by-step guided Trillat technique that is simple, efficient, and reproducible, while minimizing risk in the extra-articular subcoracoid space. Our technique does not require the release of the pectoralis minor tendon from the coracoid process, which reduces the risk of damaging the brachial plexus. We use a tight-rope fixation construct that allows progressive transfer of the coracoid process, limiting fracture risk and the risk of overtightening of the subscapularis muscle. Because there is a trend for more complex procedures being performed arthroscopically, it is important to develop and simplify operative techniques, aiding surgeons in achieving reproducible and reliable patient outcomes.

Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients' morphometric considerations.

PURPOSE: To assess the anthropometric dimensions of the coracoid process and the glenoid articular surface and to determine possible implications with the different commercially available Latarjet fixation techniques. METHODS: In a total of 101 skeletal scapulae the glenoid length (GL), the glenoid width (GW), the coracoid length (CL), the coracoid width (CW) and the coracoid thickness (CTh) were measured. In order to assess the ability of the transferred coracoid to restore the glenoid anatomy we created a hypothetical model of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% glenoid bone loss. We analyzed four common surgical fixation techniques for the Latarjet procedure (4.5 mm screws, 3.75 mm screws, 3.5 mm screws, and 2.8 mm button). The distances from the superior-inferior and medio-lateral limits of the coracoid using the four different fixation methods were calculated. We hypothesized that the "safe distance" between the implant and the coracoid osteotomy should be at least equal to the diameter of the implant. RESULTS: The intra and inter-observer reliability tests were almost perfect for all measurements. The mean GH was 36.8 ± 2.5 mm, the GW 26.4 ± 2.2 mm, the CL 23.9 ± 3 mm, the CW 13.6 ± 2.mm, and the mean CTh was 8.7 ± 1.3 mm. The CL was < 25 mm in 46% of the cases. In cases with 25% and 30% bone loss, the coracoid graft restored the glenoid anatomy in 96% and 79.2% of the cases. With the use of the 4.5 mm screws the "safe distance" was present in 56% of the cases, with the 3.75 mm screws in 85%, with the 3.5 mm screws in 87%, and with the 2.8 mm button in 98% of the cases. The distance from the medio-lateral limit of the coracoid could be significantly increased (up to 9 mm) when smaller-button implants are used. CONCLUSIONS: The coracoid graft could not always restore glenoid defects of 30%. Larger implants could be positioned too close to the osteotomy and the "medio-lateral offset" of the coracoid could be increased with smaller implants.

Partial Patellar Lateral Facetectomy: Arthroscopic Technique.

Lateral patellofemoral osteoarthritis is a relatively common condition in young, active patients. Partial lateral patellar facetectomy is a relatively minimally invasive option to restore knee function and return to sport when conservative treatments are insufficient. We describe the arthroscopic technique of partial lateral patellar facetectomy , which has been historically performed as an open procedure. We describe preoperative planning, arthroscopic portals, landmarks, intra-articular evaluation of bone resection, and surgical difficulties. The goal of the preoperative planning was a target bone resection of 10 to 15 mm including osteophytes and the lateral facet of the patella. Arthroscopic anterolateral and anterior superolateral portals were used to achieve the desired resection. An arthroscopic technique allows a direct view of the osteoarthritic bone for removal and permits intraoperative dynamic evaluation, which allows the surgeon to finetune the bone resection and obtain optimal patellar tracking. Avoiding arthrotomy could reduce morbidity and allows a rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

No clinical benefit from gender-specific total knee replacement implants: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the treatment of choice for severe osteoarthritis of the knee and nearly 60% of patients undergoing TKA are women. Females present three notable anatomic differences. Thus, gender-specific (GS) components were introduced to accommodate the females' anatomic differences. No systematic review has been published since 2014. The aim of this study was to perform a recent systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is any clinical benefit of gender-specific implants compared to conventional unisex implants in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This study included prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) comparing clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in TKA with gender-specific implants and conventional implants. All studies had a minimum follow-up of two years. RESULTS: Three PRCTs published between 2010 and 2012 were included. These studies showed a low risk of bias and were of very high quality. We did not find superior clinical outcomes for gender-specific prostheses compared to conventional prostheses. However, gender-specific TKA reduced the number of patients with femoral component overhang compared to conventional TKA. CONCLUSION: In our systematic review, despite a lower overhang rate, gender-specific implants in female TKA showed no clinical benefit over standard unisex implants. Good clinical results with significant improvement were observed with both designs. There is a notable absence of new studies on this subject in recent years, and further research needs to be performed using various gender-specific implant designs to further define the role of gender-specific implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.

Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcome Measures in the Thyroid Cancer Population.

Background: There is an escalating worldwide population of thyroid cancer (TC) survivors. In addition to conventional metrics of quality of care, quality-of-life (QoL) assessment in TC patients is imperative. TC survivors face unique impediments to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), including thyroid-specific symptoms and exposure to disease-related stressors-including fear of recurrence and financial toxicity-over a prolonged survival period. Survey instruments currently used to assess HRQoL in TC survivors may be insufficient to accurately capture the burden of disease in this population. We aimed to identify the HRQoL instruments in the literature, which have been applied in the TC survivor population, and to present the psychometric properties of the scales and indexes that have been used. We hypothesized that few instruments have shown evidence of validity in this population. Summary: Of the 927 articles identified by search criteria, only 28 studies using 15 HRQoL instruments met inclusion criteria. Of the 15 HRQoL instruments identified, 9 were psychometric health status instruments and 6 were preference-based indexes, but none had been validated in the TC survivor population. While the majority of reviewed studies demonstrated impaired psychological and emotional well-being in TC survivors, these findings were not uniformly demonstrated across studies, and the longevity of the impact of TC on HRQoL was variably reported. Conclusions: Discrepancies in the literature regarding the impact of TC survivorship on HRQoL emphasize the challenges of accurately assessing patient perspectives, reinforcing the importance of using well-constructed instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in the target population. Care providers involved in the treatment of TC survivors should be aware of longitudinal effects on HRQoL, especially pertaining to chronic psychological debilitation. Further development and rigorous validation of TC-specific instruments will allow for better data gathering and understanding of the barriers to achieving high long-term HRQoL in TC survivors throughout their long postsurvival course.

New Technologies in Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis. Despite good survival rates, up to 20% of TKA patients remain dissatisfied. Recently, promising new technologies have been developed in knee arthroplasty, and could improve the functional outcomes. The aim of this paper was to present some new technologies in TKA, their current concepts, their advantages, and limitations. The patient-specific instrumentations can allow an improvement of implant positioning and limb alignment, but no difference is found for functional outcomes. The customized implants are conceived to reproduce the native knee anatomy and to reproduce its biomechanics. The sensors have to aim to give objective data on ligaments balancing during TKA. Few studies are published on the results at mid-term of these two devices currently. The accelerometers are smart tools developed to improve the TKA alignment. Their benefits remain yet controversial. The robotic-assisted systems allow an accurate and reproducible bone preparation due to a robotic interface, with a 3D surgical planning, based on preoperative 3D imaging or not. This promising system, nevertheless, has some limits. The new technologies in TKA are very attractive and have constantly evolved. Nevertheless, some limitations persist and could be improved by artificial intelligence and predictive modeling.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Autograft Prevents Infraspinatus Retear in Massive Posterosuperior Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: Materials and patches with increased biomechanical and biological properties and superior capsular reconstruction may change the natural history of massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs). PURPOSE: To compare structural and clinical outcomes among 3 surgical techniques for the treatment of massive posterosuperior RCTs: double-row (DR) technique, transosseous-equivalent (TOE) technique with absorbable patch reinforcement, and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence 3. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the 3 techniques in patients who underwent repair of massive posterosuperior RCTs between January 2007 and March 2017. All patients completed preoperative and 24-month postoperative evaluations: range of motion, subjective shoulder value, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale for pain, and Constant score. Tendon integrity was assessed with ultrasound 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients completed the final evaluation (28 patients, DR; 30 patients, TOE + patch; 24 patients, SCR with LHBT). Groups were statistically comparable preoperatively, except for active forward elevation and tendon retraction, which were significantly worse in the SCR group (P = .008 and P = .001, respectively). After 24 months, the mean ± SD scores for the respective groups were as follows: 76 ± 10, 72 ± 15, and 77 ± 10 for the Constant score (P = .35); 84 ± 10, 84 ± 15, and 80 ± 15 for the ASES (P = .61); 9 ± 2, 9 ± 3, and 8 ± 3 for the Simple Shoulder Test (P = .23); 82 ± 15, 80 ± 18, and 75 ± 18 for the subjective shoulder value (P = .29); and 1.4 ± 1.7, 1.8 ± 2, and 1.4 ± 1.4 for the visual analog scale (P = .65). The strength of the operated shoulder was 4 ± 3 kg, 4.7 ± 3 kg, and 6.4 ± 1.6 kg for the DR, TOE + patch, and SCR groups, respectively (P = .006). At 12 months postoperatively, 60.7% (17 of 28) of the DR group, 56.7% (17 of 30) of the TOE + patch group, and 91.7% (22 of 24) of the SCR group remained healed on ultrasound. The infraspinatus tendon remained healed in 75% of the DR group, 76.5% of the TOE + patch group, and 100% of the SCR with the LHBT group (P = .006). CONCLUSION: In cases of massive posterosuperior RCTs, SCR with the LHBT should be considered a reliable, cost-effective treatment option that protects infraspinatus integrity.