Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Gut ; 60(1): 73-6, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20833659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subjects with one first-degree relative (FDR) with colorectal cancer (CRC) <50 years old or two FDRs with CRC have an increased risk for CRC (RR 4-6). Current guidelines recommend colonoscopic surveillance of such families. However, information about the yield of surveillance is limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of surveillance and to identify risk factors for the development of adenomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: asymptomatic subjects aged between 45 and 65 years, with one FDR with CRC <50 years old (group A) or two FDRs with CRC diagnosed at any age (group B). Subjects with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 551 subjects (242 male) met the selection criteria. Ninety-five subjects with a previous colonoscopy were excluded. Two of 456 remaining subjects (0.4%) were found to have a colorectal tumour (one CRC and one carcinoid). Adenomas were detected in 85 (18.6%) and adenomas with advanced pathology in 37 subjects (8.1%). 30 subjects (6.6%) had multiple (>1) adenomas. Men were more often found to have an adenoma than women (24% vs 14.3%; p=0.01). Adenomas were more frequent in group B compared with group A (22.0% vs 15.6%; p=0.09). CONCLUSION: The yield of colonoscopic surveillance in familial CRC is substantially higher than the yield of screening reported for the general population.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Adenoma/epidemiology , Adenoma/genetics , Age Factors , Aged , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Time Factors
2.
Pancreatology ; 10(2-3): 222-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20484959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early computed tomography (CT) (within 4 full days after symptom onset) may be performed to distinguish acute pancreatitis (AP) from other intra-abdominal conditions or to identify early pancreatic necrosis. We analyzed practice and yield of early CT in patients with an established clinical diagnosis of AP in a Dutch cohort (EARL study). METHODS: Multicenter observational study. Etiology, disease course, CT timing, Balthazar CT score, and clinical management were evaluated. RESULTS: First documented hospital admissions of 166 patients were analyzed. Etiology was biliary (42.8%), unknown (20.5%), alcoholic (18.1%), post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (11.4%), and miscellaneous (7.2%). In 89.2% (148/166), the disease course was mild. Out of 18 patients with severe AP, 11 eventually developed (peri)pancreatic necrosis. At least one CT (range 1-12) was performed in 47% (78/166) of all patients and in 62.8% (49/78) it was acquired within 4 full days after symptom onset. Practice, timing, and Balthazar CT score of early CTs were not significantly different between mild and severe AP. None of the early CTs showed necrosis and no alternative diagnoses were established. In 89.8% (44/49), clinical management was not altered after early CT. In 10.2% (5/49), prophylactic antibiotics were started, but in absence of necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: A CT scan was frequently acquired early in the course of AP, but its yield was low and had no implications with regard to clinical management. It seems prudent that clinicians should be more restrictive in the use of early CT, in particular in mild AP, to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure and to save costs.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Contraindications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis/pathology , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects
3.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 28(9): 1159-65, 2008 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18657130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following a nil per os (NPO) regimen, most patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) can resume normal oral intake within 1 week. If not tolerated, it is recommended to initiate artificial feeding, preferably by the enteral route. AIM: To evaluate the nutritional management of patients with AP in a Dutch cohort (EARL study). METHODS: Observational study in 18 hospitals. Total days of NPO, tube feeding (TF) with/without oral feeding, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and total starvation time were analysed. RESULTS: In mild AP, a majority of cases (80.7%, 117/145) were managed with an NPO regimen only. Twenty-seven patients (18.6%) with mild AP additionally received TF; one received TPN. Of those with severe AP, more than half of the patients (56.2%, nine of 16) were treated with TF besides an NPO regimen; four received TPN. TF was delivered preferably via the jejunal route. The median period of total starvation was 2 days for both mild and severe AP. Only 5.5% (nine of 164) of patients had a prolonged starvation time of more than 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The total time of starvation was limited in a majority of patients admitted for AP. According to international guidelines, additional nutritional interventions were quickly undertaken with enteral feeding via the jejunum as the preferred route.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/methods , Pancreatitis/therapy , Parenteral Nutrition/methods , Acute Disease , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Starvation , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL