ABSTRACT
Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24â h, separated by at least 5â min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Failure , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Risk Factors , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Incidence , Heart Failure/complications , Asia/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Tachycardia, Ventricular/complicationsABSTRACT
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Latin America , Treatment Outcome , Catheters , Asia , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) provides real-time, fluoroless imaging of cardiac structures, allowing optimal catheter positioning and energy delivery during ablation procedures. This review summarizes the use of ICE in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). RECENT FINDINGS: Growing evidence suggests that the use of ICE improves procedural safety and facilitates radiofrequency and cryoballoon AF ablation. ICE-guided catheter ablation is associated with reduced procedural duration and fluoroscopy use. Recent studies have examined the role of ICE in guiding novel ablation techniques, such as pulsed field ablation. Finally, the use of ICE allows for early detection and timely management of potentially serious procedural complications. Intracardiac echocardiography offers significant advantages during AF ablation procedures and its use should be encouraged to improve procedural safety and efficacy.
ABSTRACT
The first edition of Europace journal in 1999 came right around the time of the landmark publication of the electrophysiologists from Bordeaux, establishing how elimination of ectopic activity from the pulmonary veins (PVs) resulted in a marked reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF). The past 25 years have seen an incredible surge in scientific interest to develop new catheters and energy sources to optimize durability and safety of ablation, as well as study the mechanisms for AF and devise ablation strategies. While ablation in the beginning was performed with classic 4â mm tip catheters that emitted radiofrequency (RF) energy to create tissue lesions, this evolved to using irrigation and contact force (CF) measurement while increasing power. Also, so-called single-shot devices were developed with balloons and arrays to create larger contiguous lesions, and energy sources changed from RF current to cryogenic ablation and more recently pulsed field ablation with electrical current. Although PV ablation has remained the basis for every AF ablation, it was soon recognized that this was not enough to cure all patients, especially those with non-paroxysmal AF. Standardized approaches for additional ablation targets have been used but have not been satisfactory in all patients so far. This led to highly technical mapping systems that are meant to unravel the drivers for the maintenance of AF. In the following sections, the development of energies, strategies, and tools is described with a focus on the contribution of Europace to publish the outcomes of studies that were done during the past 25 years.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheters , Irreversible Electroporation TherapyABSTRACT
AIMS: The recurrence rates after catheter ablation (CA) and direct current (DC) cardioversion remain high, although they have been established treatments of rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). This umbrella review systematically appraises published meta-analyses of both observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the association of risk and protective factors for arrhythmia recurrence after CA and DC cardioversion of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three bibliographic databases were searched up to June 2021. Evidence of association was rated as convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant with respect to observational studies and as high, moderate, low, or very low with respect to RCTs, according to established criteria. Thirty-one meta-analyses were included. Of the 28 associations between CA and the risk of arrhythmia recurrence, none presented convincing evidence, and only the time from diagnosis to ablation over 1 year provided highly suggestive evidence. The association between hypertension and metabolic profile provided suggestive evidence. The associations of Class IC and III antiarrhythmic drugs use with the recurrence after DC cardioversion were supported by an intermediate level of evidence. CONCLUSION: Although AF is a major health issue, few risk- and protective factors for AF recurrence have been identified. None of these factors examined were supported by convincing evidence, whereas established factors such as female gender and left atrial volume showed only weak association. An early CA strategy combined with treatment of metabolic syndrome and hypertension prior to CA may reduce the risk of arrhythmia recurrence. The use of antiarrhythmics can increase the success rate of DC cardioversion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42021270613.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Female , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Recurrence , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The Working Group comprised experts in heart rhythm management including Task Force members of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD, members of the European Heart Rhythm Association, international experts, and a patient representative. We followed the ESC methodology for QI development, which involves (i) the identification of the key domains of care for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD by constructing a conceptual framework of care, (ii) the development of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature, (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs using a modified-Delphi method, and (iv) the evaluation of the feasibility of the developed QIs. We identified eight domains of care for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD: (i) structural framework, (ii) screening and diagnosis, (iii) risk stratification, (iv) patient education and lifestyle modification, (v) pharmacological treatment, (vi) device therapy, (vii) catheter ablation, and (viii) outcomes, which included 17 main and 4 secondary QIs across these domains. Following a standardized methodology, we developed 21 QIs for the management of patients with VA and the prevention of SCD. The implementation of these QIs will improve the care and outcomes of patients with VA and contribute to the prevention of SCD.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Humans , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment option for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Recent advances in various imaging modalities, including three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems, magnetic resonance imaging, transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) have been adopted in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias improving procedural outcome and safety. ICE is an imaging tool which provides real-time visualization of anatomical structures of the heart, facilitating catheter manipulation and navigation during ablation procedures. In this review we aim to highlight the benefits of ICE use in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and to describe practical techniques for visualization of cardiac structures with ICE during ventricular tachycardia ablations.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Echocardiography , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Echocardiography/methods , Heart , HumansABSTRACT
AIMS: To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the care and outcomes for adults undergoing cardiac pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Under the auspice of the Clinical Practice Guideline Quality Indicator Committee of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Working Group for cardiac pacing QIs was formed. The Group comprised Task Force members of the 2021 ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, members of the European Heart Rhythm Association, international cardiac device experts, and patient representatives. We followed the ESC methodology for QI development, which involved (i) the identification of the key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of the management of patients receiving cardiac pacing, (ii) the development of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature, (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs using a modified-Delphi method, and (iv) the evaluation of the feasibility of the developed QIs. Four domains of care were identified: (i) structural framework, (ii) patient assessment, (iii) pacing strategy, and (iv) clinical outcomes. In total, seven main and four secondary QIs were selected across these domains and were embedded within the 2021 ESC Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization therapy. CONCLUSION: By way of a standardized process, 11 QIs for cardiac pacing were developed. These indicators may be used to quantify adherence to guideline-recommended clinical practice and have the potential to improve the care and outcomes of patients receiving cardiac pacemakers.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiology , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Advisory Committees , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Humans , Quality Indicators, Health CareABSTRACT
Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, being closely interrelated as the one increases the prevalence and incidence and worsens the prognosis of the other. Their frequent coexistence raises several challenges, including under-diagnosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction in AF and of AF in HF, characterization and diagnosis of atrial cardiomyopathy, target and impact of rate control therapy on outcomes, optimal rhythm control strategy in the era of catheter ablation, HF-related thromboembolic risk and management of anticoagulation in patients with comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease or transient renal function worsening, coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, valvular or structural heart disease interventions and cancer. In the present document, derived by an expert panel meeting, we sought to focus on the above challenging issues, outlining the existing evidence and identifying gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Consensus , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
AIMS: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Smartwatches and their chargers could be a possible source of EMI. We sought to assess whether the latest generation smartwatches and their chargers interfere with proper CIED function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included consecutive CIED recipients in two centres. We tested two latest generation smartwatches (Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch) and their charging cables for potential EMI. The testing was performed under continuous electrocardiogram recording and real-time device telemetry, with nominal and 'worst-case' settings. In vitro magnetic field measurements were performed to assess the emissions from the tested devices, initially in contact with the probe and then at a distance of 10 cm and 20 cm. In total, 171 patients with CIEDs (71.3% pacemakers-28.7% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) from five manufacturers were enrolled (63.2% males, 74.8 ± 11.4 years), resulting in 684 EMI tests. No EMI was identified in any patient either under nominal or 'worst-case scenario' programming. The peak magnetic flux density emitted by the smartwatches was similar to the background noise level (0.81 µT) even when in contact with the measuring probe. The respective values for the chargers were 4.696 µΤ and 4.299 µΤ for the Samsung and Apple chargers, respectively, which fell at the background noise level when placed at 20 cm and 10 cm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two latest generation smartwatches and their chargers resulted in no EMI in CIED recipients. The absence of EMI in conjunction with the extremely low intensity of magnetic fields emitted by these devices support the safety of their use by CIED patients.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Electric Power Supplies , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Electronics , Female , Humans , Magnetic Fields , MaleABSTRACT
Optimal antithrombotic treatment of older patients is usually impeded by several prevailing misconceptions. The aim of our study was to assess the type, dosage and predictors of antithrombotic therapy in older patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). PAVE-AF was a prospective, cross-sectional study, including NVAF patients ≥ 80 years from 30 participating centers. Demographic data, comorbidities and treatment patterns were documented in a single visit. Patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were further classified into three dosing categories (recommended, underdosing and overdosing). Among 1018 patients (85.4±4.0 years), 88.4% received anticoagulants (AC), 8% antiplatelets (AP) and 3.6% no treatment. The primary reason for AP administration was physician concern of bleeding followed by patient denial. Patients ≥90 years had two times greater probability to receive AP therapy compared to patients < 90 years. Among patients treated with AC, one third received vitamin K antagonists, while two thirds received NOACs [34.6% apixaban, 9.5% dabigatran and 22.6% rivaroxaban]. Independent predictors of AC prescription over AP or no treatment were low HAS-BLED score, hypertension, labile INR, permanent AF, absence of uncontrolled hypertension, prior stroke/systemic embolism, age and male gender. In total, 37% of NOAC recipients received inappropriate dosage, while the number of patients receiving recommended dosing differed significantly among NOAC subgroups (p < 0.001). In our study, a minority of older NVAF patients received AP or no therapy for stroke prevention. Among patients treated with anticoagulants, two thirds were on NOAC treatment, though with a considerable proportion of inappropriate dosing.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Stroke/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most commonly diagnosed arrhythmia, affects a notable percentage of the population and constitutes a major risk factor for thromboembolic events and other heart-related conditions. Fibrosis plays an important role in the onset and perpetuation of AF through structural and electrical remodelling processes. Multiple molecular pathways are involved in atrial substrate modification and the subsequent maintenance of AF. In this review, we aim to recapitulate underlying molecular pathways leading to atrial fibrosis and to indicate existing gaps in the complex interplay of atrial fibrosis and AF.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Remodeling , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/pathology , Fibrosis , Heart Atria/pathology , Humans , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
This review aims to provide a comprehensive recapitulation of the evolution in the field of cardiac rhythm monitoring, shedding light in recent progress made in multilead ECG systems and wearable devices, with emphasis on the promising role of the artificial intelligence and computational techniques in the detection of cardiac abnormalities.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Wearable Electronic Devices , Algorithms , Electrocardiography , Humans , Machine Learning , Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a considerable impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study aimed to evaluate the effect of oral treatment with controlled-release (CR) flecainide on AF patients' QoL and treatment compliance during a 12-week period. A total of 70 sites enrolled consecutive patients with paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PerAF), treated with flecainide CR in the context of a rhythm control strategy. The effect on QoL was assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity of Atrial Fibrillation scale (CCS-SAF). RESULTS: In total, 679 patients (53.2% females, 66 ± 11.7 years, 86.9% PAF) were included. Prior antiarrhythmic medication had been administered in 43.8% of patients. A daily dose of 200 mg was administered to 66.4% of patients by the end of study. Flecainide CR resulted in a significant reduction in the CCS-SAF score (mean (SD)) at the end of the study as compared with baseline (1.32 (0.57) vs 1.64 (0.73), p < 0.0001). Flecainide CR significantly reduced the CCS-SAF score both in PAF (1.27 (0.52) vs 1.61 (0.72), p < 0.0001) as well as in PerAF (1.63(0.77) vs 1.84(0.81), p = 0.017). Overall, 4 (0.6%) patients experienced a total of 6 adverse events during the study period. The compliance to flecainide CR treatment was very high with 93.6% of patients responding that they had not missed any dose during the study period. CONCLUSION: Treatment with flecainide CR significantly improves QoL in both paroxysmal as well as persistent AF patients, with an excellent safety profile and associated patient compliance.
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Flecainide/therapeutic use , Heart Rate/drug effects , Quality of Life , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/psychology , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Flecainide/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) still represents an unsettled issue. In this multicentre study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and the long-term clinical course of patients with BrS. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 111 consecutive patients (86 males; aged 45.3 ± 13.3 years) diagnosed with BrS were included and followed-up in a prospective fashion. Thirty-seven patients (33.3%) were symptomatic at enrolment (arrhythmic syncope). An electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed in 59 patients (53.2%), and ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 32 (54.2%). A cardioverter defibrillator was implanted in 34 cases (30.6%). During a mean follow-up period of 4.6 ± 3.5 years, appropriate device therapies occurred in seven patients. Event-free survival analysis (log-rank test) showed that spontaneous type-1 electrocardiogram pattern (P = 0.008), symptoms at presentation (syncope) (P = 0.012), family history of sudden cardiac death (P < 0.001), positive EPS (P = 0.024), fragmented QRS (P = 0.004), and QRS duration in lead V2 > 113 ms (P < 0.001) are predictors of future arrhythmic events. Event rates were 0%, 4%, and 60% among patients with 0-1 risk factor, 2-3 risk factors, and 4-5 risk factors, respectively (P < 0.001). Current multiparametric score models exhibit an excellent negative predictive value and perform well in risk stratification of BrS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric models including common risk factors appear to provide better risk stratification of BrS patients than single factors alone.
Subject(s)
Brugada Syndrome/physiopathology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/epidemiology , Adult , Brugada Syndrome/complications , Brugada Syndrome/therapy , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Female , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Syncope/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/etiologyABSTRACT
Radiofrequency ablation is the therapy of choice for the suppression of medically intractable symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Here we present the case report of a 50-year-old woman with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and symptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia arising from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). The origin of the ventricular arrhythmia was confirmed in the left coronary cusp (LCC) of the BAV. The patient underwent a successful radiofrequency ablation. LCC of a tricuspid aortic valve is a common origin of idiopathic LVOT tachycardia; however, little is known for these types of arrhythmias when located in the cusps of a BAV.