Does the eye benefit from wearing ultraviolet-blocking contact lenses?

OBJECTIVES: The human eye is exposed to toxic ultraviolet radiation (UVR) from sunlight and artificial sources. The UVR-induced damage occurs in ocular tissues from the corneal surface to the retina. Although the cornea and crystalline lens provide inherent UVR protection, the anterior ocular surface and the limbus, which contains stem cells, receive toxic levels of UVR from relatively short solar exposures. METHODS: Shading headwear and some UVR-blocking sunglasses are designed to reduce direct solar exposure but may not protect the eye from diffuse ambient and surface reflected light. If the squint mechanism is reduced because of the reduction of visible light, the ocular surface is then exposed to ambient and reflected UVR. In addition, laterally incident radiation that is focused across the cornea onto the limbus, a phenomenon known as peripheral light focusing, can increase the dose at the nasal limbus by a factor of 20. RESULTS: The UVR-blocking contact lenses that cover the limbus provide protection from all sources of ocularly incident UVR. Although directly relating solar UVR dose to ocular damage is epidemiologically challenging, irradiation of ocular cell cultures can estimate the toxic effects of UVR exposure. The use of UVR-blocking contact lenses greatly increases the time the wearer can be exposed to solar UVR before a toxic ocular dose is reached. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for the development of a scientifically rigorous, clinically applicable ocular protection factor metric, based not only on the transmittance of eyewear but on the protection afforded from the total UVR field and the length of that exposure.

Ultraviolet radiation transmittance of the mouse eye and its individual media components.

Recently, the mouse has become the preferred animal model in ophthalmic research. Therefore, there is a need for enhanced understanding of the mouse eye to validate its use in different experimental setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the ocular transmittance of the whole mouse eye, the cornea and the crystalline lens, particularly in the ultraviolet radiation (UVR) wavebands. This was carried out using a non-cuvette based fiber optic spectrometer system and the resulting transmittance curves were compared with published cone spectral response curves and mouse ocular transmittance data. First, transmittance curves of the whole mouse eye were measured by removing a small disc of sclera from the posterior pole to provide an anterior to posterior optical path. No statistical difference was found between left and right eye in each of the four mice sampled, therefore, all eight eyes were included in the final statistical analysis. The average of five test measurements from each left and right eye for the four test mice showed a transmittance cut off at approximately 310 nm. Secondly, the cornea with a scleral rim was excised and transmittance curves obtained for all eight eyes. This data showed an average transmittance cut off at 280 nm for the cornea. Similarly measured data for the excised crystalline lens showed UVR transmittance down to 310 nm. The good correlation between total ocular UVR transmittance and the sum of the individually measured components (i.e. the cornea and the crystalline lens) supported the validity of our method and its findings. This experiment demonstrated that the mouse cornea transmits more UV-B (280-315 nm) than the rabbit and the human corneal transmittance. The mouse crystalline lens on the other hand showed a cut off in the UV-B at 310 nm, which is at a much lower UV-B wavelength than the approximate UV-A (315-400 nm) cut off for the human crystalline lens at around 390 nm. The increased transmittance of UVR in the mouse eye serves its vision, since the mouse has a cone photopigment peaking at approximately 350 nm. Due to the above stated differences between the mouse and the human it is concluded that the mouse is not an ideal model for the human eye in experiments involving UVR.

Medium-mediated effects increase cell killing in a human keratinocyte cell line exposed to solar-simulated radiation.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether cell culture medium is a biologically relevant exposure medium that can be employed in non-ionising photobiological investigations. METHODS: The effect of solar-simulated irradiation on cell culture medium and its ability to elicit cell death was studied. The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell secreted factors, and the contribution of individual components of the medium were investigated. RESULTS: Cell death was found to be primarily mediated through the formation of ROS via riboflavin photosensitisation and degradation in the cell culture medium. Phenol red was found to significantly reduce the cell killing ability of riboflavin. Exposures in riboflavin-free medium resulted in significantly increased cell survival compared to identical exposures in riboflavin containing medium. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that solar radiation toxicity is augmented by cell culture medium due to the presence of riboflavin. Results suggest that exposures performed in phenol red-free medium may serve to increase phototoxic effects if riboflavin is present. Riboflavin-free media is recommended for solar radiation investigations to eliminate concerns regarding riboflavin photosensitisation and nutrient deprivation.

Solar simulated radiation induced cell death depends on spectral distribution and irradiance but not output delivery.

Photo-biological investigations are dependent on calibration and characterisation to determine the relevance of an artificial irradiator to the study at hand. The importance of this has been voiced in the literature. However, the importance of output delivery is relatively unknown. The biological relevance of a high-energy, rapidly pulsing solar simulator was investigated using the clonogenic assay and was found to be reciprocity law compliant despite an exaggerated ultraviolet (UV) irradiance in excess of 1600 W m(-2) delivered per pulse. In fact, it was found to be the least cytotoxic irradiator compared with a second solar simulator and a UVB fluorescent lamp with continuous UV irradiances of 55 and 6.4 W m(-2), respectively. The reduced survival observed with the continuous irradiators is attributed to differences in spectral irradiance and distribution, particularly in the UVB, which in the absence of thorough calibration and characterisation may have resulted in erroneous conclusions.

Current silicone hydrogel UVR blocking lenses and their associated protection factors.

PURPOSE: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) blocking contact lenses provides ocular protection factors (PF) that vary with lens thickness and the nature of the polymer dopant. This study measured the UVR PF of silicone hydrogel lenses outdoors and compares this to known methods for determining PF mathematically. METHODS: Ambient measurements were taken using an UVA-B radiometer, adapted to hold the test lenses over its sensor to quantify their UVR blocking capabilities. The UVR blocking silicone hydrogel lenses tested included galyfilcon A, senofilcon A, and enfilcon A. The first UVR blocking hydrogel lens, vasurfilcon A, and a non-blocking silicone hydrogel lens, lotrafilcon B, served as a comparison. Lens transmittance at the centre and periphery was measured and PF calculated to predict signal reduction for comparison with field measurements. RESULTS: There was a significant range of cut-off wavelengths across the lenses, ranging from 370nm for enfilcon A to 390nm for vasurfilcon A, with lotrafilcon B transmitting down to 265nm, with a 3nm shift from centre to periphery across the -3.00 D UVR blockers. The UVR reduction calculated from the transmittance data correlates well with field data, ranging from 90-98% for the UVR blockers to 13% for the non-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: The silicone hydrogel lenses showed a wide range of transmittance curves with increasing PF from centre to periphery. PF calculations work well but do not always compare precisely with measured data due to factors such as sensor spectral response and the nature of the incident solar spectrum.

Novel method for determining hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lens transmission curves and their spatially specific ultraviolet radiation protection factors.

PURPOSE: Anterior ocular tissues exposed to high levels of toxic ultraviolet (UV) radiation may undergo physiologic changes leading to diseases that can alter the ocular surface, particularly in the stem cell-rich limbal region. UV radiation-blocking hydrogel contact lenses provide protection across the ocular surface, which varies according to the lens thickness. METHODS: A novel fiber optic spectrophotometer front-end system has been developed to measure lens transmission curves at test points across lens surfaces to determine optical properties based on the Beer-Lambert law. Factors determining the transmission curves include the hydrogel lens used, its refractive index, whether a UV radiation-blocking dopant is incorporated, the water content, and the thickness of the lens. Test lenses of equal power were placed over a detecting fiber optic and illuminated by a deuterium source, and transmission spectra were recorded. The small optical sampling size allowed the spectral transmission profile to be determined across the lens surface, and comparisons were made with different lenses. RESULTS: Transmission curves across the lenses showed greater UV radiation-blocking capacity at the thicker peripheral region, with the 50% cutoff wavelength moving toward the visible spectrum by 10 nm from the center to the periphery. In addition, the ability to determine the spatially specific absorption coefficient and the related UV radiation protection factor was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The system measures spatial variation in lens transmission and comparing different lens types while overcoming many of the handling limitations of cuvette-based spectrophotometer methods. The data show good agreement with published transmission curves and allow intralens and interlens comparisons.

Can UV radiation-blocking soft contact lenses attenuate UV radiation to safe levels during summer months in the southern United States?

PURPOSE: Peak solar UV radiation (UVR) intensities are typically experienced in summer months. People living in the southern states of the United States, where the UVR frequently exceeds the recommended minimum erythema dose (MED), are at particular risk, especially outdoor workers. The present study analyzed summertime MED readings in Houston, TX, to assess the frequency of intensities regarded as unhealthy. The study also sought to assess whether UV-blocking hydrogel contact lenses provide ocular protection from these high doses. METHODS: Readings, taken at midday using a UVR biometer, were analyzed to assess the potential UVR risk. The spectral response of the meter, modified by the spectral transmission curves of the contact lenses, allowed us to mathematically assess the ocular protection provided. In addition, ambient UVR measurements were taken at midday, using a portable UVR radiometer. The detector was adapted so that a standard diameter hydrogel contact lens could be placed over it to quantify the UV-blocking capabilities of the lens. RESULTS: The MED readings showed that the recommended safety standards were exceeded approximately at local midday 90% of the time. Model calculations and empirical data demonstrated that contact lenses attenuated the MED readings by up to 90%, bringing them well within the recommended Environmental Protection Agency safety standards. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the model used in this study was verified through direct comparison of the modeled and measured data. UV-blocking hydrogel soft contact lenses reduce the MED to the human eye and therefore limit the lifetime ocular dose. These lenses are highly recommended to prevent the development of UVR-related ocular pathologic conditions.