Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates and Infants: Favorable Outcomes with Epicardial Pacing Systems.

The implantation of pacemakers (PM) in neonates and infants requires particular consideration of small body size, marked body growth potential, and the decades of future pacing therapy to be expected. The aim of this study is to quantify the complications of implantation and outcome occurring at our center and to compare these with other centers. Retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients undergoing PM implantation at a single tertiary care center within the first year of life. PMs were implanted at a median age of 3 months (range 0-10 months). Structural heart defects were present in 44 of 52 patients. During a median follow-up time of 40.4 months (range 0.1-114 months), measurements for sensing, pacing thresholds, and lead impedance remained stable. No adverse pacing effect was observed in left ventricular function or dimensions over time. There were 20 reoperations in 13 patients at a median time of 4.7 years (range 0.05-8.2 years) after implantation, for end of battery life (n = 10), lead dysfunction (n = 3), device dislocation (n = 3), infection (n = 3), and diaphragmatic paresis (n = 1). No PM-related mortality occurred. Epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants is an invasive but safe and effective procedure with a relatively low risk of complications. Our current implantation technique and the use of bipolar steroid-eluting electrodes, which we prefer to implant on the left ventricular apex, lead to favorable long-term results.

Vertical Right Axillary Mini-Thoracotomy for Correction of Ventricular Septal Defects and Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defects.

BACKGROUND: Vertical right axillary mini-thoracotomy (VRAMT) is the standard approach for correction of atrial septal defect and partial atrioventricular septal defect at our institution. This observational single-center study compares our initial results with the VRAMT approach for the repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD) and complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) in infants and children to an approach using standard median sternotomy (MS). METHODS: The perioperative courses of patients undergoing VSD and CAVSD correction through either a VRAMT or an MS were analyzed retrospectively. The surgical technique for the VRAMT involved a 4- to 5-cm vertical incision in the right axillary fold. RESULTS: Of 84 patients, 25 (VSD, n = 15; CAVSD, n = 10) underwent correction through a VRAMT approach, whereas 59 (VSD, n = 35; CAVSD, n = 24) had repair through MS. VSD and CAVSD groups were comparable with respect to age and weight. No significant differences were observed for aortic cross-clamp duration, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and echocardiographic follow-up. There was no need for any conversion from VRAMT to MS in any case. Neither wound infections nor thoracic deformities were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: VRAMT can be considered as a safe and effective approach for the repair of VSD and CAVSD in selected patient groups, and the outcome data appear comparable to those of MS.