Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 141(1): 250-256, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28550988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aspirin desensitization is an effective treatment option for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Aspirin desensitization protocol modifications have improved the safety and efficiency of this procedure, yet some providers remain reluctant to perform it. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of outpatient aspirin desensitization procedures. A secondary objective was to assess clinical characteristics that might predict reaction severity during aspirin desensitization. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-five patients underwent aspirin desensitization at Scripps Clinic between January 2009 and August 2015. Baseline patient characteristics and reaction results were analyzed in the 167 patients who reacted during desensitization. RESULTS: All of the 167 reactors, including 23 who were classified as severe reactors, were successfully desensitized in the outpatient setting. The average desensitization duration among reactors was 1.67 days, and the average duration for gastrointestinal reactors was 2.29 days. The mean baseline Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score was higher in severe reactors compared with nonsevere reactors (P = .05). Overall, patients receiving omalizumab had a similar reaction profile to those not receiving omalizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing aspirin desensitization will have symptoms. It remains difficult to predict the severity of these symptoms. However, desensitization can be done safely and efficiently in an appropriately equipped outpatient setting. This treatment option should be made available to all patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score might be able to predict more severe reactions and merits further study. Eight of the 9 patients receiving omalizumab reacted during desensitization, suggesting that it does not block reactions during aspirin desensitization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Tract Diseases/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Diseases/metabolism , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 116(4): 755-60, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16210047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), pretreatment with asthma controller medications (leukotriene modifiers, inhaled or systemic corticosteroids, and salmeterol) partially modifies the severity of aspirin-induced asthmatic reactions. OBJECTIVE: A recent study showed that pretreatment with tacrolimus completely prevented aspirin-induced respiratory reactions and might allow silent aspirin desensitization. METHODS: Ten patients with rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, and asthma had a history of asthma attacks after ingesting aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. All underwent baseline oral aspirin challenges and had typical respiratory reactions. They were then randomized to receive tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg weight; 8 patients) or placebo (2 patients) in a double-blind protocol before rechallenge with aspirin using the previous provoking dose of aspirin. In addition, respiratory reactions sustained by 50 consecutive patients with AERD during 2004 were recorded, analyzed, and compared with the tacrolimus/placebo-treated patients to determine whether there were any differences. RESULTS: Tacrolimus pretreatment failed to block respiratory reactions to provoking doses of aspirin in 5 of 8 patients with AERD, and in the other 3 patients did not block higher doses of aspirin. The results of oral aspirin challenges in the control population of 50 patients were compared with either the baseline or postchallenge data from the tacrolimus-pretreated or placebo-pretreated patients with AERD, and there were no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Use of tacrolimus as add-on pretreatment to prevent reactions to aspirin in patients with AERD or to achieve the goal of silent aspirin desensitization could not be accomplished.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Asthma/etiology , Asthma/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Tacrolimus/pharmacology , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/immunology , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/immunology , Asthma/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Double-Blind Method , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL