ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In 2017, China launched a new round of medical reform (NMR) to address the inaccessibility of high-priced drugs for patients with serious diseases. This study explored the impact of the NMR on the accessibility and affordability of high-priced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and the effective promotion policies after the NMR. METHODS: We used a standard method developed by the World Health Organization to conduct two surveys on the availability of mAbs and their prices before and after the NMR in the public hospitals in Hubei province, China. By interviewing hospital pharmacy experts, we identified the potential value of the current NMR in improving the access to therapeutic mAbs. RESULTS: The average availability of 13 mAbs increased by 8.1% in the surveyed hospitals of Hubei province after the NMR. The median unit price of 10 mAbs dropped by 34.3%. The average affordability of a treatment cycle of 10 mAbs dropped from 680 days to 298 days of the disposable daily income for a middle-income resident (56.2% reduction). The drug price negotiation of medical insurance inclusion and the promotion of consistent evaluation of generic and original drugs could effectively promote the accessibility of mAbs. However, the zero markup of drug pricing and the limit on the proportion of drug revenues in public hospitals showed certain negative effects on the availability of mAbs. CONCLUSION: Not all current NMR policies play a positive role in promoting the accessibility of mAbs. To further improve the accessibility of mAbs in the future in China, it is therefore critical to increase the investment in independent research and development of high-quality mAbs, establish localized guidelines for the rational use of mAbs in clinical practice, and have a cost-sharing mechanism for high-priced drugs with multiple stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public , Humans , Costs and Cost Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , ChinaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Generic drugs provide an opportunity for savings in drug expenditure since they are available at a lower cost and do not affect patients' health. A better understanding of pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and perception can promote the quality use of generic drugs. The objective of this study was to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perception of pharmacists from tertiary hospitals in China regarding generic drugs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a postal questionnaire was conducted, which was sent to 200 hospital pharmacists randomly selected from tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. A total of 125 questionnaires out of 200 were received. Of the respondents, 80 were female and 45 were male. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (87.2%) could clearly distinguish between original and generic drugs. Pharmacists agreed that generic drugs were less effective (52.8%) and produced more side effects (52%). Fortynine respondents thought that generic drug products were not adequately tested. Approximately 78% and 60% of the pharmacists indicated that generic substitution was not feasible for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows and drugs for critical diseases, respectively. Most of them supported the recommendation of generic drugs based on professional judgment. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that a considerable portion of Chinese hospital pharmacists hold negative perceptions of generic drugs. Interventions to improve pharmacists' knowledge of generic drugs are needed.