Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Theft Biofilm Require Host Lipids of Cutaneous Wound.

OBJECTIVE: This work addressing complexities in wound infection, seeks to test the reliance of bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) on host skin lipids to form biofilm with pathological consequences. BACKGROUND: PA biofilm causes wound chronicity. Both CDC as well as NIH recognizes biofilm infection as a threat leading to wound chronicity. Chronic wounds on lower extremities often lead to surgical limb amputation. METHODS: An established preclinical porcine chronic wound biofilm model, infected with PA or Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceramidase mutant (PA ∆Cer ), was used. RESULTS: We observed that bacteria drew resource from host lipids to induce PA ceramidase expression by three orders of magnitude. PA utilized product of host ceramide catabolism to augment transcription of PA ceramidase. Biofilm formation was more robust in PA compared to PA ∆Cer . Downstream products of such metabolism such as sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate were both directly implicated in the induction of ceramidase and inhibition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)δ, respectively. PA biofilm, in a ceram-idastin-sensitive manner, also silenced PPARδ via induction of miR-106b. Low PPARδ limited ABCA12 expression resulting in disruption of skin lipid homeostasis. Barrier function of the wound-site was thus compromised. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that microbial pathogens must co-opt host skin lipids to unleash biofilm pathogenicity. Anti-biofilm strategies must not necessarily always target the microbe and targeting host lipids at risk of infection could be productive. This work may be viewed as a first step, laying fundamental mechanistic groundwork, toward a paradigm change in biofilm management.

FosB is essential for the enhancement of stress tolerance and antagonizes locomotor sensitization by ΔFosB.

BACKGROUND: Molecular mechanisms underlying stress tolerance and vulnerability are incompletely understood. The fosB gene is an attractive candidate for regulating stress responses, because ΔFosB, an alternative splice product of the fosB gene, accumulates after repeated stress or antidepressant treatments. On the other hand, FosB, the other alternative splice product of the fosB gene, expresses more transiently than ΔFosB but exerts higher transcriptional activity. However, the functional differences of these two fosB products remain unclear. METHODS: We established various mouse lines carrying three different types of fosB allele, wild-type (fosB(+)), fosB-null (fosB(G)), and fosB(d) allele, which encodes ΔFosB but not FosB, and analyzed them in stress-related behavioral tests. RESULTS: Because fosB(+/d) mice show enhanced ΔFosB levels in the presence of FosB and fosB(d/d) mice show more enhanced ΔFosB levels in the absence of FosB, the function of FosB can be inferred from differences observed between these lines. The fosB(+/d) and fosB(d/d) mice showed increased locomotor activity and elevated Akt phosphorylation, whereas only fosB(+/d) mice showed antidepressive-like behaviors and increased E-cadherin expression in striatum compared with wild-type mice. In contrast, fosB-null mice showed increased depression-like behavior and lower E-cadherin expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that FosB is essential for stress tolerance mediated by ΔFosB. These data suggest that fosB gene products have a potential to regulate mood disorder-related behaviors.

Antagonistic regulation of cell-matrix adhesion by FosB and DeltaFosB/Delta2DeltaFosB encoded by alternatively spliced forms of fosB transcripts.

Among fos family genes encoding components of activator protein-1 complex, only the fosB gene produces two forms of mature transcripts, namely fosB and DeltafosB mRNAs, by alternative splicing of an exonic intron. The former encodes full-length FosB. The latter encodes DeltaFosB and Delta2DeltaFosB by alternative translation initiation, and both of these lack the C-terminal transactivation domain of FosB. We established two mutant mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines carrying homozygous fosB-null alleles and fosB(d) alleles, the latter exclusively encoding DeltaFosB/Delta2DeltaFosB. Comparison of their gene expression profiles with that of the wild type revealed that more than 200 genes were up-regulated, whereas 19 genes were down-regulated in a DeltaFosB/Delta2DeltaFosB-dependent manner. We furthermore found that mRNAs for basement membrane proteins were significantly up-regulated in fosB(d/d) but not fosB-null mutant cells, whereas genes involved in the TGF-beta1 signaling pathway were up-regulated in both mutants. Cell-matrix adhesion was remarkably augmented in fosB(d/d) ES cells and to some extent in fosB-null cells. By analyzing ES cell lines carrying homozygous fosB(FN) alleles, which exclusively encode FosB, we confirmed that FosB negatively regulates cell-matrix adhesion and the TGF-beta1 signaling pathway. We thus concluded that FosB and DeltaFosB/Delta2DeltaFosB use this pathway to antagonistically regulate cell matrix adhesion.

Functional characterization of a mammalian transcription factor, Elongin A.

Elongin A is the transcriptionally active subunit of the Elongin complex that strongly stimulates the rate of elongation by RNA polymerase II (pol II) by suppressing the transient pausing of the polymerase at many sites along the DNA template. We have recently shown that Elongin A-deficient mice are embryonic lethal, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Elongin A(-/-) embryos display not only increased apoptosis but also senescence-like phenotypes accompanied by the activation of p53. To further understand the function of Elongin A in vivo, we have carried out the structure-function analysis of Elongin A and identified sequences critical to its nuclear localization and direct interaction with pol II. Moreover, we have analyzed the replication fork movement in wild-type and Elongin A(-/-) MEFs, and shown the possibility that the genomic instability observed in Elongin A(-/-) MEFs might be caused by the replication fork collapse due to Elongin A deficiency.

Mammalian elongin A is not essential for cell viability but is required for proper cell cycle progression with limited alteration of gene expression.

Elongin A is a transcription elongation factor that increases the overall rate of mRNA chain elongation by RNA polymerase II. To investigate the function of Elongin A in vivo, the two alleles of the Elongin A gene have been disrupted by homologous recombination in murine embryonic stem (ES) cells. The Elongin A-deficient ES cells are viable, but show a slow growth phenotype because they undergo a delayed mitosis. The cDNA microarray and RNase protection assay using the wild-type and Elongin A-deficient ES cells indicate that the expression of only a small subset of genes is affected in the mutant cells. Taken together, our results suggest that Elongin A regulates transcription of a subset but not all of genes and reveal a linkage between Elongin A function and cell cycle progression.

Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel transcription elongation factor, Elongin A3.

The Elongin complex stimulates the rate of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II by suppressing the transient pausing of the polymerase at many sites along the DNA template. Elongin is composed of a transcriptionally active A subunit and two small regulatory B and C subunits, the latter binding stably to each other to form a binary complex that interacts with Elongin A and strongly induces its transcriptional activity. To further understand the role of Elongin A in transcriptional regulation by RNA polymerase II, we are attempting to identify Elongin A-related proteins. Here, we report on the molecular cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of human Elongin A3, a novel transcription elongation factor that exhibits 49 and 81% identity to Elongin A and the recently identified Elongin A2, respectively. The mRNA of Elongin A3 is ubiquitously expressed, and the protein is localized to the nucleus of cells. Mechanistic studies have demonstrated that Elongin A3 possesses similar biochemical features to Elongin A2. Both stimulate the rate of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II and are capable of forming a stable complex with Elongin BC. In contrast to Elongin A, however, their transcriptional activities are not activated by Elongin BC. Structure-function analyses using fusion proteins composed of Elongin A3 and Elongin A revealed that the COOH-terminal region of Elongin A is important for the activation by Elongin BC.