Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 114
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 29(1): 28-38, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33171315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Establish the impact of pain severity on the cost-effectiveness of generic duloxetine for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the United States. DESIGN: We used a validated computer simulation of knee OA to compare usual care (UC) - intra-articular injections, opioids, and total knee replacement (TKR) - to UC preceded by duloxetine in those no longer achieving pain relief from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We considered cohorts with mean ages 57-75 years and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain 25-55 (0-100, 100-worst). We derived inputs from published data. We discounted costs and benefits 3% annually. We conducted sensitivity analyses of duloxetine efficacy, duration of pain relief, toxicity, and costs. RESULTS: Among younger subjects with severe pain (WOMAC pain = 55), duloxetine led to an additional 9.6 QALYs per 1,000 subjects (ICER = $88,500/QALY). The likelihood of duloxetine being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY was 40% and 54%. Offering duloxetine to older patients with severe pain led to ICERs >$150,000/QALY. Offering duloxetine to subjects with moderate pain (pain = 25) led to ICERs <$50,000/QALY, regardless of age. Among knee OA subjects with severe pain (pain = 55) who are unwilling or unable to undergo TKR, ICERs were <$50,600/QALY, regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine is a cost-effective addition to knee OA UC for subjects with moderate pain or those with severe pain unable or unwilling to undergo TKR. Among younger subjects with severe pain, duloxetine is cost-effective at WTP thresholds >$88,500/QALY.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Aged , Analgesics/economics , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Computer Simulation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/economics , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
2.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 39(5): 420-427, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460873

ABSTRACT

Surgical resection with free surgical margins is the cornerstone of successful primary treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). In general reexcision is recommended when the minimum peripheral surgical margin (MPSM) is <8 mm microscopically. Pathologists are, therefore, required to report the minimum distance from the tumor to the surgical margin. Currently, there are no guidelines on how to make this measurement, as this is often considered straightforward. However, during the 2018 Annual Meeting of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP), a discussion on this topic revealed a variety of opinions with regard to reporting and method of measuring margin clearance in VSCC specimens. Given the need for uniformity and the lack of guidance in the literature, we initiated an online survey in order to deliver a consensus-based definition of peripheral surgical margins in VSCC resections. The survey included questions and representative diagrams of peripheral margin measurements. In total, 57 pathologists participated in this survey. On the basis of consensus results, we propose to define MPSM in VSCC as the minimum distance from the peripheral edge of the invasive tumor nests toward the inked peripheral surgical margin reported in millimeters. This MPSM measurement should run through tissue and preferably be measured in a straight line. Along with MPSM, other relevant measurements such as depth of invasion or tumor thickness and distance to deep margins should be reported. This manuscript provides guidance to the practicing pathologist in measuring MPSM in VSCC resection specimens, in order to promote uniformity in measuring and reporting.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Vulvar Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Margins of Excision , Pathologists , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery
3.
Lupus ; 27(1): 120-123, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28595511

ABSTRACT

Objective There is a decreased risk of breast cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) versus the general population; little is known regarding the receptor status of breast cancers in SLE, or treatment. Methods Breast cancer cases occurring after SLE diagnosis were ascertained through linkage with tumor registries. We determined breast cancer positivity for estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and/or Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), as well as cancer treatment. Results We obtained information on ER, PR, and/or HER2 status for 63 SLE patients with breast cancer. Fifty-three had information on ER and/or PR status; 36 of these (69%) were ER positive. Thirty-six of the 63 had information on HER2 status; of these, 26 had complete information on all three receptors. Twenty-one of these 26 (81%) were HER2 negative; seven of 26(27%) were triple negative. All but one patient underwent surgery; 11.5% received both non-tamoxifen chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 16.4% radiotherapy without non-tamoxifen chemotherapy, and 14.7% received non-tamoxifen chemotherapy without radiotherapy. Conclusion ER positivity was similar to historical general population figures, with a trend toward a higher proportion of triple-negative breast cancers in SLE (possibly reflecting the relatively young age of our SLE patients).


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/complications , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
4.
Lupus ; 26(3): 311-315, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27687028

ABSTRACT

Objective There is a decreased breast cancer risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) versus the general population. We assessed a large sample of SLE patients, evaluating demographic and clinical characteristics and breast cancer risk. Methods We performed case-cohort analyses within a multi-center international SLE sample. We calculated the breast cancer hazard ratio (HR) in female SLE patients, relative to demographics, reproductive history, family history of breast cancer, and time-dependent measures of anti-dsDNA positivity, cumulative disease activity, and drugs, adjusted for SLE duration. Results There were 86 SLE breast cancers and 4498 female SLE cancer-free controls. Patients were followed on average for 7.6 years. Versus controls, SLE breast cancer cases tended to be white and older. Breast cancer cases were similar to controls regarding anti-dsDNA positivity, disease activity, and most drug exposures over time. In univariate and multivariate models, the principal factor associated with breast cancers was older age at cohort entry. Conclusions There was little evidence that breast cancer risk in this SLE sample was strongly driven by any of the clinical factors that we studied. Further search for factors that determine the lower risk of breast cancer in SLE may be warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors
5.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 24(5): 776-85, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746146

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies suggest nerve growth factor inhibitors (NGFi) relieve pain but may accelerate disease progression in some patients with osteoarthritis (OA). We sought cost and toxicity thresholds that would make NGFi a cost-effective treatment for moderate-to-severe knee OA. DESIGN: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of NGFi compared to standard of care (SOC) in OA, using Tanezumab as an example. Efficacy and rates of accelerated OA progression were based on published studies. We varied the price/dose from $200 to $1000. We considered self-administered subcutaneous (SC) injections (no administration cost) vs provider-administered intravenous (IV) infusion ($69-$433/dose). Strategies were defined as cost-effective if their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was less than $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In sensitivity analyses we varied efficacy, toxicity, and costs. RESULTS: SOC in patients with high levels of pain led to an average discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 11.15 QALYs, a lifetime risk of total knee replacement surgery (TKR) of 74%, and cumulative discounted direct medical costs of $148,700. Adding Tanezumab increased QALYs to 11.42, reduced primary TKR utilization to 63%, and increased costs to between $155,400 and $199,500. In the base-case analysis, Tanezumab at $600/dose was cost-effective when delivered outside of a hospital. At $1000/dose, Tanezumab was not cost-effective in all but the most optimistic scenario. Only at rates of accelerated OA progression of 10% or more (10-fold higher than reported values) did Tanezumab decrease QALYs and fail to represent a viable option. CONCLUSIONS: At $100,000/QALY, Tanezumab would be cost effective if priced ≤$400/dose in all settings except IV hospital delivery.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Nerve Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Osteoarthritis, Knee/economics , Pain Measurement/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Self Administration/economics , United States
6.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 24(3): 409-18, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525846

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes of naproxen, ibuprofen, celecoxib or tramadol for OA patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. DESIGN: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to examine treatment with these analgesics after standard of care (SOC) - acetaminophen and corticosteroid injections - failed to control pain. NSAID regimens were evaluated with and without proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) regimens where available. Estimates of treatment efficacy (pain reduction, occurring in ∼57% of patients on all regimens) and toxicity (major cardiac or gastrointestinal toxicity or fractures, risk ranging from 1.09% with celecoxib to 5.62% with tramadol) were derived from published literature. Annual costs came from Red Book Online(®). Outcomes were discounted at 3%/year and included costs, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Key input parameters were varied in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Adding ibuprofen to SOC was cost saving, increasing QALYs by 0.07 while decreasing cost by $800. Incorporating OTC naproxen rather than ibuprofen added 0.01 QALYs and increased costs by $300, resulting in an ICER of $54,800/QALY. Using prescription naproxen with OTC PPIs led to an ICER of $76,700/QALY, while use of prescription naproxen with prescription PPIs resulted in an ICER of $252,300/QALY. Regimens including tramadol or celecoxib cost more but added fewer QALYs and thus were dominated by several of the naproxen-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple comorbidities, naproxen- and ibuprofen-containing regimens are more effective and cost-effective in managing OA pain than opioids, celecoxib or SOC.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/economics , Celecoxib/adverse effects , Celecoxib/economics , Celecoxib/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy, Combination/economics , Female , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Ibuprofen/economics , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Naproxen/adverse effects , Naproxen/economics , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Nonprescription Drugs/economics , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/economics , Pain Measurement/methods , Proton Pump Inhibitors/economics , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tramadol/adverse effects , Tramadol/economics , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United States
7.
Lupus ; 25(1): 12-7, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26190169

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Family planning discussions are an important aspect of medical care for women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as active disease is a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes, and the medications used for treatment can be harmful to the fetus when used during conception and pregnancy. Our objective was to examine the impact of patient perception of quality and type of communication on receiving contraception counseling. METHODS: Data were derived from patients enrolled in the University of California, San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study. Individuals participate in a yearly structured telephone interview that includes assessment of contraception counseling when starting new medications, and measures of communication and decision making. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of not receiving contraception counseling. RESULTS: Of the 68 women included in this analysis, one-third did not receive contraception counseling when starting new medications. Older age, white race, depressive symptoms, and higher SLE disease activity were independently associated with not receiving contraception counseling. Participants who did not receive contraception counseling rated their physicians lower in shared decision-making (SDM) communication. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a gap in family planning counseling among women with SLE starting new medications. Future studies to address these potential areas of intervention, including education about the need for contraception through menopause, and mechanisms to engage in SDM surrounding contraception are needed to improve quality of care for women with lupus.


Subject(s)
Communication , Contraception/methods , Counseling , Delivery of Health Care , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adult , Contraception/standards , Counseling/standards , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/ethnology , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Education as Topic , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Racial Groups , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , San Francisco/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Telephone
8.
Oncology ; 85(2): 117-21, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23887245

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evidence points to a decreased breast cancer risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We analyzed data from a large multisite SLE cohort, linked to cancer registries. METHODS: Information on age, SLE duration, cancer date, and histology was available. We analyzed information on histological type and performed multivariate logistic regression analyses of histological types according to age, SLE duration, and calendar year. RESULTS: We studied 180 breast cancers in the SLE cohort. Of the 155 cases with histology information, 11 were referred to simply as 'carcinoma not otherwise specified'. In the remaining 144 breast cancers, the most common histological type was ductal carcinoma (n = 95; 66%) followed by lobular adenocarcinoma (n = 11; 8%), 15 cancers were of mixed histology, and the remaining ones were special types. In our regression analyses, the independent risk factors for lobular versus ductal carcinoma was age [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.14] and for the 'special' subtypes it was age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) and SLE duration (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, up to 80% of breast cancers are ductal carcinomas. Though our results are not definitive, in the breast cancers that occur in SLE, there may be a slight decrease in the ductal histological type. In our analyses, age and SLE duration were independent predictors of histological status.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/etiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/etiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Cohort Studies , Disease Susceptibility/etiology , Disease Susceptibility/pathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
9.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 40(6): 428-32, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21936614

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this study we compared activity limitations, pain intensity, and global health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Sweden and the USA and aimed to determine whether nationality is associated with these outcomes. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the 'Swedish TIRA project' (n = 149) and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) RA panel study (n = 85). Data were collected annually concerning use of medications [disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics, and corticosteroids], morning stiffness, number of swollen joints, and number of painful joints. Three self-reported outcome measures were examined: pain intensity measured on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS), activity limitation according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and global health. To analyse the data, the Student's t-test, the χ(2)-test, and the generalized estimating equation (GEE) method were used. RESULTS: Nationality was significantly related to HAQ score and pain intensity, even after adjustment for covariates. The patients in the TIRA cohort reported a lower HAQ score and a higher pain intensity than the patients in the UCSF cohort. Nationality was not related to global health. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA should be assessed with awareness of the psychosocial and cultural context because disability seems to be affected by nationality. Further knowledge to clarify how a multinational setting affects disability could improve the translation of interventions for patients with RA across nationalities.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Health Status , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , California , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Sweden
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 66(3): 154-60, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18805880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Self-reported exposure to vapours, gas, dust or fumes (VGDF) has been widely used as an occupational exposure metric in epidemiological studies of chronic lung diseases. Our objective was to characterise the performance of VGDF for repeatability, systematic misclassification, and sensitivity and specificity against exposure likelihood by a job-exposure matrix (JEM). METHODS: We analysed data from two interviews, 24 months apart, of adults with asthma and chronic rhinitis. Using distinct job as the unit of analysis, we tested a single response item (exposure to VGDF) against assignment using a JEM. We further analysed VGDF and the JEM among a subset of 199 subjects who reported the same job at both interviews, using logistic regression analysis to test factors associated with VGDF inconsistency and discordance with the JEM. RESULTS: VGDF was reported for 193 (44%) of 436 distinct jobs held by the 348 subjects studied; moderate to high exposure likelihood by JEM was assigned to 120 jobs (28%). The sensitivity and specificity of VGDF against JEM were 71% and 66%, respectively. Among 199 subjects with the same job at both interviews, 32% had a discordant VGDF status (kappa = 0.35). Those with chronic rhinitis without concomitant asthma compared to asthma alone were more likely to have a VGDF report discordant with the JEM (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 9.0; p = 0.01). Rhinitis was also associated with reported VGDF in a job classified by the JEM as low exposure (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.4; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The VGDF item is moderately sensitive measured against JEM as a benchmark. The measure is a useful assessment method for epidemiological studies of occupational exposure risk.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Asthma/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure , Rhinitis/etiology , Adult , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dust , Gases , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Health , Occupations , Risk Assessment/methods , Self Disclosure , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 64(12): 798-805, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17567725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on work and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) have been primarily focused on physical demands; very little is known about work-related organisational policies and KOA risks and outcomes. We examined the associations between workplace policies and KOA in a community-based population in the USA. METHODS: The associations between employment offering accommodations (switch to physically less demanding jobs; part-time work for people needing reduced time) and benefits policies (paid sick leave; disability payment) with KOA outcomes (knee symptoms; symptomatic KOA [sKOA]; asymptomatic radiographic KOA [rKOA]) were analysed in participants (n = 1639) aged <65 years old and with completed employment histories and knee radiographs at baseline examination of the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate the prevalence odds ratios (ORs) of KOA associated with each workplace policy, adjusting for sociodemographic features, lifestyle factors, knee injuries, body mass index and other workplace characteristics. We used propensity score models to evaluate the differential selection in employment offering favourable policies and adjust for this potential bias accordingly. RESULTS: Individuals employed in workplaces offering better policies had significantly less knee symptoms. Lower sKOA prevalence was noted in workplaces offering job-switch accommodation (8% vs. 13%), paid sick leave (9% vs. 16%) and disability payment (8% vs. 16%) than their counterparts. In multivariable models, the difference in sKOA prevalence was statistically significant for paid sick leave (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91) and disability payment policies (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.85). Even among those without overt knee-related symptoms, a similar pattern of negative association between workplace policies and rKOA was present and remained robust after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSION: The negative associations between KOA and workplace policies raise concerns about possible employment discrimination or beneficial effects of workplace policies. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the dynamic complexities of KOA risks and outcomes in relation to workplace policies.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint , Knee , Occupational Health , Organizational Policy , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Work , Adult , Disabled Persons , Discrimination, Psychological , Female , Humans , Knee/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Prevalence , Radiography , Sick Leave , United States/epidemiology , Workplace
12.
Environ Health Perspect ; 109(8): 809-14, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11564616

ABSTRACT

Because the morbidity and mortality from adult asthma have been increasing, the identification of modifiable environmental exposures that exacerbate asthma has become a priority. Limited evidence suggests that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may adversely affect adults with asthma. To study the effects of ETS better, we developed a survey instrument to measure ETS exposure in a cohort of adults with asthma living in northern California, where public indoor smoking is limited. To validate this survey instrument, we used a passive badge monitor that measures actual exposure to ambient nicotine, a direct and specific measure of ETS. In this validation study, we recruited 50 subjects from an ongoing longitudinal asthma cohort study who had a positive screening question for ETS exposure or potential exposure. Each subject wore a passive nicotine badge monitor for 7 days. After the personal monitoring period, we readministered the ETS exposure survey instrument. Based on the survey, self-reported total ETS exposure duration ranged from 0 to 70 hr during the previous 7 days. Based on the upper-range boundary, bars or nightclubs (55 hr) and the home (50 hr) were the sites associated with greatest maximal self-reported exposure. As measured by the personal nicotine badge monitors, the overall median 7-day nicotine concentration was 0.03 microg/m(3) (25th-75th interquartile range 0-3.69 microg/m(3)). Measured nicotine concentrations were highest among persons who reported home exposure (median 0.61 microg/m(3)), followed by work exposure (0.03 microg/m(3)), other (outdoor) exposure (0.025 microg/m(3)), and no exposure (0 microg/m(3); p = 0.03). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between self-reported ETS exposure duration and directly measured personal nicotine concentration during the same 7-day period was 0.47, supporting the survey's validity (p = 0.0006). Compared to persons with no measured exposure, lower-level [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-8.8] and higher-level ETS exposures (OR 6.8; 95% CI, 1.4-32.3) were associated with increased risk of respiratory symptoms. A brief, validated survey instrument can be used to assess ETS exposure among adults with asthma, even with low levels of exposure. This instrument could be a valuable tool for studying the effect of ETS exposure on adult asthma health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis , Adult , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Asthma/diagnosis , California/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Humans , Nicotine/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment
13.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 52(7): 667-75, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10391660

ABSTRACT

We performed analyses to examine the structure, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), originally validated in Australia in a self-administered format, among 539 U.S. subjects with asthma. Subjects were interviewed twice by telephone over an 18-month period. Based on factor analyses, the subscale structure of the AQLQ was modified slightly to eliminate item overlap among subscale scores. Cross-sectionally, total AQLQ scores were significantly correlated in expected directions with baseline asthma severity scores (r = 0.58), SF-36 physical (r = -0.66) and mental (r = -0.40) health status scores, and pulmonary function (FEV1% predicted, r = -0.14). Longitudinally, changes in AQLQ total and subscale scores were significantly (P<0.01) associated with changes in asthma severity and both physical and mental status. The AQLQ, administered by telephone, appears to be useful for assessing changes in the impact of adult asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma/classification , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Asthma/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Sickness Impact Profile , United States
14.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 54(6): 610-8, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11377122

ABSTRACT

Asthma and rhinitis are common chronic conditions that affect adults of working age. Little is known about their relative impacts on work loss and decreased productivity. Using random digit telephone dialing, we carried out a population-survey of adults in Northern California aged 18-50 years. We interviewed 125 persons with asthma (with or without concomitant rhinitis) and 175 persons with rhinitis alone. Study eligibility was based on subject report of a physician's diagnosis of asthma and/or a rhinitis-related condition. Any adult labor force participation since condition onset was lower among those with asthma (88%) than among those with rhinitis alone (97%) (P = 0.002). In contrast, among those still employed, decreased job effectiveness was more frequently reported in the rhinitis group (43 of 121; 36%) compared to those with asthma (14 of 72; 19%) (P = 0.02). Condition-attributed lost work was common in both groups, with more than 20% reporting one or more complete or partial work days lost in the 4 weeks previous to interview. Taking into account age, gender, race, and smoking status, those with asthma were more likely to have no labor force participation after diagnosis (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and less likely to report decreased job effectiveness among those remaining employed (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Excluding subjects from the rhinitis group most likely to have unreported asthma based on past medication use had little impact on these associations. Both asthma and rhinitis negatively affect work productivity. Those with asthma are less likely to be employed at all, while among those remaining on the job, rhinitis is a more potent cause of decreased work effectiveness. The economic impact of asthma and rhinitis and related conditions may be under-appreciated.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Asthma/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , California/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Efficiency , Health Status , Humans , Middle Aged
15.
Chest ; 109(3): 688-96, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8617077

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Identify risk factors for work disability among adults with asthma treated by pulmonary and allergy specialists. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey, including retrospective work history data. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight pulmonary and 16 allergy internal medicine subspecialists maintaining a registry of patient visits for asthma; 698 registered patients aged 18 to 50 years, of whom 601 (86%) were studied. MEASURES: Computer-assisted, telephone-administered structured interview assessing asthma severity, perceived general health status, asthma quality of life, demographics, and work history. Complete work disability defined as total work cessation attributed to asthma; partial work disability defined as change in job, duties, or reduction in work hours attributed to asthma. RESULTS: Complete cessation of work due to asthma was reported by 40 (7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 9%) and partial work disability by 53 (10%; 95% CI, 7 to 12%) of 550 subjects with a history of labor force participation. Severity of asthma score predicted both complete disability (odds ratio [OR], 7.9; 95% CI, 4.2 to 15 per 10-point increment) and partial disability (OR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.2). Taking illness severity into account, job conditions, occupation, and work exertion carried a combined disability OR of 3.9 (95% CI, 1.7 to 8.6). CONCLUSIONS: Work disability is common among adults with asthma receiving specialist care. Severity of disease is a powerful predictor, but not the sole predictor of disability in this group. Working conditions, including job-related exposures, are associated with added disability risk even after taking illness severity into account.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Disability Evaluation , Occupational Health , Adult , Asthma/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Medicine , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors
16.
Chest ; 115(5): 1259-64, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10334137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In general practice settings, the proportion of adult asthma attributable to occupational factors is not known. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to estimate the proportion of adult asthma cases that can be attributed to occupational factors initiating new disease onset and exacerbating preexisting disease. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of interview data for 150 adults with asthma recruited from a random sample of family practice specialists. We ascertained the asthma and work histories of the subjects and estimated the proportion with likely work-initiated asthma and work-related asthma recrudescence. RESULTS: Seventy-four subjects (49%) reported adult-onset asthma while employed; an additional 25 (17%) reported recrudescence of previously quiescent childhood-onset asthma during employment. Of those with new-onset asthma while employed, 15 (10% of the study group; 95% confidence interval, 5 to 15%) were employed in occupations at increased risk of occupational asthma initiation on the basis of an independent job scoring matrix. Of those with asthma recrudescence in adulthood, seven (5% of the study group; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 8%) were employed in occupations at increased risk of exposures aggravating asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with asthma treated in general practice settings, > 1 in 10 patients has a work history strongly suggestive of a potential relationship between exposure and disease.


Subject(s)
Asthma/etiology , Occupational Diseases , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupations , Risk Factors
17.
Chest ; 104(5): 1371-7, 1993 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8222790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of work disability among adults with asthma and to evaluate a clinically based illness severity score as a predictor of such disability. DESIGN: Baseline and follow-up telephone interviews and medical record review. SETTING: University-based outpatient pulmonary specialty practice. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients interviewed at baseline; 42 reinterviewed 2 years later. MEASUREMENTS: Work disability ascertained by interview report and defined as change in job duties, reduction in pay, or change in job or employment status attributed to asthma. Severity of asthma score derived from medical records and based on respiratory symptom frequency, asthma history, and prescribed medications. Pulmonary function by routine testing. Logistic regression analysis of the 5-year incidence of work disability on severity score and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). RESULTS: The 5-year work disability cumulative incidence was 19 percent for change in duties, 17 percent for reduction in pay, 20 percent for change in job or work status, and 36 percent for any of these measures. The median asthma score was 10 (range, 2 to 26). The mean FEV1 as a percent predicted (FEV1 percent) was 88 +/- 25 percent. Score and FEV1 percent were statistically correlated (r = -0.6, p < 0.0001). Severity of asthma score statistically predicted each measure of work disability (p < 0.01). Addition of FEV1 percent added little additional explanatory power to the logistic regression model (maximum chi 2 = 1.3, p > 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Work disability is common among adults with asthma. A severity of asthma score based on clinical variables is statistically correlated with lung function but appears to be a stronger predictor of disability than airflow measured at one point in time.


Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Disability Evaluation , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Respiratory Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , San Francisco/epidemiology
18.
Chest ; 115(2): 403-9, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10027439

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether findings from surveillance bronchoscopy predict survival following lung transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective review and analysis of 498 bronchoscopies with transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and BAL performed in 34 patients after lung transplantation. SETTING: University-based, tertiary referral medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients after lung transplantation. The mean age at transplantation was 49+/-9 years; 20 (59%) were female. Twenty-four (71%) underwent single and 10 (29%) underwent bilateral lung transplantation. The most common pretransplantation diagnostic groups were emphysema/COPD without concomitant alpha1-antiprotease deficiency (n = 13) and other obstructive disease processes (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: Over follow-up, subjects underwent multiple bronchoscopies with TBB and BAL. The median number per subject was 15 (25 to 75% range 13 to 17). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We calculated the overall median BAL WBCs and median percent neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]) among all of the BALs performed for each subject. We then calculated the mean +/- SD of those median values. We used Cox proportionate hazards to assess mortality risk. The median overall follow-up observation period for the cohort was 560 days. There were 11 deaths during this period. Twenty-four subjects (71%) had acute rejection (AR) grades 2 to 4 (mild to severe), and nine (27%) had obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) diagnosed by TBB at any point. The mean value for BAL WBCs was 366+/-145 x 10(3) per milliliter; for percentage PMNs, the mean was 7+/-10%. Adjusting for age, gender, single vs bilateral lung transplantation, pretransplantation diagnostic group, presence of AR, presence of OB, BAL WBC concentration, and lymphocyte CD4/CD8 ratio, PMN percent was a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing inflammation manifested by an increased percentage PMNs over repeated bronchoscopies predicts mortality following lung transplantation. Biopsy data alone may be insufficient to identify posttransplantation patients at risk of poor outcome.


Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Neutrophils , Adult , Biopsy , Bronchi/pathology , Bronchoscopy , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/surgery , Lung Transplantation/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Emphysema/surgery , Retrospective Studies
19.
Chest ; 120(5): 1461-7, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11713120

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Asthma and rhinosinusitis are common medical conditions among adults. Alternative treatments could have important impacts on health status among those individuals with these conditions, but specific prevalence data for these treatments are limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of specific alternative treatment modalities, including herbal agents, ingestion of caffeinated beverages, homeopathy, acupuncture, and massage therapies. DESIGN: Random population telephone sample. SETTING: Northern California. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred adults aged 18 to 50 years with self-report of a physician diagnosis of asthma (n = 125) or rhinosinusitis without concomitant asthma (n = 175). MEASUREMENTS: Structured telephone interviews covering demographics and clinical variables, including the following alternative treatments used in the previous 12 months: herbal agents; caffeine-containing products; homeopathy; acupuncture; aromatherapy; reflexology; and massage. RESULTS: Any alternative practice was reported by 127 subjects (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 48%). Of these, 33 subjects (26%; 95% CI, 21 to 31%) were not current prescription medication users. Herbal use was reported by 72 subjects (24%), caffeine treatment by 54 subjects (18%), and other alternative treatments by 66 subjects (22%). Taking into account demographic variables, subjects with asthma were more likely than those with rhinitis alone to report caffeine self-treatment for their condition (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8%), but herbal use and other alternative treatments did not differ significantly by condition group. CONCLUSION: Alternative treatments are frequent among adults with asthma or rhinosinusitis and should be taken into account by health-care providers and public health and policy analysts.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Attitude to Health , California , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phytotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Self Care , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Socioeconomic Factors
20.
Arthritis Care Res ; 8(4): 311-7, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8605272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, incidence, and correlates of work disability among persons with musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: Literature review and analysis of the Health and Retirement Survey, a national, probability sample of community-based adults ages 51-61. RESULTS: Clinical samples of persons with RA report work disability rates of 51% to 60%. Community-based studies of persons with a broad range of musculoskeletal conditions find work disability rates of 38% to 71%, depending on the mix of symptoms and particular sampling strategy. Persons with musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidity are particularly prone to work loss, with three-quarters leaving work prior to the normal age of retirement. In multivariate models, after adjusting for demographic and functional characteristics, persons with musculoskeletal conditions actually are more likely to work than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with musculoskeletal conditions have high rates of work disability, but given their level of impairment, are more likely to work than persons without musculoskeletal conditions.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL