Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(1): 111-120, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597065

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), male erectile dysfunction (ED), and the prevalence and correlates of sexual health discussions between early-onset CRC survivors and their health care providers. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered in partnership with a national CRC advocacy organization. Respondents (n = 234; diagnosed < 50 years, 6-36 months from diagnosis/relapse) were colon (36.8%) and rectal (63.3%) cancer survivors (62.5% male). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) was used to measure FSD, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used to measure ED. Survivors reported whether a doctor communicated with them about sexual issues during/after treatment. RESULTS: Among females (n = 87), 81.6% had FSD (mean FSFI-6 score = 14.3 [SD±6.1]). Among males (n = 145), 94.5% had ED (mean IIEF-5 score = 13.6 [SD±3.4]). Overall, 59.4% of males and 45.4% of females reported a sexual health discussion. Among the total sample, older age of diagnosis and relapse were significantly associated with reporting a discussion, while female sex was negatively associated with reporting a sexual health discussion. Among males, older age at diagnosis and relapse, and among females, older age of diagnosis, were significantly associated with reporting a sexual health discussion. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of FSD and ED were high (8 in 10 females reporting FSD, almost all males reporting ED), while reported rates of sexual health discussion were suboptimal (half reported discussion). Interventions to increase CRC provider awareness of patients at risk for not being counseled are needed to optimize long-term health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Erectile Dysfunction , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Sexual Health , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/complications , Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction/complications , Survivors , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Recurrence
2.
Oncologist ; 27(7): 579-586, 2022 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35427410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young adults (YA) diagnosed with rectal cancer are disproportionately impacted by the gonadotoxic effects of treatment and potential subsequent infertility. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of fertility preservation measures used, reasons why such measures were not used, and correlates of discussion between providers and YA rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered on the Facebook page of a national colorectal cancer (CRC) advocacy organization. Eligible participants were rectal cancer survivors diagnosed before age 50, between 6 and 36 months from diagnosis or relapse, and based in the US. RESULTS: Participants were 148 rectal cancer survivors. Over half of the survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about potential therapy-related fertility complications. Only one-fifth of survivors banked sperm (males) or eggs/embryos (females) prior to their cancer therapy. Older age at diagnosis and greater quality of life were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussions among males. Greater quality of life was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussion among females. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the majority of YA rectal cancer survivors do not receive, or cannot recall, comprehensive cancer care, and help to identify patients with rectal cancer who may be at risk for inadequate fertility counseling. Clinicians should provide proper counseling to mitigate this late effect and to ensure optimal quality of life for YA rectal cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Fertility Preservation , Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Rare Diseases , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Semen , Survivors/psychology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL