ABSTRACT
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) are categorized seropositive or seronegative, dependent upon the presence or absence of specific autoreactive antibodies, including rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. Autoantibody-based diagnostics have proved helpful in patient care, not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring of disease activity and prediction of therapy responsiveness. Recent work demonstrates that AIRD patients develop autoantibodies beyond those contained in the original categorization. In this study we discuss key mechanisms that underlie autoantibody development in AIRD: defects in early B cell development, genetic variants involved in regulating B cell and T cell tolerance, environmental triggers and antigen modification. We describe how autoantibodies can directly contribute to AIRD pathogenesis through innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, eventually culminating in systemic inflammation and localized tissue damage. We conclude by discussing recent insights that suggest distinct AIRD have incorrectly been denominated seronegative.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/metabolism , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adaptive Immunity , Animals , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunity, InnateABSTRACT
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex, heterogeneous autoimmune connective tissue disease. Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) has emerged as a valuable treatment option for rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) patients, and thus far is the only treatment that has been shown to have a long-term clinical benefit. AHSCT is thought to reintroduce immune homeostasis through elimination of pathogenic self-reactive immune cells and reconstitution of a new, tolerant immune system. However, the mechanism of action underlying this reset to tolerance remains largely unknown. In this study we review the immune mechanisms underlying AHSCT for SSc, with a focus on the role of the innate immune cells, including monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, in restoring immune balance after AHSCT.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Immunity, Innate , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Monocytes/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy , Autografts , Humans , Killer Cells, Natural/pathology , Monocytes/pathology , Scleroderma, Systemic/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the effectiveness of remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies according to current guidelines in early RA. RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-nine studies, heterogeneous on, e.g., specific treatment strategy and remission outcome used, were identified. Using DAS28-remission over 12 months, 13 (76%) of 17 remission induction strategies showed significantly more patients achieving remission. Pooled relative "risk" was 1.73 [95%CI 1.59-1.88] for bDMARD-based remission induction strategies and 1.20 [95%CI 1.03-1.40] for combination csDMARD-based remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies. When additional glucocorticoid "bridging therapy" was used in single csDMARD-initiating strategies, the higher proportion patients achieving remission in remission induction strategies was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.06 [95%CI 0.83-1.35]). For other remission outcomes, results were in line with above. Remission induction strategies are more effective in achieving remission compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies, possibly more so in bDMARD-based induction strategies. However, compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies with glucocorticoids, induction strategies may not be more effective.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it is of major importance to identify non-responders to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi) before starting treatment, to prevent a delay in effective treatment. We developed a protein score for the response to TNFi treatment in RA and investigated its predictive value. METHOD: In RA patients eligible for biological treatment included in the BiOCURA registry, 53 inflammatory proteins were measured using xMAP® technology. A supervised cluster analysis method, partial least squares (PLS), was used to select the best combination of proteins. Using logistic regression, a predictive model containing readily available clinical parameters was developed and the potential of this model with and without the protein score to predict European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response was assessed using the area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) and the net reclassification index (NRI). RESULTS: For the development step (n = 65 patient), PLS revealed 12 important proteins: CCL3 (macrophage inflammatory protein, MIP1a), CCL17 (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine), CCL19 (MIP3b), CCL22 (macrophage-derived chemokine), interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-6, IL-7, IL-15, soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14), sCD74 (macrophage migration inhibitory factor), soluble IL-1 receptor I, and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor II. The protein score scarcely improved the AUC-ROC (0.72 to 0.77) and the ability to improve classification and reclassification (NRI = 0.05). In validation (n = 185), the model including protein score did not improve the AUC-ROC (0.71 to 0.67) or the reclassification (NRI = -0.11). CONCLUSION: No proteomic predictors were identified that were more suitable than clinical parameters in distinguishing TNFi non-responders from responders before the start of treatment. As the results of previous studies and this study are disparate, we currently have no proteomic predictors for the response to TNFi.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cytokines/metabolism , Proteomics/methods , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/metabolism , Cluster Analysis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RegistriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In the second Computer-Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis trial, patients had started with methotrexate and 10 mg prednisone (MTX+pred) or placebo (MTX+plac). After the trial, prednisone was tapered and stopped, if possible. The objective was to compare, during the post-trial follow-up between the two former strategy groups, initiation of the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), radiographic outcome and onset of glucocorticoid (GC)-related comorbidities. METHODS: Data on prednisone and bDMARD use and onset of GC-related comorbidities were collected retrospectively. Sharp/van der Heijde scoring was performed. Data were analysed using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Of 218 patients post-trial follow-up data were available. The maximum follow-up time was 11.8 years. Fewer patients initiated a first bDMARD in the former MTX+pred compared with the former MTX+plac strategy group: 31% vs 50%, p=0.003. At the 2 year post-trial follow-up, the median erosion score was significantly lower in the former MTX+pred versus former MTX+plac strategy group: 0 (range 0-0) versus 0 (0-2), p=0.002. No significant differences between the former strategy groups in the onset of GC-related comorbidities during the post-trial follow-up were found. CONCLUSION: Addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to an MTX-based treatment strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis results in a lower initiation rate of a first bDMARD and significantly better radiographic outcomes, yet does not result in more GC-related comorbidities.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted , Early Medical Intervention , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation whether biomarkers of joint damage are sensitive to change shortly after a joint bleed in hemophilia patients and in a canine model of blood-induced joint damage. METHODS: Blood and urine samples were collected from 10 hemophilia patients after they reported a joint bleed: within 2 days, after 3-5 days, and 12-14 days. Additionally, 90 days after the bleed a blood and urine sample was taken and considered to represent baseline condition. Commercial serum and urine biomarker assays were performed: urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (uCTX-II), serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP), serum cartilage cleavage product C1,2C, and serum chondroitin sulfate 846 (sCS846). The same panel of biomarkers was explored in dogs (n = 7) after induction of a first joint bleed by intra-articular blood injections. Biosamples were collected at baseline, day 2, 1 and 2 weeks later. RESULTS: In hemophilia patients, levels of uCTX-II and sCS846 increased 5 days after joint bleeding when compared with baseline (+52%; P = 0.021 and +14%; P = 0.011, respectively). In dogs, uCTX-II increased statistically significant from day 2 to day 7 (from 75% to 155% of baseline; P = 0.018), and sCOMP from baseline to day 2 (+46%; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that biochemical markers of joint tissue damage increase shortly after a single joint bleed, both in humans with established hemophilic arthropathy (HA) and in an animal model of joint damage upon a first joint bleed. Biomarkers might be useful in monitoring the impact of a joint bleed and in evaluation of treatment of such bleeds.
Subject(s)
Hemarthrosis/complications , Joint Diseases/blood , Joint Diseases/urine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/urine , Dogs , Female , Hemarthrosis/etiology , Hemophilia A/complications , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnosis , Joint Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a tight-control treatment strategy using the handscan (TCHS) compared to using only clinical assessments (TC) and compared to a general non-tight-control treatment strategy (usual care; UC) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data from 299 early RA patients from the CAMERA trial were used. Clinical outcomes were extrapolated to Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs using a Markov model. Costs and QALYs were compared between the TC and UC treatment strategy arm of the CAMERA trial and a simulated tight-control treatment strategy using the handscan (TCHS). Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were calculated and several scenario analyses performed. All analyses were performed probabilistically to obtain confidence intervals and costs-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves. RESULTS: In TCHS, 4,660 (95% CI -11,516 to 2,045) was saved and 0.06 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) QALYs were gained when compared to UC, with an ICER of 77,670 saved per QALY gained. Ninety-one percent (91%) of simulations resulted in less costs and more QALYs. TCHS resulted in comparable costs or even limited savings 642 (95% CI -6,903 to 5,601)) and comparable QALYs to TC. In all scenario analyses, TCHS and TC were found to be cost effective as compared to UC. CONCLUSIONS: A tight-control treatment strategy is highly cost-effective compared to a non-tight-control approach in early RA. Using the handscan as a monitoring device might facilitate implementation of tight-control treatment strategy at comparable costs and with comparable effects. This approach should be investigated further.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Drug Monitoring , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Patient Care Management , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Monitoring/economics , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Acuity , Patient Care Management/economics , Patient Care Management/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life YearsABSTRACT
Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease of unknown aetiology characterised by autoimmunity, inflammation, vascular abnormalities and ultimately fibrosis. Although great advances have been made in determining the molecular mechanisms of disease pathogenesis over the last decade, aided by new genetic screens, no current specific disease-modifying treatment is yet available. Epigenetics is defined as heritable changes that are not due to changes in DNA sequence, and there is at present intense research effort to understand the basic mechanisms of epigenetic regulation and how these impact diseases. Epigenetic modifications and dysregulation are associated now with autoimmune disease, inflammatory disease and cancer. In rheumatic diseases all three epigenetic processes are associated with various diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis. In systemic sclerosis much focus has been on microRNAs; however, other modifications including DNA methylation are emerging to have a key role. This review examines the role of epigenetics in systemic sclerosis and appraises the contribution of each modification and suggests that modulators of epigenetic changes may be a novel therapeutic option.
Subject(s)
Epigenesis, Genetic , Scleroderma, Systemic/genetics , Animals , DNA Methylation , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/metabolismABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs, characterized by flares and remission. Treatment aims to reduce flare severity and prevent long-term damage, but remission is often elusive, and patients may still experience flares and a reduced quality of life (QoL). This had led to a growing interest in non-pharmacological therapies to improve patient wellbeing. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess and summarize the efficacy of lifestyle interventions in SLE patients on disease activity and QoL. METHODS: A systematic search on lifestyle interventions, SLE, disease activity, and QoL was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Clinicaltrials.gov in August 2024. Included studies were randomized controlled trials on lifestyle interventions in adult SLE patients. Each trial was appraised using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria, with participant numbers, study duration, intervention type and outcome measures detailed in separate tables. RESULTS: A total of 3564 articles were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 25 randomized controlled trials with 1521 patients. Study quality varied from high (11 studies) to low (6 studies) with considerable intervention heterogeneity. The interventions fell into five categories: physical activity, psychotherapy, lifestyle coaching, supplements and dietary interventions. Physical activity (2 studies, 116 patients), psychotherapy (5 studies, 507 patients) and coaching (1 study with 30 patients) had no significant effect on disease activity, while fish oil supplementation showed a slight benefit in two studies with a total of 102 patients. Quality of life generally improved with physical activity (4 studies with in total 253 patients) and psychotherapy (9 studies with in total 623 patients), with significant mental health benefits, but coaching (3 studies with in total 186 patients) showed no effect. CONCLUSION: Various lifestyle interventions influence quality of life in SLE patients. Consistent with recent guidelines, both exercise and psychotherapy may positively impact the health-related quality of life in these patients. However, some studies were biased due to self-reported outcomes and the Hawthorne effect, where participants' behavior changed from receiving extra attention. Further research with larger patient cohorts is necessary to reduce the influence of heterogeneity across different studies and to better understand the potential of these promising therapies.
ABSTRACT
Systemic sclerosis is a relatively rare connective tissue disorder, in which a severe and progressive fibrosis of the skin and sometimes also of internal organs often develops as a result of an increased deposition of collagen. Fibrosis of the salivary glands may cause hyposalivation and xerostomia. Fibrosis of the perioral skin reduces the maximum opening of the mouth, thereby hampering dental treatment and the maintenance of oral hygiene. Periodontitis and bone resorption ofthe jaws are more frequently observed in systemic sclerosis patients.
Subject(s)
Bone Resorption/etiology , Oral Health , Periodontitis/etiology , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Bone Resorption/epidemiology , Humans , Mouth Diseases/epidemiology , Mouth Diseases/etiology , Periodontitis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Regulatory T cells (T(regs)) are crucial in the maintenance of the immune tolerance and seem to have an important role in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The interleukin 2 receptor α (IL2RA) is an important T(reg) marker, and polymorphisms of IL2RA gene are associated with a number of autoimmune diseases. Therefore, we aimed to investigate for the first time the association of the IL2RA locus in SSc. For this purpose, a total of 3023 SSc patients and 2735 matched healthy controls, from six European Caucasian cohorts, were genotyped for the IL2RA gene variants rs11594656, rs2104286 and rs12722495 using the TaqMan allelic discrimination technology. The overall meta-analysis reached statistical significance when the three polymorphisms were tested for association with SSc, the limited subtype (lcSSc) and anti-centromere auto-antibodies (ACAs). However, no significant P-values were obtained when the ACA-positive patients were removed from the SSc and lcSSc groups, suggesting that these associations rely on ACA positivity. The strongest association signal with ACA production was detected for rs2104286 (P(FDR)=2.07 × 10(-4), odds ratio=1.30 (1.14-1.47)). The associations of rs11594656 and rs12722495 were lost after conditioning to rs2104286, and allelic combination tests did not evidence a combined effect, indicating that rs2104286 best described the association between IL2RA and ACA presence in SSc.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/genetics , Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit/genetics , Scleroderma, Systemic/genetics , Adult , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Genetic Loci , Humans , Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit/immunology , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunologyABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2017/2810202.].
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The role of B cells in inflammatory bone formation and resorption is controversial. We investigated this in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with rituximab, a B-cell depleting antibody. We found a significant suppression in bone turnover, possibly a direct effect or as a consequence of a reduction in inflammation and disease activity. INTRODUCTION: RA is the most prevalent inflammatory joint disease, in which B cells play an important role. However, the role of B cells in bone turnover is controversial and RA subjects treated with rituximab, a B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, provide an ideal model for determining the role of B cells in inflammatory bone resorption. METHODS: Serum from 46 RA patients, collected pre- and post-rituximab therapy, was analysed for biomarkers of bone turnover (procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide [P1NP], osteocalcin, ß-isomerised carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen [ßCTX] and osteoprotegerin [OPG]). RESULTS: A significant decrease in bone resorption was observed 6 months after rituximab (median change ßCTX -50 ng/L, 95%CI -136, -8 p < 0.001, this equates to -37%; 95%CI -6, -49), mirrored by a reduction in disease activity. Similarly, there was a significant increase in P1NP, a marker of bone formation (median change P1NP 5.0 µg/L, 95%CI -1.0, 11.2, p = 0.02; 13%; 95%CI -3, 39), but no significant change in osteocalcin or OPG levels. The percentage change from baseline of ßCTX in a subgroup of patients (not on prednisolone or bisphosphonate) was significantly correlated with the percentage reduction in DAS28 score (r (s) = 0.570, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have found that B-cell depletion increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption in RA patients; this may be a direct effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively, and be at least partially explained by the decreased inflammation and disease activity.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , B-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Collagen Type I/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoprotegerin/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Peptides/blood , Procollagen/blood , RituximabABSTRACT
Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease with a poor prognosis, particularly when a patient has rapidly progressive skin or pulmonary involvement. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an emerging treatment for this condition, that has been demonstrated to be more effective than immunosuppressants. Careful selection of patients has reduced the transplant-related mortality and maximized the likelihood of benefit. In this report, we present three cases of successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients who would not have met inclusion criteria for entrance into the completed hematopoietic stem cell transplant. After >18 months of follow-up, three patients had clinically significant benefit in terms of skin tightening and pulmonary function tests. Future studies of hematopoietic stem cell transplant in systemic sclerosis may aim to carefully liberalize inclusion criteria to include patients who may not have otherwise been treated while still maintaining an acceptable safety profile.
ABSTRACT
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare rheumatic disease characterised by inflammation, vasculopathy and fibrosis of skin and internal organs. A common complication and a leading cause of death in SSc is interstitial lung disease (ILD). The current armamentarium of treatments in SSc-ILD mainly includes immunosuppressive therapies and has recently been expanded with anti-fibrotic agent nintedanib. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is increasingly used in progressive diffuse cutaneous SSc. This intensive treatment has been studied in three randomised trials and demonstrated to improve survival and quality of life. In the subsets of patients with SSc-ILD, SCT resulted in stabilisation and modest improvement of lung volumes and disease extent on high resolution computed tomography, but less impact was seen on diffusion capacity. Comparison of SCT outcomes with results from SSc-ILD trials is difficult though, as lung involvement per se was not an inclusion criterion in all SCT trials. Also, baseline characteristics differed between studies. The risk of severe treatment-related complications from SCT is still considerable and patients with extensive lung disease are particularly at risk of complications during transplantation. Therefore SCT should only be provided by experienced multidisciplinary teams in carefully selected patients. Future research needs to include comprehensive pulmonary evaluation and establish whether SCT early in the disease might prevent irreversible pulmonary damage and reduce treatment-related complications. Also, more insight in mechanisms of action of SCT in the lung and predictors for response will improve the use of this treatment in SSc-ILD. In this review the role of SCT in the treatment of SSc-ILD is summarised.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether persistence of synovial B lineage cells and lack of clinical response to rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with low rituximab serum levels and anti-rituximab antibody (ARA) formation. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with RA were treated with rituximab. The clinical response was determined 24 weeks after each treatment course using the Disease Activity Score evaluated in 28 joints (DAS28) and EULAR response criteria. Rituximab serum levels, ARAs and synovial B lineage cell numbers were determined before and after treatment. RESULTS: Four weeks after treatment rituximab serum levels were highly variable. Low rituximab levels were associated with ARA formation (in five patients (8.6%)) and high baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Interestingly, serum rituximab levels were not related to persistence of synovial B lineage cells or clinical response. Furthermore, response to treatment and re-treatment was similar in ARA-positive and ARA-negative patients. CONCLUSION: There is clear variability in serum levels after rituximab treatment, but rituximab levels are not lower in patients with persistence of synovial B lineage cells or lack of clinical response. The current treatment schedule suffices to induce and maintain a clinical response, even when ARAs are formed.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Synovial Membrane/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/drug effects , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Rituximab , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of several guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), clinical routine practice will only improve when an implementation strategy is in place to support clinical decision making and adequate implementation of guidelines. We describe here an initiative to establish national and multidisciplinary consensus on broad aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of AAV relevant to daily clinical practice in the Netherlands. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working group of physicians in the Netherlands with expertise on AAV addressed the broad spectrum of diagnosis, terminology, and immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive treatment, including an algorithm for AAV patients. Based on recommendations from (inter)national guidelines, national consensus was established using a Delphi-based method during a conference in conjunction with a nationally distributed online consensus survey. Cut-off for consensus was 70% (dis)agreement. RESULTS: Ninety-eight professionals were involved in the Delphi procedure to assess consensus on 50 statements regarding diagnosis, treatment, and organisation of care for AAV patients. Consensus was achieved for 37/50 statements (74%) in different domains of diagnosis and treatment of AAV including consensus on the treatment algorithm for AAV. CONCLUSION: We present a national, multidisciplinary consensus on a diagnostic strategy and treatment algorithm for AAV patients as part of the implementation of (inter)national guideline-derived recommendations in the Netherlands. Future studies will focus on evaluating local implementation of treatment protocols for AAV, and assessments of current and future clinical practice variation in the care for AAV patients in the Netherlands.
Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/diagnosis , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Algorithms , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , NetherlandsABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The prevalence and incidence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in The Netherlands is unknown. The same holds true for its leading causes of death: pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), for which effective treatment options have recently become available. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence and incidence of SSc and its pulmonary complications. METHODS: Detailed information on patients in the POEMAS registry, "Pulmonary Hypertension Screening, a Multidisciplinary Approach in Scleroderma", consisting of 819 patients, was combined with a nationwide questionnaire. RESULTS: By combining the two sources the prevalence of SSc was found to be 8.9 per 100 000 adults. The incidence was 0.77 patients per 100 000 per year. PAH was diagnosed in 9.9% of SSc patients. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease in SSc varied from 19% to 47% depending on the definition used. CONCLUSION: This study clarifies the epidemiology of SSc in The Netherlands and confirms the frequent occurrence of pulmonary complications, based on 654 cases. This can and will be studied further in the ongoing POEMAS study.
Subject(s)
Scleroderma, Systemic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/complications , Hypertension, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Incidence , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Pulmonary Fibrosis/complications , Pulmonary Fibrosis/epidemiology , Pulmonary Fibrosis/physiopathology , Registries , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathology , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires , Total Lung Capacity , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessment of disease activity is a critical component of tight-control, treat-to-target treatment strategies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, the HandScan has been validated as a novel method for objectively assessing RA disease activity in only 1.5 min, using optical spectral transmission (OST) in hands and wrists. We describe the protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) to investigate whether HandScan-guided treatment aimed at 'HandScan remission' (HandScan arm) is at least as effective as and more cost-effective than clinically guided treatment aimed at ACR/EULAR 2011 Boolean remission (DAS arm). METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a multi-center, double-blind, non-inferiority RCT of 18 months duration. Patients ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve RA according to the ACR 2010 classification criteria, will be randomized to the DAS arm or the HandScan arm. The efficacy of the arms will be compared by evaluating Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (primary outcome) after 18 months of DMARD therapy, aimed at remission. The equivalence margin in HAQ scores between study arms is 0.2. Secondary outcomes are differences in cost-effectiveness and radiographic joint damage between treatment arms. The non-inferiority sample size calculation to obtain a power of 80% at a one-sided p value of 0.05, with 10% dropouts, resulted in 61 patients per arm. In both arms, DMARD strategy will be intensified monthly according to predefined steps until remission is achieved; in both arms DMARDs and treatment steps are identical. If sustained remission, defined as remission that persists consistently over three consecutive months, is achieved, DMARD therapy will be tapered. DISCUSSION: The study protocol and the specifically designed decision-making software application allow for implementation of this RCT. To test a novel method of assessing disease activity and comparing (cost-)effectiveness with the contemporary method in treat-to-target DMARD strategies in early RA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register, NTR6388. Registered on 6 April 2017 ( NL50026.041.14 ). Protocol version 3.0, 19-01-2017.