Effect of Oral Insulin on the Severity and Recovery of Methotrexate-Induced Gastrointestinal Mucositis in the Rat.

OBJECTIVES: Gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis is an adverse-effect of chemo- and radiotherapy. Oral insulin has been suggested as possible intestinal growth factor and possible intervention for GI mucositis. We aimed to determine the effect of oral insulin on the severity and recovery of mucositis in a methotrexate (MTX)-induced GI mucositis rat model. METHODS: Male Wistar rats (n = 24) received a single injection of 60 mg/kg MTX intravenously at day 0. From day -3 oral insulin was added to the drinking water. Group MTX received normal drinking water, group MTX+INS0.5 received 0.5 U/mL insulin, and group MTX+INS1 received 1 U/mL insulin in drinking water. The severity of mucositis was determined by intake, bodyweight, illness, and plasma citrulline. In the recovery phase, the function of the gut was tested with an oral glucose tolerance test, and villus and crypt length of the small intestine were measured. RESULTS: MTX-induced mucositis in all 3 groups and oral insulin did not cause a change in the severity of mucositis, with comparable bodyweight, food intake, and water intake. Oral insulin did not alter the enterocyte mass, determined with plasma citrulline. The glucose level after bolus was higher in the MTX group than the MTX+INS1 group (P < 0.05). Histology was not significant different between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral insulin does not alter the severity or the acceleration of recovery of mucositis. Therefore, we conclude that it is not useful to further study oral insulin as possible intervention to prevent or treat chemotherapy-induced GI mucositis.

Influenza virus damages the alveolar barrier by disrupting epithelial cell tight junctions.

A major cause of respiratory failure during influenza A virus (IAV) infection is damage to the epithelial-endothelial barrier of the pulmonary alveolus. Damage to this barrier results in flooding of the alveolar lumen with proteinaceous oedema fluid, erythrocytes and inflammatory cells. To date, the exact roles of pulmonary epithelial and endothelial cells in this process remain unclear.Here, we used an in vitro co-culture model to understand how IAV damages the pulmonary epithelial-endothelial barrier. Human epithelial cells were seeded on the upper half of a transwell membrane while human endothelial cells were seeded on the lower half. These cells were then grown in co-culture and IAV was added to the upper chamber.We showed that the addition of IAV (H1N1 and H5N1 subtypes) resulted in significant barrier damage. Interestingly, we found that, while endothelial cells mounted a pro-inflammatory/pro-coagulant response to a viral infection in the adjacent epithelial cells, damage to the alveolar epithelial-endothelial barrier occurred independently of endothelial cells. Rather, barrier damage was associated with disruption of tight junctions amongst epithelial cells, and specifically with loss of tight junction protein claudin-4.Taken together, these data suggest that maintaining epithelial cell integrity is key in reducing pulmonary oedema during IAV infection.

Antibiotic-induced disruption of the microbiome exacerbates chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea and can be mitigated with autologous faecal microbiota transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is well documented to disrupt the gut microbiome, leading to poor treatment outcomes and a heightened risk of adverse toxicity. Although strong associations exist between its composition and gastrointestinal toxicity, its causal contribution remains unclear. Our inability to move beyond association has limited the development and implementation of microbial-based therapeutics in chemotherapy adjuncts with no clear rationale of how and when to deliver them. METHODS/RESULTS: Here, we investigate the impact of augmenting the gut microbiome on gastrointestinal toxicity caused by the chemotherapeutic agent, methotrexate (MTX). Faecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) delivered after MTX had no appreciable impact on gastrointestinal toxicity. In contrast, disruption of the microbiome with antibiotics administered before chemotherapy exacerbated gastrointestinal toxicity, impairing mucosal recovery (P < 0.0001) whilst increasing diarrhoea severity (P = 0.0007) and treatment-related mortality (P = 0.0045). Importantly, these detrimental effects were reversed when the microbiome was restored using autologous FMT (P = 0.03), a phenomenon dictated by the uptake and subsequent expansion of Muribaculaceae. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first data to show that clinically impactful symptoms of gastrointestinal toxicity are dictated by the microbiome and provide a clear rationale for how and when to target the microbiome to mitigate the acute and chronic complications caused by disruption of the gastrointestinal microenvironment. Translation of this new knowledge should focus on stabilising and strengthening the gut microbiome before chemotherapy and developing new microbial approaches to accelerate recovery of the mucosa. By controlling the depth and duration of mucosal injury, secondary consequences of gastrointestinal toxicity may be avoided.