Orthotopic Wilms tumor xenografts derived from cell lines reflect limited aspects of tumor morphology and clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Wilms tumor (WT) is a pediatric tumor of the kidney, the treatment of which includes heavy chemotherapy. Affected children would likely benefit from more targeted therapies with limited side effects. Establishment of relevant orthotopic WT xenografts is important to better understand mechanisms of WT growth and for preclinical drug testing. PROCEDURE: Here we established and characterized orthotopic xenografts from WT cell lines WiT49, CCG-99-11, and WT-CLS1 to ascertain in what aspects each of them recapitulated WT histology, immunophenotype, invasion, and metastatic spread. RESULTS: WiT49 xenografts recapitulated near triphasic WTs with clear WT1 staining and anaplastic features, but with tumor restricted to the kidney. On the contrary both CCG-99-11 and WT-CLS1 xenografts conveyed metastatic disease. CCG-99-11 showed a blastemal phenotype whereas WT-CLS1 xenografts did not properly reflect any specific WT subtype. CONCLUSIONS: From the three tested cell lines, orthotopic WiT49 xenografts best reflect the triphasic pattern of classical WT.

Retinoic acid promotes differentiation of WiT49- but not of CCG99-11 Wilms tumour cells.

BACKGROUND: Most children with Wilms tumour are successfully treated with multidrug chemotherapy and surgery. These treatments cause severe side effects for the patients, an issue that needs to be addressed by exploring other treatment options with less or no side effects. One option is to complement current therapies with agents that could potentially induce tumour cell differentiation, for example retinoic acid (RA). AIMS: To facilitate quick assessment of an agent's effect on Wilms tumour differentiation by a rapid in vitro model system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here WiT49 and CCG99-11 Wilms tumour cells were treated with 10 µM RA for 72 h or 9 days. Cultured cells were scraped off from Petri dishes, pelleted and embedded in paraffin in the same way as clinical tumour specimens are preserved. Cell morphology and differentiation were evaluated by analyses of haematoxylin eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical stainings. Based on H&E, WT1 and CKAE1/3 stainings, RA treatment induced further epithelial differentiation of WiT49 cells, whereas there was no sign of induced maturation in CCG99-11 cells. Ki67 staining showed that RA inhibited cell proliferation in both cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that in vitro culturing of WiT49 and CCG99-11 cells, followed by pelleting and paraffin embedding of cell pellets, could aid in a quick evaluation of potential differentiating agents against Wilms tumour. In addition, our results strengthen previous results that retinoic acid could be a potential complement to regular Wilms tumour treatment.