CCHCR1-astrin interaction promotes centriole duplication through recruitment of CEP72.

BACKGROUND: The centrosome is one of the most important non-membranous organelles regulating microtubule organization and progression of cell mitosis. The coiled-coil alpha-helical rod protein 1 (CCHCR1, also known as HCR) gene is considered to be a psoriasis susceptibility gene, and the protein is suggested to be localized to the P-bodies and centrosomes in mammalian cells. However, the exact cellular function of HCR and its potential regulatory role in the centrosomes remain unexplored. RESULTS: We found that HCR interacts directly with astrin, a key factor in centrosome maturation and mitosis. Immunoprecipitation assays showed that the coiled-coil region present in the C-terminus of HCR and astrin respectively mediated the interaction between them. Astrin not only recruits HCR to the centrosome, but also protects HCR from ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. In addition, depletion of either HCR or astrin significantly reduced centrosome localization of CEP72 and subsequent MCPH proteins, including CEP152, CDK5RAP2, and CEP63. The absence of HCR also caused centriole duplication defects and mitotic errors, resulting in multipolar spindle formation, genomic instability, and DNA damage. CONCLUSION: We conclude that HCR is localized and stabilized at the centrosome by directly binding to astrin. HCR are required for the centrosomal recruitment of MCPH proteins and centriolar duplication. Both HCR and astrin play key roles in keeping normal microtubule assembly and maintaining genomic stability.

Comprehensive assessments of germline deletion structural variants reveal the association between prognostic MUC4 and CEP72 deletions and immune response gene expression in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Functional disruptions by large germline genomic structural variants in susceptible genes are known risks for cancer. We used deletion structural variants (DSVs) generated from germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and DSV immune-related association tumor microenvironment (TME) to predict cancer risk and prognosis. METHODS: We investigated the contribution of germline DSVs to cancer susceptibility and prognosis by silicon and causal inference models. DSVs in germline WGS data were generated from the blood samples of 192 cancer and 499 non-cancer subjects. Clinical information, including family cancer history (FCH), was obtained from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital and Taiwan Biobank. Ninety-nine colorectal cancer (CRC) patients had immune response gene expression data. We used joint calling tools and an attention-weighted model to build the cancer risk predictive model and identify DSVs in familial cancer. The survival support vector machine (survival-SVM) was used to select prognostic DSVs. RESULTS: We identified 671 DSVs that could predict cancer risk. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the attention-weighted model was 0.71. The 3 most frequent DSV genes observed in cancer patients were identified as ADCY9, AURKAPS1, and RAB3GAP2 (p < 0.05). The DSVs in SGSM2 and LHFPL3 were relevant to colorectal cancer. We found a higher incidence of FCH in cancer patients than in non-cancer subjects (p < 0.05). SMYD3 and NKD2DSV genes were associated with cancer patients with FCH (p < 0.05). We identified 65 immune-associated DSV markers for assessing cancer prognosis (p < 0.05). The functional protein of MUC4 DSV gene interacted with MAGE1 expression, according to the STRING database. The causal inference model showed that deleting the CEP72 DSV gene affect the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of IFIT1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: We established an explainable attention-weighted model for cancer risk prediction and used the survival-SVM for prognostic stratification by using germline DSVs and immune gene expression datasets. Comprehensive assessments of germline DSVs can predict the cancer risk and clinical outcome of colon cancer patients.

Contribution of common and rare genetic variants in CEP72 on vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in brain tumour patients.

AIMS: Studies implicated a role for a genetic variant in CEP72 in vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy. This study aims to evaluate this association in a cohort of brain tumour patients, to perform a cross-disease meta-analysis and explore the protein-coding region of CEP72. METHODS: In total, 104 vincristine-treated brain tumour patients were genotyped for CEP72 rs924607, and sequenced for the protein-coding region. Data regarding patient and treatment characteristics, and peripheral neuropathy, were collected. Logistic regression and meta-analysis were performed for rs924607 replication. A weighted burden analysis was applied to evaluate impact of overall genetic variation in CEP72. RESULTS: Analysis of 24 cases and 80 controls did not show a significant association between CEP72 rs924607 and neuropathy (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] 2.076 [0.359-11.989], P = .414). When combined with 8 cohorts (1095 cancer patients), a significant increase in risk for neuropathy was found for patients with a TT genotype (OR [95% CI] 2.15 [1.35-3.43], P = .001). Additionally, a missense variant (rs12522955) was significantly associated (OR [95% CI] 2.3 [1.2-4.4], P = .041) and patients with severe neuropathy carried more impactful variants in CEP72 coding regions (P = .039). CONCLUSION: The association of CEP72 rs924607 in vincristine-induced neuropathy was not confirmed in a cohort of brain tumour patients, but did contribute to its suggested effect when combined in a cross-disease meta-analysis. The importance of other genetic variations in CEP72 on vincristine-induced neuropathy was demonstrated. This study contributes to evidence of the importance of genetic variants in CEP72 in development of vincristine-induced toxicity, and provides guidance for future prospective studies.

Increased expression of CEP72 predicts poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a fatal hematological malignancy and does not have adequate prognostic indicators. Previous studies indicate that CEP72 is closely related to tumorigenesis and tumor progression. However, the expression and function of CEP72 in multiple myeloma have yet to be elucidated. METHODS: In this study, we explored the correlation between CEP72 expression and clinicopathological characteristics as well as the impacts of CEP72 expression on the survival of MM patients. In addition, PPI, GSEA and Chemotherapy drug resistance analysis identified the possible mechanism. RESULTS: CEP72 is overexpressed in both MM patients and MM cell lines. Clinically, patients in the CEP72high subgroup were significantly older than those in the CEP72low subgroup (p = 0.003). Up-regulation of CEP72 was related to poor overall survival and event-free survival. PPI network showed that CEP72 was related to PCM1, KIZ, OFD1, etc. GSEA analysis showed that CEP72 was enriched in cell cycle, oocyte meiosis, protein export, lysosome and N-glycan biosynthesis pathways. Drug resistance analysis indicated that there was a positive correlation between the CEP72 expression and the IC50 values of 6-mercaptopurine, 8-chloro-adenosine, clofarabine, fludarabine and allopurinol. CONCLUSION: High CEP72 expression was a poor prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

Loss of Cep72 affects the morphology of spermatozoa in mice.

The centrosome regulates mammalian meiosis by affecting recombination, synapsis, chromosome segregation, and spermiogenesis. Cep72 is one of the critical components of the centrosome. However, the physiological role of Cep72 in spermatogenesis and fertility remains unclear. In this study, we identify Cep72 as a testis-specific expression protein. Although Cep72 knockout mice were viable and fertile, their sperms were morphologically abnormal with incomplete flagellum structures. Transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in six genes (Gm49527, Hbb-bt, Hba-a2, Rps27a-ps2, Gm29647, and Gm8430), which were not previously associated with spermatogenesis. Overall, these results indicate that Cep72 participates in regulating sperm morphology and yet is dispensable for fertility in mice.

Pharmacogenomics of Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Children with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is a debilitating side-effect of vincristine. It remains a challenge to predict which patients will suffer from VIPN. Pharmacogenomics may explain an individuals' susceptibility to side-effects. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we describe the influence of pharmacogenomic parameters on the development of VIPN in children with cancer. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched. In total, 1597 records were identified and 21 studies were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the influence of CYP3A5 expression on the development of VIPN. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in transporter-, metabolism-, cytoskeleton-, and hereditary neuropathy-associated genes and SNPs in genes previously unrelated to vincristine or neuropathy were associated with VIPN. CYP3A5 expression status was not significantly associated with VIPN. The comparison and interpretation of the results of the included studies was limited due to heterogeneity in the study population, treatment protocol and assessment methods and definitions of VIPN. Independent replication is essential to validate the clinical significance of the reported associations. Future research should aim for prospective VIPN assessment in both a discovery and a replication cohort. Ultimately, the goal would be to screen patients upfront to determine optimal vincristine dosage with regards to efficacy and risk of VIPN.

Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Genetic Variation as a Potential Risk Factor.

Vincristine (VCR) is the first-line chemotherapeutic medication often co-administered with other drugs to treat childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Dose-dependent neurotoxicity is the main factor restricting VCR's clinical application. VCR-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) sometimes results in dose reduction or omission, leading to clinical complications or affecting the patient's quality of life. With regard to the genetic basis of drug responses, preemptive pharmacogenomic testing and simultaneous blood level monitoring could be helpful for the transformation of various findings into individualized therapies. In this review, we discussed the potential associations between genetic variants in genes contributing to the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of VCR and VIPN incidence and severity in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Of note, genetic variants in the CEP72 gene have great potential to be translated into clinical practice. Such a genetic biomarker may help clinicians diagnose VIPN earlier. Besides, genetic variants in other genes, such as CYP3A5, ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, TTPA, ACTG1, CAPG, SYNE2, SLC5A7, COCH, and MRPL47, have been reported to be associated with the VIPN, but more evidence is needed to validate the findings in the future. In fact, a variety of complex factors jointly determine the VIPN. In implementing precision medicine, the combination of genetic, environmental, and personal variables, along with therapeutic drug monitoring, will allow for a better understanding of the mechanisms of VIPN, improving the effectiveness of VCR treatment, reducing adverse reactions, and improving patients' quality of life.

Genetic polymorphisms and vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy.

Vincristine (VCR)-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is a common and life-long toxicity in lymphoma patients receiving current standard chemotherapy. The association between VIPN and genetic polymorphisms is largely unknown in adult lymphoma patients. To examine the possible relationship between known genetic polymorphisms in patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and incidence of VIPN in adult patients with B cell lymphoma, we examined CEP72 rs924607, ETAA1 rs17032980, MTNR1B rs12786200, CYP3A5 rs776746, rs7963521, and rs1045644 genetic polymorphisms in samples from 56 adult patients with B-cell lymphoma who received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, VCR, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. Mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing. The median age was 65 years (range 30-79). The median cumulative dose of VCR was 12 mg (range 2-16). VIPN was documented in 42 patients (75%), and 9 (16%) had grade 2-4 VIPN. Age, impaired glucose tolerance, number of cycles of R-CHOP, and VCR cumulative dose were not associated with incidence of VIPN. There was no association between the incidence of grade 2-4 or any grade VIPN and these six genetic polymorphisms. These results indicate that CEP72, MTNR1B, ETAA1, CYP3A5, rs7963521, and rs1045644 genetic polymorphisms are not associated with VIPN in patients with B-cell lymphoma who received R-CHOP.

Severe Vincristine-induced Neuropathic Pain in a CYP3A5 Nonexpressor With Reduced CYP3A4/5 Activity: Case Study.

PURPOSE: Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent vincristine-induced adverse effect. Vincristine is a substrate of P-glycoprotein and is metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A5 and 3A4 isoforms, with CYP3A5 contributing to 75% of the intrinsic clearance of vincristine. Alterations in the function of these proteins may lead to an increase in vincristine toxicity. CYP3A5 nonexpressor status has been associated with vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy. The severity of neuropathy has been reported to be inversely correlated to vincristine metabolite concentrations. Recently, the presence of a mutation in the CEP72 gene, which encodes for a protein involved in microtubule formation, has also been associated with vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy. However, a clear correlation between genetic polymorphisms and vincristine toxicity has not been established. METHODS: Here we report the case of a 21-year old patient in whom severe neuropathic pain developed after vincristine treatment. FINDINGS: The patient was a CYP3A5 nonexpressor and presented with reduced CYP3A4/5 functional activity, a likely reason for the occurrence of the adverse event, as genotyping showed that his status was wild type for the ABCB1 and CEP72 genes. IMPLICATIONS: CYP phenotype and genotype may explain the occurrence of severe neuropathy in some patients treated with vincristine.