Ibudilast reduces slowly enlarging lesions in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Ibudilast has shown beneficial effects on several imaging outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Slowly enlarging lesions are a proposed imaging biomarker of compartmentalized inflammation within chronic active lesions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment effect of ibudilast on slowly enlarging lesion volumes over 96 weeks from a phase II clinical trial of ibudilast (Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis [SPRINT-MS]). METHODS: In total, 255 participants with progressive MS from 28 sites were randomized to oral ibudilast or placebo. Participants with at least four analyzable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Slowly enlarging lesions were quantified using Jacobian determinant maps. A linear model was used to assess the effect of ibudilast. Magnetization transfer ratio within slowly enlarging lesions was assessed to determine the effect of ibudilast on tissue integrity. RESULTS: In total, 195 participants were included in this analysis. Ibudilast significantly decreased slowly enlarging lesion volume (23%, p = 0.003). Ibudilast also reduced magnetization transfer ratio change in slowly enlarging lesions: 0.22%/year, p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: Ibudilast showed a significant effect on baseline volume of lesions that were slowly enlarging and magnetization transfer ratio in slowly enlarging lesions. The results support the use of slowly enlarging lesions for assessment of compartmentalized inflammation represented by chronic active lesions and provide further support for the neuroprotective effects of ibudilast in progressive MS.

Paramagnetic rim lesions predict greater long-term relapse rates and clinical progression over 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) have been linked to higher clinical disease severity and relapse frequency. However, it remains unclear whether PRLs predict future, long-term disease progression. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess whether baseline PRLs were associated with subsequent long-term (10 years) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase and relapse frequency and, if so, whether PRL-associated EDSS increase was mediated by relapse. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 172 people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) with 1868 yearly clinical visits over a mean follow-up time of 10.2 years. 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired at baseline and PRLs were assessed on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images. The associations between PRLs, relapse, and rate of EDSS change were assessed using linear models. RESULTS: PRL+ pwMS had greater overall annual relapse rate (ß = 0.068; p = 0.010), three times greater overall odds of relapse (exp(ß) = 3.472; p = 0.009), and greater rate of yearly EDSS change (ß = 0.045; p = 0.010) than PRL- pwMS. Greater PRL number was associated with greater odds of at least one progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) episode over follow-up (exp(ß) = 1.171, p = 0.009). Mediation analysis showed that the association between PRL presence (yes/no) and EDSS increase was 96.7% independent of relapse number. CONCLUSION: PRLs are a marker of aggressive ongoing disease inflammatory activity, including more frequent future clinical relapses and greater long-term, relapse-independent disability progression.

Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical status in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Paramagnetic rims have been observed as a feature of some multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and indicate compartmentalized inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical, MRI, and intrathecal (cerebrospinal fluid, CSF) associations of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) using 3T MRI in MS. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. All patients underwent 3T MRI using a T2*-weighted sequence with susceptibility postprocessing (susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) protocol, GE). SWAN-derived filtered-phase maps and corresponding T2-FLAIR images were manually reviewed to determine PRL. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and regression determined demographic, clinical, MRI, and CSF associations with PRL. RESULTS: A total of 147 MS patients were included; 79 of whom had available CSF. Forty-three percent had at least one PRL. PRL status (presence/absence) did not vary by sex or Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) but was associated with younger age, shorter disease duration, worse disease severity, high-efficacy therapy use, and poorer dexterity, as well as lower age-adjusted brain volumes and cognitive processing speeds. PRL status was moreover associated with blood-brain barrier disruption as determined by pathologically elevated albumin quotient. Sensitivity analyses remained supportive of these findings. CONCLUSION: PRLs, an emerging noninvasive biomarker of chronic neuroinflammation, are confirmed to be associated with greater disease severity and newly shown to be preliminarily associated with blood-brain barrier disruption.

Paramagnetic Rim Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of Visualization at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI.

BACKGROUND. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by both acute and chronic intrathecal inflammation. A subset of MS lesions show paramagnetic rims on susceptibility-weighted MRI sequences, reflecting iron accumulation in microglia. These para-magnetic rim lesions have been proposed as a marker of compartmentalized smoldering disease. Paramagnetic rim lesions have been shown at 7 T and, more recently, at 3 T. As susceptibility effects are weaker at lower field strength, it remains unclear if paramagnetic rim lesions are visible at 1.5 T. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare visualization of paramagnetic rim lesions using susceptibility-weighted imaging at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI in patients with MS. METHODS. This retrospective study included nine patients (five women, four men; mean age, 46.8 years) with MS who underwent both 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a comparable susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) sequence from the same manufacturer. Lesions measuring greater than 3 mm were annotated. Two reviewers independently assessed images at each field strength in separate sessions and classified the annotated lesions as isointense, diffusely paramagnetic, or paramagnetic rim lesions. Discrepancies were discussed at consensus sessions including a third reviewer. Agreement was assessed using kappa coefficients. RESULTS. Based on the 3-T consensus readings, 115 of 140 annotated lesions (82%) were isointense lesions, 16 (11%) were diffusely paramagnetic lesions, and nine (6%) were paramagnetic rim lesions; based on the 1.5-T consensus readings, 115 (82%) were isointense lesions, 14 (10%) were diffusely paramagnetic lesions, and 11 (8%) were para-magnetic rim lesions. The mean lesion diameter was 11.9 mm for paramagnetic rim lesions versus 6.4 mm for diffusely paramagnetic lesions (p = .006) and 7.8 mm for iso-intense lesions (p = .003). Interrater agreement for lesion classification as a paramagnetic rim lesion was substantial at 1.5 T (κ = 0.65) and 3 T (κ = 0.70). Agreement for paramagnetic rim lesions was also substantial between the consensus readings at the two field strengths (κ = 0.79). CONCLUSION. We show comparable identification of paramagnetic rim lesions at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI with substantial interrater agreement at both field strengths and substantial consensus agreement between the field strengths. CLINICAL IMPACT. Paramagnetic rim lesions may be an emerging marker of chronic neuroinflammation in MS. Their visibility at 1.5 T supports the translational potential of paramagnetic rim lesion identification to more widespread clinical settings, where 1.5-T scanners are prevalent.

Central Vein Sign and Paramagnetic Rim Lesions: Susceptibility Changes in Brain Tissues and Their Implications for the Study of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common acquired inflammatory and demyelinating disease in adults. The conventional diagnostic of MS and the follow-up of inflammatory activity is based on the detection of hyperintense foci in T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesions with brain-blood barrier (BBB) disruption in the central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma. However, T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions are not specific to MS and the MS pathology and inflammatory processes go far beyond focal lesions and can be independent of BBB disruption. MRI techniques based on the magnetic susceptibility properties of the tissue, such as T2*, susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) offer tools for advanced MS diagnostic, follow-up, and the assessment of more detailed features of MS dynamic pathology. Susceptibility-weighted techniques are sensitive to the paramagnetic components of biological tissues, such as deoxyhemoglobin. This capability enables the visualization of brain parenchymal veins. Consequently, it presents an opportunity to identify veins within the core of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, thereby affirming their venocentric characteristics. This advancement significantly enhances the accuracy of the differential diagnostic process. Another important paramagnetic component in biological tissues is iron. In MS, the dynamic trafficking of iron between different cells, such as oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia, enables the study of different stages of demyelination and remyelination. Furthermore, the accumulation of iron in activated microglia serves as an indicator of latent inflammatory activity in chronic MS lesions, termed paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs). PRLs have been correlated with disease progression and degenerative processes, underscoring their significance in MS pathology. This review will elucidate the underlying physical principles of magnetic susceptibility and their implications for the formation and interpretation of T2*, SWI, and QSM sequences. Additionally, it will explore their applications in multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly in detecting the central vein sign (CVS) and PRLs, and assessing iron metabolism. Furthermore, the review will discuss their role in advancing early and precise MS diagnosis and prognostic evaluation, as well as their utility in studying chronic active inflammation and degenerative processes.

Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion classification on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in people with multiple sclerosis: Single-site experience and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in iron-sensitive MRI techniques have enabled visualization of chronic active lesions as paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) in vivo. Although PRLs have potential as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for multiple sclerosis (MS), limited studies have reported the reliability of PRL assessment. Further evaluation of PRL reliability, through original investigations and review of PRL literature, are warranted. METHODS: A single-center cohort study was conducted to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of PRL identification on quantitative susceptibiltiy mapping (QSM) in 10 people with MS, 5 people with clinically isolated syndrome, and 5 healthy controls. An additional systematic literature search was then conducted of published PRL reliability data, and these results were synthesized. RESULTS: In the single-center study, both inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of per-subject PRL number were at an "Excellent" (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.901 for both) level with only 2-years lesion classification experience. Across the reported literature values, reliability of per-lesion rim presence was on average "Near perfect" (for intra-rater; Cohen's κ = 0.833) and "Substantial" (for inter-rater; Cohens κ = 0.687), whereas inter-rater reliability of per-subject PRL number was "Good" (ICC = 0.874). Only 4/22 studies reported complete information on rater experience, rater level of training, detailed PRL classification criteria, and reliability cohort size and disease subtypes. CONCLUSION: PRLs can be reliably detected both at per-lesion and per-subject level. We recommend that future PRL studies report detailed reliability results, including rater experience level, and use a standardized set of reliability metrics (Cohen's κ or ICC) for improved comparability between studies.