A proposal for the management of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy in adults.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has a high case fatality rate. Most severely ill patients develop a special type of coagulopathy that had not been described before and that is now considered the main cause of death. For this reason, anticoagulant treatment has become one of the cornerstones of the treatment of this infection. However, the rate at which the evidence regarding the use of anticoagulants is generated is quite fast, and sometimes it is difficult to interpret and conflicting. After having performed an extensive review of the published literature, this proposal for the use of anticoagulant treatment is made, taking into account available resources in Mexico.

La infección por coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) es la causante de la pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), con un índice de letalidad alto. La mayoría de los pacientes graves desarrollan un tipo especial de coagulopatía no descrito hasta ahora y la cual se considera ahora la principal causa de muerte. Por esta razón, el tratamiento anticoagulante se ha convertido en una de las piedras angulares del tratamiento de esta infección. Sin embargo, la velocidad con la que se genera la evidencia respecto al uso de anticoagulantes es muy rápida y, en ocasiones difícil de interpretar y contradictoria. Luego de hacer una revisión extensa de la literatura publicada, se hace esta propuesta para el uso del tratamiento anticoagulante tomando en cuenta los recursos disponibles en México.

Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medical patients. / La profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en los pacientes con enfermedad médica.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent and serious complication in hospitalized medical patients. Pulmonary embolism is the most common preventable cause of hospital death. VTE extends hospitalization, with a higher resource consumption and an increase in healthcare costs. Risk factors for VTE include intrinsic factors and those related to hospitalization. It is important to know and to identify these factors at the moment of hospital admission and during the course of disease. VTE prophylaxis has demonstrated to be an efficient and effective action. Its implementation reduces life-threatening pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and death rate three months after discharge. An individual and detailed assessment of prophylaxis risk-benefit is a priority. In our country, low molecular weight heparins are still the first option for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis. In those patients at high risk of bleeding or in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated mechanical methods could be used.

Pulmonary embolism treatment. Detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. / Tratamiento de la embolia de pulmón. Detección de la hipertensión pulmonar tromboembólica crónica.

The correct stratification of pulmonary embolism risk (PE) is essential for decision-making, regarding treatment and defining the patient's place of admission. In high-risk PE, urgent re-establishment of pulmonary circulation and admission to a critical unit is required. The reperfusion treatment of choice is systemic thrombolysis, although in certain situations, especially when there is a contraindication for it, we will evaluate a surgical embolectomy or one of the catheter-guided therapies. In the rest of PE, the treatment of choice will be anticoagulation. Currently, direct oral anticoagulants have become the treatment of choice for the treatment of PE, due to their better safety profile. However, low molecular weight heparins and subsequently antivitamins K, remain the most used treatment, because they are funded by the public system. In cases of PE with cardiorespiratory arrest and / or cardiogenic shock, whenever available at our center, we must consider the indication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The recent creation of PE response teams (PERT team), have meant an improvement in the care of patients with intermediate-high and high risk PE. During the follow-up of patients with PE, it is essential to perform a correct screening of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, in order to perform a correct diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Proposal for the management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in children.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has become a pandemic with a high case fatality rate that mainly affects adults. Most severely ill adult patients develop a coagulopathy that was not described until recently, and which is currently considered a main cause of death. Everything indicates that a similar phenomenon also occurs in children with COVID-19. Anticoagulant treatment has become one of the therapeutic foundations for this infection; however, its implementation in children can be difficult since, until recently, it was not considered in the pediatric population. Evidence regarding the use of anticoagulants in COVID-19 is rapidly generated, changes constantly, it is often difficult to interpret, and can be contradictory. After an extensive review of the published literature, a proposal was generated that offers suggestions for anticoagulant treatment, considering available resources in Mexico.

La infección por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) se ha constituido en una pandemia con alto índice de letalidad que afecta principalmente a los adultos. La mayor parte de los pacientes adultos graves desarrolla una coagulopatía que no estaba descrita, la cual actualmente se considera la principal causa de muerte. Todo indica que un fenómeno parecido ocurre también en el niño con COVID-19. El tratamiento anticoagulante se ha convertido en uno de los fundamentos terapéuticos de esta infección; sin embargo, su establecimiento en el niño puede ser difícil ya que, hasta hace poco, no estaba considerado en la población pediátrica. La evidencia respecto al uso de anticoagulantes en COVID-19 se genera con rapidez, cambia constantemente, con frecuencia es difícil de interpretar y puede ser contradictoria. Después de una extensa revisión de la literatura publicada, se generó una propuesta que ofrece sugerencias para el tratamiento anticoagulante en la que se consideran los recursos disponibles en México.

Improvement of the safety of a clinical process using failure mode and effects analysis: Prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in critical patients. / Mejora en la seguridad de un proceso clínico utilizando el análisis modal de fallos y efectos: profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en pacientes críticos.

OBJECTIVE: To improve critical patient safety in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, using failure mode and effects analysis as safety tool. DESIGN: A contemporaneous cohort study covering the period January 2014-March 2015 was made in 4 phases: phase 1) prior to failure mode and effects analysis; phase 2) conduction of mode analysis and implementation of the detected improvements; phase 3) evaluation of outcomes, and phase 4) (post-checklist introduction impact. SETTING: Patients admitted to the adult polyvalent ICU of a third-level hospital center. PATIENTS: A total of 196 patients, older than 18 years, without thromboembolic disease upon admission to the ICU and with no prior anticoagulant treatment. INTERVENTIONS: A series of interventions were implemented following mode analysis: training, and introduction of a protocol and checklist to increase preventive measures in relation to thromboembolic disease. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Indication and prescription of venous thrombosis prevention measures before and after introduction of the measures derived from the failure mode and effects analysis. RESULTS: A total of 59, 97 and 40 patients were included in phase 1, 3 and 4, respectively, with an analysis of the percentage of subjects who received thromboprophylaxis. The failure mode and effects analysis was used to detect potential errors associated to a lack of training and protocols referred to thromboembolic disease. An awareness-enhancing campaign was developed, with staff training and the adoption of a protocol for the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease. The prescription of preventive measures increased in the phase 3 group (91.7 vs. 71.2%, P=.001). In the post-checklist group, prophylaxis was prescribed in 97.5% of the patients, with an increase in the indication of dual prophylactic measures (4.7, 6.7 and 41%; P<.05). There were no differences in complications rate associated to the increase in prophylactic measures. CONCLUSIONS: The failure mode and effects analysis allowed us to identify improvements in the prevention of thromboembolic disease in critical patients. We therefore consider that it may be a useful tool for improving patient safety in different processes.

[Prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in the critical patient: an assessment of clinical practice in the Community of Madrid]. / Profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en el paciente crítico: aproximación a la práctica clínica en la Comunidad de Madrid.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze measures referred to venous thromboembolic prophylaxis in critically ill patients. DESIGN: An epidemiological, cross-sectional (prevalence cut), multicenter study was performed using an electronic survey. Comparison of results with quality indexes of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physician guidelines and international studies. SETTING: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in the Community of Madrid (Spain). PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the ICU on the day of the survey. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: General aspects of venous thromboembolic prophylaxis and protocols used (risk stratification and ultrasound screening). A descriptive analysis was performed, continuous data being expressed as the mean or median, and categorical data as percentages. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients in 18 ICUs were included. Eighteen percent (42/234) received no prophylaxis, and 55% had no contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis. Of the 192 patients receiving prophylaxis, 84% received pharmacological prophylaxis, 14% mechanical prophylaxis and 2% combined prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin was the only pharmacological prophylaxis used, with a majority use of enoxaparin (17 of 18 ICUs). In patients with mechanical prophylaxis (31/192), antiembolic stockings were the most commonly used option (58%). Pharmacological prophylaxis contraindications were reported in 20% of the patients (46/234), the most frequent cause being thrombocytopenia (28% of the cases). Fifty percent of the ICUs used no specific venous thromboembolic prophylaxis protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin was the most frequently used venous thromboembolic prophylactic measure. In patients with contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis, mechanical measures were little used. The use of combined prophylaxis was anecdotal. Many of our ICUs lack specific prophylaxis protocols.

Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients admitted from Spanish emergency departments: the PROTESU II study. / Profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en pacientes hospitalizados por patología médica desde los servicios de urgencias españoles: estudio PROTESU II.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of inappropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with medical diseases admitted to hospital from the emergency department. To explore variables associated with inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study in 15 hospital emergency departments. We included patients admitted for a medical condition during 7 days in the first quarter of 2022. We assessed risk for VTE with the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). Inappropriate thromboprophylaxis was defined by failure to prescribe prophylaxis in patients with a high-risk PPS assessment unless there were absolute contraindications (active bleeding or severe thrombopenia) or, alternatively, the prescription of prophylaxis in patients with a low-risk PPS assessment or absolute contraindications. A logistic regression model was adjusted for risk level to identify variables associated with inappropriate use of thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS: Of a total of 630 patients included, 450 (71.4%) had PPS scores indicating high risk for VTE; 180 patients were at low risk. Thromboprophylaxis was inappropriate in 248 patients (39.4%): 165 high-risk patients who received no prophylaxis, 82 low-risk patients who were nonetheless treated, and 1 patient who was treated in spite of severe thrombopenia. Odds ratios (ORs) revealed that the variables associated with inappropriate use of thromboprophylaxis were trauma or recent surgery (OR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.58-19.34), presence of factors indicating risk for bleeding (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.44-4.73), and hospital admission for either urinary tract infection (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.07-4.87) or gastrointestinal disease (OR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.71-10.85). CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate use of thromboprophylaxis in Spanish emergency departments is high and associated with certain clinical characteristics.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la inadecuación de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica, según la escala Padua (PPS), para prevenir la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) entre los pacientes que ingresan desde el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) por patología médica, así como las variables asociadas a su uso inadecuado. METODO: Estudio de cohortes, prospectivo, multicéntrico donde participaron 15 SUH. Se incluyeron los pacientes atendidos que requirieron ingreso por enfermedad médica durante 7 días del primer trimestre de 2022. La inadecuación de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica se definió como la no utilización en pacientes clasificados por PPS de alto riesgo sin contraindicaciones absolutas para su uso (hemorragia activa o trombopenia grave) o su utilización en pacientes de riesgo bajo o con contraindicaciones absolutas. Se ajustó, para cada grupo de riesgo, un modelo de regresión logística para identificar las variables asociadas a la inadecuación. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 630 pacientes, 450 (71,4%) tenían riesgo alto y 180 (28,6%) riesgo bajo para ETV según la PPS. De ellos, la tromboprofilaxis fue inadecuada en 248 pacientes (39,4%) (165 tenían riesgo alto pero no recibieron tromboprofilaxis, 1 la recibió teniendo trombopenia grave y 82 tenían riesgo bajo pero recibieron tromboprofilaxis). Las variables asociadas con la inadecuación en pacientes de alto riesgo fueron trauma o cirugía recientes con odds ratio (OR) de OR 5,53 (IC 95%: 1,58-19,34), presencia de factores de riesgo hemorrágico con OR de 2,61 (IC 95%: 1,44-4,73), e infección del tracto urinario con OR de 2,29 (IC 95%: 1,07-4,87) y enfermedad gastrointestinal con OR de 4,30 (IC 95%: 1,71-10,85) como motivos de ingreso. CONCLUSIONES: En los SUH españoles, el uso inadecuado de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica es elevado. Algunas características clínicas se asocian al uso inadecuado de dicha tromboprofilaxis.

Impact of an emergency department nurse training intervention on the adequacy of thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism: the PROTESU III study. / Impacto de una intervención formativa en enfermería de urgencias sobre la adecuación de la profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa: estudio PROTESU III.

OBJECTIVE: Objectives. To assess the impact of training for emergency department (ED) nurses on adequate thromboprophylaxis for patients admitted to hospital from the ED for medical conditions. Methods. Multicenter quasiexperimental pre-post study of an ED nurse training intervention in 8 hospitals. Patients were recruited from January 2022 through May 2023 in 3 phases: before nurse training, in the first month after training, and in the sixth month after training. Included were patients attended in the ED for medical conditions. Adequate thromboprophylaxis was defined as 1) use of prophylactic drugs in patients at high risk for venousthromboembolism according to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS), and 2) nonuse in patients at low risk. We compared the percentage of adequate prophylaxis in the first phase to the percentages in the second and third phases. Results. A total of 928 patients were included (326 in phase 1, 295 in phase 2, and 307 in phase 3). PPS scores indicated that 238 (73%) of the patients were at high risk in phase 1 vs 189 (64.1%, P = .016) in phase 2 and 207 (67.4%, P = .125) in phase 3. A total of 187 patients (57.4%, 95% CI, 51.8%-62.8%) were adequatelythromboprophylaxed in phase 1 vs 178 (60.%, 95% CI, 54.5%-66%) in phase 2 (absolute difference in proportions, 3.0% (95% CI, -4.8% to 10.6%; P = .462)]. In phase 3, 166 patients (54.1%, 95% CI, 48.3%-59.7%) received adequate prophylaxis (difference, -3.3% (95% CI, -11.0% to 4.4%; P = .405). Conclusions. A training intervention for ED nurses, implemented as an isolated strategy, had no impact on the adequacy of thromboprophylaxis in patients admitted from the ED for medical conditions.

OBJETIVO: Objetivos. Evaluar el impacto de una intervención formativa en enfermería de urgencias sobre la adecuación de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica de los pacientes ingresados por patología médica. Método. Estudio cuasiexperimental, multicéntrico (8 hospitales), pre y posintervención, con 3 fases de reclutamiento (enero 2022-mayo 2023): primera,preintervención; segunda, en el primer mes tras la intervención; y tercera, al sexto mes. Se incluyeron los pacientes atendidos en urgencias que requirieron ingreso por enfermedad médica. La adecuación de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica se definió como: 1) la utilización en pacientes clasificados en el grupo de riesgo alto por la Escala de Padua (PPS); o 2) la no utilización en pacientes clasificados de riesgo bajo. Se compararon los porcentajes de adecuación de las fases 2 y 3 frente a la fase 1. Resultados. Se incluyeron 928 pacientes: 326 en la fase 1; 295 en la fase 2; y 307 en la fase 3. En la fase 1, 238 pacientes (73%) fueron clasificados de riesgo alto por PPS; en la fase 2, 189 (64,1%) (p = 0,016); y en la fase 3, 207 (67,4%) (p = 0,125). La tromboprofilaxis farmacológica fue adecuada en 187 pacientes (57,4%, IC 95% 51,8-62,8%) de la fase 1; en 178 (60,3%, IC 95% 54,5 66%) de la fase 2 [diferencia absoluta proporciones (DAP) 3,0% (IC 95% de ­4,8 a +10,6%), p = 0,462], y en 166 (54,1%, IC 95% 48,3-59,7%) de la fase 3 [DAP 3,3% (IC 95% de ­11,0 a +4,4%, p = 0,405]. Conclusiones. Una intervención formativa aislada en la enfermería de urgencias no tuvo impacto sobre la adecuación de la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica en urgencias de los pacientes que ingresan por enfermedad médica.

Cerebral venous thrombosis.

Cerebral venous thrombosis is part of the so-called thrombosis in unusual sites. It is defined as an occlusion in the cerebral venous territory. Its incidence is progressively increasing, especially in developing countries. It is more frequently observed in young women, with hormonal factors such as pregnancy or hormonal contraception being significant risk factors in the development of this condition. The clinical presentation will depend fundamentally on the topography of the thrombosis, with a confirmatory diagnosis based mainly on imaging tests. The treatment generally consists of anticoagulation, and other options may be considered depending on the severity of the case. Overall, the prognosis is better than that of other intracranial vascular disorders. This review describes the current evidence available regarding cerebral venous thrombosis.

Incidence of venous thromboembolic disease and risk of bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to describe the use of thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of VTE/bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (2014-2022). SETTING: Medic-Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to ICU with a concomitant diagnosis of a hematological malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: We analyzed demographic data, use of thromboprophylaxis and secondary outcomes that included incidence of VTE (venous thromboembolism), bleeding, mortality, severity scores and organ support. We applied a multivariable logistic regression model to examine the risk of thrombosis in the ICU. RESULTS: We included 862 ICU admissions (813 unique patients). Thromboprophylaxis was given during 65% of admissions (LMWH 14%, UFH 8%, and SCDs 43%); in 21% it was contraindicated due to thrombocytopenia; 14% of cases lacked documentation on prophylaxis. There were 38 unique incident cases of VTE (27 DVT, 11 PE), constituting 4.4% of ICU episodes. Most of VTE cases happened in patients with various degrees of thrombocytopenia. In the multivariable analysis, SOFA score on the first ICU day was independently associated (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96) with the risk of VTE. Bleeding occurred in 7.2% (minor) and 14.4% (major) of episodes; most frequent sites being CNS, abdomen/GI and pulmonary. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of critically ill patients with HM, there was considerable variability in the utilization of DVT prophylaxis, with predominant use of SCDs. The incidence of VTE was 4.4% and major bleeding 14%. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05396157. Venous Thromboembolism in Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients: a Retrospective Study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).

Soluble urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and mortality in acute pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: The soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) potentially plays a role in immune-thrombosis, possibly by modulating plasmin activity or contributing to chemotaxis in a complex, poorly understood context. The role of suPAR levels in the short-term prognostic of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational, prospective, single-center study enrolled consecutive patients aged 18 and above with confirmed acute symptomatic PE and no prior anticoagulant therapy. The primary objective was to assess the prognostic capacity of suPAR levels measured at the time of diagnosis in terms of mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients, with a mean age of 73.8 years (±17), were included, with gender distribution evenly split at 50%. Seven (13.5%) patients died. The ROC curve for mortality yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.48-0.96), with an optimal suPAR cut-off of 5.5ng/mL. Bivariate analysis for suPAR>5.5ng/mL was associated with a crude odds ratio of 10 (95% CI 1.63-61.27; p=0.01) for 30-day mortality. Survival analysis showed a 30-day mortality hazard ratio of 8.33 (95% CI 1.69-40.99; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: suPAR emerges as a potential biomarker for short-term mortality prediction and holds the potential for enhanced stratification in patients with acute symptomatic PE.

Long-term monitoring and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease: recommendations of the Thromboembolic Disease Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine 2024.

Venous thromboembolim (VTE) is a highly prevalent condition that requires long-term monitoring and treatment. This monitoring includes: 1) completing the etiological study and determining the risk of VTE recurrence; 2) establishing the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment, as well as the type of therapy and its dosage; 3) estimating the risk of bleeding, and 4) identifying the occurrence of chronic complications. This consensus document, prepared by the VTE Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), aims to update and establish consensus recommendations on these aspects. The document focuses on four aspects of management: the first includes risk factors for VTE recurrence after an unprovoked VTE episode and describes the predictive scores of VTE recurrence; the second focuses on risk factors for bleeding; the third provides recommendations for long-term follow-up in VTE, addressing specific considerations for screening chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and post-thrombotic syndrome of the lower limbs; and the fourth provides guidance on the optimal duration of extended anticoagulant treatment, as well as the type of therapy and its dosage;. For each area, an exhaustive literature review was conducted, analyzing the updated VTE clinical guidelines and recent studies. This document is intended to be a guide in the long-term management of VTE based on the most current knowledge.

[Recommendations for thromboembolic disease in oncological processes. A view from primary care]. / Recomendaciones sobre enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en procesos oncológicos. Una visión desde la medicina de familia.

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients diagnosed with cancer and a cause of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 20% of thromboembolic episodes develop in association with active cancer. On the other hand, it is estimated that about 2-12% of cases, the thromboembolic episode is the first manifestation of an occult cancer, diagnosed at that time or subsequently, which offers an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. There are multiple factors that contribute to increase the risk of VTE in oncological patients in relation to specific characteristics of the patient, the tumor and the treatments. Knowledge of these risk factors will contribute to early diagnosis when signs of VTE appear, as well as the assessment of thromboprophylaxis if indicated. The diagnosis of VTE in patients with cancer does not differ of those who do not suffer from it. Regarding the treatment of VTE in these patients, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), direct acting anticoagulants (DACs) and antivitamin K (VKA) are the most commonly used, although the dosing regimen and length are not clear yet. The management of these patients should be interdisciplinary and early, so the primary care physician plays a key role in this process as he/she is liaise with his/her patients. It is also necessary to update knowledge in order to improve the care of these patients. For these reasons, this document has been prepared by the Working Group on Vasculopathies of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) whose objective is to present the available information regarding the management of VTE that may appear in oncological patients, as well as the assessment of thromboprophylaxis and treatment, if appropriate, from an approach focused on a primary care field.

Impact of emergency department management of isolated superficial vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: a secondary analysis of data from the ALTAMIRA study. / Impacto del manejo en urgencias en la evolución de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial aislada de miembros inferiores: subanálisis del estudio ALTAMIRA.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs in patients treated in Spanish hospital emergency departments (EDs). To evaluate the impact of ED management of venous thromboembolic complications on outcomes and to determine the characteristics of patients who develop complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective multicenter ALTAMIRA study (Spanish acronym for risk factors, complications, and assessment of Spanish ED management of SVT) used recorded data for consecutive patients with a diagnosis of isolated SVT treated in 18 EDs. We gathered data on symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or the extension or recurrence of SVT), clinically significant bleeding, and 180-day mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to explore variables associated with complications. RESULTS: A total of 703 patients were included. Anticoagulation was prescribed for 84.1% of the patients for a median of 30 days (interquartile range, 15-42 days); 81.3% were treated with low molecular weight heparin. A prophylactic dose was prescribed for 48% and an intermediate therapeutic dose for 52%. Sixty-four patients (9.2%) developed symptomatic thromboembolic disease within 180 days, 12 (1.7%) experienced clinically significant bleeding, and 4 (0.6%) died. Complications developed later in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy than in those not taking an anticoagulant (66 vs 11 days , P=.009), and 76.6% of those developing complications were not on anticoagulant when symptoms appeared. A history of thromboembolic disease was associated with developing complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.62). CONCLUSION: ED treatment of SVT varies and is often suboptimal. The incidence of thromboembolic complications after SVT is high. Starting anticoagulation in the ED delays the development of complications. Patients with a history of thromboembolic disease are more at risk of complications.

OBJETIVO: Describir el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial (TVS) aislada de miembros inferiores en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) españoles. Evaluar el impacto del tratamiento instaurado en urgencias en la evolución, en términos de complicaciones de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV), y conocer las características de los pacientes que sufren complicaciones. METODO: El estudio multicentrico (18 SUH) ALTAMIRA (fActores de riesgo, compLicaciones y evaluación del manejo de la TVS de Miembros Inferiores en hospitales españoles atendidos en los seRvicios de urgenciAs) creó un cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico objetivo de TVS aislada. Se recogieron las complicaciones de ETV sintomáticas (trombosis venosa profunda, tromboembolia pulmonar y extensión o recurrencia de TVS), sangrados clínicamente relevantes y defunciones a 180 días. Se evaluaron las variables asociadas a las complicaciones mediante una regresión de Cox. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 703 pacientes. El 84,1% recibieron anticoagulación durante 30 días (rango intercuartil 15-42), 81,3% con heparina de bajo peso molecular (48% dosis profilácticas, 52% intermedias-terapéuticas). En 180 días, 64 pacientes (9,1%) tuvieron complicación de ETV, 12 (1,7%) tuvieron sangrado clínicamente relevante, y 4 fallecieron (0,6%). Los pacientes en que se instauró anticoagulación en urgencias tardaron más tiempo en desarrollar complicaciones (66 vs 11 días, p = 0,009). El 76,6% de los que se complicaron no estaban anticoagulados en ese momento. La ETV previa se asoció de forma independiente con el desarrollo de complicaciones (hazard ratio ajustada 2,20; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1,34-3,62). CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento en urgencias de la TVS aislada es heterogéneo y con frecuencia subóptimo. La incidencia de complicaciones de ETV es elevada. El tratamiento anticoagulante iniciado en urgencias supone un retraso en el desarrollo de complicaciones. Los pacientes con ETV previa tienen más riesgo de complicaciones.

[Clinical characteristics and presentation form in patients with venous thromboembolism and negative or weakly positive D-dimer]. / Características clínicas y forma de presentación en pacientes con enfermedad tromboembólica venosa y dímero-D negativo o débilmente positivo.

INTRODUCTION: D-dimer has a high negative predictive value for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). However, VTE has been reported in the presence of normal D-dimer values. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in patients with VTE from Hospital Gregorio Marañón between 2001 and 2022, comparing the characteristics of clinical presentation based on D-dimer levels (<500 ng/mL vs. ≥500 ng/mL). RESULTS: A total of 2582 patients were found, 333 patients (12.9%) presented negative or weakly positive D-dimer levels. They were significantly younger (57.9 vs. 65.3 years), with a lower prevalence of comorbidities (ischemic heart disease, dementia, and chronic kidney disease), and a greater family history of VTE (8.4% vs. 5.2%) and thrombophilia (11.7% vs. 7.8%). They presented significantly less dyspnea (57.6% vs. 75.4%), syncope (3% vs. 13.5%), less thrombotic load, elevated NT-pro-BNP (22.0% vs. 48.2%), and right ventricle dilatation (8.1% vs. 30.0%). CONCLUSION: Patients with VTE and low D-dimer levels at diagnosis were younger, with milder clinical presentation and lower thrombotic load; but they presented a higher prevalence of thrombophilia and a family history of VTE.

Characteristics of isolated superficial vein thrombosis and diagnostictherapeutic management in Spanish hospital emergency departments: the ALTAMIRA study. / Características y manejo diagnóstico-terapéutico de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial aislada en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios españoles. Estudio ALTAMIRA.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with isolated lower-limb superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) treated in hospital emergency departments and to evaluate adherence to clinical practice guidelines on diagnosis (vein ultrasound imaging) and therapeutic management (start of anticoagulant therapy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in 18 Spanish emergency departments. We included all patients with a final emergency department diagnosis of lower-limb SVT aged 18 years or older between January 2016 and May 2017. Backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate adherence to clinical practice guidelines on ordering vein ultrasound imaging and starting anticoagulant therapy. RESULTS: A total of 1166 patients were included. The mean patient age was 59.6 years, and 67.9% were women. About a quarter of the patients (24.4%) had a history of venous thromboembolic disease. Complications developed in 8.9% within 180 days: 4.6% experienced a recurrence and 3.6% progressed to SVT and 1.8% to deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in 0.9%. Hemorrhagic complications developed in 17 patients (1.5%). Sixteen patients (1.4%) died. Vein ultrasound imagine was ordered for 703 patients (60.3%). Anticoagulant agents were prescribed for 898 (77%) for a median period of 22 days. Variables associated with a decision to order anticoagulants were a history of venous thromboembolic disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.30), varicose veins (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-2.30); limb pain (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.91); painful cord (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.97-1.73); and availability of vein ultrasound images (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.94-3.45). CONCLUSION: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of isolated lower-limb SVT is low in Spanish emergency departments. Ultrasound imaging is not ordered for 1 out of every 2 to 3 patients, and anticoagulant treatment is not started in 1 out of 4 patients. There is great room for improvement.

OBJETIVO: Describir las características de los pacientes diagnosticados de trombosis venosa superficial (TVS) aislada de miembros inferiores en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH), y evaluar la adherencia a las guías de práctica clínica en el manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico (realización de ecografía venosa e instauración de tratamiento anticoagulante). METODO: . Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo en 18 SUH españoles. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes atendidos en los SUH con diagnóstico final de TVS en miembros inferiores, con edad $ 18 años, de enero de 2016 a mayo de 2017. Para evaluar la no adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías de práctica clínica (realización de ecografía venosa, e instauración de tratamiento anticoagulante) se ajustó un modelo de regresión logística múltiple por pasos hacia atrás. RESULTADOS: . Mil ciento sesenta y seis pacientes fueron incluidos. La edad media fue de 59,6 años, el 67,9% eran mujeres. El 24,4% tenían antecedentes de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV). El 8,9% tuvieron alguna complicación a 180 días [4,6% recurrencia y 3,6% progresión de TVS, 1,8% trombosis venosa profunda (TVP) y 0,9% tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP)]. Hubo 17 pacientes (1,5%) con hemorragia y 16 (1,4%) muertes. Se realizó ecografía venosa a 703 (60,3%) pacientes. Recibieron tratamiento anticoagulante 898 (77%), con una mediana de 22 días. Las variables asociadas con la decisión de anticoagular fueron: antecedentes ETV (OR 1,60; IC 95%: 1,12-2,30), varices (OR 1,40; IC 95%: 1,12-2,30), dolor de la extremidad (OR 1,44; IC 95%: 1,08-191), presencia de cordón doloroso (OR 1,30; IC 95%: 0,97-1,73) y realización de ecografía venosa (OR 1,60; IC 95%: 1,94-3,45). CONCLUSIONES: Existe una baja adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías de práctica clínica en el manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de los pacientes con diagnóstico de TVS aislada de miembros inferiores en los SUH españoles: no se realiza ecografía venosa en uno de cada 2-3 pacientes, y no se instaura tratamiento anticoagulante en 1 de cada 4. Esto constituye un margen de mejora muy relevante.

Profiles of patients with venous thromboembolic disease in the emergency department and their medium-term prognosis: data from the ESPHERIA registry. / Registro ESPHERIA: perfiles de pacientes con enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en urgencias y su asociación con el pronóstico a medio plazo.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the 180-day prognosis for patients of different profiles diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in emergency departments (EDs). Secondary aims were to assess all-cause mortality and readmission rates and to describe the clinical characteristics and forms of presentation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in each patient profile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the ESPHERIA registry (Spanish acronym for Risk Profile of Patients with VTE Attended in Spanish Emergency Departments), which includes consecutive patients with symptomatic VTE treated in 53 EDs. The cases were divided according to 4 profiles: 1) unprovoked DVT, 2) DVT provoked by transient risk factors, 3)patients with cancer, and 4) patients with low cardiopulmonary reserve. The primary outcome was a composite of 180-day all-cause mortality or readmission. RESULTS: We studied 773 patients: 450 (58.2%) were classified as profile 1, 128 (16.6%) as profile 2, 115 (14.9%) as profile 3 , a nd 8 0 ( 10.3%) a s p rofile 4. We fo und di fferences be tween th e 4 pr ofiles in demographics, com orbidity, clinical presentation, type of DVT and location, management, and outcomes. One hundred ninety-five p atients (25.2%) had at least one of the adverse events included in the composite within 180 days: 69 (8.9%) died and 179 (23.2%) were readmitted. Hazard ratios (HR) indicated that DVT with low cardiopulmonary reserve (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.12-2.68; P = .01)) or DVT with cancer (HR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.22-4.34; P .001) were the profiles t hat w ere independently associated with the 180-day composite outcome. CONCLUSION: Classifying patients with DVT according to 4 profiles ( unprovoked, provoked by t ransient r isk f actors, associated with cancer, and associated with low cardiopulmonary reserve) when making the diagnosis is useful for assessing prognosis for all-cause mortality or readmission within 180 days. This classification could be useful for establishing a care and follow-up plan when discharging patients with DVT from the ED.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el pronóstico a 180 días de los pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) en urgencias, en función de una clasificación por perfiles clínicos. Los objetivos secundarios fueron evaluar la mortalidad y el reingreso por todas las causas de manera individual, y describir las características clínicas y formas de presentación de trombosis venosa profunda (TVP) y tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP), según dichos perfiles. METODO: Análisis secundario del registro ESPHERIA que incluye pacientes consecutivos con ETV sintomática de 53 servicios de urgencias (SU). Se dividió la muestra en 4 perfiles: ETV no provocada (perfil 1), ETV provocada por factores de riesgo transitorios (perfil 2), cáncer (perfil 3) y baja reserva cardiopulmonar (perfil 4). La variable de resultado primaria fue la compuesta mortalidad o reingreso por cualquier causa a 180 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 773 pacientes de los cuales 450 (58,2%) fueron clasificados en el perfil 1, 128 (16,6%) en el perfil 2, 115 pacientes (14,9%) en el perfil 3 y 80 (10,3%) en el perfil 4. Se documeô€‚˜taron diferencias demográficas, de comorbilidad, presentación clínica, tipo de ETV, manejo, ubicación y resultados entre los perfiles clínicos. Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes (25,2%) presentaron un resultado adverso compuesto a los 180 días, de los cuales 69 (8,9%) fallecieron y 179 (23,2%) sufrieron un nuevo ingreso por cualquier causa. La ETV asociada a baja reserva cardiopulmonar (HR 1,73; IC 95% 1,12-2,68; p = 0,01) y la ETV asociada a cáncer (HR 3,10; IC 95% 2,22-4,34; p 0,001) se asociaron de forma independiente con sufrir un resultado adverso en los primeros 180 días. CONCLUSIONES: Clasificar a los pacientes con ETV según factores de riesgo y comorbilidades en 4 perfiles (no provocada, provocada por factores transitorios, asociada a cáncer y asociada a baja reserva cardiopulmonar) resulta útil al momento del diagnóstico de la ETV para estimar el pronóstico en términos de mortalidad y reingreso a 180 días. Esta clasificación podría ayudar a establecer un plan de cuidados y seguimiento al alta en la ETV diagnosticada en urgencias.

C-reactive protein level predicts 30-day mortality and bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism: A prospective single-center study.

AIMS: The association of on-admission CRP and early adverse outcomes in acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been investigated. We hypothesized that increased on-admission CRP levels would correlate with adverse outcomes in patients with acute VTE. METHOD: In this prospective observational study, consecutive patients with acute VTE were enrolled and CRP levels were measured within the first 24h after diagnosis. Mortality, bleeding and recurrence were recorded during a 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: 586 patients were included. Higher CRP levels were found in patients with mortality (7.5 vs 4.0mg/dL; p=0.01) and bleeding (7.8 vs 3.9mg/dL; p=0.03). Multivariable logistic regression showed that CRP levels >5mg/dL were associated with higher mortality (OR 6.25; 95% CI, 2.1-18.6) and bleeding (OR 2.7; CI 95% 1.3-5.7). These results were independent to ESC risk score and simplified PESI score for mortality prediction. The predictive capacity of CRP showed an area under the ROC curve - AUC - of .7 (CI 95% .56-.85) for mortality and .65 (CI 95% .54-.75) for bleeding. The prognostic capacity of the ESC risk score and simplified PESI score was improved after adding the CRP cutoff of 5mg/dL (AUC of .87 CI 95% .79-.95). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that on-admission CRP level may be a simple, widely available and valuable biomarker to identify high-risk VTE patients for early mortality and bleeding. CRP ≥5mg/dL was independently associated with 30-day VTE related death and bleeding.

[Prevention of thromboembolic disease in elderly patients admitted to medical wards]. / Adecuación de la profilaxis tromboembólica en pacientes de edad avanzada hospitalizados en servicios médicos de un hospital de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the suitability of the prevention of thromboembolic disease in elderly patients admitted to medical departments, as well as some associated factors, such as the measures required in order to improve quality and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study in a tertiary level hospital that included elderly patients that were admitted to medical departments. A simple, non-proportional, randomised sample was used, stratified by department. The risk was measured using the Padua prediction model and the risk assessment model of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) adjusting depending on the number of discharges. A Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) plan was used with three levels, good, (standard 95%, threshold 70%), acceptable (standard 95%, threshold 50%), and not acceptable. RESULTS: A total of 72 cases from 8 departments were evaluated. Just over half (51.4%) of patients had a high risk of thromboembolic disease (Padua≥4), and 23.6% of bleeding (IMPROVE≥7). Besides the advanced age, the adjusted scores were particularly due to cancer (22%) and reduced mobility (19%) for Padua, and male gender (13%) and renal failure (12%) for IMPROVE. The adjusted overall suitability was 57.5% (95%CI: ±19.0%). The OR for suitable conduct on not starting medication, 1.56 (95%CI: 1.07-2.26). The suitability by department was not uniform: all the lots were acceptable, in 3 with level "good" and in 5 with "acceptable". CONCLUSIONS: The suitability of thromboembolic prophylaxis in the study hospital maintains acceptable levels, although not homogeneous. There is an opportunity for improvement that must be taken. The data obtained may help in deciding interventions, with LQAS being useful to optimise the evaluation effort.

Clinical characteristics and course in emergency department patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and symptomatic acute venous thromboembolic disease: secondary analysis of the ESPHERIA registry. / Características y evolución de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y enfermedad tromboembólica venosa aguda sintomática en urgencias: subanálisis del registro ESPHERIA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on prognosis in patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in Spanish emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the ESPHERIA (Spanish acronym for Risk Profile of Patients VTED Attended in Spanish Emergency Departments) registry. RESULTS: A total of 801 patients, 71 (9%) with COPD, were included. Pulmonary thromboembolism was recorded in 77.%% of the patients with COPD (vs in 47.1% of patients without COPD; P<.001). Patients with COPD had evidence of right ventricular dysfunction on computed tomography angiography more often than other VTED patients (18.2% vs 13.1%; P<.001) and more often required ventilatory support (7% vs 0.5%; P<.001). VTED patients with COPD also had a higher rate of readmission or mortality at 180 days (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00-2.29; P = .048)] than patients without COPD. CONCLUSION: COPD affects the prognosis of patients diagnosed with VTED in Spanish emergency departments as evidenced by hospital readmission and mortality.

OBJETIVO: Determinar el impacto pronóstico de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) en los pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) en servicios de urgencias (SU) españoles. METODO: Análisis secundario del registro ESPHERIA que incluyó pacientes consecutivos con ETV sintomática en 53 SU. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 801 pacientes de los que 71 (9%) tenían EPOC, siendo la tromboembolia pulmonar la forma de presentación más frecuente de ETV en este subgrupo de pacientes (77,5% vs 47,1%, p < 0,001). Los pacientes con EPOC tuvieron con más frecuencia disfunción de ventrículo derecho en la angiotomografía pulmonar (18,2% vs 13,1%; p < 0,001) y necesidad de soporte ventilatorio (7% vs 0,5%; p < 0,001). Los pacientes con ETV y EPOC tuvieron mayor incidencia de reingreso o mortalidad en el seguimiento a 180 días [HR 1,52 (IC 95% 1,00-2,29; p = 0,048)], comparados con los pacientes con ETV sin EPOC. CONCLUSIONES: La EPOC tiene impacto pronóstico en los pacientes diagnosticados de ETV en SU españoles, en términos de mortalidad y reingreso hospitalario.