Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) control and identify the factors associated with failure of initial Ex-PRESS surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma for 3 years. METHODS: A total of 79 patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (55 normal-tension glaucoma and 24 primary open-angle glaucoma) were enrolled. All patients underwent Ex-PRESS implantation (including combined cataract surgery). The outcome measure was the survival rate using life table analysis, the failure was defined as IOP of > 18 mmHg (criterion A), > 15 mmHg (criterion B) or > 12 mmHg (criterion C) and/or IOP reduction of < 20% from baseline (each criterion) without any glaucoma medications. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors for IOP management defined as the above criterion.  RESULTS: The mean preoperative IOP was 19.3 ± 5.8 mmHg. At 36 months, the mean IOP was 11.8 ± 3.6 mmHg with a mean IOP change of 7.5 mmHg (reduction rate 39.0%). The cumulative probability of success was 58% (95%CI: 42-64%) (criterion A), 48% (95%CI: 37-59%) (criterion B) and 30% (95%CI: 20-40%) (criterion C). In multivariate analyses, factors that predicted poor IOP control included the intervention of bleb needling after 6 months after the surgery (HR: 2.43; 95%CI: 1.35-4.37; P = 0.032). Transient hypotony was observed in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: The implementation of bleb needling after Ex-PRESS surgery in the late postoperative period was suggested to be the main risk factor for achieving lower IOP.

Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density reduction between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma patients at 3 years after Ex-Press® surgery.

PURPOSE: We compared corneal endothelial cell (CED) loss after Ex-Press (EXP) surgery between patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma (PEX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-facility retrospective study. We included glaucoma patients who had undergone EXP surgery and were followed up > 3 years. We measured the CED before and after (at 12, 24, and 36 months) EXP surgery by noncontact specular microscopy and compared the means of the CED values and CED survival ratios after EXP surgery by paired t-test. RESULTS: We included 119 eyes that underwent EXP surgery, including 60 POAG eyes and 59 PEX eyes. In the POAG group, the mean CED decreased from 2389 ± 321 at baseline to 2230 ± 424 cells/mm2 after 3 years. In the PEX group, the mean CED decreased from 2111 ± 510 at baseline to 1845 ± 628 cells/mm2 after 3 years. At the 3-year follow-up, the CED survival ratio was 93.3 ± 12.5% in the POAG group and significantly lower, at 85.0 ± 19.5%, in the PEX group (p = 0.0064). Two cases in the PEX group developed bullous keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: EXP surgery decreased the corneal endothelial cell populations in PEX patients faster than POAG patients.

Epiretinal membrane development after Ex-Press glaucoma filtration device implant: 2-year results of a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The most common retinal complications after glaucoma surgery are choroidal detachment, hypotony maculopathy, malignant glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis and retinal detachment. However, if glaucoma surgery is a risk factor for the ERM development needs to be clarified. This study aims to assess the incidence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) in 2 years of follow-up in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with Ex-Press shunt implant. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive, single-center, case-control study. We enrolled patients affected by POAG and scheduled for Ex-Press device implant with or without concomitant cataract surgery. The control group was the contralateral eyes which continues anti-glaucomatous eyedrops. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were performed before surgery, at 6 months and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-two eyes of 41 consecutive patients, 18 males and 23 females with a mean age of 70, 29 ± 8,45, were analyzed at 24 months. 39.1% of eyes developed ERM: 29.3% were cellophane macular reflex (CMR) and 9.8% were pre-macular fibrosis (PMF). In the control group, 19.5% of eyes developed ERM: 17.1% were CMR and 2.4% were PMF. No statistically significant difference was reported (p = 0.121) between treated and control group. ERM development did not affect significantly the central foveal thickness (260.13 ± 35.01 µm at baseline, 265.03 ± 34.90 µm at 6 months and 275.18 ± 33.31 µm at 24 months) and macular volume (7.75 ± 0.43 mm3 at baseline, 7.77 ± 0.48 mm3 at 6 months and 7.77 ± 0.46 mm3 at 24 months), remained comparable to reported average measures in healthy individuals during the follow-up. Concomitant cataract surgery did not increase the ERM incidence. CONCLUSION: Ex-Press implant may increase the ERM incidence regardless concomitant cataract surgery, accelerating or inducing a posterior vitreous detachment, such as other ocular surgical procedure. Nevertheless, the vast majority of ERM are CMR, not affecting the macular profile.

Corneal endothelial cell loss after EX-PRESS surgery depends on site of insertion, cornea or trabecular meshwork.

PURPOSE: Previously, we reported that the Ex-press® shunt (EXP) was associated with more rapid reduction in corneal endothelial cells when inserted into the cornea rather than the trabecular meshwork (TM). We compared the reduction rate of corneal endothelial cells between the corneal insertion group and TM insertion group. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We included patients who had undergone EXP surgery and were followed for > 5 years. We analyzed the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) before and after EXP implantation. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in the corneal insertion group and 53 patients in the TM insertion group. One patient in the corneal insertion group developed bullous keratopathy. The ECD decreased significantly more rapidly in the corneal insertion group (p < 0.0001), in whom the mean ECD decreased from 2227 ± 443 to 1415 ± 573 cells/mm2 at 5 years with a mean 5-year survival rate of 64.9 ± 21.9%. By contrast, in the TM insertion group, the mean ECD decreased from 2356 ± 364 to 2124 ± 579 cells/mm2 at 5 years, and the mean 5-year survival rate was 89.3 ± 18.0%. The decrease rate of ECD was calculated as 8.3%/year in the corneal insertion group and 2.2%/year in the TM insertion group. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion into cornea is a risk factor for rapid ECD loss. The EXP should be inserted into the TM to preserve the corneal endothelial cells.

Comparison of the results of Ex-PRESS® surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma between high and low preoperative intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes of Ex-PRESS® (EXP) surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) between low preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and high preoperative IOP. METHODS: This was a retrospective non-randomized study. Seventy-nine POAG patients who underwent EXP surgery and were followed for > 3 years were included. Patients with a preoperative IOP of ≦ 16 mmHg and > 16 mmHg with tolerant glaucoma medications were defined as the low IOP group and the high IOP group, respectively. We compared the surgical outcomes, postoperative IOP and number of glaucoma medications. Success was defined as a postoperative IOP of ≦ 15 mmHg and a reduction of > 20% from the preoperative IOP to the postoperative IOP. RESULTS: EXP surgeries significantly decreased IOPs from 13.2 ± 2.0 to 9.1 ± 2.9 mmHg in the low IOP group (p < 0.001), and from 22.5 ± 4.8 to 12.5 ± 4.0 mmHg in the high IOP group (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative IOP was significantly low in the low IOP group at 3 years (p = 0.0008). Success rates compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve were not significantly different (p = 0.449). CONCLUSIONS: EXP surgery was useful for POAG patients with a low preoperative IOP.

Risk factors for Ex-Press® surgery failure.

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk factors for Ex-Press® (EXP) surgery failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective non-randomized study of 98 patients who had undergone EXP and were followed up ≥ 5 years. We investigated the following nine risk factors: age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), previous glaucoma surgery, type of glaucoma (primary open-angle glaucoma vs. pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma), surgical methods (EXP alone vs. EXP + cataract surgery simultaneously), central corneal thickness (CCT), and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). We defined a successful surgery as a postoperative reduction in the IOP ≥ 20% from the preoperative IOP and ≤ 18 mmHg. We determined the risk factors using multivariate cox regression models. RESULTS: Performing EXP significantly decreased the IOP (preoperative: 25.2 ± 8.7, at 5 years: 11.1 ± 4.1). The success ratio of EXP was 67.4% at 5 years. We found no significant risk factors for EXP surgery failure. The p values of the factors were age (p = 0.936), gender (p = 0.0587), hypertension (p = 0.409), DM (p = 0.967), previous glaucoma surgery (p = 0.940), type of glaucoma (p = 0.435) surgical methods (p = 0.521), CCT (p = 0.091), and preoperative IOP (p = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: No preoperative factors that could be used to predict the failure of EXP surgery were identified. EXP can be safely performed for primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma.

Trabeculectomy with Ologen implant versus trabeculectomy with P 50 Ex-PRESS shunt in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Background: This is the first randomized controlled trial of trabeculectomy with Ex-Press Shunt versus Ologen implant in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Indian eyes. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients of POAG treated with two different methods of augmented trabeculectomy. Group A with Ex-PRESS shunt (P50 model) and Group B with Ologen implant. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure of 21 mm Hg or lower at 6 months postoperative. Results: N = 40 eyes of 33 patients. Baseline IOP in Group A was 23.70 ± 4.6 mm Hg (Range 22-36 mm Hg), and Group B was 26.00 ± 4.0 mm Hg (Range 23-36 mm Hg). Surgical success was achieved in 85% of patients in both Groups. Change in IOP from baseline was statistically significant in both groups at 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperative. No statistically significant difference in the change in IOP between the two groups. Postoperative complications were lesser in Group A compared to Group B, in both early (35% vs 50%) and late stage (20% vs 30%). The drop in visual acuity became statistically insignificant at 4 weeks in Group A and 8 weeks in Group B. Conclusions: There is no difference between the surgical success rates of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS Shunt versus Ologen. However, the Ex-PRESS shunt fares better with lower complication rates and faster visual recovery than the Ologen group.

Ex-PRESS® surgery versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma with low preoperative intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes between Ex-PRESS® surgery (EXP) and trabeculectomy (Trab) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with low preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective non-randomized study. We included POAG patients with preoperative IOP ≤ 16 mmHg who were taking tolerance glaucoma medications. We compared the surgical outcomes, postoperative IOP, number of glaucoma medications, reduction rate of corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), visual acuity, and postoperative complications between POAG patients who underwent EXP (34 eyes) or Trab (38 eyes) and could be followed up for > 2 years. RESULTS: Both surgeries significantly decreased the IOP (p < 0.001): At 2 years, EXP provided decreases from 13.4 ± 2.3 to 10.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, and Trab provided decreases from 13.5 ± 2.0 to 8.9 ± 3.2 mmHg. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative IOP (p = 0.076), number of postoperative medications (p = 0.263), success rate (p = 0.900), reduction rate of ECD (p = 0.410), or difference in visual acuity (p = 0.174). The reduction rate of IOP was significantly high in the Trab group (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgeries significantly decreased IOP and were useful surgical methods for low-IOP glaucoma. Our results suggest that trabeculectomy can decrease IOP more than Ex-PRESS surgery but might have more complications.

Secondary epiretinal membrane after Ex-Press glaucoma filtration device implant.

PURPOSE: To estimate the frequency of epiretinal membrane (ERM) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with Ex-Press shunt implant. Secondarily, we aimed to assess the role of concomitant cataract surgery and the impact of the ERM on central foveal thickness and macular volume. METHODS: In this prospective, consecutive, case-control study, we enrolled 54 patients affected by PAOG and scheduled for Ex-Press device implant with or without contemporary phacoemulsification. Contralateral eyes affected by POAG and receiving anti-glaucomatous eyedrops constituted the control group. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-six eyes received the Ex-Press implant alone, and 28 eyes underwent the combined procedure. Six months postoperatively, we observed 18 (33%) cases of ERM: 15 (28%) of cellophane macular reflex (CMR) and 3 (6%) of pre-macular fibrosis (PMF). In the control group, 9 (17%) eyes developed an ERM: 8 (15%) were CMR, and 1 (2%) was PMF. The frequency of ERM statistically differs between treated and contralateral eyes (P = 0.032, χ2 test). The ERM frequency did not statically differ between eyes subjected to simple or combined surgery (P = 0.846, χ2 test). Mean central foveal thickness and mean macular volume did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The Ex-Press glaucoma shunt may increase the risk of ERM onset regardless of the concomitant cataract surgery; however, most cases were cellophane macular reflex with limited functional and anatomical impact.

Ex-PRESS shunt implantation for intractable glaucoma with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of the posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens has been widely performed to correct high and extreme myopia. Chronic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation may occur in its late postoperative period. For medically uncontrolled cases, surgical treatment is necessary, and benefits should be weighed against risks when determining whether to remove the lens. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old man with extremely high myopia presented with progressive blurred vision and medically uncontrolled IOP in the right eye. His past ocular history was significant for bilateral implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation ten years ago. On ophthalmic examination, the ICL was well placed with a vault height of 456 µm in the right eye. The anterior chamber angles were open but narrow, and mild to moderate trabecular pigmentation was noted. Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration surgery without ICL removal was performed to control IOP. During surgery, an Ex-PRESS P50 shunt was inserted into the anterior chamber via the front edge of the blue-grey transition zone between the sclera and cornea. Transient hypotony and shallow anterior chamber occurred in the first week after surgery, along with an ICL tilt towards the cornea with reduced vault height. No other complications related to either the ICL or the Ex-PRESS shunt were noted. IOP remained stable at 12 ~ 14 mmHg at the first 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration surgery might be a safe and effective alternative treatment for intractable glaucoma with high myopia and ICL implantation. Careful assessment of the ICL position and anterior chamber angle is necessary to plan the appropriate surgical procedure. A postoperative shallow anterior chamber may result in ICL dislocation.

A new, minimally invasive procedure for dogs with encapsulated Ahmed drainage implants and elevated intraocular pressures: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel, minimally invasive method for re-establishing aqueous humor outflow in dogs with refractory glaucoma after fibrous encapsulation of their Ahmed drainage implants. PROCEDURE: Three dogs (4 eyes) underwent trans-capsular implantation of an Alcon EX-PRESS® glaucoma filtration device under sedation (2 dogs) or general anesthesia (1 dog). After rotating the eye downwards, a 2 mm incision was made in the conjunctiva/Tenon's capsule overlying the encapsulated Ahmed plate, and later closed with absorbable suture. All eyes received subconjunctival mitomycin-C 0.02 mg. RESULTS: Mean post-operative follow-up was 341 days (range: 77-530). All eyes were hypertensive pre-operatively (mean IOP: 31.25 ± 7.14 mmHg) despite receiving topical latanoprost (4/4), timolol (4/4), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (4/4), and demecarium bromide (2/4). Two eyes (dogs 1 and 2) were visual pre-operatively, while 2 eyes (dog 3) displayed equivocal or no vision. Post-operatively, all eyes received timolol and a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Other anti-hypertensive medications were discontinued. Immediately following surgery, all eyes were mildly hypotensive (mean IOP: 5.75 ± 1.71 mm Hg). Two of 4 eyes were normotensive and visual until days 90 (dog 2) and 530 (dog 1) (IOP range: 10-16 mm Hg). One eye (dog 3) was normotensive for approximately 150 days, and then hypertension returned. One eye (dog 3) from the start displayed severe uveitis, hypertensive episodes, and was phthisical by the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-capsular EX-PRESS® implantation is a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of refractory glaucoma in dogs with encapsulated Ahmed drainage implants, and further investigation is warranted.

Ex-Press® versus Baerveldt implant surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes between Ex-Press® (EXP) and Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgeries for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-facility study. The inclusion criteria were that the patient's preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was > 21 mmHg and the post-surgery follow-up was > 1 year. We recruited 161 patients who had undergone a trabeculectomy with EXP (89 eyes) or BGI surgery (72 eyes). We compared these groups' postoperative IOP values and postoperative glaucoma medications, the reduction rate of corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), surgical outcomes, complications, the hospital stay duration, and the number of visits within 3 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Both the EXP and BGI surgeries could significantly decrease the IOP. When the surgical success was defined postoperative IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, the surgical outcome of BGI was significantly better than EXP (p = 0.0148). When the surgical success was defined postoperative IOP ≤ 18, 15 , and 12 mmHg, the surgical outcomes between BGI and EXP surgeries were not significantly different (p = 0.0815, p = 0.331, and p = 0.910). The mean ECD reduction rate was significantly faster in the EXP group. The BGI patients had significantly shorter stays in the hospital and fewer visits within 3 months post-surgery (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: BGI surgery could provide comparable surgical outcomes as EXP surgery for POAG or PEXG patients with high preoperative IOP. BGI surgery has some advantages: fewer post-surgery visits, less postoperative interventions, and a lower ECD reduction rate.

Various modalities for management of secondary angle closure neovascular glaucoma in diabetic eyes: 1-year comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare outcome of 4 methods for management of angle closure neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in diabetic eyes. METHODS: Prospective comparative study, on 40 eyes (40 patients) with NVG. Patients were randomly assigned to group A (Trabeculectomy with MMC), B (Ahmed valve), C (Ex-Press Minishunt with MMC) or D (Diode cyclophotocoagulation). Patients were followed regularly for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: intraocular pressure (IOP), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications and 2ry intervention. RESULTS: Preoperative data were not significantly different between 4 groups. Postoperatively, there was significant drop in IOP in each group at each follow-up. Ahmed valve group showed least mean postoperative IOP and highest mean drop of the IOP at 1 day and 1 week postoperatively, while Ex-Press minishunt group had least mean postoperative IOP at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. At 6 months and 1 year, there was no significant difference between 4 groups. BCVA was not significantly different between 4 groups. At 1 year, CFT was significantly lower in each of the 4 groups, and it was significantly the least in group A and highest in group D. Highest intraoperative bleeding was observed with trabeculectomy. Success rate was not significantly different among the 4 groups. CONCLUSION: The 4 management options showed a significant long-term effect on IOP, and on long-terms there was no significant difference between them for IOP and BCVA. Trabeculectomy showed highest incidence of intraoperative bleeding, while cyclophotocoagulation showed none.

Factors influencing the reduction in corneal endothelial cells after Ex-Press® surgery.

PURPOSE: We investigated the factors that influence the reduction in corneal endothelial cells after Ex-Press® surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We included patients who had undergone Ex-Press surgery and were followed up for > 2. We analyzed the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) before and after Ex-Press surgery. We investigated the insertion position (Ex-Press device was inserted into cornea or trabecular meshwork (TM)), Ex-Press-iris touch, cornea-iris touch, peripheral anterior synechiae, history of trabeculotomy, history of selective laser trabeculoplasty, type of glaucoma, and simultaneous cataract surgery as influencing factors. We used multivariate analysis to determine the factors influencing the reduction rate of ECD. RESULTS: We included 129 eyes. The mean of ECD had decreased 7.0% at 2 years. Ex-Press surgeries significantly decreased the ECD after 2 years (p = 0.0118). As a result of the multivariate analysis, the factor that led to a significantly faster reduction in ECD was the insertion position of the Ex-Press (p < 0.0001). The reduction rate of ECD after 2 years in cases of insertion into the cornea (27 eyes) was 15.1 ± 3.6%, and in cases of insertion into a TM (102 eyes), it was 5.2 ± 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion into the cornea was a risk factor for rapid ECD loss. The Ex-Press should be inserted into a TM for long-term protection of the corneal endothelial cells.

Short term efficacy of EX-PRESS filtration shunt implantation for open angle glaucoma. / EX-PRESSå¼•æµé’‰æ¤å ¥æœ¯æ²»ç–—å¼€è§’åž‹é’å ‰çœ¼çš„çŸ­æœŸç–—æ•ˆ.

OBJECTIVES: To observe the short-term efficacy of EX-PRESS filtration shunt implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma, and to analyze the safety and effectiveness of the surgical method. METHODS: From April 2017 to January 2018, a total of 28 eyes of 17 open angle glaucoma patients in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were screened. Among them, 16 eyes in the experimental group were treated with EX-PRESS filtration shunt (P200)implantation, and 12 eyes in the control group underwent trabeculectomy. Related examinations were performed in 1 day before operation, 1 day after operation, 1 week after operation, 1 month after operation and 3 months after operation, which included intraocular pressure (IOP), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central anterior chamber depth (ACD), trabecular iris angle (TIA), the long axis of drainage nail and corneal endothelium angle (ACA), intraoperative and postoperative complications. Visual-related quality of life questionnaire was conducted and scored in 3 months after operation. RESULTS: In the experimental group, the IOP in 1 day after operation, 1 week after operation and 1 month after operation was decreased significantly compared with that in 1 day before operation (all P<0.05), but the IOP in 3 months after operation was not significantly decreased compared with that in 1 day before operation (P>0.05). In the control group, the IOP in 1 week after operation, 1 month and 3 months after operation was decreased significantly with that of pre-operation (all P<0.05), but the IOP in 1 day after operation was not significantly decreased compared with that in 1 day before operation (P>0.05).The BCVA between the 2 groups was significantly different in 1 week after operation, 1 month and 3 months after operation compared with that in 1 day before operation (P>0.05). The ACD in 1 day after operation, 1 week after operation, 1 month after operation and 3 months after operation was not significantly different compared with that in 1 day before operation (all P>0.05). However, the ACD in 1 week after operation and 1 month after operation was significantly different in the control group compared with that in 1 day before operation (both P<0.05). There was no significant change in the TIA in the 2 group compared with that in 1 day before operation (all P>0.05). At different observed time after operation, there was no significant difference in the ACA (all P>0.05). The correlation analysis of Pearson showed that there was a weak correlation between the ACA and the IOP (r=0.286, P<0.05). According to the standard of surgical success defined in this study, the success rate of experimental group was 81.25%, and the control group was 83.33%. There was no significant difference in the visual-related quality of life score between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05), but the mean value in the former was higher. CONCLUSIONS: As a new type of anti-glaucoma surgery, the success rate of EX-PRESS filtration shunt implantation for 3-month follow-up is equivalent to that of classic trabeculectomy. The operation process is simple, and there is no significant change in the ACD before and after the operation in the period of 3-month follow-up. The stability of the anterior chamber is better. There is no significant correlation between the relative position of the shunt in the anterior chamber and the IOP. Compared with trabeculectomy, there is no significant difference in the visual-related quality of life.

Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). METHODS: Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucoma surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 were included in the study, and their medical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The Ex-PRESS® and trabeculectomy groups included 14 eyes and 30 eyes, respectively. Surgical failure was defined by an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥21 mmHg (condition A) or ≥ 18 mmHg (condition B); Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess efficacies. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that the probabilities of success at 1 year for the Ex-PRESS® group were 25.7 and 31.8% based on complete and qualified success under condition A, respectively. The corresponding values for the trabeculectomy group were 47.8 and 69.3%, and there was a significant difference in qualified success with condition A (Fig. 1; P = 0.018), while there were no significant differences in the other criteria. Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and higher intraocular pressure were independent prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazards model analyses in qualified success as in condition A (P = 0.012 and 0.0495, respectively). The occurrences of postsurgical hyphema and bleb leaks were significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: During a 1 year follow-up, Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery was a less effective, but safer treatment for NVG compared with trabeculectomy.

Impending extrusion of Ex-PRESS shunt treated by shunt-position adjustment: a case report.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of impending extrusion of Ex-PRESS shunt treated by shunt-position adjustment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old Asian woman presented with impending extrusion and malposition of Ex-PRESS shunt in her left eye. The bleb of the left eye was shallow and diffuse. In the past, the patient was treated by Ex-PRESS shunt implantation under the scleral flap in both eyes. There had been no Ex-PRESS shunt-related complication in her right eye, and she reported no history of left-eye trauma. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the source of the left-eye problem was a loosely fixed Ex-PRESS shunt spur. It was thought, furthermore, that this inadequate scleral resistance during the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation was due to the low scleral rigidity resulting from high myopia and insufficient maintenance of the anterior chamber. We proceeded to make an incision in the area adjacent to the Ex-PRESS shunt using a super sharp blade. The shunt was then pushed into the anterior chamber with forceps, and the spur was fixed firmly. Pushing the shunt to the anterior chamber was found to have been sufficient to fix it firmly. In fact, when the sclera was palpated with a sponge, aqueous outflow was observed with no shunt displacement. Postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was managed well, and the bleb had formed with diffuse, prominent shapes. The Ex-PRESS shunt was well sustained with good positioning. CONCLUSIONS: When an Ex-PRESS shunt operation is performed on a patient who shows a tendency for low scleral rigidity, shunt implantation should be accomplished carefully and with force adequate for firm spur fixation.

Changes in corneal endothelial cells after trabeculectomy and EX-PRESS shunt: 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To compare trabeculectomy and EX-PRESS device implantation procedures for treating glaucoma and evaluate changes in corneal endothelial cell density (CECD). METHODS: This study prospectively evaluated changes in the CECD in 60 eyes of 60 patients who underwent trabeculectomy and 50 eyes of 45 patients who underwent EX-PRESS device implantation. Baseline patient data recorded included age at surgery, sex, type of glaucoma medications, and lens status. Using a noncontact specular microscope, corneal specular microscopy was performed preoperatively at the central cornea and then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. CECD before and after surgery was compared using a paired t-test. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications in both groups after the surgery. The mean CECD in the trabeculectomy group was 2505 ± 280 cells/mm2 at baseline, while it was 2398 ± 274 cells/mm2 (P < 0.001), 2349 ± 323 cells/mm2 (P < 0.001), 2293 ± 325 cells/mm2 (P < 0.001), and 2277 ± 385 cells/mm2 (P = 0.003) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. However, the CECD in the EX-PRESS group was 2377 ± 389 cells/mm2 at baseline, while it was 2267 ± 409 cells/mm2 (P = 0.007), 2292 ± 452 cells/mm2 (P = 0.043), 2379 ± 375 cells/mm2 (P = 0.318), and 2317 ± 449 cells/mm2 (P = 0.274) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS device implantation appears to be a safer procedure with regard to the endothelial cell loss risk.

Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations after EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy, and the determination of associated factors that influence visual function.

PURPOSE: This study investigated postoperative visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations following EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy. METHODS: Out of 56 eyes of 56 patients analyzed, 30 eyes were treated using trabeculectomy, while 26 eyes were treated with EX-PRESS. Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations were analyzed in both groups before and at 2 weeks, 1, 2, and 3 months after the surgeries. Risk factors that could potentially influence corneal higher-order aberrations were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant reductions in the IOP were observed at 3 months after the surgery in both groups. Although a significant decrease in the visual acuity (logMAR) was observed at 2 weeks after the surgery in both groups, at 1 month after the surgeries, there were no significant differences found for the vision as compared to the baseline. At each study visit in the trabeculectomy group, significantly higher corneal higher-order aberrations compared to baseline were noted. In the EX-PRESS group, however, these aberrations were no longer significantly different from the baseline at month 2 (P = 0.36). Analysis of the risk factors indicated that hypotony could influence corneal higher-order aberrations after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal higher-order aberrations were significantly increased at 1 month after EX-PRESS treatment, with levels returning to baseline by 2 months. After trabeculectomy, however, corneal higher-order aberrations remained significantly increased at 3 months after the procedure.

Clinical outcomes after Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy: two-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the two-year outcomes of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone NPDS or Ex-PRESS since 2012 was conducted. Patients were excluded if they had undergone eye surgery other than cataract extraction, were diagnosed with ocular pathology other than glaucoma or had less than two-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of hypotensive drugs and visual fields were recorded, as well as intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Thirty-nine eyes were included in the NPDS and twenty-three eyes in the Ex-PRESS group. There were no differences in baseline IOP and hypotensive drugs, IOP reduction or postoperative IOP-lowering medications between groups. Two years after surgery, IOP decrease compared to baseline was 23.5% with NPDS and 24.8% with Ex-PRESS. Qualified success (a 20% IOP reduction, with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication) rates were similar: 53.8 and 69.6% for NPDS and Ex-PRESS. Visual fields progressed in four eyes of the NPDS (10.2%) and in three eyes (8.7%) of the Ex-PRESS group. As regards complications, early hypotony was more frequent after NPDS (9 eyes, 23.1%) than Ex-PRESS (2 eyes, 8.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both NPDS and Ex-PRESS produce an IOP-lowering effect of approximately 25%. Success rates are similar after both procedures, and both seem to lead to a stabilization of visual loss.