Indications, safety, and effectiveness of transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy during endovascular repair of aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of aortic dissections may be complicated by inadequate sealing zones, persistent false lumen perfusion, and limited space for catheter manipulation and target artery incorporation. The aim of this study was to describe the indications, technical success, and early outcomes of transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy (TES) during endovascular repair of aortic dissections. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients treated by endovascular repair of aortic dissections with adjunctive TES in two centers between 2021 and 2023. End points were technical success, defined by successful septotomy without dislodgment of the lamella or target artery occlusion, and 30-day rates of major adverse events (MAEs). RESULTS: Among 197 patients treated by endovascular repair for aortic dissections, 36 patients (18%) (median age, 61.5 years (interquartile range, 55.0-72.5 years; 83% male) underwent adjunctive TES for acute (n = 3 [8%]), subacute (n = 1 [3%]), or chronic postdissection aneurysms (n = 32 [89%]). Indications for TES were severe true lumen (TL) compression (≤16 mm) in 28 patients (78%), target vessel origin from false lumen in 19 (53%), creation of suitable landing zone in 12 (33%), and organ/limb malperfusion in four (11%). Endovascular repair included fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in 18 patients (50%), thoracic EVAR/EVAR/PETTICOAT in 11 (31%), and arch branch repair in 7 (19%). All patients had dissections extending through zones 5 to 7, and 28 patients (78%) underwent TES across the renal-mesenteric segment. Technical success of TES was 92% (33/36) for all patients and 97% (32/33) among those with subacute or chronic postdissection aneurysms. There were three technical failures, including two patients with acute dissections with inadvertent superior mesenteric artery dissection in one patient and distal dislodgement of the dissection lamella in two patients. There were no arterial disruptions. The mean postseptotomy aortic lumen increased from 13.2 ± 4.8 mm to 28.4 ± 6.8 mm (P < .001). All 18 patients treated by fenestrated-branched EVAR had successful incorporation of 78 target arteries. There was one early death (3%) from stroke, and three patients (8%) had major adverse events. After a median follow-up of 8 months (interquartile range, 4.5-13.5 months), 13 patients (36%) had secondary interventions, and two (6%) died from non-aortic-related events. There were no other complications associated with TES. CONCLUSIONS: TES is an adjunctive technique that may optimize sealing zones and luminal aortic diameter during endovascular repair of subacute and chronic postdissection. Although no arterial disruptions or target vessel loss occurred, patients with acute dissections are prone to technical failures related to dislodgement of the lamella.

Midterm outcomes of the Viabahn VBX balloon-expandable covered stent for fenestrations during complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal bridging stent for fenestrations during complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has not been defined. At our institution, the Viabahn VBX is frequently used given its availability and mechanical and heparin-bonding characteristics. This study aimed to assess the performance of the Viabahn VBX vs the iCast balloon-expandable covered stents as bridging stents for fenestrations during complex EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing complex EVAR between 2015 and 2021 was performed. Celiac arteries (CAs), superior mesenteric arteries (SMAs), left renal arteries, and right renal arteries stented with fenestrations were grouped according to the type of bridging stent, VBX vs iCast. Target vessels (TV) stented with a branch or scallop were excluded. The primary end points included primary patency and freedom from TV instability. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients undergoing complex EVAR were treated using VBX or iCast with a mean follow-up of 190 days (interquartile range, 36-384 days) for the VBX cohort and 804 days (interquartile range, 384-1507 days) for the iCast cohort. A total of 677 TVs were stented, including 134 CAs (20%), 175 SMAs (26%), 182 left RAs (27%), 186 right RAs (27%), and 12 additional vessels (2%). Proximal reinforcement was more frequent with VBX than with iCast stent (23% vs 2.4%; P < .0001). There was no difference in primary patency rates at 2 years between VBX and iCast stent for CA (100% vs 96.4%; P = .32), SMA (97.8% vs 100%; P = .14), and the RAs (96.7% vs 99.4%; P = .11). There was no difference between VBX and iCast in the cumulative incidence of type Ic and type IIIc endoleaks (3.2% vs 5.6%; P = .69) or freedom from TV instability at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Viabahn VBX stents are a safe and effective option as bridging stents in fenestrations during complex EVAR with comparable midterm outcomes to iCast stents. However, proximal stent reinforcement may be required with VBX stent to ensure adequate sealing at the fenestrations. Longer follow-ups and larger series are required to assess long-term outcomes and durability.

A national census for the off-label treatment of complex aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Despite regulatory challenges, device availability, and rapidly expanding techniques, off-label endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs) has expanded in the past decade. Given the lack of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved endovascular technology to treat cAAs, we performed a national census to better understand volume and current practice patterns in the United States. METHODS: Targeted sampling identified vascular surgeons with experience in off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. An electronic survey was distributed with institutional review board approval from the University of Rochester to 261 individuals with a response rate of 38% (n = 98). RESULTS: A total of 93 respondents (95%) reported off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. Mean age was 45.7 ± 8.3 years, and 84% were male. Most respondents (59%) were within the first 10 years of practice, and 69% trained at institutions with a high-volume of off-label endovascular procedures for complex aortic aneurysms with or without a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (PS-IDE). Twelve respondents from 11 institutions reported institutional PS-IDEs for physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), in-situ laser fenestration (ISLF), or parallel grafting technique (PGT), including sites with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. Eighty-nine unique institutions reported elective off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 20.2 ± 16.5 cases/year and ∼1757 total cases/year nationally. Eighty reported urgent/emergent off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 5.7 ± 5.4 cases/year and ∼499 total cases/year nationally. There was no correlation between high-volume endovascular institutions (>15 cases/year) and institutions with high volumes of open surgical repair for cAAs (>15 cases/year; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.5; P = .34). Elective techniques included PMEG (70%), ISLF (30%), hybrid PMEG/ISLF (18%), and PGT (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 63% of respondents. Techniques for emergent endovascular treatment of complex aortic disease included PMEG (52%), ISLF (40%), PGT (20%), and hybrid-PMEG/ISLF (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 41% of respondents. Thirty-nine percent of respondents always or frequently offer referrals to institutions with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. The most common barrier for referral to PS-IDE centers included geographic distance (48%), longitudinal relationship with patient (45%), and costs associated with travel (33%). Only 61% of respondents participate in the Vascular Quality Initiative for complex endovascular aneurysm repair, and only 57% maintain a prospective institutional database. Eighty-six percent reported interest in a national collaborative database for off-label endovascular repair of cAA. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of off-label endovascular repair of cAAs are likely underrepresented in the literature based on this national census. PMEG was the most common technique for elective and emergent procedures. Under-reported off-label endovascular repair of cAA outcomes data appears to be limited by non-standardized PS-IDE reporting to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the lack of Vascular Quality Initiative participation and prospective institutional data collection. Most participants are interested in a national collaborative database for endovascular repair of cAAs.

Effect of fenestration configuration on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fenestration configuration and fenestration gap on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed, including patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with F/BEVAR that incorporated at least one small fenestration to a renal artery. The renal fenestrations were divided into groups 1 (8 × 6 mm) and 2 (6 × 6 mm). Primary patency, target vessel instability (TVI), freedom from secondary interventions (SIs), occurrence of type IIIc endoleak, all related to the renal arteries, were analyzed at 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year landmarks. The fenestration gap (FG) distance was analyzed as a modifier, and clustering was addressed at the patient level. RESULTS: A total of 796 patients were included in this study, 71.7% male, with a mean age of 73.3 ± 8.1 years. The mean follow-up was 30.0 ± 20.6 months. Of the 1474 small renal fenestrations analyzed, 47.6% were 8 × 6 mm, and 52.4% were 6 × 6 mm. At the 30-day landmark, primary patency (99.9% vs 98.0%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), freedom from TVI (99.6% vs 97.1%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), and freedom from SI (99.8% vs 98.4%; P value = .022 for groups 1 and 2, respectively) were higher in 8 × 6 compared with 6 × 6 fenestrations, and the incidence of acute kidney injury was similar across the groups (92.6% vs 92.7%; P value = .953 for groups 1 and 2 respectively). The primary patency at 1 and 5 years was higher in 8 × 6 fenestrations (1-year: 98.8% vs 96.9%; 5-year: 97.8% vs 95.7%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P values = .010 and .021 for 1 and 5 year comparisons, respectively). The freedom from SIs was significantly higher among 6 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (93.1% vs 96.4%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P value = .007). The groups were equally as likely to experience a type Ic endoleak (1.3% and 1.6% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6mm fenestrations, respectively, P = .689). The 6 × 6 fenestrations were associated with higher risk of kidney function deterioration (17.8%) when compared with 8 × 6 fenestrations (7.6%) at 5 years (P < .001). The risk of type IIIc endoleak was significantly higher among 8 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (4.9% and 2% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6 mm fenestrations, respectively; P = .005). A FG ≥5 mm negatively impacted the cumulative 5-year freedom from TVI (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.714, FG <5 mm = 0.857; P < .001; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.761, FG <5 mm = 0.929; P < .001) and the cumulative 5-year freedom from type IIIc endoleak (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.759, FG <5 mm = 0.921; P = .034; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.853, FG <5 mm = 0.979; P < .001) in both groups and the cumulative 5-year patency in group 2 (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.963, FG <5 mm = 0.948; P = .572; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.905, FG <5 mm = 0.938; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Fenestration configuration for the renal arteries impacts outcomes. The 8 × 6 small fenestrations have better patency at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, whereas 6 × 6 small fenestrations are associated with lower rates of SIs, primarily due to a lower incidence of type IIIc endoleaks. FG ≥5 mm at the level of the renal arteries significantly impacts the freedom from TVI, freedom from type IIIc endoleak, and 5-year patency independently of the fenestration size or vessel diameter.

Early and Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using In Situ Laser Fenestration.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to present single-center outcomes in patients treated with in situ laser fenestration thoracic endovascular aortic repair (LFTEVAR) for various aortic arch pathologies and assess the impact of increasing experience. METHODS: The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was followed. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected single aortic center data was conducted, including baseline information and peri- and post-operative outcomes of consecutive patients managed with LFTEVAR for aortic arch pathologies. Patients were enrolled from April 1, 2017 to January 31, 2023. The cohort was dichotomized to compare early (2017-2019) and late experience (2020-2023). Primary outcomes were peri-operative mortality and cerebrovascular morbidity. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (63.3% males, mean age 69.8±9.6 years); 21.4% presented with aortic ruptures. Aortic aneurysm involving the aortic arch was the most frequent pathology (53.3%). Forty target vessels (TVs) were revascularized, including 19 left subclavian arteries (47.5%) and 17 left common carotid arteries (42.5%). Double fenestrations were performed in 10 patients. The proximal landing zone was Ishimaru zone 0 in 5 patients (16.7%) and zone 1 in 13 patients (43.3%). Technical success was 93%. No spinal cord ischemia was recorded, and 3 patients (10%) suffered a post-operative stroke, of which 1 was major (3.3%). The median follow-up was 12 months (range=1-48 months). Thirty-day and follow-up mortality rates were 13.5% and 15.3%, respectively. Target vessel instability was 10%, of which 3.8% required reintervention. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the early and late experience groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laser fenestration thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the aortic arch performed in experienced aortic centers is associated with low early mortality and stroke rates. It is a safe and effective therapeutic option in patients considered unfit for open repair. CLINICAL IMPACT: Custom-made devices for arch pathologies requiring urgent repair are not an option because of manufacturing delays. Off-the-shelf devices with single branch arch prostheses, and outside IFU techniques such as parallel-grafts and surgeon-modified endografts have been proposed in this setting. Another off-the-shelf alternative is in situ laser fenestration thoracic endovascular repair (LFTEVAR), which addresses many limitations of the other off-the-shelf options. Our study reports the outcomes of 30 patients treated with LFTEVAR, showing that it is a viable therapeutic option in patients considered unfit for open repair acknowledging that sufficient experience with complex endovascular aortic repair is mandatory to achieve acceptable outcomes in these high-risk patients with challenging aortic anatomies.

Physician-Modified Endograft with the TREO Stent Graft System.

PURPOSE: Description of physician-modified endograft technique and its advantages using the TREO stent graft system. TECHNIQUE: After partial back-table deployment of the TREO endograft, fenestrations are created using a scalpel and reinforced with a double snare loop and running suture. The distance between the Z-shaped stents of the TREO main body of almost 20 mm allows for more flexible placement of multiple fenestrations and easier and faster re-sheathing. The technique is illustrated with physician modification of a TREO aortic cuff and bifurcated endograft in three patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms or type Ia endoleak after previous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CONCLUSION: Physician modification of the TREO stent graft system can be safely performed, making it an excellent additional option to treat juxtarenal aneurysms. CLINICAL IMPACT: The TREO stent graft system offers various sizing options including different main body lengths and diameters, thus increasing applicability. Larger distance between the main body's stents facilitates placement of multiple physician-modified fenestrations. Re-sheathing is easier and faster due to the low number of main body stents which have to be re-sheathed. Therefore, the TREO stent graft system is an excellent platform for the physician-modified technique.

The Electrified Wire Technique in Complex Aortic Interventions: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: Electrosurgery has been long used in endovascular procedures, with only case reports in the aortic field. Our aim is to present a case series with the use of an electrified wire to perform catheter-based electrosurgery by applying external current through an electrocautery pen. METHODS: Single-center retrospective case series of all patients undergoing complex aortic surgery from October 2020 to August 2023, in whom the electrified wire technique was used: (1) Perforation of a dissection flap or left subclavian artery (LSA) in situ endograft fenestration-a 0.014" polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) insulated guidewire is detached from the insulation with a scalpel at the end and a cautery pen is here attached with a clamp. A curved tip catheter or sheath is positioned against the aortic flap or the endograft (through a left brachial access in this case) and the wire pushed, crossing the flap by activating the electrocautery pen and (2) slicing a dissection flap ("powered cheese-wire technique")-after same preparation as above, the middle section of the 0.014 guidewire is removed from the PTFE and bent into a V-shape. Once in the aorta, the guidewire crosses from the true lumen (TL) to the false lumen (FL) and a through-and-through access is obtained. Sheaths are positioned against the flap from both sides and moved up or down while the electricity is activated, slicing the flap and communicating both lumens. Technical success and technical-related complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven cases concerning aortic dissections and 1 case of aortic atresia were treated. Four patients presented urgently, whereas the rest were planned procedures. Seven cases underwent perforation of a dissection flap, 2 cases underwent the powered cheese-wire technique, in 2 cases for an LSA in situ fenestration, and in 1 case to cross an aortic atresia at the aortic isthmus. The technique was in all cases successfully applied. No complications related to the technique occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The "electrified wire" technique is a feasible and ready-available tool that can be safely used in complex aortic interventions, especially to perforate aortic tissue like dissection flaps or to perform in situ fenestrated repairs by perforation of the endograft fabric. CLINICAL IMPACT: The electrified wire technique described herein is a straightforward technique that uses readily available tools to perform electrosurgery. We present its use in complex aortic procedures. However, it could be envisioned for any vascular procedure that requires crossing of the vessel or even prosthetic material. As we have described in this series, when used along with an adequate properative planning, it can be a safe tool of great utility, as has already been demonstarted in the field of the interventional cardiology.

Transprosthetic Fenestration With Electrified Wires. Experimental Evaluation of Three Multifilament Endografts.

PURPOSE: In situ fenestration of aortic endografts is an alternative endovascular technique for treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. While this technique has been carried out also to pass stent-grafts in individual cases, its feasibility and safety using different stent-grafts needs to be evaluated. METHODS: In a saline bath at water temperature of 37°C, a 0.018" Astato 30 guidewire was advanced through 3 different stent-grafts (RelayPro, Zenith and Endurant II) by applying external current of 180 W via an electrosurgery pencil. Puncture efficacy and quality of the fenestration after ballooning with a 6 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) catheter were assessed. Then, balloon-expandable covered stents were deployed in the fenestrations and evaluated for stenosis, using microscopy and radiography. RESULTS: Crossing of the electrified guidewire was instantaneous in the Zenith (n:10) and RelayPro (n:10) groups but not in 3 of 10 punctures in the Endurant group (p<.05). The fenestration area created after PTA was significantly larger in the RelayPro (5.3 mm2 ± 1.8, interquartile range [IQR] 1.6) and Zenith group (6.7 mm2 ± 0.7, IQR 0.5) compared to Endurant (2.3 mm2 ± 0.4, IQR 0.5, p<.001). Fraying was observed in all groups while graft shredding was found in 8 cases after PTA of the Zenith and Endurant endografts and in 5 of the RelayPro group, but the difference was not significant. Vertical tearing was detected after RelayPro (2 out of 10) and Zenith (6 out of 10) fenestrations, no damage was found in the Endurant group (p<.01). Residual stenosis at the level of the fenestration after implantation of a 6 × 79 mm VBX stent had to be corrected in all Endurant cases with a high-pressure PTA catheter. No stenosis was found in the RelayPro and Zenith groups before and after flaring. CONCLUSIONS: The "electrified wire" technique is a feasible tool that can be used to perform in situ fenestration by perforation of the endograft fabric. Based on this experimental evaluation the "ideal graft" for this technique could not be identified. Long-term fatigue tests and comparison with other fenestration techniques are required. CLINICAL IMPACT: In situ endograft fenestration can be a useful technique in emergent aortic repair. Recently, the electrified wire technique has been proposed as alternative option to laser, radiofrequency and needle-based techniques. In comparison to these methods, the use of electrified wires can be performed without modifications of routine equipment. Additionally, the material costs can be substantially reduced. However, the effectiveness of this approach for fenestration of different prosthetic grafts is unknown. Based on our experimental studies, the electrified wire technique is feasible but the Endurant endograft requires more attempts, and the placement of a bridging stent should be completed with high-pressure balloons.

Early Experience With Fenestration Modification of Castor Branched Stent-Graft for Aortic Arch Diseases.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety and viability of combining branched stent graft with fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in treating aortic arch lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included patients presenting with aortic arch lesions who underwent treatment with a combination of branched stent graft and fenestrated TEVAR between July 2020 and November 2022. Technical success was defined as the precise deployment of the stent graft, maintenance of branch vessel patency, and the absence of type I endoleak. The secondary outcomes examined were complications and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 21 patients (average age: 61.0±14.8 years) with aortic arch lesions from 3 tertiary care hospitals. The aortic arch lesions encompassed aortic dissection (N=8), aortic aneurysm (N=8), pseudoaneurysm (N=1), intramural hematoma (N=1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (N=3). The technical success rate achieved was 95.2% (20/21). Failure in one case was due to an intraoperative type I endoleak, which was rectified with an additional stent graft placement. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (1/21). One patient suffered a stroke but responded well to medical intervention. The median hospital stay was 10.9±5.4 days. During the follow-up period, one death (4.8%) was associated with aortic complications. A type II endoleak was observed and managed with close monitoring. Two patients underwent re-interventions for retrograde type A dissection and stent migration, respectively. No occlusions were observed in the target branch arteries. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of branched stent graft with fenestrated TEVAR emerges as a viable strategy for addressing specific lesions in the aortic arch. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using branched stent grafts with fenestrated TEVAR for treating aortic arch lesions, achieving a technical success rate of 95.2%. Compared to traditional open surgery, this innovative, minimally invasive approach reduces perioperative mortality and complications, such as stroke and spinal cord ischemia. For clinicians, it offers a viable alternative for patients unfit for open repair, particularly in complex aortic arch cases. While the initial outcomes are promising, further research is needed to assess long-term durability and risks, including stent graft migration and late endoleak, ensuring the technique's safety and efficacy over time.

Anatomical Feasibility of the "Canaud Technique" for Physician-Modified Thoracic Endovascular Grafts for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease.

PURPOSE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), originally conceived for deployment distal to the left subclavian artery (LSA), has been recently extended to more proximal landing zones. Among total endovascular solutions, the "Canaud technique" for Physician-Modified Thoracic Endovascular Grafts (C-PMEGs) has gained acceptance with good early results. The aim of this study is to report the proportion of patients with zone 0, 1, and 2 aortic arch lesions that could theoretically be treated with a C-PMEG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of all consecutive patient candidates to open, hybrid, or endovascular arch repair from January 2009 to July 2023 at our Institution were analyzed. The assessment of feasibility of C-PEMG was conducted following previously extensively described anatomical criteria. RESULTS: During the study period, 209 consecutive patients were candidates for an open, hybrid, or endovascular aortic arch repair. Of them, 164 patients had a preoperative CTA scan eligible for analysis. One hundred twenty-six patients were male (76.8 %), with a mean age of 67 ± 10.8 years. Ninety-four patients (57.3%) were affected by atherosclerotic aneurysms, 48 post-dissecting aneurysms (29.3%) and 22 penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) (13.4%). Twenty patients (12.2%) were suitable for double-fenestrated C-PMEG, and 34 patients (20.7%) for single-fenestrated C-PMEG, totaling 32.9% of the entire cohort. The combination of supra-aortic trunks (SAT) bypass or the use of covered stent in IA or left common carotid artery (LCCA) as adjunctive maneuvers, would extend the C-PMEGs feasibility to 69 patients (42.1%). The use of an iliac graft conduit in 3 (1.8%) patients with inadequate ileo-femoral accesses would increase the C-PMEG suitability to 72 patients (43.9%). The main reason for exclusion was excessive ascending aortic diameter in 78 patients (47.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of C-PMEG was shown to be theoretically feasible in a percentage of patients ranging from 32.9 to 43.9% affected by aortic arch aneurysms, dissections, and PAU. The main reason for exclusion was the dimension of the ascending aorta. The C-PMEG technique is a viable option in aortic arch lesions endovascular treatment. An off-the-shelf device with similar characteristics could also be used in emergency, avoiding the limitations of physician modifications (such as time for back-table procedure, sterility, off-label use). CLINICAL IMPACT: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been extended to more proximal landing zones for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysm, dissections, penetrating aortic ulcers. Among total endovascular solutions, the "Canaud technique" for Physician-Modified Thoracic Endovascular Grafts (C-PMEGs) has gained acceptance with good early results. The anatomical feasibility in 164 consecutive patients was 69 patients (42.1%), with the combination of supra-aortic trunks (SAT) bypass or the use of covered stent in IA or left common carotid artery (LCCA) as adjunctive maneuvers, showing that the C-PMEG technique is a viable option in aortic arch lesions endovascular treatment.

Physician-Modified and In Situ Fenestrated Stent Grafts in Zone 0 for Aortic Arch Pathology After Ascending Aortic Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe our experience and outcomes of a zone 0 landing physician-modified aortic stent for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies late after open ascending aortic replacement. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients with aortic arch diseases treated with total endovascular repair using different techniques. The indication for endovascular repair was agreed on in a multidisciplinary discussion. Study end points were technical success, early and late outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2018 to May 2022, 16 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies. Median time for surgery was 4.8 hours (range, 2.6-6.6 hours). All the new-onset aortic arch pathologies were successfully treated. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients had endoleak. The median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (range, 3-6 days). During follow-up, 1 patient underwent reintervention for type II endoleak. There were no conversions to retrograde dissection, aortic rupture and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of using different total endovascular techniques for selective patients with arch pathologies who may be unfit or too risky for reopen surgery revealed favorable initial results. In addition, these techniques are promising options for urgent arch pathologies without availability of custom-manufactured devices. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT: The use of physician-modified and in situ fenestrated stent grafts in zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies in patients with prior open ascending aortic replacement is effective in endovascular therapy. This innovation enables clinicians to offer an alternative option to high-risk patients, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality. It underscores the feasibility of tailored endovascular therapy in complex aortic diseases, where customized devices may not be available.

Visceral Aorta Electrocautery Septotomy to Allow Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Ruptured Chronic Post-Dissection Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysm.

PURPOSE: Endovascular repair of chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) presents specific technical challenges due to the presence of chronic septum. Small true lumen diameter and false lumen visceral vessel origin can make branched endograft prohibitive. Septotomy may allow to overcome these challenges in cases of high complex anatomy. TECHNIQUE: We describe the application of electrocautery septotomy to the visceral aorta segment to deploy an off-the-shelf branched endograft in a chronic PD-TAAA rupture with true lumen collapse. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocautery septotomy can be an effective adjunctive technique to facilitate branched endograft, overcoming technical challenges associated with the endovascular treatment of chronic PD-TAAA. CLINICAL IMPACT: Electrocautery septotomy is an adjunctive technique that can facilitate endovascular treatment of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. By creating a common lumen, this technique might reduce the number of re-interventions associated with PD-TAAA endovascular exclusion.

Novel Approaches to the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) typically affects women of childbearing age, is associated with recent weight gain, and can result in debilitating headache as well as papilledema that can cause vision loss. There have been advances in the medical and surgical treatment of affected patients with IIH that can improve outcomes and tolerability of therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Medical treatment with agents that lower intracranial pressure through pathways other than carbonic anhydrase inhibition are being developed, and medically-directed weight loss as well as bariatric surgery now may be considered as primary therapy. New surgical options including venous sinus stenting have shown efficacy even with cases of severe vision loss. Our treatment options for IIH patients are becoming more diverse, and individualized treatment decisions are now possible to address specific components of the patient's disease manifestations and to lead to IIH remission.

Clinical comparative analysis of 3D printing-assisted extracorporeal pre-fenestration and Castor integrated branch stent techniques in treating type B aortic dissections with inadequate proximal landing zones.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the clinical effects of two distinct surgical approaches, namely 3D printing-assisted extracorporeal pre-fenestration and Castor integrated branch stent techniques, in treating patients with Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBAD) characterized by inadequate proximal landing zones. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction at our center from January 2022 to July 2023. Based on the different surgical approaches, the patients were divided into two groups: the group assisted by 3D printing for extracorporeal pre-fenestration (n = 44) and the group using the castor integrated branch stent (n = 40). Clinical indicators: including general patient information, operative time, surgical success rate, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, re-intervention rate, and mortality, as well as postoperative aortic remodeling, were compared between the two groups. The endpoint of this study is the post-TEVAR mortality rate in patients. RESULTS: The surgical success rate and device deployment success rate were 100% in both groups, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). However, the group assisted by 3D printing for extracorporeal pre-fenestration had a significantly longer operative time (184.20 ± 54.857 min) compared to the group using the castor integrated branch stent (152.75 ± 33.068 min), with a statistically significant difference (t = 3.215, p = 0.002, P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and beak sign was significantly lower in the group assisted by 3D printing for extracorporeal pre-fenestration compared to the castor-integrated branch stent group, demonstrating statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of other postoperative complication rates and aortic remodeling (P > 0.05). Notably, computed tomography angiography images revealed the expansion of the vascular true lumen and the reduction of the false lumen at three specified levels of the thoracic aorta. The follow-up duration did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups (10.59 ± 4.52 vs. 9.08 ± 4.35 months, t = 1.561, p = 0.122 > 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, neither group experienced new endoleaks, spinal cord injuries, nor limb ischemia. In the castor-integrated branch stent group, one patient developed a new distal dissection, prompting further follow-up. Additionally, there was one case of mortality due to COVID-19 in each group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of re-intervention rate and survival rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both 3D printing-assisted extracorporeal pre-fenestration TEVAR and castor-integrated branch stent techniques demonstrate good safety and efficacy in treating Stanford type B aortic dissection with inadequate proximal anchoring. The 3D printing-assisted extracorporeal pre-fenestration TEVAR technique has a lower incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and beak sign, while the castor-integrated branch stent technique has advantages in operative time.

The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal fenestration in the treatment of completely embedded upper gastrointestinal foreign body.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal foreign body ingestion is a common digestive tract emergency, of which completely embedded ones were challenging for most endoscopists. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal fenestration in the treatment of completely embedded upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. METHODS: From December 2018 to December 2021, 19 patients with completely embedded upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies who underwent endoscopic submucosal fenestration in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were included. The safety, efficacy, and outcome were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 19 patients, 15 foreign bodies were embedded in the esophagus, 3 located in the gastric wall, and 1 located in the duodenal bulb. The foreign bodies were successfully managed in 12 cases, and 7 failed after attempts of repeated exploration. Two cases confirmed completely traversing into the mediastinum were successfully removed after transfer to surgery. One case had retrieval of a foreign body in a half-year examination. Till now, 3 failed patients had great relief of symptoms and only one patient claimed occasional thoracodynia. Of note, there were neither serious adverse events, nor long-term complications during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In disposing of foreign bodies completely embedded in the upper gastrointestinal tract, ESF is a safe and effective alternative to surgery.

Comparison of the novel Ankura Plus stent and Castor stent for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection with an insufficient proximal anchoring area.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the Ankura Plus and Castor stents in Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an insufficient proximal anchoring area. METHODS: Between January 2020 and October 2022, 54 patients with TBAD were enrolled, including 16 patients with Ankura Plus stents and 38 patients with Castor stents. Data from the two stents were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical success rate for both stents was 100%, and no endoleaks or deaths occurred during hospitalization. The Ankura Plus stent group had a longer surgery time than the Castor stent group (122.6±5.1 vs. 103.7±10.0, P ＜0.001). After an average follow-up of 12 months, the patency rates of the main and branch stents were 100% in both groups. The diameter of the true lumen (TL) was significantly increased, the diameter of the false lumen (FL) was reduced, and there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of complete thrombosis of the FL (68.8% vs. 67.6%, P=0.993). There were no significant differences in the incidences of renal failure (6.3% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.814), stroke (6.3% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.520), or endoleaks (6.3% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.621) between the Ankura Plus and Castor stent groups. One patient in the Castor stent group underwent reintervention because of a type I endoleak three months after surgery. One patient in the Ankura Plus stent group had an additional covered stent placed after one month due to distal TL stenosis of the main stent. One patient in the Castor stent group died of renal failure four months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Both the Ankura Plus and Castor stents are feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of TBAD with an insufficient proximal anchoring area. Additional long-term studies are required to evaluate the robustness and applicability of Ankura Plus stents.

Middle fossa arachnoid cyst fenestration for ruptured cysts associated with subdural collections: paediatric neurosurgery tertiary unit experience.

INTRODUCTION: Arachnoid cysts are commonly encountered benign cystic structures and often come to attention as incidental findings following cranial imaging. Surgical intervention rates vary in different studies; however, rupture of cyst and subdural collection with mass effect are some of the indications for surgical intervention. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our operated cohort of middle fossa arachnoid cysts to determine the rate of traumatic subdural collection in this cohort and further assess outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive operated middle cranial fossa arachnoid cysts was carried out for the period 2010 to 2024. Demographics including age, sex, Galassi type, surgical technique for fenestration, preceding history of trauma, presence of papilloedema, and complications following surgery were extracted. Indication for surgery included papilloedema and headaches or increasing head circumference or rupture and subdural collections. Arachnoid cysts managed with CSF diversion as primary surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Over the study period, 21 fenestrations of the arachnoid cysts were carried out in 19 patients with mean age of 7 years and M:F ratio of 2.2:1 (laterality: 9 right-sided and 10 left-sided). These included seven Galassi 2 and twelve Galassi 3 arachnoid cysts. At presentation, 10 had papilloedema, 5 with no papilloedema, and 4 with no available ophthalmological assessment. Fenestration of cyst included 12 microscopic, 6 endoscopic, and 3 combined approaches. Of the operated cohort, 8 were due to rupture of arachnoid cyst and subdural collections causing mass effect. Of 8 cases of ruptured arachnoid cyst with subdural collections, 75% had clear history of preceding head injury in the context of accidental or sports-related injuries. Two patients required redo-fenestration (10.5%), 1 patient required temporary lumbar drain (5.2%), and 2 patients required cysto-peritoneal shunts (10.5%). CONCLUSION: Rupture of arachnoid cysts and subdural collections although rare can be associated with head injury in majority of cases. All operated cases belonged to grade 2 and 3 Galassi.

Prenatal dispositions and genetic analysis of monozygotic female twins with suprasellar cysts and hydrocephalus: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: We present a unique case of monozygotic female twins with virtually identical clinical and radiological presentations of supratentorial hydrocephalus and cystic formations from the suprasellar cistern. DISCUSSION: Evaluating genetic predispositions and prenatal exposures is crucial for hydrocephalus in twins. Familial cases imply a genetic contribution to the development of these anomalies, including chromosomal abnormalities and specific variants linked to arachnoid cyst formation in various syndromes. Extensive genetic analyses found no pathogenic variants in the twins. Prenatal exposure to anti-epileptic medication was known during pregnancy and may be associated with fetal abnormalities, but not central nervous system (CNS) malformations, and was therefore not considered the cause of the condition in the twins. The twins presenting simultaneously with hydrocephalus caused by suprasellar cysts (SAC) underwent a two-step surgical management: initial ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement followed by fenestration. Postoperative imaging showed cyst reduction, but a secondary VPS was necessary in both cases. CONCLUSION: Genetic analysis is less likely to identify a monogenic etiology in non-syndromic cases of SACs, which are assumed to be multifactorial. There is no established evidence linking a teratogenic effect of anti-epileptic drugs to CNS malformations. Moreover, the surgical treatment of this complex condition constitutes a point of discussion.

Pediatric spinal arachnoid cysts with compressive myelopathy: single-center experience and update on surgical management.

PURPOSE: This study describes the surgical outcome of pediatric primary spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) presenting with compressive myelopathy and gives an update on the classification and management of these rare lesions. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of pediatric patients operated for primary spinal arachnoid cysts. The clinical and radiologic profiles and surgical outcomes of these children were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was done in the laminoplasty vs laminectomy groups to see for the development of spinal deformity. RESULTS: There were 10 males and seven females with a mean age of 10.4 years (range:6-14 years). The cysts extended to an average of 5.2 levels (range:2-8). They were extradural in seven (41%) and intradural in 10 (59%). Six intradural and four extradural cysts underwent laminectomy (n = 10) while four intradural and three extradural cysts underwent laminoplasty (n = 7). Although three out of 10 cases in the laminectomy group and none in the laminoplasty group had post-operative spinal deformity, this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.110). There was a moderate negative correlation between post-operative cord occupancy ratio (COR) and post-operative McCormick grade (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.453, p = 0.068), suggesting that higher CORs are associated with lower McCormick grades. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic pediatric primary spinal arachnoid cysts are safely and effectively managed by marsupialization or microsurgical excision. Considering the growing age group, laminoplasty rather than laminectomy should be the standard surgical procedure to prevent late postoperative spinal deformity. Clinically significant recurrences are rare in the setting of adequate cord expansion and restored subarachnoid CSF flow following surgery.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of symptomatic Rathke's cleft cysts: outcomes of the strategy to maintain the fenestration open.

PURPOSE: The study intends to clarify the optimal endoscopic endonasal surgical strategy for symptomatic Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with RCCs that underwent EEA surgery. The strategy for surgical and reconstruction method selection was presented. Patients were split into groups of fenestration open or closed. Pre- and postoperative symptoms, imaging, ophthalmologic, and endocrinologic exams were reviewed. The incidence of complications and the recurrence rates were determined. RESULTS: The 75 individuals were all received primary operations. The fenestration closed group contained 32 cases, while the fenestration open group contained 43 cases. The median follow-up period was 39 months. The three primary complaints were headache (n = 51, 68.00%), vision impairment (n = 45, 60.00%), and pituitary dysfunction (n = 16, 21.33%). Of the 51 patients with preoperative headaches, 48 (94.12%) reported improvement in their symptoms following surgery. Twenty-three out of 45 patients (51.11%) experienced an improvement in visual impairment. Pituitary dysfunction was found improved in 14 out of 16 individuals (87.50%). There was no discernible difference in the rate of symptom alleviation between both groups. There were three patients (3/75, 4.00%) had cyst reaccumulation. One of them (1/75, 1.33%), which needed reoperation, was healed using pterional approach. In term of complications, cerebral infections occurred in two patients (2/75, 2.67%). Both of them recovered after antibiotic treatment. No postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea occurred. One patient (1/75, 1.33%) in the open group experienced epistaxis. There was no persistent hypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus (DI). Analysis of headache related factors showed that the presence of wax like nodules was related to it. CONCLUSION: RCC was successfully treated with endoscopic endonasal surgery with few problems when the fenestration was kept as open as feasible. Preoperative identification of T2WI hypointense nodules may be a potential reference factor for surgical indication.