Validation of Igls Criteria for Islet Transplant Functional Status Using Person-Reported Outcome Measures in a Cross-Sectional Study.

Associations between islet graft function and well-being in islet transplant recipients requiring exogenous insulin remain unclear. This cross-sectional analysis compared person-reported outcome measures in 15 adults with type 1 diabetes whose islet transplants were classified according to Igls criteria as "Good" (n = 5), "Marginal" (n = 4) and "Failed" (n = 6) graft function. At a mean of 6.2 years post-first islet transplant, 90% reduction in severe hypoglycaemia was maintained in all groups, with HbA1c (mean ± SD mmol/mol) 49 ± 4 in recipients with "Good" function; 56 ± 5 ("Marginal"); and 69 ± 25 ("Failed"). Self-reported impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia persisted in all groups but those with "Good" function were more likely to experience symptoms during hypoglycaemia. "Marginal" function was associated with greater fear of hypoglycaemia (HFS-II score: "Marginal": 113 [95, 119]; "Failed": 63 [42, 93] (p = 0.082); "Good": 33 [29, 61]) and severe anxiety (GAD7: "Marginal"): 21 [17, 21]; "Failed": 6 [6, 6] "Good": 6 [3, 11]; (p = 0.079)), diabetes distress and low mood. Despite clear evidence of ongoing clinical benefit, Igls criteria 'Marginal' function is associated with sub-optimal well-being, including greater fear of hypoglycaemia and severe anxiety. This study provides person-reported validation that "Good" and "Marginal" graft function are differentiated by general and diabetes-specific subjective well-being, suggesting those with "Marginal" function may benefit from further intervention, including re-transplantation.

Performance of modified Igls criteria to evaluate islet autograft function after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation - a retrospective study.

The Igls criteria assess islet function after islet allotransplant, based on C-peptide, insulin use, hemoglobin A1c, and severe hypoglycemia. However, these criteria as currently defined cannot be applied to total pancreatectomy islet autotransplant (TPIAT) patients. We tested modified criteria for assessing islet function in a large cohort of TPIAT patients (n = 379). Metabolic outcomes were assessed. We assigned Auto-Igls class to each patient as able and evaluated the utility, validity, and perioperative risk factors of Auto-Igls at 1-year post-IAT. We tested the association of Auto-Igls with independent measures of islet graft function, specifically continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data or acute C-peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) from intravenous glucose tolerance tests. An Auto-Igls class was assigned to 264 patients (69%). Among patients who could not be classified, most were missing exact insulin dose. Seventy-three percent of TPIAT recipients were classified as optimal or good at 1 year. The only significant predictor of Auto-Igls class was islet mass transplanted (P < 0.0001). Auto-Igls class was associated with percent time in range (70-140 mg/dl) on CGM (P = 0.02) and ACRglu (P < 0.0001). Modified Igls classification for IAT permits simple, comprehensive assessment of metabolic outcomes after TPIAT and is associated with other islet functional measures.

Effect of institutional quality on FDI inflows in South Asian and Southeast Asian countries.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a pivotal role in the economic development of countries and institutional quality encompassing aspects such as political stability, regulatory environment, and the rule of law, plays a vital role in attracting and retaining foreign investment. This study investigates the impact of institutional quality on the level of FDI inflows in the South Asian and Southeast Asian countries over the period 2002-2019. We have constructed an institutional quality index by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on six governance indicators. Iterated generalized least squares (I-GLS) in the fixed effect model has been employed for the estimation of the results. The results show that the institutional quality index has a positive and significant impact on the FDI inflows in both the regions. This implies that an ideal governance system comprising of low corruption, political stability, absence of violence, voice and accountability, regulatory quality and proper judicial system helps to attract FDI inflows in the South Asian and Southeast Asian countries. It also has positive spillovers to other economic activities such as GDP growth, international trade and financial development that are vital for economic growth and development.