Linear distributed inverse solutions for interictal EEG source localisation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the spatial accuracy of 6 linear distributed inverse solutions for EEG source localisation of interictal epileptic discharges: Minimum Norm, Weighted Minimum Norm, Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA), Local Autoregressive Average (LAURA), Standardised LORETA, and Exact LORETA. METHODS: Spatial accuracy was assessed clinically by retrospectively comparing the maximum source of averaged interictal discharges to the resected brain area in 30 patients with successful epilepsy surgery, based on 204-channel EEG. Additionally, localisation errors of the inverse solutions were assessed in computer simulations, with different levels of noise added to the signal in both sensor space and source space. RESULTS: In the clinical evaluations, the source maximum was located inside the resected brain area in 50-57% of patients when using LORETA or LAURA, while all other inverse solutions performed significantly worse (17-30%; corrected p < 0.01). In the simulation studies, when noise levels exceeded 10%, LORETA and LAURA had substantially smaller localisation errors than the other inverse solutions. CONCLUSIONS: LORETA and LAURA provided the highest spatial accuracy both in clinical and simulated data, alongside with a comparably high robustness towards noise. SIGNIFICANCE: Among the different linear inverse solution algorithms tested, LORETA and LAURA might be preferred for interictal EEG source localisation.

High-density Electric Source Imaging of interictal epileptic discharges: How many electrodes and which time point?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of caudal EEG electrodes over cheeks and neck for high-density electric source imaging (ESI) in presurgical epilepsy evaluation, and to identify the best time point during averaged interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) for optimal ESI accuracy. METHODS: We retrospectively examined presurgical 257-channel EEG recordings of 45 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy. By stepwise removal of cheek and neck electrodes, averaged IEDs were downsampled to 219, 204, and 156 EEG channels. Additionally, ESI at the IED's half-rise was compared to other time points. The respective sources of maximum activity were compared to the resected brain area and postsurgical outcome. RESULTS: Caudal channels had disproportionately more artefacts. In 30 patients with favourable outcome, the 204-channel array yielded the most accurate results with ESI maxima < 10 mm from the resection in 67% and inside affected sublobes in 83%. Neither in temporal nor in extratemporal cases did the full 257-channel setup improve ESI accuracy. ESI was most accurate at 50% of the IED's rising phase. CONCLUSION: Information from cheeks and neck electrodes did not improve high-density ESI accuracy, probably due to higher artefact load and suboptimal biophysical modelling. SIGNIFICANCE: Very caudal EEG electrodes should be used for ESI with caution.